skip to main content
research-article

A Nash bargaining solution for a multi period competitive portfolio optimization problem: : Co-evolutionary approach

Published: 01 December 2021 Publication History

Highlights

A Nash bargaining model is proposed for multi-period competitive portfolio.
Market conditions including transaction costs, risky assets and cash are considered.
Budget constraints, trading rules, competition, pricing mechanism are considered.
The problem is modeled using General Nash equilibrium idea.
The problem is heuristically solved using a cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm.

Abstract

This study focuses on proposing a Nash bargaining model to solve a novel multi-period competitive portfolio optimization problem for large investors in the stock market who want to maximize their terminal wealth while taking into account competitors' profits. In this study, a Competitive Portfolio Model (CPM) is developed in accordance with the Cournot competition principle for a static, non-cooperative, and non-zero-sum game with complete information. Transaction costs, risk-free assets and cash are also included to match real-world conditions. Also, three criteria including the average value at risk, the mean absolute semi-deviation, and entropy are considered to control the investment risk in the model. Moreover, due to common constraints between players (free floating shares of risky assets) in stock markets, this study falls into the category of Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems (GNEP). Therefore, to overcome the problem, a Cooperative Co-evolutionary Algorithm (CCA) based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is customized and used. A few experimental tests and a numerical example with descriptive analytics (using real data from two large mutual funds who invest in the Iranian Stock Exchange market) are used to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed model and the efficiency of the design algorithm. After solving the model, for each time period, investors' trading strategies (trading signals and stock volume in their portfolio) are determined. The results show that the volume of transactions due to the market power of an investor has a significant effect on the terminal wealth of competitors. Also, the results of sensitivity analysis show that profit-making is inversely related to the degree of risk aversion of investors.

