default search action
COMMA 2022: Cardiff, Wales, UK
- Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido:
Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022, Cardiff, Wales, UK, 14-16 September 2022. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 353, IOS Press 2022, ISBN 978-1-64368-306-5
Research Article
- Paul E. Dunne:
Well, to Be Honest, I Wouldnt Start from Here at All. 3-14 - Iryna Gurevych:
Detect - Debunk - Communicate: Combating Misinformation with More Realistic NLP. 15 - Antonis C. Kakas:
Argumentation: From Theory to Practice & Back. 16-17 - Milad Alshomary, Jonas Rieskamp, Henning Wachsmuth:
Generating Contrastive Snippets for Argument Search. 21-31 - Ofer Arieli, AnneMarie Borg, Matthis Hesse, Christian Straßer:
Explainable Logic-Based Argumentation. 32-43 - Yohann Bacquey, Jean-Guy Mailly, Pavlos Moraitis, Julien Rossit:
Admissibility in Strength-Based Argumentation: Complexity and Algorithms. 44-55 - Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin:
A Generalized Notion of Consistency with Applications to Formal Argumentation. 56-67 - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson:
Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription. 68-79 - Lars Bengel, Matthias Thimm:
Serialisable Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. 80-91 - Michael Bernreiter, Wolfgang Dvorák, Stefan Woltran:
Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences. 92-103 - Lydia Blümel, Matthias Thimm:
A Ranking Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Based on Serialisability. 104-115 - Raimund Dachselt, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Markus Krötzsch, Julián Méndez, Dominik Rusovac, Mei Yang:
NEXAS: A Visual Tool for Navigating and Exploring Argumentation Solution Spaces. 116-127 - Wolfgang Dvorák, Tjitze Rienstra, Leendert van der Torre, Stefan Woltran:
Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. 128-139 - Wolfgang Dvorák, Matthias König, Stefan Woltran:
Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. 140-151 - Xiuyi Fan:
Rule-PSAT: Relaxing Rule Constraints in Probabilistic Assumption-Based Argumentation. 152-163 - Nguyen Duy Hung, Nam-Van Huynh, Thanaruk Theeramunkong, Tho-Quy Nhu:
Composite Argumentation Systems with ML Components. 164-175 - Anthony Hunter:
Automated Reasoning with Epistemic Graphs Using SAT Solvers. 176-187 - Timotheus Kampik, Kristijonas Cyras:
Explaining Change in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation. 188-199 - Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Wolfgang Dvorák, Rineke Verbrugge, Bart Verheij:
How Complex Is the Strong Admissibility Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks? 200-211 - Matthias König, Anna Rapberger, Markus Ulbricht:
Just a Matter of Perspective. 212-223 - Isabelle Kuhlmann, Thorsten Wujek, Matthias Thimm:
On the Impact of Data Selection when Applying Machine Learning in Abstract Argumentation. 224-235 - Tuomo Lehtonen, Johannes Peter Wallner, Matti Järvisalo:
Algorithms for Reasoning in a Default Logic Instantiation of Assumption-Based Argumentation. 236-247 - Jieting Luo, Beishui Liao, Dov M. Gabbay:
Value-Based Practical Reasoning: Modal Logic + Argumentation. 248-259 - Jack Mumford, Isabel Sassoon, Elizabeth Black, Simon Parsons:
On the Complexity of Determining Defeat Relations Consistent with Abstract Argumentation Semantics. 260-271 - Daphne Odekerken, AnneMarie Borg, Floris Bex:
Stability and Relevance in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. 272-283 - Giuseppe Pisano, Roberta Calegari, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts. 284-295 - Henry Prakken:
Formalising an Aspect of Argument Strength: Degrees of Attackability. 296-307 - Kenneth Skiba, Matthias Thimm:
Ordinal Conditional Functions for Abstract Argumentation. 308-319 - Markus Ulbricht, Johannes Peter Wallner:
Strongly Accepting Subframeworks: Connecting Abstract and Structured Argumentation. 320-331 - Kees van Berkel, Christian Straßer:
Reasoning With and About Norms in Logical Argumentation. 332-343 - Stefano Bistarelli, Alessio Mancinelli, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi:
An Argumentative Explanation of Machine Learning Outcomes. 347-348 - AnneMarie Borg, Daphne Odekerken:
PyArg for Solving and Explaining Argumentation in Python: Demonstration. 349-350 - Federico Castagna, Simon Parsons, Isabel Sassoon, Elizabeth I. Sklar:
Providing Explanations via the EQR Argument Scheme. 351-352 - Dennis Craandijk, Floris Bex:
EGNN: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Architecture for Enforcement Heuristics. 353-354 - Stefan Ellmauthaler, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Dominik Rusovac, Johannes Peter Wallner:
ADF-BDD: An ADF Solver Based on Binary Decision Diagrams. 355-356 - Kamila Gorska, Wassiliki Siskou, Chris Reed:
Annotating Very Large Arguments. 357-358 - Nikolai Käfer:
CPrAA - A Checker for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation. 359-360 - Adamos Koumi, Antonis C. Kakas, Emmanuelle Dietz:
COGNICA: Cognitive Argumentation. 361-362 - Jonas Klein, Matthias Thimm:
probo2: A Benchmark Framework for Argumentation Solvers. 363-364 - John Lawrence, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed:
Polemicist: A Dialogical Interface for Exploring Complex Debates. 365-366 - Mirko Lenz, Ralph Bergmann:
User-Centric Argument Mining with ArgueMapper and Arguebuf. 367-368 - Nico Potyka:
Attractor - A Java Library for Gradual Bipolar Argumentation. 369-370 - Nikolaos I. Spanoudakis, Georgios Gligoris, Antonis C. Kakas, Adamos Koumi:
Gorgias Cloud: On-line Explainable Argumentation. 371-372 - Jonathan Spieler, Nico Potyka, Steffen Staab:
Interpretable Machine Learning with Gradual Argumentation Frameworks. 373-374 - Jacky Visser, John Lawrence:
The Skeptic Web Service: Utilising Argument Technologies for Reason-Checking. 375-376 - Dimitra Zografistou, Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed:
ACH-Nav: Argument Navigation Using Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. 377-378
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.