research-article

Negotiation by induction

Author:

Chiaki SakamaAuthors Info & Claims

AAMAS '08: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 3

Pages 1459 - 1462

Published: 12 May 2008 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

This paper presents a logical framework for automated negotiation. An agent accepts a proposal if it is proved by its knowledge base. If this is not the case, an agent seeks conditions to accept a proposal or may give up some of its current belief to reach an agreement. These attitudes of agents are characterized using induction and default reasoning.

References

[1]

K. Inoue and C. Sakama. Abductive framework for nonmonotonic theory change. In: Proc. IJCAI-95, pp. 204--210, Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

A. C. Kakas, R. A. Kowalski, and F. Toni. The role of abduction in logic programming. In: Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming, D. M. Gabbay, et al. (eds), vol. 5, pp. 235--324, Oxford University Press, 1998.

Google Scholar

[3]

V. Lifschitz. Answer set programming and plan generation. Artificial Intelligence 138:39--54, 2002.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

S.-H. Nienhuys-Cheng and R. De Wolf. Foundations of inductive logic programming. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1228, Springer, 1997.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13:81--132, 1980.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

C. Sakama and K. Inoue. Negotiation by abduction and relaxation. In: Proc. AAMAS '07, pp. 1018--1025, ACM Press, 2007.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

C. Sakama. Inductive negotiation in answer set programming. Submitted for publication, 2008.

Google Scholar

Index Terms

Negotiation by induction
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Distributed artificial intelligence
2. Theory of computation
  1. Logic
  2. Models of computation
    1. Computability

Recommendations

Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

A negotiation between agents is typically an incomplete information game, where the agents initially do not know their opponent's preferences or strategy. This poses a challenge, as efficient and effective negotiation requires the bidding agent to take ...
Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation
AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems

In this paper, we study how argumentation can be used as a basis for negotiation between autonomous agents, where negotiation strategies of the different parties are represented as argumentation theories within their knowledge. We propose an ...
Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation
WI-IAT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02

In the negotiation literature we find two relatively distinct types of negotiation. The two types are known as integrative negotiations and distributive negotiations. Integrative negotiations are those where all sides are looking for solutions that are "...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

AAMAS '08: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 3

May 2008

503 pages

ISBN:9780981738123

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 12 May 2008

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

AAMAS08

Sponsor:

ACM
AAAI

AAMAS08: 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems

May 12 - 16, 2008

Estoril, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

0
Total Citations
119
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Index Terms

Recommendations

Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation

Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Login options

Full Access

PDF

eReader

Abstract

References

Index Terms

Recommendations

Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation

Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations