article

Decentralized Data Storages: Technologies of Construction

Authors:

A. P. Kryukov,

A. P. DemichevAuthors Info & Claims

Programming and Computing Software, Volume 44, Issue 5

Pages 303 - 315

https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768818050067

Published: 01 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

[1]

Handbook of Peer-to-Peer Networking, Shen, X.S., Yu, H., Buford, J., and Akon, M., Eds., vol. 34, Berlin: Springer, 2010.

Google Scholar

[2]

Daswani, N., Garcia-Molina, H., and Yang, B., Open problems in data-sharing peer-to-peer systems, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Database Theory (ICDT), 2003, pp. 1---15.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Napster. http://www.napster.com. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[4]

The annotated Gnutella protocol specification. http:// rfc-gnutella.sourceforge.net/developer/stable. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[5]

Good, N.S. and Krekelberg, A., Usability and privacy: A study of Kazaa P2P file-sharing, Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003, pp. 137---144.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Cohen, B., Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent, Proc. Workshop Economics of Peer-to-Peer systems, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 68---72.

Google Scholar

[7]

Rizzo, F., Spoto, G.L., Brizzi, P., Bonino, D., Di Bella, G., and Castrogiovanni, P., Beekup: A distributed and safe P2P storage framework for IoE applications, Proc. 20th Conf. Innovations in Clouds, Internet, and Networks (ICIN), 2017, pp. 44---51.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Meng, X., A churn-aware durable data storage scheme in hybrid P2P networks, J. Supercomput., 2018, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 183---204.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Osorio, M. and Buil-Aranda, C., Storage balancing in P2P based distributed RDF data stores, 2017. https:// openreview.net/pdf?id=rJn8cDtIb.

Google Scholar

[10]

Theyyampattil, M.R. and James, M., A survey on reputation systems and social network based peer-to-peer file sharing systems, Int. J. Comput., Inf., Syst. Sci.,Eng., 2017, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1619---1626.

Google Scholar

[11]

Ravichandran, C.G. and Xavier, J.L., A survey of data sharing and security issues in P2P networks, Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci., 2017, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 329---335.

Google Scholar

[12]

Gurkin, Yu.N. and Semenov, Yu.A., File-sharing P2P networks: Basic principles, protocols, and security. http://www.ccc.ru/magazine/depot/06_11/read.html ?0302.htm. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[13]

Malatras, A., State-of-the-art survey on P2P overlay networks in pervasive computing environments, J. Network Comput. Appl., 2015, vol. 55, pp. 1---23.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[14]

Meshkova, E., Riihijarvi, J., Petrova, M., and Mahonen, P., A survey on resource discovery mechanisms, peer-to-peer, and service discovery frameworks, Comput. Networks, 2008, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2097---2128.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Tsoumakos, D. and Roussopoulos, N., Adaptive probabilistic search in peer-to-peer networks, Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2003, pp. 102---109.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

Yang, C. and Wu, J., A dominating-set-based routing in peer-to-peer networks, Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop Grid and Cooperative Computing (GCC), 2003. pp. 332---339.

Google Scholar

[17]

Mizrak, A.T., Cheng, Y., Kumar, V., and Savage, S., Structured superpeers: Leveraging heterogeneity to provide constant-time lookup, Proc. IEEE Workshop Internet Applications (WIAPP), 2003, pp. 104---111.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

Li, J-S. and Chao, C-H., An efficient superpeer overlay construction and broadcasting scheme based on perfect difference graph, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 2010, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 594---606.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

Lv, Q., Cao, P., Cohen, E., Li, K., and Shenker, S., Search and replication in unstructured peer-to-peer networks, Proc. 16th ACM Int. Conf. Supercomputing (ACM ICS), 2002, pp. 84---95.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

Barjini, H., Othman, M., Ibrahim, H., and Udzir, N., Shortcoming, problems, and analytical comparison for flooding-based search techniques in unstructured P2P networks, Peer-to-Peer Network Appl., 2012, vol. 5, pp. 1---13.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[21]

Brocco, A., Malatras, A., and Hirsbrunner, B., Enabling efficient information discovery in a self-structured grid, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2010, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 838---846.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

Ciancaglini, V., Liquori, L., and Hoang, G., Towards a common architecture to interconnect heterogeneous overlay networks, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2011, pp. 817---822.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Stoica, I., Morris, R., Liben-Nowell, D., Karger, D.R., Kaashoek, M.F., Dabek, F., and Balakrishnan, H., Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2003, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17---32.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Varlamov, M.I. and Turdakov, D.Yu., A survey of methods for the extraction of information from Web resources, Program. Comput. Software, 2016, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 279---291.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Clarke, I., Sandberg, O., Wiley, B., and Hong, T.W., Freenet: A distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system, in Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2001, pp. 46---66.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

