Armando Marques-Guedes
Armando Marques Guedes
Studied Government at the Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (ISCSP), Social Anthropology at The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), and at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), in Paris. He was awarded a summa cum laude Doctorate in Social and Cultural Anthropology by the Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (FCSH), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, where he was from 1990 to 1999, and his Agrégation in Law at the NOVA School of Law (NSL, UNL) in 2005..
Received a Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation longterm scholarship, a University College, London (UCL) Mary Scharlieb Scholarship, another from The British Museum (Museum of Mankind), and more than half a dozen others throughout the years. Was elected Ivor Evans Fellow, University of Cambridge, and also Tweedie Fellow, University of Edinburgh; this allowed him to live for 3 years in the Philippines northern tropical rainforest with Atta hunter-gatherers, to write his PhD on their politics and rituals .Academically, he became, at FCSH, Professor of Anthropology, then Theory and History of Ideas, and then also Political Studies. He was made a Professor honoris causa in History, by and at the University of Bucharest, Romania.
He is a Tenured Full Professor (beginning in 1999-2000, now retired, since late 2022) of the NOVA School of Law, UNL of the Instituto Universitário Militar (IUM), Ministério da Defesa, where he for 22 years was the professor responsible for Geopolitics, and at the Instituto Superior de Ciências Policiais e Segurança Interna (ISCPSI), Ministério da Administração Interna, in those two now also retired.
Professionally, among other posts held, he began as first Cultural Counsellor at the Portuguese Embassy in Luanda, Angola, for 5 years. Later, he was President of the Instituto Diplomático, at the Portuguese Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros and Director of Policy Planning of the same Ministry, and President of the General Assembly of the Portuguese Society of International Law (SPDI), in Lisbon.
He is the author of twenty one books and over one hundred and thirty articles, and a member of over twenty scientific societies, both in Portugal and abroad. He carried out intensive fieldwork in the Philippines, in Angola, São Tomé e Príncipe, Cape Verde, and East-Timor. His work has been published in 15 countries and in 12 languages, and he has given papers and/or organized courses in 43 countries.
My Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-3312
Estudou Administração Política no Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (ISCSP), Antropologia Social na London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), e na École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), em Paris. Doutorou-se em Antropologia Social e Cultural na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (FCSH), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, onde esteve de 1990 até 1999. Agregou-se em Direito na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa (NSL, UNL) em 2005.
Recebeu uma bolsa de longa duração da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, outra do University College, London (UCL) a Mary Scharlieb Scholarship, outra ainda do British Museum (Museum of Mankind) e mais de meia dúzia de outras ao longo dos anos. Foi eleito Ivor Evans Fellow, University of Cambridge e também Tweedie Fellow, University of Edinburgh; o que lhe permitiu passar 3 anos na floresta tropical húmida no norte das Filipinas, onde viveu com caçadores-recoletores Atta, sobre cujos ritos e política redigiu o seu Doutoramento. Foi nomeado Professor honoris causa em História, pela Universidade de Bucareste, na Roménia.
É Professor Catedrático (jubilado em finais de 2022), de nomeação definitiva, da NSL, UNL, na qual esteve desde 1999 e até 2022, do Instituto Universitário Militar (IUM), Ministério da Defesa, onde foi durante 22 anos o professor responsável pela Geopolítica, e do Instituto de Ciências Policiais e Segurança Interna (ISCPSI), Ministério da Administração Interna, também jubilado nestas duas desde 2022.
Profissionalmente, entre outras posições, foi o Primeiro Conselheiro Cultural da Embaixada Portuguesa, em Luanda, Angola, depois Presidente do Instituto Diplomático, no Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros e Director de Policy Planning do mesmo Ministério, e Presidente da Assembleia Geral da Sociedade Portuguesa de Direito Internacional (SPDI), em Lisboa.
É autor de vinte e um livros e mais de cento e trinta artigos e membro de mais de uma vintena de Sociedades científicas, cá e no estrangeiro. Fez trabalho intensivo de terreno nas Filipinas, em Angola, São Tomé e Príncipe, Cabo Verde, e Timor-Leste. Os seus estudos foram publicados em 15 países e 12 línguas, e fez conferências e/ou organizou cursos em 43 países.