References

[1]
H. Aghadadashli, M. Dertwinkel-Kalt, C. Wey, The Nash bargaining solution in vertical relations with linear input prices, Economics Letters 145 (2016) 291–294,.
[2]
S. Almahdi, S.Y. Yang, A constrained portfolio trading system using particle swarm algorithm and recurrent reinforcement learning, Expert Systems with Applications 130 (2019) 145–156,.
[3]
M. Barati, M. Mohammadi, B. Naderi, Multi-period fuzzy mean-semi variance portfolio selection problem with transaction cost and minimum transaction lots using genetic algorithm, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 7 (2) (2016) 217–228,.
[4]
A. Barkaoui, A.Z. Dragicevic, Nash bargaining and renegotiation with social preferences: Case of the roundwood log supply contracts in the French timber market, Forest Policy and Economics 69 (2016) 90–100,.
[5]
M.T. Bohl, J. Brzeszczyński, Do institutional investors destabilize stock prices? Evidence from an emerging market, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 16 (4) (2006) 370–383,.
[6]
I. Boussaïd, J. Lepagnot, P. Siarry, A survey on optimization metaheuristics, Information Sciences 237 (2013) 82–117,.
[7]
T. Chen, Z. Gao, J. He, W. Jiang, W. Xiong, Daily price limits and destructive market behavior, Journal of Econometrics 208 (1) (2019) 249–264,.
[8]
W. Chen, D. Li, S. Lu, W. Liu, Multi-period mean–semivariance portfolio optimization based on uncertain measure, Soft Computing 23 (15) (2019) 6231–6247,.
[9]
W. Chen, Y. Wang, P. Gupta, M.K. Mehlawat, A novel hybrid heuristic algorithm for a new uncertain mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection model with real constraints, Applied Intelligence 48 (9) (2018) 2996–3018,.
[10]
Y. Crama, M. Schyns, Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems, European Journal of Operational Research 150 (3) (2003) 546–571,.
[11]
Z. Dai, H. Zhu, F. Wen, Two nonparametric approaches to mean absolute deviation portfolio selection model, Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization 13 (5) (2019) 1,.
[12]
G. Di Tollo, A. Roli, Metaheuristics for the portfolio selection problem, International Journal of Operations Research 5 (1) (2008) 13–35.
[13]
J. Doering, R. Kizys, A.A. Juan, À. Fitó, O. Polat, Metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: Current state and future trends, Operations Research Perspectives 6 (2019) 100121,.
[14]
T. Dokeroglu, E. Sevinc, T. Kucukyilmaz, A. Cosar, A survey on new generation metaheuristic algorithms, Computers & Industrial Engineering 137 (2019) 106040,.
[15]
R. Dreżewski, K. Doroz, An agent-based co-evolutionary multi-objective algorithm for portfolio optimization, Symmetry 9 (9) (2017) 168,.
[16]
R.M. Edelen, O.S. Ince, G.B. Kadlec, Institutional investors and stock return anomalies, Journal of Financial Economics 119 (3) (2016) 472–488,.
[17]
O. Ertenlice, C.B. Kalayci, A survey of swarm intelligence for portfolio optimization: Algorithms and applications, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 39 (2018) 36–52,.
[18]
E.F. Fama, K.R. French, Permanent and temporary components of stock prices, Journal of Political Economy 96 (2) (1988) 246–273,.
[19]
X. Gabaix, P. Gopikrishnan, V. Plerou, H.E. Stanley, Institutional investors and stock market volatility, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2) (2006) 461–504,.
[20]
X. Gabaix, P. Gopikrishnan, V. Plerou, H.E. Stanley, A theory of limited liquidity and large investors causing spikes in stock market volatility and trading volume, Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (2–3) (2007) 564–573,.
[21]
D.P. Gandhmal, K. Kumar, Systematic analysis and review of stock market prediction techniques, Computer Science Review 34 (2019) 100190,.
[22]
B. Ghasemishabankareh, X. Li, M. Ozlen, Cooperative coevolutionary differential evolution with improved augmented Lagrangian to solve constrained optimisation problems, Information Sciences 369 (2016) 441–456,.
[23]
P.A. Gompers, A. Metrick, Institutional investors and equity prices, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1) (2001) 229–259,.
[24]
D. Gong, B. Xu, Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, S. Yang, A similarity-based cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for dynamic interval multi-objective optimization problems, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 24 (1) (2019) 142–156,.
[25]
P. Gupta, M.K. Mehlawat, S. Yadav, A. Kumar, A polynomial goal programming approach for intuitionistic fuzzy portfolio optimization using entropy and higher moments, Applied Soft Computing 85 (2019) 105781,.
[26]
J.C. Hung, J.B. Su, M.C. Chang, Y.H. Wang, The impact of liquidity on portfolio value-at-risk forecasts, Applied Economics 52 (3) (2020) 242–259,.
[27]
K. Hussain, M.N.M. Salleh, S. Cheng, Y. Shi, Metaheuristic research: A comprehensive survey, Artificial Intelligence Review 52 (4) (2019) 2191–2233,.
[28]
P.H. Jiao, J.J. Chen, K. Peng, Y.L. Zhao, K.F. Xin, Multi-objective mean-semi-entropy model for optimal standalone micro-grid planning with uncertain renewable energy resources, Energy 191 (2020) 116497,.
[29]
C.B. Kalayci, O. Ertenlice, H. Akyer, H. Aygoren, An artificial bee colony algorithm with feasibility enforcement and infeasibility toleration procedures for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization, Expert Systems with Applications 85 (2017) 61–75,.
[30]
K. Khalili-Damghani, A.R. Abtahi, M. Tavana, A new multi-objective particle swarm optimization method for solving reliability redundancy allocation problems, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 111 (2013) 58–75,.
[31]
D.P. Koesrindartoto, A. Aaron, I. Yusgiantoro, W.A. Dharma, A. Arroisi, Who moves the stock market in an emerging country–Institutional or retail investors?, Research in International Business and Finance 51 (2020) 101061,.
[32]
H. Lei, R. Wang, G. Laporte, Solving a multi-objective dynamic stochastic districting and routing problem with a co-evolutionary algorithm, Computers & Operations Research 67 (2016) 12–24,.
[33]
W. Li, L. Wang, X. Cai, J. Hu, W. Guo, Species co-evolutionary algorithm: A novel evolutionary algorithm based on the ecology and environments for optimization, Neural Computing and Applications 31 (7) (2019) 2015–2024,.
[34]
K. Liagkouras, K. Metaxiotis, Multi-period mean–variance fuzzy portfolio optimization model with transaction costs, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 67 (2018) 260–269,.
[35]
J. Liang, A. Shirsat, W. Tang, Sustainable community based PV-storage planning using the Nash bargaining solution, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 118 (2020) 105759,.
[36]
