Showing posts with label Eddie Marsan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eddie Marsan. Show all posts

Monday, 30 December 2024

World's End (5 Stars)


Simon Pegg and Nick Frost play two old friends who haven't seen each other for 20 years. They reunite to do a pub crawl in their former home town of Newton Haven. Twelve pubs, starting at "The First Post" and ending at "The World's End". Very appropriate names. But what are they staring at?


Schoolgirls! There's something delightfully sexy about girls in school uniforms, and clever women know how to take advantage of it, even in later years.


As it turns out, the schoolgirls aren't human, but even aliens know how to drive men crazy by dressing in school uniforms.


I would have surrendered to the alien schoolgirls, but the two heroes resist them and fight them to the death. As a result, society breaks down and all that there is to remind them of the past is Cornetto wrappers. There must be a moral in there somewhere.

Success Rate:  + 0.3

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday, 1 April 2023

Tyrannosaur (3 Stars)


Joseph is an unemployed widower who lives in a poor area in Leeds. He suffers from a bad temper. In the opening scenes he kicks his dog so hard that he breaks its ribs. This pushes him into depression.

One day he seeks refuge in a Christian charity shop. He hides behind the clothes so that nobody can see him. The shopkeeper Hannah prays for him. He's not a Christian, but he's moved by her concern for him, and he visits the shop every day. He thinks that Hannah has a perfect life, but he's wrong. Her husband hits her. Her friendship with Joseph makes it worse. Her husband is jealous and thinks it's more than a platonic friendship, so he hits her even more.

I'm very impressed by Olivia Colman's acting, and not just in this film. She's magnificent in every role she plays. It's not an uplifting film. It shows an ugly community with dysfunctional people in northern England. It's a place I wouldn't want to live.

Success Rate:  - 1.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday, 11 March 2023

Hobbs & Shaw (4 Stars)


Wow! Dwayne Johnson has muscles! What do they feed them in Samoa?


Or is it the pancakes that he eats in America?


This is the first film in which he performs the People's Eyebrow (TM). I'm sure he could raise his eyebrow higher in his wrestling days. I'll have to check.


Out of all the professional wrestlers who've ever tried their hand at acting, Dwayne is the most talented. Hulk Hogan was embarrassing. John Cena tries his best, but he just doesn't have what it takes. Can you recognise another WWE wrestler who appears in "Hobbs & Shaw" as a non-speaking extra? Will Roman Reigns take the plunge into real acting? He's 37, whereas Dwayne Johnson was 29 when he made his first film, "The Mummy Returns", followed by his first lead role in "The Scorpion King" a year later. I have "The Scorpion King" on DVD, but I haven't watched it since I started my blog in September 2010. I don't think I liked it very much, but after all this time I should give it another chance.


Maybe I should write a few words about the film itself. Dwayne Johnson plays the DSS agent Luke Hobbs, Jason Statham plays the ex-SAS fighter Deckard Shaw. Deckard was the main villain in "Fast & Furious 7" when he sought revenge for the near-death of his criminal brother, but he teamed up with Vin Diesel's gang as a hero in "Fast & Furious 8". I'm surprised that the two initially refuse to work together when they're assigned to the same case. Luke repeatedly says that he doesn't like Deckard, but I thought they'd already got over it in "Fast & Furious 8".


Their main antagonist is Brixton Lore, a genetically enhanced super-soldier played by Idris Elba. He calls himself the Black Superman. Okay, but I think the Samoan Superman is stronger.

There's actually another antagonist behind the scenes. Brixton works for a high-tech terrorist organisation called Eteon. The director of Eteon says that Luke and Deckard know him, but we only hear his voice and his identity is never revealed. A sequel was planned, but the latest news is that it won't be made, so we might never find out who this mysterious character is.

Success Rate:  + 1.8

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday, 6 January 2022

Pierrepoint (5 Stars)



Name: Albert Pierrepoint
Lived: 30 March 1905 – 10 July 1992
Film dates: 1932 to 1955
Film made in 2005

Albert Pierrepoint wasn't Britain's last hangman, as is sometimes claimed, but he was Britain's most famous and most prolific hangman.

Hanging was the form of execution used in British prisons in the 20th Century. It was a secret job. There was a small list of licensed hangmen which was never released to the public. When a criminal had to be executed, the Home Office contacted two of the men on the list to carry out the execution. One man was the chief executioner, the other was his assistant.