O meu Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-3312
Supervisors: James Woodburn, Maurice Bloch, Georges Condominas, Maurice Godelier, and Jill Reany Dias
Studied Government at the Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (ISCSP), Social Anthropology at The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), and at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), in Paris. He was awarded a summa cum laude Doctorate in Social and Cultural Anthropology by the Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (FCSH), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, where he was from 1990 to 1999, and his Agrégation in Law at the NOVA School of Law (NSL, UNL) in 2005..
Received a Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation longterm scholarship, a University College, London (UCL) Mary Scharlieb Scholarship, another from The British Museum (Museum of Mankind), and more than half a dozen others throughout the years. Was elected Ivor Evans Fellow, University of Cambridge, and also Tweedie Fellow, University of Edinburgh; this allowed him to live for 3 years in the Philippines northern tropical rainforest with Atta hunter-gatherers, to write his PhD on their politics and rituals .Academically, he became, at FCSH, Professor of Anthropology, then Theory and History of Ideas, and then also Political Studies. He was made a Professor honoris causa in History, by and at the University of Bucharest, Romania.
He is a Tenured Full Professor (beginning in 1999-2000, now retired, since late 2022) of the NOVA School of Law, UNL of the Instituto Universitário Militar (IUM), Ministério da Defesa, where he for 22 years was the professor responsible for Geopolitics, and at the Instituto Superior de Ciências Policiais e Segurança Interna (ISCPSI), Ministério da Administração Interna, in those two now also retired.
Professionally, among other posts held, he began as first Cultural Counsellor at the Portuguese Embassy in Luanda, Angola, for 5 years. Later, he was President of the Instituto Diplomático, at the Portuguese Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros and Director of Policy Planning of the same Ministry, and President of the General Assembly of the Portuguese Society of International Law (SPDI), in Lisbon.
He is the author of twenty one books and over one hundred and thirty articles, and a member of over twenty scientific societies, both in Portugal and abroad. He carried out intensive fieldwork in the Philippines, in Angola, São Tomé e Príncipe, Cape Verde, and East-Timor. His work has been published in 15 countries and in 12 languages, and he has given papers and/or organized courses in 43 countries.
My Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-3312
Estudou Administração Política no Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (ISCSP), Antropologia Social na London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), e na École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), em Paris. Doutorou-se em Antropologia Social e Cultural na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (FCSH), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, onde esteve de 1990 até 1999. Agregou-se em Direito na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa (NSL, UNL) em 2005.
Recebeu uma bolsa de longa duração da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, outra do University College, London (UCL) a Mary Scharlieb Scholarship, outra ainda do British Museum (Museum of Mankind) e mais de meia dúzia de outras ao longo dos anos. Foi eleito Ivor Evans Fellow, University of Cambridge e também Tweedie Fellow, University of Edinburgh; o que lhe permitiu passar 3 anos na floresta tropical húmida no norte das Filipinas, onde viveu com caçadores-recoletores Atta, sobre cujos ritos e política redigiu o seu Doutoramento. Foi nomeado Professor honoris causa em História, pela Universidade de Bucareste, na Roménia.
É Professor Catedrático (jubilado em finais de 2022), de nomeação definitiva, da NSL, UNL, na qual esteve desde 1999 e até 2022, do Instituto Universitário Militar (IUM), Ministério da Defesa, onde foi durante 22 anos o professor responsável pela Geopolítica, e do Instituto de Ciências Policiais e Segurança Interna (ISCPSI), Ministério da Administração Interna, também jubilado nestas duas desde 2022.
Profissionalmente, entre outras posições, foi o Primeiro Conselheiro Cultural da Embaixada Portuguesa, em Luanda, Angola, depois Presidente do Instituto Diplomático, no Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros e Director de Policy Planning do mesmo Ministério, e Presidente da Assembleia Geral da Sociedade Portuguesa de Direito Internacional (SPDI), em Lisboa.
É autor de vinte e um livros e mais de cento e trinta artigos e membro de mais de uma vintena de Sociedades científicas, cá e no estrangeiro. Fez trabalho intensivo de terreno nas Filipinas, em Angola, São Tomé e Príncipe, Cabo Verde, e Timor-Leste. Os seus estudos foram publicados em 15 países e 12 línguas, e fez conferências e/ou organizou cursos em 43 países.