Manku, G.S., Bawa, M., and Raghavan, P., Symphony: Distributed hashing in a small world, Proc. 4th USENIX Symp. Internet Technology and Systems (USITS), 2003, p. 10---25.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[27]

Gupta, I., Birman, K., Linga, P., Demers, A., and Renesse, R.V., Kelips: Building an efficient and stable P2P DHT through increased memory and background overhead, Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2003, pp. 160---169.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[28]

Demirci, M. and Ammar, M., Fair allocation of substrate resources among multiple overlay networks, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2010, pp. 121---30.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[29]

Hsu, C-J., Chung, W-C., Lai, K-C., Li, K-C., and Chung, Y-C., A novel approach for cooperative overlay-maintenance in multi-overlay environments, Proc. IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2010, pp. 81---88.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[30]

Peng, F., Malatras, A., Hirsbrunner, B., and Courant, M., Antom: Constructing multi-layer overlays for pervasive environments, Proc. 8th Int. Workshop Mobile P2P Computing (MP2P), 2012, pp. 1---6.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[31]

Buford, J., Yu, H., and Lua, E.K., P2P Networking and Applications, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[32]

Serbu, S., Felber, P., and Kropf, P., Hypeer: Structured overlay with flexible-choice routing, Comput. Networks, 2011, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 300---313.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[33]

Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, M.F., Karger, D., Morris, R., and Stoica, I., Looking up data in P2P systems, Commun. ACM, 2003, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 43---48.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[34]

Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., and Shenker, S., A scalable content-addressable network, ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 2001, vol. 31, pp. 161---172.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[35]

Rowstron, A. and Druschel, P., Pastry: Scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems, Proc. IFIP/ACM Int. Conf. Distributed Systems Platforms, 2001, pp. 329---350.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[36]

Zhao, B.Y., Huang, L., Stribling, J., Rhea, S.C., Joseph, A.D., and Kubiatowicz, J.D., Tapestry: A resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2004, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41---53.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[37]

Maymounkov, P. and Mazieres, D., Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the XOR metric, Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2002, pp. 53---65.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[38]

Malkhi, D., Naor, M., and Ratajczak, D., Viceroy: A scalable and dynamic emulation of the butterfly, Proc. 21st Symp. Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2002, pp. 183---192.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[39]

Aberer, K., Cudre-Mauroux, P., Datta, A., Despotovic, Z., Hauswirth, M., and Punceva, M., P-grid: A self-organizing structured P2P system, SIGMOD Record, 2003, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 29---33.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[40]

Harvey, N., Jones, M., Saroiu, S., Theimer, M., and Wolman, A., Skipnet: A scalable overlay network with practical locality properties, Proc. 4th USENIX Symp. Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), 2003, pp. 1---38.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[41]

Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.-L., Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 2002, vol. 74, pp. 47---98.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[42]

Estrada, E., The Structure of Complex Networks: Theory and Applications, Oxford University Press, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[43]

Cohen, R. and Havlin, S., Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness, and Function, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[44]

Ciancaglini, V., Gaeta, R., Loti, R., and Liquori, L., Interconnection of large scale unstructured P2P networks: Modeling and analysis, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2013, vol. 7984, pp. 183---197.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[45]

Leitao, J., Marques, J.P., Pereira, J., and Rodrigues, L., X-bot: A protocol for resilient optimization of unstructured overlay networks, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 2012, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2175---2188.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[46]

Matos, R., Marques, C., and Sargento, S., Distributed approach to control and manage context-based multi-virtual networks, Mobile Networks Appl., 2012, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 447---462.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[47]

Liang, J., Kumar, R., and Ross, K.W., The fasttrack overlay: A measurement study, Comput. Networks, 2006, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 842---858.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[48]

Cohen, B., Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent, Proc. Workshop Economics of Peer-to-Peer systems, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 68---72.