Y.J. Liu, W.G. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Credibilistic multi-period portfolio optimization model with bankruptcy control and affine recourse, Applied Soft Computing 38 (2016) 890–906,.
[37]
N. Loukeris, D. Donelly, A. Khuman, Y. Peng, A numerical evaluation of meta-heuristic techniques in portfolio optimisation, Operational Research 9 (1) (2009) 81–103,.
[38]
G. Ma, C.C. Siu, S.P. Zhu, Dynamic portfolio choice with return predictability and transaction costs, European Journal of Operational Research 278 (3) (2019) 976–988,.
[39]
G. Mamanis, Portfolio Optimization with Metaheuristics, Finance and Market 2 (2) (2017),.
[40]
H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance 7 (1) (1952) 77–91.
[41]
J. Nash, Two-person cooperative games, Econometrica 21 (1) (1953) 128–140,.
[42]
J.A. Nash, The bargaining problem, Econometrica 18 (1950) 155–162.
[43]
Q. Ni, X. Yin, K. Tian, Y. Zhai, Particle swarm optimization with dynamic random population topology strategies for a generalized portfolio selection problem, Natural Computing 16 (1) (2017) 31–44,.
[44]
J.M. Nilakantan, Z. Li, Q. Tang, P. Nielsen, Multi-objective co-operative co-evolutionary algorithm for minimizing carbon footprint and maximizing line efficiency in robotic assembly line systems, Journal of Cleaner Production 156 (2017) 124–136,.
[45]
A. Pahlavanhoseini, M.S. Sepasian, Optimal planning of PEV fast charging stations using nash bargaining theory, Journal of Energy Storage 25 (2019) 100831,.
[46]
A. Pahlavanhoseini, M.S. Sepasian, Scenario-based planning of fast charging stations considering network reconfiguration using cooperative coevolutionary approach, Journal of Energy Storage 23 (2019) 544–557,.
[47]
Pearce, D. K., & Roley, V. V. (1984). Stock prices and economic news. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1296.
[48]
X. Peng, K. Liu, Y. Jin, A dynamic optimization approach to the design of cooperative co-evolutionary algorithms, Knowledge-Based Systems 109 (2016) 174–186,.
[49]
M.A. Potter, K.A. De Jong, A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization, in: International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Natur, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994, pp. 249–257,.
[50]
M.A. Potter, K.A.D. Jong, Cooperative coevolution: An architecture for evolving coadapted subcomponents, Evolutionary Computation 8 (1) (2000) 1–29,.
[51]
A.R. Pouya, M. Solimanpur, M.J. Rezaee, Solving multi-objective portfolio optimization problem using invasive weed optimization, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 28 (2016) 42–57,.
[52]
C.Z. Qin, G. Tan, A.C.L. Wong, Implementation of Nash bargaining solutions with non-convexity, Economics Letters 178 (2019) 46–49,.
[53]
Shiran Rachmilevitch, An implementation of the Nash bargaining solution by iterated strict dominance, Economics Letters 188 (2020) 108960,.
[54]
A. Sadeghi, M. Zandieh, A game theory-based model for product portfolio management in a competitive market, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (7) (2011) 7919–7923,.
[55]
G. Safari, A. Hafezalkotob, M. Khalilzadeh, A Nash bargaining model for flow shop scheduling problem under uncertainty: A case study from tire manufacturing in Iran, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 96 (1–4) (2018) 531–546,.
[56]
I.B. Salehpoor, S. Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, A constrained portfolio selection model at considering risk-adjusted measure by using hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms, Applied Soft Computing 75 (2019) 233–253,.
[57]
R. Shang, Y. Wang, J. Wang, L. Jiao, S. Wang, L. Qi, A multi-population cooperative coevolutionary algorithm for multi-objective capacitated arc routing problem, Information Sciences 277 (2014) 609–642,.
[58]
Y.L.T. Silva, A.B. Herthel, A. Subramanian, A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a class of mean-variance portfolio selection problems, Expert Systems with Applications 133 (2019) 225–241,.
[59]
A. Staino, E. Russo, Nested Conditional Value-at-Risk portfolio selection: A model with temporal dependence driven by market-index volatility, European Journal of Operational Research 280 (2) (2020) 741–753,.
[60]
F. Tao, L. Bi, Y. Zuo, A.Y.C. Nee, A cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for large-scale process planning with energy consideration, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 139 (6) (2017),.
[61]
D. Venturelli, A. Kondratyev, Reverse quantum annealing approach to portfolio optimization problems, Quantum Machine Intelligence 1 (1–2) (2019) 17–30,.
[62]
M.J. Villena, L. Reus, On the strategic behavior of large investors: A mean-variance portfolio approach, European Journal of Operational Research 254 (2) (2016) 679–688,.
[63]
M. Wang, Y. Li, Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model, Expert Systems with Applications 41 (9) (2014) 4181–4185,.
[64]
J.R. Yu, W.J.P. Chiou, W.Y. Lee, S.J. Lin, Portfolio models with return forecasting and transaction costs, International Review of Economics & Finance 66 (2020) 118–130,.
[65]
W. Yue, Y. Wang, H. Xuan, Fuzzy multi-objective portfolio model based on semi-variance–semi-absolute deviation risk measures, Soft Computing 23 (17) (2019) 8159–8179,.
[66]
W.G. Zhang, Y.J. Liu, W.J. Xu, A new fuzzy programming approach for multi-period portfolio optimization with return demand and risk control, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 246 (2014) 107–126,.
[67]
Z. Zhou, X. Liu, H. Xiao, T. Ren, W. Liu, Time-consistent strategies for multi-period portfolio optimization with/without the risk-free asset, Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2018).
[68]
H. Zhu, Y. Wang, K. Wang, Y. Chen, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for the constrained portfolio optimization problem, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (8) (2011) 10161–10169,.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A Nash bargaining solution for a multi period competitive portfolio optimization problem: Co-evolutionary approach
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
          Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 184, Issue C
          Dec 2021
          1533 pages

          Publisher

          Pergamon Press, Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 December 2021

          Author Tags

          1. Multi-Period portfolio problem
          2. Nash bargaining model
          3. Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problem
          4. Co-evolutionary algorithm

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all

          View Options

          View options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media