O meu Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-3312
Supervisors: James Woodburn, Maurice Bloch, Georges Condominas, Maurice Godelier, and Jill Reany Dias
less
InterestsView All (1575)
Uploads
Videos
some of my Papers & Books
Cascais, Centro Cultural de Cascais, 26 de junho, 2024
Dos Desafios Estratégicos Actuais
Armando Marques Guedes
Miguel Miranda
Jaime Ferreira da Silva
Moderador: Gonçalo Magalhães Colaço
click on the link for both image and sound
Neste episódio o público encontrará uma entrevista ao Professor Doutor Armando Marques Guedes, Professor Catedrático Jubilado da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, onde lecionou, entre muitas disciplinas, as de Antropologia Jurídica e Direitos Africanos. A entrevista explora conceitos como os de pluralidade jurídica, pluralismo jurídico e hibridização jurídica e sua aplicação na análise de sociedades pós-coloniais. Abordando os exemplos da Nigéria e do Quénia, o Prof. nos explica como estas diferentes formas de não uniformização jurídica se distinguem. De seguida, explicando a centralidade que o conceito de "regra do reconhecimento" tem na análise destes fenómenos, o Prof. aborda o fenómeno de forum shopping e outras situações típicas em contextos de acentuado pluralismo jurídico. Em seguida, o Professor introduz o seu conceito de “hibridização jurídica”, apresentando três casos de estudo que seguiu de perto. O primeiro sobre como o imaginário jurídico são-tomense se baseia em formas híbridas de entender o poder, a sua legitimidade e terminologia, típicas de sociedades de plantação; o segundo sobre os conflitos que resultaram da incompatibilidade entre as regras de reconhecimento no campo de refugiados do Casseque 3, no planalto do Huambo, em Angola; e o terceiro sobre acusações de prática de feitiçaria que recentemente tiveram lugar na província do Cuando Cubango, Angola.
In early 2007, Professor Adriano Moreira, then President of the Academia das Ciências, asked me if I would "actualize" a book he had written in the mid-70s of last century, which he wrote and published in Brazil, after self-exiling there. I told him that I did not want to touch what I considered to be his best book -- which he had entitled A Comunidade Internacional em Mudança, a series of lectures he had rather carefully put together and delivered to his post-graduate Brazilian students and then had published in the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Not wanting to say no to his request and simply refuse, I carefully told him that I felt uncomfortable with the idea of touching his best book. Instead, I proposed the following: I would be happy to write a long text, a sort of an overview of his best book and use the opportunity to frame it within the scope of his many seminars, articles and papers on International Politics. To my great relief, he promptly agreed.
A couple of weeks later I called and joined him at the Academy of Sciences, and handed him the circa 30 pages that I had written about his book and about my take on his view of international history. He was pleased with my speed in delivering the freshly written text and, after carefully reading it, he became rather emotional, mumbling "I do not know what to say...". I, too, did not know how to respond, so I just cracked a joke and we both laughed, with an obvious mutual relief.
A couple of months later, as soon as all was printed and ready to go in a series I directed at Almedina, the then top legal editing house in Portugal, we launched the book together at the Society de Geografia, to a full room, in the grandiose Sala de Portugal. A few weeks later, he asked if I would repeat and replay, with him, a second book launch, in another venue, at the Instituto da Defesa Nacional (IDN). I, of course, gladly agreed. We faced, again, a full room in its main amphitheater, really fully packed.
After, when he accompanied me home, I was sad as, in the loneliness of a private conversation, he told me he was ill and feared dying soon -- subtly insisting that he needed to go out with a bang. He was entering his 90s, and did not feel well, he explained to me. A year or two later he did somewhat recover, however, and merrily continued working for a full decade.
Back to his book. A third launch took place at his beckoning, at the very large and wonderful Instituto de Altos Estudos Militares, where we then both taught. Again, that launch too was a success. Later, and for quite a few years, we sat side by side at the Scientific Council of IESM, as the Institute was awarded a University status, involving all three branches of the military and the National Guard. A firm, if cautious, mutual respect had been consolidated. All went well, I mused, as things wrapped up, in which I added a eulogy. He was pleased as he held my hand for a couple of minutes.
In a large variety of venues we spun joint round-tables and conferences in the following decade. He had turned from international to domestic politics, in which he became President of CDS, a basically Christian Democratic Party. I never wanted to have any sort of a party, albeit I regularly voted (and still do) for Social Democracy. Political issues were never discussed between us two. With one exception, as once we were both invited by his Party’s Youth wing, an event attended by many party elders. That was in early 2017 and the topic with the then budding Donald Trump presidency of the USA. He, of spoke first, for forty minutes or so, heavily critical of Trump — Adriano Moreira loved the UN, and felt very comfortable with both NATO and the EU: all institutions despised by Trump. I spoke second, also for some forty minutes. As he arrived from the rostrum and sat down beside me, not realizing he had his microphone open on our table he told me: “your turn, now. Hit them hard, demolish Trump and his positions. I do not want people of my Party to like Trump. You are more up to date than I am, so smash him down: the guy is a monster!”. I got up smiling and complied, as I felt the same about the then US President — always claiming that I strongly supported NATO, the EU, and the UN, and relentlessly criticizing Trump’s postures in general, while focusing mostly on the details of his disparaging speech.as he was “enthroned”. As a duo, it worked: as I was driven home from the talks venue by the two heads of the Youth Wing of Adriano’s Party I was told we had both managed to switch the opinion of our audience — from 80% Trump supporters to 80% anti-Trumpists. A feat that, in a phone call the following day, delighted Adriano Moreira who, albeit somewhat truculent, was a cosmopolitan humanist with, to my mind, strange hues and a nonlinear political and personal path.
Adriano then disappeared, for a couple of years or more in which, weakened and worried he stayed home, and finally died of old age, following a series of health complications.
He was precisely 100 years old when he left us, in 2022.
Cascais, Centro Cultural de Cascais, 26 de junho, 2024
Dos Desafios Estratégicos Actuais
Armando Marques Guedes
Miguel Miranda
Jaime Ferreira da Silva
Moderador: Gonçalo Magalhães Colaço
click on the link for both image and sound
Neste episódio o público encontrará uma entrevista ao Professor Doutor Armando Marques Guedes, Professor Catedrático Jubilado da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, onde lecionou, entre muitas disciplinas, as de Antropologia Jurídica e Direitos Africanos. A entrevista explora conceitos como os de pluralidade jurídica, pluralismo jurídico e hibridização jurídica e sua aplicação na análise de sociedades pós-coloniais. Abordando os exemplos da Nigéria e do Quénia, o Prof. nos explica como estas diferentes formas de não uniformização jurídica se distinguem. De seguida, explicando a centralidade que o conceito de "regra do reconhecimento" tem na análise destes fenómenos, o Prof. aborda o fenómeno de forum shopping e outras situações típicas em contextos de acentuado pluralismo jurídico. Em seguida, o Professor introduz o seu conceito de “hibridização jurídica”, apresentando três casos de estudo que seguiu de perto. O primeiro sobre como o imaginário jurídico são-tomense se baseia em formas híbridas de entender o poder, a sua legitimidade e terminologia, típicas de sociedades de plantação; o segundo sobre os conflitos que resultaram da incompatibilidade entre as regras de reconhecimento no campo de refugiados do Casseque 3, no planalto do Huambo, em Angola; e o terceiro sobre acusações de prática de feitiçaria que recentemente tiveram lugar na província do Cuando Cubango, Angola.
In early 2007, Professor Adriano Moreira, then President of the Academia das Ciências, asked me if I would "actualize" a book he had written in the mid-70s of last century, which he wrote and published in Brazil, after self-exiling there. I told him that I did not want to touch what I considered to be his best book -- which he had entitled A Comunidade Internacional em Mudança, a series of lectures he had rather carefully put together and delivered to his post-graduate Brazilian students and then had published in the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Not wanting to say no to his request and simply refuse, I carefully told him that I felt uncomfortable with the idea of touching his best book. Instead, I proposed the following: I would be happy to write a long text, a sort of an overview of his best book and use the opportunity to frame it within the scope of his many seminars, articles and papers on International Politics. To my great relief, he promptly agreed.
A couple of weeks later I called and joined him at the Academy of Sciences, and handed him the circa 30 pages that I had written about his book and about my take on his view of international history. He was pleased with my speed in delivering the freshly written text and, after carefully reading it, he became rather emotional, mumbling "I do not know what to say...". I, too, did not know how to respond, so I just cracked a joke and we both laughed, with an obvious mutual relief.
A couple of months later, as soon as all was printed and ready to go in a series I directed at Almedina, the then top legal editing house in Portugal, we launched the book together at the Society de Geografia, to a full room, in the grandiose Sala de Portugal. A few weeks later, he asked if I would repeat and replay, with him, a second book launch, in another venue, at the Instituto da Defesa Nacional (IDN). I, of course, gladly agreed. We faced, again, a full room in its main amphitheater, really fully packed.
After, when he accompanied me home, I was sad as, in the loneliness of a private conversation, he told me he was ill and feared dying soon -- subtly insisting that he needed to go out with a bang. He was entering his 90s, and did not feel well, he explained to me. A year or two later he did somewhat recover, however, and merrily continued working for a full decade.
Back to his book. A third launch took place at his beckoning, at the very large and wonderful Instituto de Altos Estudos Militares, where we then both taught. Again, that launch too was a success. Later, and for quite a few years, we sat side by side at the Scientific Council of IESM, as the Institute was awarded a University status, involving all three branches of the military and the National Guard. A firm, if cautious, mutual respect had been consolidated. All went well, I mused, as things wrapped up, in which I added a eulogy. He was pleased as he held my hand for a couple of minutes.
In a large variety of venues we spun joint round-tables and conferences in the following decade. He had turned from international to domestic politics, in which he became President of CDS, a basically Christian Democratic Party. I never wanted to have any sort of a party, albeit I regularly voted (and still do) for Social Democracy. Political issues were never discussed between us two. With one exception, as once we were both invited by his Party’s Youth wing, an event attended by many party elders. That was in early 2017 and the topic with the then budding Donald Trump presidency of the USA. He, of spoke first, for forty minutes or so, heavily critical of Trump — Adriano Moreira loved the UN, and felt very comfortable with both NATO and the EU: all institutions despised by Trump. I spoke second, also for some forty minutes. As he arrived from the rostrum and sat down beside me, not realizing he had his microphone open on our table he told me: “your turn, now. Hit them hard, demolish Trump and his positions. I do not want people of my Party to like Trump. You are more up to date than I am, so smash him down: the guy is a monster!”. I got up smiling and complied, as I felt the same about the then US President — always claiming that I strongly supported NATO, the EU, and the UN, and relentlessly criticizing Trump’s postures in general, while focusing mostly on the details of his disparaging speech.as he was “enthroned”. As a duo, it worked: as I was driven home from the talks venue by the two heads of the Youth Wing of Adriano’s Party I was told we had both managed to switch the opinion of our audience — from 80% Trump supporters to 80% anti-Trumpists. A feat that, in a phone call the following day, delighted Adriano Moreira who, albeit somewhat truculent, was a cosmopolitan humanist with, to my mind, strange hues and a nonlinear political and personal path.
Adriano then disappeared, for a couple of years or more in which, weakened and worried he stayed home, and finally died of old age, following a series of health complications.
He was precisely 100 years old when he left us, in 2022.
Here is the link to it:
https://www.rfi.fr/pt/mundo/20150806-russia-sobe-parada-da-escalada-militar-no-artico
The key questions asked by the authors in this book are: to what extent is there an emerging regionalism in the Black Sea area? Is the Black Sea a region? What are the common interests shared by the former USSR states, the three EU member states neighboring the Black Sea - Bulgaria, Greece and Romania, and a NATO country - Turkey? Are the fault-lines dividing them more pervasive than the incentives for cooperation? Can we speak of a shared identity?
The first part of the book places the Black Sea problematique in a wider historical and spatial context. The authors then take a closer look at the region and examine further the structure of the Black Sea area. They offer a perspective on smaller actors with great ambitions, such as Azerbaijan and Romania, and go on to make a comparison between the emerging regionalism in the Black Sea area and regionalisms in other parts of the world.
Contents: Introduction, Ruxandra Ivan; Part I Identities, Space and History: Fluid histories: culture, community, and the longue durée of the Black Sea world, Alexander A. Bauer and Owen P. Doonan; Two axes, three seas: a geopolitical assessment of the wider Black Sea area, Nicolas Bárdos-Féltoronyi. Part II Structural Evolutions after the Cold War: Black Sea Cooperation and the Great Powers: The Black Sea area within the international system: the struggle for influence between the United States and Russia, Baptiste Chatré and Stéphane Delory; Energy politics in the Black Sea region, Radu Dudau and Armando Marques Guedes; Normative narratives of EU foreign policy in the Black Sea region, Cristian Nitoiu; The Russian factor in the wider Black Sea region: inconclusive status quo or a neo-imperial strategy?, Octavian Milevschi. Part III Regionalism in National Perspectives: New regionalization for a new regional leader? The role of Azerbaijan in the southern Caucasus, Samuel Lussac; Black Sea regional leadership in Romanian foreign policy discourse, Ruxandra Ivan. Part IV A Regionalism like No Other? The Black Sea in Comparative Perspective: Regionalism at the margins: East Central European and Black Sea regional cooperation initiatives in comparative perspective, Luciana Alexandra Ghica; A comparison of Caribbean and Black Sea regionalisms, Caterina Preda; Index.About the Editor: Ruxandra Ivan is a Lecturer at the University of Bucharest, Fellow, Romanian Academy, Romania and Associate Researcher, Université Libre de Bruxelles, BelgiumReviews: 'This is an exceptionally broad-ranging account of the significance of the Black Sea region. It covers everything from ancient history to comparative perspectives in the modern world, yet its clear focus on the nature of regionalism gives the work both coherence and relevance for the study of politics and international relations as a whole.'
Karen Henderson, University of Leicester, UK
'A valuable contribution to the literature on the international politics of the Black Sea region. The chapters in this book provide a comprehensive overview of the divergent positions of the different actors in the Black Sea region…an excellent starting place for anyone wanting to understand the complexities and contradictions of Black Sea regionalism in the twenty-first century.'
Andrew Cottey, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
'At a crossroad between the former Soviet Union Southern Republics and the EU Eastern member states and Turkey, the Black Sea region is a controversial reality and remains underdeveloped and understudied. As such, Ruxandra's book provides a welcomed coherent collection of substantial chapters comparatively addressing the history, structure, and policies of this region. Both the multiple endogenous and exogenous factors of regional cooperation and conflict, notably US, EU and Russia, are taken into consideration and critically evaluated. The result is a well-focused and insightful contribution to the knowledge of progresses and shortcomings of a relevant part of regionalist comparative studies.'
Mario Telo, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, and Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences
'This is a welcome and excellent addition to the literature on regionalism. An interdisciplinary team of scholars cover various aspects of Black Sea area regionalism and its limitations. Some chapters in this informative book also give valuable comparative perspectives that can contribute to conceptual and theoretical advances in regionalism studies.'
Finn Laursen, European Union Centre of Excellence, Dalhousie University, Canada
CNN, 8 de julho, 2023.
CNN,
Isidro Morais Pereira e Armando Marques Guedes
https://cnnportugal.iol.pt/videos/russos-sao-o-vassalo-da-china-e-posicoes-dos-dois-paises-vao-colidir/644d85dc0cf2665294e15669
Armando Marques Guedes e Isidro Morais Pereira
27 de Abril de 2022
RDP 1
O regresso da política eda diplomacia à invasão da Ucrânia pela Federação Russa
Armando Marques Guedes, Isidro Morais Pereira
CNN, 15 de Julho, 2023
28 de Maio de 2014
A Ucrânia e a anexação de Crimeia em 2014
Editorial Reviews
Review
Israeli Prisoner of War Policies is a rare example of both conceptual clarity and formidable innovation. Bligh grapples with a difficult and understudied theme. The book is not only rich in data embedded and brought together in an elegant and new analytical framework; he does it in a giant leap that will eventually give rise, one suspects, to a theory that stands somewhere in the intersection of military issues, legal constructs, ethical stances, and the political, diplomatic, financial, and economic challenges relating to POWs of and in Israel. An obscure theme becomes almost transparent in his able hands. A must-read text. -- Armando Marques Guedes, Nova Law School and Portuguese Joint Command and Staff College
About the Author
Alexander Bligh is chief scientist at the Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, Israel.
Looking back at it, I deem the book as still pertinent, since my 2007 prospective speculations did and continues, now, in 2024, unfortunately, to continue as foreseen.