Google Scholar

[49]

Ripeanu, M., Iamnitchi, A., Foster, I., and Rogers, A., In search of simplicity: A self-organizing group communication overlay, Concurrency Comput. Pract. Exper., 2010, vol. 22, pp. 788---815.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[50]

Chawathe, Y., Ratnasamy, S., Breslau, L., Lanham, N., and Shenker, S., Making Gnutella-like P2P systems scalable, Proc. Conf. Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM), 2003. pp. 407---418.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[51]

Wouhaybi, R.H. and Campbell, A.T., Phenix: Supporting resilient low-diameter peer-to-peer topologies, Proc. 23rd Joint Conf. IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), 2004, pp. 1---12.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[52]

Carchiolo, V., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G., and Nicosia, V., An adaptive overlay network inspired by social behaviour, J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., 2010, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 282---295.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[53]

Babaoglu, O., Canright, G., Deutsch, A., di Caro, G.A., Ducatelle, F., and Gambardella, L.M., Design patterns from biology for distributed computing, ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst., 2006, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26---66.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[54]

Balasubramaniam, S., Leibnitz, K., Lio, P., Botvich, D., and Murata, M., Biological principles for future Internet architecture design, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2011, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 44---52.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[55]

Brocco, A. and Baumgart, I., A framework for a comprehensive evaluation of ant-inspired peer-to-peer protocols, Proc. 20th Euromicro Int. Conf. Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 2012, pp. 303---310.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[56]

Dressler, F. and Akan, O.B., Bio-inspired networking: From theory to practice, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2010, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 176---83.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[57]

Brocco, A., Malatras, A., and Hirsbrunner, B., Enabling efficient information discovery in a self-structured grid, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2010, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 838---846.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[58]

Peng, F., Malatras, A., Hirsbrunner, B., and Courant, M., Antom: Constructing multi-layer overlays for pervasive environments, Proc. 8th Int. Workshop Mobile P2P Computing (MP2P), 2012, pp. 1---6.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[59]

Forestiero, A., Leonardi, E., Mastroianni, C., and Meo, M., Self-chord: A bio-inspired P2P framework for self-organizing distributed systems, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2010, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1651---1664.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[60]

Barthelemy, M., Spatial networks, Phys. Rep., 2011, vol. 499, pp. 1---101.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[61]

Wallach, D., A survey of peer-to-peer security issues, Proc. Int. Symp. Software Security, Theories, and Systems, 2002, pp. 42---57.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[62]

Marmol, F.G. and Perez, G.M., State of the art in trust and reputation models in P2P networks, Handbook of Peer-to-Peer Networking, 2010, pp. 761---784.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[63]

Urdaneta, G., Pierre, G., and van Steen, M., A survey of DHT security techniques, ACM Comput. Surv., 2011, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 1---49.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[64]

Tormasov, A., Lysov, A., and Mazur, E., Distributed storage systems: Analysis, classification, and choice, Tr. Inst. Sistemnogo Program. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 225---252.

Google Scholar

[65]

Kuznetsov, S.D. and Poskonin, A.V., NoSQL data management systems, Program. Comput. Software, 2014, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 323---332.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[66]

Rabin, M.O., Efficient dispersal of information for security, load balancing, and fault tolerance, J. ACM, 1989, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 335---348.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[67]

Dimakis, A.G., Ramchandran, K., Wu, Y., and Suh, C., A survey on network codes for distributed storage, Proc. IEEE, 2011, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 476---489.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[68]

Weatherspoon, H. and Kubiatowicz, J.D., Erasure coding vs. replication: A quantitative comparison, Proc. Int. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2002, pp. 328---337.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[69]

Peterson, W.W. and Wesley, W., Error-Correcting Codes, MIT Press, 1972.

Google Scholar

[70]

Ateniese, G., Burns, R., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z., and Song, D., Provable data possession at untrusted stores, Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Computer and Communications Security, 2007, pp. 598---609.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[71]

Ateniese, G., Pietro, R.D., Mancini, L.V., and Tsudik, G., Scalable and efficient provable data possession, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Security and Privacy in Communication Networks, 2008, p. 9.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[72]

Wang, C., Ren, K., and Wang, J., Secure and practical outsourcing of linear programming in cloud computing, Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2011, pp. 820---828.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[73]

Juels, A. and Kaliski, B.S., PORs: Proofs of retrievability for large files, Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Computer and Communications Security, 2007, pp. 584---597.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[74]

Dodis, Y., Vadhan, S., and Wichs, D., Proofs of retrievability via hardness implication, Proc. 6th Conf. Theory of Cryptography, 2009, pp. 109---127.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[75]

Sookhak, M., Talebian, H., Ahmed, E., Gani, A., and Khan, M.K., A review on remote data auditing in single cloud server: Taxonomy and open issues, J. Network Comput. Appl., 2014, vol. 43, pp. 121---141.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[76]

Mao, W., Modern Cryptography: Theory and Practice, Prentice Hall, 2005.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[77]

Szabo, N., The idea of smart contracts. http://www. fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/ CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo. best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_idea.html. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[78]

BitFury Group, Public versus private blockchains. http: //bitfury.com/content/5-white-papers-research/public-vs-private-pt1-1.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[79]

Buterin, V., Ethereum white paper. https://github. com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[80]

Wood, G., Ethereum: A secure decentralized generalised transaction ledger. http://gavwood.com/paper. pdf. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[81]

Franco, P., Understanding Bitcoin, Cryptography, Engineering, and Economics, West Sussex: Wiley, 2015.

