skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-06509-5_23guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Optimal Touchscreen Button Size and Button Spacing for Next Generation Fighter Aircrafts

Published: 26 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The popularity of integrating touchscreen technology into next-generation fighter aircraft’s flight decks has increased recently. Therefore, the touch button size and button spacing have gained importance in human factors. In this way, the current study aimed to investigate the optimal button size and button spacing for next-generation fighter aircraft’s touchscreen. In accordance with that purpose, fourteen participants consisting of flight test engineers and pilots performed experimental tasks in a flight simulator on the six different keyboard designs consisting of three different sized buttons (12.7 mm, 15.87 mm & 19.05 mm) and two different sized spacing (1.65 mm & 2.54 mm). Dependent variables consisted of task completion time, total errors, subjective workload scale scores, and user preference. A button size of 12.7 mm and a button spacing of 2.54 mm are optimal when considered task completion time and workload. No significant difference was found in terms of total error. Participants mostly favored a button size of 15.87 mm. Optimal button size and button spacing can be affected by the factors such as maneuvering and pilot equipment (e.g., gloves). Hence, it is recommended that human factors researchers replicate this study by manipulating these factors, especially in simulator settings with jet fighter pilots.

References

[1]
Jin ZX, Plocher T, and Kiff L Stephanidis C Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity 2007 Heidelberg Springer 933-941
[2]
Wang, L., Cao, Q., Chang, J., Zhao, C.: The effect of touch-key size and shape on the usability of flight deck MCDU. In: the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 234–238. IARIA, Lisbon, Portugal (2015)
[4]
Cockburn, A., et al.: Turbulent touch: touchscreen input for cockpit flight displays. In: International Conference for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 6742–6753. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2017)
[5]
Dodd, S., Lancaster, J., Miranda, A., Grothe, S., DeMers, B., Rogers, B.: Touch screens on the flight deck: The impact of touch target size, spacing, touch technology and turbulence on pilot performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 6–10. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications (2014)
[6]
Stanton NA, Harvey C, Plant KL, and Bolton L To twist, roll, stroke or poke? a study of input devices for menu navigation in the cockpit Ergonomics 2013 56 4 590-611
[7]
Tao D, Yuan J, Liu S, and Qu X Effects of button design characteristics on performance and perceptions of touchscreen use Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2018 64 59-68
[8]
Colle HA and Hiszem KJ Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference Ergonomics 2004 47 13 1406-1423
[9]
Avsar, H., Fischer, J., Rodden, T.: Target size guidelines for interactive displays on the flight deck. In: 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pp. 3C4–1. IEEE (2015)
[10]
Sesto ME, Irwin CB, Chen KB, Chourasia AO, and Wiegmann DA Effect of touch screen button size and spacing on touch characteristics of users with and without disabilities Hum. Factors 2012 54 3 425-436
[11]
Tao D, Diao X, Wang T, Guo J, and Qu X Freehand interaction with large displays: effects of body posture, interaction distance and target size on task performance, perceived usability and workload Appl. Ergon. 2021 93 103370
[13]
Tao D, Chen Q, Yuan J, Liu S, Zhang X, and Qu X Harris D Effects of key size, gap and the location of key characters on the usability of touchscreen devices in input tasks Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Design 2017 Cham Springer 133-144
[14]
Chen KB, Savage AB, Chourasia AO, Wiegmann DA, and Sesto ME Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities Appl. Ergon. 2013 44 2 297-302
[15]
Conti AS, Kremser F, Krause M, An DJ, and Bengler K The effect of varying target sizes and spaces between target and non-target elements on goal-directed hand movement times while driving Procedia Manufact. 2015 3 3168-3175
[16]
Fitts PM The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement J. Exp. Psychol. 1954 47 6 381
[17]
Conradi J, Busch O, and Alexander T Optimal touch button size for the use of mobile devices while walking Procedia Manufact. 2015 3 387-394
[18]
Coutts LV et al. Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments Ergonomics 2019 62 2 286-304
[19]
Sun, X., Plocher, T., Qu, W.: An empirical study on the smallest comfortable button/icon size on touch screen. In: Aykin, N. (eds.) Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture. UI-HCII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4559, pp. 615–621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007).
[20]
Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Rafferty LA, Walker GH, Baber C, and Jenkins DP Human Factors Methods: a Practical Guide for Engineering and Design 2013 2 England Ashgate
[21]
Thomas PR Performance, characteristics, and error rates of cursor control devices for aircraft cockpit interaction Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 2018 109 41-53

Index Terms

  1. Optimal Touchscreen Button Size and Button Spacing for Next Generation Fighter Aircrafts
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        Human Interface and the Management of Information: Applications in Complex Technological Environments: Thematic Area, HIMI 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26 – July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part II
        Jun 2022
        463 pages
        ISBN:978-3-031-06508-8
        DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-06509-5

        Publisher

        Springer-Verlag

        Berlin, Heidelberg

        Publication History

        Published: 26 June 2022

        Author Tags

        1. Button size
        2. Button spacing
        3. Touchscreen

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media