skip to main content
article

Determining the optimal number of body-worn sensors for human activity recognition

Published: 01 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Recent developments in sensors increased the importance of action recognition. Generally, the previous studies were based on the assumption that the complex actions can be recognized by more features. Therefore, generally more than required body-worn sensor types and sensor nodes were used by the researchers. On the other hand, this assumption leads many drawbacks, such as computational complexity, storage and communication requirements. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the applicability of recognizing the actions without degrading the accuracy with less number of sensors by using a more sophisticated feature extraction and classification method. Since, human activities are complex and include variable temporal information in nature, in this study one-dimensional local binary pattern, which is sensitive to local changes, and the grey relational analysis, which can successfully classify incomplete or insufficient datasets, were employed for feature extraction and classification purposes, respectively. Achieved mean classification accuracies by the proposed approach are 95.69, 98.88, and 99.08 % while utilizing all data, data obtained from a sensor node attached to left calf and data obtained from only 3D gyro sensors, respectively. Furthermore, the results of this study showed that the accuracy obtained by using only a 3D acceleration sensor attached in the left calf, 98.8 %, is higher than accuracy obtained by using all sensor nodes, 95.69 %, and reported accuracies in the previous studies that made use of the same dataset. This result highlighted that the position and type of sensors are much more important than the number of utilized sensors.

References

[1]
Aggarwal JK, Xia L (2014) Human activity recognition from 3D data: a review. Pattern Recognit Lett 48:70-80.
[2]
Altun K, Barshan B, Tunçel O (2010) Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recognit 43:3605-3620.
[3]
Bache K, Lichman M (2013) UCI machine learning repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.
[4]
Banos O, Toth MA, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I (2014) Dealing with the effects of sensor displacement inwearable activity recognition. Sensors 14(6):9995-10023.
[5]
Banos O, Galvez JM, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I (2014) Window size impact in activity recognition. Sensors 14(4):6474-6499.
[6]
Banos O, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I (2013) Activity recognition based on a multi-sensor meta-classifier. In: Proceedings of the international work conference on neural networks (IWANN 2013), Tenerife.
[7]
Banos O, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I (2013) Handling displacement effects in on-body sensor-based activity recognition. In: Ambient assisted living and active aging, pp 80-87.
[8]
Banos O, Toth MA, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I, Amft O (2012) A benchmark dataset to evaluate sensor displacement in activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp 2012), Pittsburgh.
[9]
Chaquet JM, Carmona EJ, Fernández-Caballero A (2013) A survey of video datasets for human action and activity recognition. Comput Vis Image Underst 117:633-659.
[10]
Chavarriaga R, Sagha H, Calatroni A, Digumarti ST, Tröster G, Millán JR, Roggen D (2013) The opportunity challenge: a benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 34:2033-2042.
[11]
Chernbumroong S, Cang S, Yu H (2014) A practical multi-sensor activity recognition system for home-based care. Decis Support Syst 66:61-70.
[12]
Dash M, Liu H (1997) Feature selection for classification. Intell Data Anal 1:131-156.
[13]
Deng JL (1982) Control problems of grey system. Syst Control Lett 1:288-294.
[14]
Deng JL (1989) Grey information space. J Grey Syst 1:103-117.
[15]
Fortino G, Galzarano S, Gravina R, Li W (2014) A framework for collaborative computing and multi-sensor data fusion in body sensor Networks. Inf Fusion 22:50-70.
[16]
Gao L, Bourke AK, Nelson J (2014) Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. Med Eng Phys 36:779-785.
[17]
Gu T, Chen S, Tao X, Lu J (2010) An unsupervised approach to activity recognition and segmentation based on object-use fingerprints. Data Knowl Eng 69:533-544.
[18]
Guiry JJ, Ven P, Nelson J, Warmerdam L, Riper H (2014) Activity recognition with smartphone support. Med Eng Phys 36:670-675.
[19]
Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157-1182.
[20]
Hachaj T, Ogiela MR, Koptyra K (2015) Application of assistive computer vision methods to oyama karate techniques recognition. Symmetry 7(4):1670-1698.
[21]
Hachaj T, Ogiela MR (2014) Rule-based approach to recognizing human body poses and gestures in real time. Multimed Syst 20(1):81-99.
[22]
Hachaj T, Ogiela MR (2015) Full body movements recognition-unsupervised learning approach with heuristic R-GDL method. Dig Signal Process 46:239-252.
[23]
Kaya Y, Uyar M, Tekin R, Yildirim S (2014) 1D-local binary pattern based feature extraction for classification of epileptic EEG signals. Appl Math Comput 243:209-219.
[24]
Kaya Y (2015) Hidden pattern discovery on epileptic EEG with 1- D local binary patterns and epileptic seizures detection by grey relational analysis. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38(3):435-446.
[25]
Kwon Y, Kang K, Bae C (2014) Unsupervised learning for human activity recognition using smartphone sensors. Expert Syst Appl 41:6067-6074.
[26]
Ladha L, Deepa T (2011) Feature selection methods and algorithms. Int J Comput Sci Eng (IJCSE) 3(5):1787-1797.
[27]
Lin Y, Lee H, Chang PC (2009) Practical expert diagnosis model based on the grey relational analysis technique. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1523-1528.
[28]
Lin Y, Liu S (2004) A historical introduction to grey systems theory. Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 1:2403-2408.
[29]
Okeyo G, Chen L, Wang H, Sterritt R (2014) Dynamic sensor data segmentation for real-time knowledge-driven activity recognition. Pervasive Mobile Comput 10:155-172.
[30]
Pediaditis M, Tsiknakis M, Leitgeb N (2012) Vision-based motion detection, analysis and recognition of epileptic seizures--a systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 108:1133-1148.
[31]
Pincus SM (1991) Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88(6):2297-2301.
[32]
Punchoojit L, Hongwarittorrn N (2015) A comparative study on sensor displacement effect on realistic sensor displacement benchmark dataset. In: Recent advances in information and communication technology, pp 97-106.
[33]
Renyi A (1961) On measures of entropy and information. In: Fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, pp 547-561.
[34]
Reyes-Ortiz JL, Oneto L, Samà A, Parra X, Anguita D (2016) Transition-aware human activity recognition using smartphones. Neurocomputing 171:754-767.
[35]
Taraldsen K, Chastin SFM, Riphagen II, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL (2012) Physical activity monitoring by use of accelerometer-based body-worn sensors in older adults: A systematic literature review of current knowledge and applications. Maturitas 71:13- 19.
[36]
Wang L, Hu W, Tan T (2003) Recent developments in human motion analysis. Pattern Recognit 36:585-601.
[37]
Wang L, Gu T, Tao X, Lu J (2012) A hierarchical approach to real-time activity recognition in body sensor networks. Pervasive Mobile Comput 8:115-130.
[38]
Wilson J, Najjar N, Hare J, Gupta S (2015) Human activity recognition using LZW-coded probabilistic finite state automata. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3018-3023.
[39]
Ye J, Stevenson G, Dobson S (2014) KCAR: a knowledge-driven approach for concurrent activity recognition. Pervasive Mobile Comput. (in Press).
[40]
Yin J, Tian G, Feng Z, Li J (2014) Human activity recognition based on multiple order temporal information. Comput Electr Eng 40:1538- 1551.

Cited By

View all
  1. Determining the optimal number of body-worn sensors for human activity recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications
    Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications  Volume 21, Issue 17
    September 2017
    329 pages
    ISSN:1432-7643
    EISSN:1433-7479
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2017

    Author Tags

    1. Activity recognition
    2. Grey relational analysis
    3. Local binary patterns
    4. Sensor reduction
    5. Wearable sensors

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media