Albert Pierrepoint was following in a family tradition. His father and his uncle had both been hangmen when he applied to be put on the list in 1932. His first execution was in 1933, where he served as the assistant executioner. For the rest of the 1930's he continued as an assistant executioner.

The film skips to 1941, when Albert is already married and living in Lancashire. He works as a grocery delivery man, and his wife knows nothing about his secondary job. All that she knows is that he goes away on special business at irregular intervals. This wasn't so unusual in the war years, so she accepted his absence. It wasn't until the end of the war that she discovered his notebook in which he kept a list of everyone he had hanged.


Albert Pierrepoint hanged at least 435 people in his career. The exact number is unclear, because of the secrecy involved. It's estimated that it was closer to 600 people. How could a man kill so many people and remain sane? He says that he did it by separating his personal self from his job. Outside the prison cell he was Albert Pierrepoint, but as soon as he walked through the door to collect the prisoner he became the Executioner. He never troubled himself with questions about whether a person might be innocent. The courts had decided a person was guilty, and it was the Executioner's job to do what the court wanted.

Albert managed to keep his identity secret until 1945. This changed when he was sent to Germany to execute Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials. On his return the press hounded him. His neighbours and friends treated him as a hero, but the praise wasn't welcome. He would rather have remained anonymous. In later years he became a target for those protesting against capital punishment.

Eventually Albert resigned from the list. It wasn't because of doubts about the correctness of his job, as many of his opponents claimed. It was a matter of money. He received payment in cash after every execution. If there was a last minute reprieve, he received nothing, not even reimbursement of his travel expenses. He protested against this, and when nothing was changed he resigned.


The film shows about a dozen executions, half of them at the Nuremberg Trials. Out of curiosity, I looked up the names of the people mentioned, and they're all famous criminals, even if they aren't described in the film itself. For instance, Ruth Ellis, shown in the first photo in this post, was the last woman to be hanged in Britain. (The last man hanged in Britain was Peter Allen in 1964, nine years after Pierrepoint's retirement).

There are some historical inaccuracies that have been introduced for the sake of dramatization. The biggest change is the Nuremberg Trials. The film gives the impression that Pierrepoint was the only executioner. He actually had to share the task with an American executioner.

This is a deeply moving film with excellent acting by Timothy Spall.

Tuesday, 22 June 2021

The Disappearance of Alice Creed (5 Stars)


This is a beautifully crafted film that excels through its minimalism. There are only three actors, and almost all of the film takes place in a small apartment. The film was made on the Isle of Man, which has a film industry that's independent of the rest of Britain, so there was only a small budget available. We can be glad. Pouring more money into the film would have ruined it. My suspicion is that most of the budget was used to pay the salaries of the three actors, and they deserved it.

Of the three actors, the best known at the time was Gemma Arterton. It was made in 2009, only a year after she appeared in "Quantum of Solace", so she was the film's biggest star. I hope this meant that she received the largest salary. Last year I had an argument with a rather ignorant person on Facebook who claimed that women should be paid the same as men when they appear in a film together. That's stupid! Actors should be paid based on their Star Quality, i.e. how much audience appeal they have after their previous films. In the case of "The Disappearance of Alice Creed" it would have been unfair to pay Gemma Arterton the same as the male actors, because she clearly deserved more.


The second actor in the film is Eddie Marsan, who plays the kidnapper Vic. I consider him to be a capable actor, but after 20 years in acting he's still waiting for his breakthrough. His face is well known to cinemagoers, but he always plays minor roles. This film is the largest role I've seen him play. He obviously doesn't have Gemma Arterton's Star Quality, which is regretful.


The third actor is Martin Compston, who was completely unknown to me when I first watched the film. I searched IMDB and found that he'd played small roles in a few other films I'd seen, so small that I'd missed him. Ironically, my ex-wife walked in on the film this evening, and he was the only one she recognised. She says that he plays the lead role in the television series "Line of Duty". There's a big difference between film and television careers, although the gap has been closing in the last two or three years. The "big actors" appear in films, and the "small actors" appear on television. As a rule of thumb, acting in a television series means more work and less pay. Some actors begin their career in television and progress to film, but the opposite direction is frowned on and considered to be the result of career failure. I know I'm generalising, but occasional exceptions don't mean it's not true. This film was made before "Line of Duty" began, so it's fair to say that Martin Compston had almost no Star Quality.


Now to the film itself: Alice Creed is the daughter of a rich man (who we never see in the film). She's kidnapped by two men and held for a ransom of two million pounds ($2.8 million). I admit that it's disgusting to see the way she's treated, tied to a bed and gagged for most of the film, but I can say in the kidnappers' favour that they're professional; they don't hurt her more than they have to. Interestingly, Gemma Arterton insisted that she should remain tied to the bed even when she wasn't being filmed, to help her play her part more realistically.

The film develops slowly through twists and turns as a psychological thriller. Vic and Danny are no match for her. After her initial shock she plays them against one another.


She also tempts Danny to untie her so they can have some fun. I think you can guess where this is going.


Is this photo a spoiler?

Significantly, the film's title isn't shown until the last few seconds of the film. Today is the third time I've watched it, but I didn't notice this detail until today.

There should be more films like this. We don't need helicopters, car chases and big explosions. All we need to make a good film is a well written plot and good actors. Although, judging by the film's lack of success, the majority of cinema audiences disagree with me.

Success Rate:  - 2.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk

Friday, 21 May 2021

Deadpool 2 (5 Stars)



Stan Lee doesn't actually make a cameo in "Deadpool 2", but he appears briefly in one of the trailers. He's even addressed by name. Deadpool emerges from a phone booth after changing into his costume.

Stan Lee: "Wow, nice suit!"
Deadpool: "Zip it, Stan Lee!"

This is Marvel dialogue at its best!

The first Deadpool film was so good that I didn't think the sequel could possibly live up to it. I was wrong. I remember sitting wide-mouthed in the cinema on 20th May 2018. When the opening credits rolled (at the 15 minute mark) I already knew that it exceeded the quality of the first film. The humour is similar. The repeated breaking of the third wall is similar. But something is better. Maybe it's the tastefully inappropriate placing of music. I don't know. I just know it's better, and I have great hopes that "Deadpool 3" will be just as good, whenever it's finally released.

This is the second film in Marvel's X-Men franchise in which someone comes from the future to change the past. The first was "Days of Future Past". Cable, a super-soldier from the future, travels back in time to kill Firefist, the mutant who will be responsible for murdering his wife and daughter. When Cable arrives Firefist is still a 12-year-old boy called Russell Collins. Russell is at a turning point. He's a troubled youngster, due to being tortured by the staff of an orphanage run by the Essex Corporation, an organisation that trains mutants to become mercenaries, but he's not truly evil. Cable says that he'll turn evil after his first kill, which is due to happen soon. Deadpool sees the good in the boy and wants to persuade him not to kill anyone. This is ironic, because Deadpool himself is a killer.


Deadpool has contact with the X-Men, but the only team members he sees at the X-Men mansion are Colossus, Negasonic Teenage Warhead and Yukio. It's a running joke that the other X-Men are missing because the film had a limited budget.


Negasonic Teenage Warhead introduces Yukio as her girlfriend, making them the first openly lesbian couple in a Marvel movie. Yukio is possibly the same character as Yukio in "Wolverine", but it's not clear. Her role in "Deadpool 2" is too minor to make a comparison possible. Logically, they would have to be different characters, because "Wolverine" takes place shortly before "Deadpool 2", yet Yukio looks much younger in the latter film. But when has there ever been any logic in the X-Men continuity?


A bigger problem is a brief cameo by the other X-Men, who are in the mansion after all, though unseen by Deadpool. This was an outtake from "Dark Phoenix", which was being filmed at the same time. "Dark Phoenix" takes place in 1992, so the X-Men should look a lot older in "Deadpool 2", which takes place 25 years later. Even taking into account the rewriting of the timeline in "Days of Future Past", the scene still doesn't fit.

But don't worry about inconsistencies. Just accept the film for what it is. It doesn't take itself seriously, so neither should you.

Success Rate:  + 4.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday, 13 March 2021

Atomic Blonde (4½ Stars)


As I've stated in the past, this is an almost perfect film. The only reason I haven't given it five stars is because of the excessive smoking. I don't like smoking. It was cigarettes that killed my father when he was only 53. If you think I'm wrong to penalise the film for one trivial detail like this, so what? This is my blog, and I'll do what I like with it. If you don't like it, write your own blog.

One of the things that makes the film so good is the director David Leitch's selection of 1980's songs, which perfectly give the feeling of Berlin in 1989.

  • Queen: Under Pressure (1981)
  • After the Fire: Der Kommissar (1982)
  • A Flock of Seagulls: I ran so far away (1982)
  • David Bowie: Cat People (1982)
  • Nena: 99 Luftballons (1983)
  • Peter Schilling: Major Tom (1983)
  • Re-Flex: The Politics of Dancing (1983)
  • Siouxsie & the Banshees: Cities in Dust (1985)
  • Til Tuesday: Voices Carry (1985)
  • Depeche Mode: Behind the Wheel (1987)
  • George Michael: Father Figure (1987)
  • New Order: Blue Monday (1988)
  • Public Enemy: Fight the Power (1989)

There's also "London Calling" by the Clash. That's actually a 1979 song, but I'll forgive the director for adding it, because it's very appropriate when it's used in the film.


The Berlin Wall shortly before reunification in 1989. A lot of people don't realise how close the Wall was built to the houses on either side.


This is a film that establishes Charlize Theron as an action heroine. She looks incredible even when she's just been fighting KGB agents to the death. A sequel has been promised, but like so many other films, it's been delayed by the Coronavirus.

Success Rate:  + 1.3

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 23 November 2020

Their Finest (4 Stars)


This is a charming tale about a film crew making a propaganda film in early 1941. The central character is the screenwriter, Catrin Cole, played by Gemma Arterton. She was a strong woman fighting to establish herself in a man's world.

Click here to read my full review. I'm not feeling motivated to write a lot while the new Blogger interface is full of bugs.

Success Rate:  - 0.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday, 5 November 2020

Deadpool 2 (5 Stars)


This week I finally bought myself a 4K resolution television set. I've been using the standard 1080p resolution since December 2008. I had a 32" television from 2008 to 2012, a 42" television from 2012 to 2016 and a 40" television from 2016 to 2020, all with a 1080p resolution, The downgrade in 2016 was necessitated by moving to Germany. I couldn't take my television with me, so when I arrived in Germany I used the television that was already available.

My new television is 43". Ideally I would have preferred to buy a larger television with OLED technology, the current state of the art, but my space is limited. In my room I have to sit about 1.80 meters away from the screen, so a larger television set would be overkill.


After extensive research, I decided that this television was the best available at this size. At first I was disappointed that the frame is white. Every flatscreen television I've ever owned has a black frame. However, after a few hours sitting in front of it I've grown used to its appearance.


I bought the television from Amazon. I wanted to delay buying a 4K Blu-ray player, but once I had the television in front of me I was impatient. My old Blu-ray player wasn't good enough for me. I jumped on the bus and went to Saturn, an electronics store in Stuttgart city centre. I'd already decided on the Sony UBP-X700 Blu-ray player. It's not the best Blu-ray player on the market, but it's the best in its price range. At Saturn the Blu-ray player costs 25 Euros more than Amazon's price, but they offer a price match guarantee, so I bought it for Amazon's price.

After experimenting with snippets of films on Netflix and Amazon Prime, I finally sat down to watch my first full film with the new equipment. I picked "Deadpool 2", the theatrical version. It's a standard Blu-ray, so it was upscaled to 4K, and the picture was perfect. I currently only own one 4K Blu-ray, "John Wick 2", because the multi-format package (Blu-ray plus 4K) was the same price as the standard Blu-ray alone. I'll have to watch it some time in the next few days.

Success Rate:  + 4.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday, 13 August 2020

Atomic Blonde (4½ Stars)


After watching this film in the cinema three years ago I'm finally returning to it. I don't know why I waited so long. It's an almost perfect film. I would have given it five stars, but I deducted half a star because the smoking in the film is excessive. If smoking doesn't bother you, there's no reason not to watch it.

Charlize Theron plays the MI6 agent Lorraine Broughton, who's on a mission in Berlin in the final week of the Berlin Wall, from 2nd November to 10th November 1989. Well, the demolition of the Wall didn't actually begin until 13th June 1990, so the images of people hitting the Wall with hammers are incorrect. What actually happened is that the border checkpoints opened on 9th November, allowing people to pass through without showing their passports. The film "Bornholmer Straße" tells this story. In my review of "Goodbye Lenin" I've listed the dates of the most important occurrences.

When Lorraine arrives in Berlin on 2nd November, Western intelligence services already assume that the opening of the Wall is inevitable, but there's something more dangerous. There's a list of all the spies in Berlin, western and eastern, that's been hidden on microfilm inside a watch. It's expected that whichever government receives this list will assassinate all the other spies and secret agents. Initially it's in the hands of a Russian spy, but instead of delivering it to his country he's attempting to sell it to the highest bidder.


Lorraine's has to work with David Percival (James McAvoy), the head of MI6 operations in West Berlin. He's an efficient agent, but very eccentric. Following the mission's guideline, "Don't trust anyone", he tells Lorraine as much as she needs to know, but lies about everything else. He warns her about an infamous double agent codenamed Satchel, who will do anything to stop the list being made public.


Bill Skarsgard plays a young man called Merkel. He's active in organising demonstrations in East Berlin, but he also assists the CIA if necessary. I hardly recognise him without his face paint.

This is a film that has everything: action, suspense, espionage and nail-biting intrigue. It's a shame about the smoking. Is that supposed to make the film more realistic? If there had been no smoking at all, nobody would have complained.

Rumours have been floated that a crossover between "Atomic Blonde" and the John Wick franchise is planned. That's interesting, but how would it work? "Atomic Blonde" took place in the 1980's, whereas the John Wick films take place today. Or do they? They have very old-fashioned technology, so it's difficult to date them. Lorraine Broughton couldn't possibly be a member of John Wick's organisation, because it stands above international politics. Or maybe she could join later after leaving MI6. She would be an excellent recruit. There are so many questions open, but in principle it's a good idea.

Success Rate:  + 1.3

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Tuesday, 3 March 2020

The Gentlemen (4½ Stars)


I almost didn't go to see this film. I have mixed feelings about the director, Guy Ritchie. His first two films, "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" (1998) and "Snatch" (2000) were works of genius, among my favourite films ever. After that he slumped. "RocknRolla" (2005) was awful, the Sherlock Holmes films were entertaining but average, and "King Arthur" (2017) was dull. Probably his worst film was "The Man from UNCLE" (2015), which is a stain on the memory of a wonderful TV series. "The Gentlemen" was scheduled for release in Germany two months later than in England and America, so I had time to decide if it was worth the price of a cinema ticket. The trailer didn't impress me, but critics and fans were calling it a "return to form" for Guy Ritchie, so I gave it a chance.

Wow!

From the opening minutes I was drawn in. The style of the storytelling is as enthralling as the story itself. An investigative journalist wants to blackmail an American drug lord operating in Britain, so he sits and relates what he knows. The drug lord, Mickey Pearson, wants to retire from the business of selling marijuana, and he's offered his operations for £400 million to a rival. The reporter, Fletcher, has uncovered secrets about him and offers to keep them out of the newspaper for £20 million.

The film's strength is less in the plot than in the richness of the characters portrayed. We see all levels of British society, from aristocrats to the middle class, workers and low-level drug addicts. They are credible characters, and they're amusing in the way they react to one another. I couldn't help laughing out loud at situations that were serious in themselves.

This is a must-have film for my Blu-ray collection. On the bus coming home I thought long and hard whether to give it a full five star rating. I decided against it, because it's not quite as good as Guy Ritchie's first two films. Almost, but not quite. It's possible that I'll rethink my rating after watching it again.

I expect most of my readers live in countries where the film is no longer running in the cinema. If you haven't seen it yet, wait for it to be shown on television or online. You won't be disappointed.

Tuesday, 17 September 2019

The Professor and the Madman (4 Stars)


This is the 24th film in the Stuttgart Fantasy Film Festival.

It could be argued that the film doesn't fit the festival's theme. It's not a fantasy, horror or science fiction film, it's a true story about the creation of the Oxford English Dictionary.

The linguist James Murray (Mel Gibson) approached Oxford University with the wish to create a complete dictionary of every word in the English language, based on its usage from the 14th to the 19th Century. The work was too much for one man, so he asked for volunteers from the whole of the British Empire to read books and submit quotes. The main contributor was Dr. William Minor (Sean Penn).

Dr. Minor was a former army surgeon who fled from America to England because he thought he was being pursued by an army deserter. He shot an innocent man, thinking he was the deserter. He was considered insane and interred in Broadmoor Mental Hospital. He was given relative luxury within the hospital, two adjoining cells and a large library.

The two men became friends as the work progressed.

For the first 30 minutes of the film I felt bored. Then I slowly warmed up as I finally began to understand what the film was about. Maybe I'm biased. What impressed me most was the way the two men had a passionate love for the English language, like me.

Saturday, 14 September 2019

Feedback (3 Stars)


This is the ninth film in the Stuttgart Fantasy Film Festival.

Jarvis Dolan and Andrew Wilde were the hosts of a successful radio talk show. They took a break for a few months because of rape allegations brought against Andrew, but now they want to get back on air. The studio boss suggests that Jarvis does the show by himself, but he insists on Andrew joining him. After all, Andrew was never officially charged with rape.

On their first day back two masked men break into the studio, intending to force Jarvis and Andrew to confess to the rape. Andrew confesses at gunpoint to having raped a girl. Jarvis refuses to confess, because he says that he wasn't in the room when the rape took place.

Despite the tense atmosphere, this is ultimately an unsatisfying film. Most of the film is made up of repetitive dialogue, the same questions and the same answers being repeated over and over again. Whatever the intention of the film is meant to be, it fails.

Monday, 5 August 2019

Hobbs & Shaw (5 Stars)


There are a few posters for "Hobbs & Shaw", but this one, which is also the preliminary DVD cover for the UK release, is the best. It says it all in one picture. Two men on different sides of the road, from different countries, with different styles. The film emphasises this from the beginning, including exaggerated bouts of insults and trash talking. They don't want to work together, but they don't have a choice. The fate of the human race lies in their hands.

An organisation called Eteon has created a virus that will kill almost everyone on Earth. Only the strong will survive, and I'm sure that Eteon has its own definition of "strong". A group of MI6 agents try to steal the virus, but they're wiped out by Brixton Lore, a cybernetically enhanced super-soldier. The only survivor of the MI6 team is Hattie Shaw, who injects the virus into herself to smuggle it out of the building. It will lie dormant within her for a few days, after which it will kill her and infect the whole Earth. Brixton frames her as a traitor who's killed her own men.

Hattie's brother, Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham), is recruited by MI6 to find the virus, not knowing that Hattie is carrying it within herself. The CIA also sends Lukas Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) to find the virus.

The film's action scenes are so exaggerated that I almost laughed while watching them, but they overwhelmed me and kept me excited throughout the film. Whenever the action stopped it was replaced by humorous scenes. It's rare that a film has drawn me in on such a visceral level. This is a spin-off from the Fast & Furious film series, and it's just as exaggerated as the recent Fast & Furious films.

I've already used the word "exaggerated" three times, so I think that's the single word that I should use to describe "Hobbs & Shaw".

Exaggerated.

Sunday, 25 November 2018

Deadpool 2 (5 Stars)


When I sat down to watch this film I realised it was an extended version, not the same version that I saw in the cinema earlier this year. The Blu-ray I've bought has both versions, so I'll have to compare them. The theatrical version (surprisingly) doesn't have an after-credits scene, but the extended cut does. Censorship? I remember reading that there was some controversy about the baby Hitler scene. It's a moral question that has been asked before. If you know that an innocent little baby will grow up to kill millions of people, does that make it right to kill him?

This film doesn't have a Stan Lee cameo, although his face does appear in artwork painted on a wall. It makes up for it by having a Stan Lee cameo in one of the trailers. Unfortunately, the trailers aren't included in the disc's extra features.

Success Rate:  + 4.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Friday, 12 October 2018

Their Finest (4½ Stars)


In summer 2017 two films were shown in the cinemas about the battle of Dunkirk. This is the better of the two. To be precise, "Their Finest" is a film about a film about Dunkirk, but it's still better than Christopher Nolan's effort. It's less pretentious, it's more emotional and it has a strong feminist message.


The film within a film is called "The Nancy Starling". It's about twin sisters, Rose and Lily, who sail to Dunkirk with their drunken father to rescue Rose's boyfriend Johnny. At the beach they don't just pick up Johnny, they take ten soldiers and an American reporter on board, the maximum their boat can hold. The boat can't sail home because a rope is tangled in its propeller. Both Johnny and the girls' father are killed by aircraft fire while trying to free the propeller. Rose is a brave English girl and doesn't let her sorrow slow her down. She dives below water and cuts the propeller free.


The film itself is about the struggles of the screenwriter Catrin Cole to make "The Nancy Starling" the film she wants it to be. She's forced to make compromises. In the original script the two sisters left the harbour without their father because they wanted to rescue British soldiers. Johnny had to be added because Catrin was told that no women would be selfless enough to risk their lives for complete strangers. The father had to go along because it was considered unrealistic for women to sail a boat by themselves; they needed a man, even if he was a drunk. To put it in other words, a drunk man is a better captain than a sober woman.

There are many scenes in the film that made me laugh because of the ridiculous male prejudices of the 1940's. I shouldn't laugh. These attitudes might seem like a joke to me 75 years later, but those were the attitudes that women have had to endure for centuries. The women of the 1940's had nothing to laugh about, they had to suffer in silence.

This is an excellent film that I'm sure I shall watch again many times in the future.

Success Rate:  - 0.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de