Google Scholar

[82]

Dabek, F., Li, J., Sit, E., Robertson, J., Kaashoek, M., and Morris, R., Designing a DHT for low latency and high throughput, Proc. 1st Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2004, vol. 4, pp. 85---98.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[83]

Flocchini, P., Nayak, A., and Xie, M., Enhancing peer-to-peer systems through redundancy, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2007, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15---24.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[84]

Giordanelli, R., Mastroianni, C., and Meo, M., Bio-inspired P2P systems: The case of multidimensional overlay, ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst., 2012, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 35:1---28.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[85]

Clarke, I., Sandberg, O., Wiley, B., and Hong, T.W., Freenet: A distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system, Proc. Int. Workshop Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies: Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, 2001, pp. 46---66.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[86]

Wilkinson, S., Boshevski, T., Brandoff, J., and Buterin, V., Storj: A peer-to-peer cloud storage network. https:// storj.io/storj.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

[87]

Vorick, D. and Champine, L., Sia: Simple decentralized storage. https://sia.tech/sia.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Pandey MLitoriya RPandey P(2022)Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach in Analyzing Mobile App IssuesProgramming and Computing Software10.1134/S036176881905005045:5(268-287)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1134/S0361768819050050
Demichev AKryukov APrikhod’ko N(2021)Business Process Engineering for Data Storing and Processing in a Collaborative Distributed Environment Based on Provenance Metadata, Smart Contracts and Blockchain TechnologyJournal of Grid Computing10.1007/s10723-021-09544-419:1Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10723-021-09544-4
Valdivia JLora-González ALimón XCortes-Verdin KOcharán-Hernández J(2020)Patterns Related to Microservice Architecture: a Multivocal Literature ReviewProgramming and Computing Software10.1134/S036176882008025346:8(594-608)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1134/S0361768820080253

Index Terms

Decentralized Data Storages: Technologies of Construction
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Architectures
    1. Distributed architectures
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Software system structures
      1. Distributed systems organizing principles

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

A Case for Continuous Data Protection at Block Level in Disk Array Storages

This paper presents a study of data storages for continuous data protection (CDP). After analyzing the existing data protection technologies, we propose a new disk array architecture that provides Timely Recovery to Any Point-in-time, referred to as ...
A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data

Open government data (OGD) refers to making public sector information freely available in open formats and ways that enable public access and facilitate exploitation. Lately, a large number of OGD initiatives launched worldwide aiming to implement one-...
Elastic HDFS: interconnected distributed architecture for availability–scalability enhancement of large-scale cloud storages
Abstract
This paper presents an interconnected distributed architecture for storing data and metadata in large-scale cloud storage systems. The primary goal of the proposed architecture is to enhance the scalability of namespace directory in large-scale ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Programming and Computing Software

Programming and Computing Software Volume 44, Issue 5

September 2018

76 pages

ISSN:0361-7688

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Plenum Press

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2018

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Pandey MLitoriya RPandey P(2022)Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach in Analyzing Mobile App IssuesProgramming and Computing Software10.1134/S036176881905005045:5(268-287)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1134/S0361768819050050
Demichev AKryukov APrikhod’ko N(2021)Business Process Engineering for Data Storing and Processing in a Collaborative Distributed Environment Based on Provenance Metadata, Smart Contracts and Blockchain TechnologyJournal of Grid Computing10.1007/s10723-021-09544-419:1Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10723-021-09544-4
Valdivia JLora-González ALimón XCortes-Verdin KOcharán-Hernández J(2020)Patterns Related to Microservice Architecture: a Multivocal Literature ReviewProgramming and Computing Software10.1134/S036176882008025346:8(594-608)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1134/S0361768820080253

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

A Case for Continuous Data Protection at Block Level in Disk Array Storages

A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data

Elastic HDFS: interconnected distributed architecture for availability–scalability enhancement of large-scale cloud storages

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations