Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
interface en français
Cette page du projet dans d’autres langues :
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Skip to current candidates Aller à:

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure

[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image

[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.

Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer

Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition

[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote

[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} ( Support),
  • {{Contre}} ( Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} ( Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} ( Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles

[edit]

Règles générales

[edit]
  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion

[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations

[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} ( Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire

[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste

[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours

[edit]
[edit]

File:IceCube Neutrino Observatory in 2023 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:28:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

IceCube Neutrino Observatory in 2023

File:Marilyn Monroe photo pose Seven Year Itch.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marilyn Monroe while filming The Seven Year Itch on the streets of New York

File:Monasterio de Ciuflea, Chisináu, Moldavia, 2023-11-03, DD 06-08 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 07:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Ciuflea monastery, Chișinău, Moldova.

File:Townsend's Chipmunk 9424vv.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 04:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Townsend's Chipmunk on a branch

File:Monarch caterpillar (23229).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 13:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monarch butterfly caterpillar on a milkweed plant

File:Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) 27-08-2024 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 04:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Spa massage parlor in Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 02:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spa massage parlor in Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos

File:Wieskirche 18.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 13:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling painting in the nave, Wieskirche, Steingaden, Bavaria, Germany

File:Alucita hexadactyla 02 (js), Lodz (Poland).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 10:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alucita hexadactyla Lodz (Poland)
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: poor quality level -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron in Plumb Beach marsh (12973p).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 22:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron in a saltmarsh

File:Bubo September 2014-5a.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 18:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European eagle-owl

File:Huppe fasciée Lac de Tunis.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:33:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurasian hoopoe in the south lake of Tunis

File:Ips typographus (female).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:00:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus)

File:Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 12:01:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo
  •  Oppose Good documentation image but midday sun (13:28 according to the exif) coming from left side (according to the orientation of the shadows), creating a dull light. This is not something you can change afterwards. My eyes are caught by the wastes and litter in the water, and look for something more exciting to compensate. Unfortunately the houses are not colorful (like in Manarola for example), and seem quite ordinary with the uniform red of their standard bricks. Slightly blurry foreground (perhaps fixable with AI tools). I think Commons has many photos of this kind, featuring banal architecture and taken in the middle of the day. Perhaps at sunrise, sunset, golden hour, blue hour, or under a special sky, a stormy weather for example, or colorful clouds, the subject would appear more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I am fine with it. Its slum, aka mess, Manarola is Lux city. Midday sometime help to avoid shadow, unless godlen hours with sun behind. Foreground is not so sharp but if you cut it some info would be lost, like chanel and drying on balcony. --Mile (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 10:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support For finding a composition that works in a chaotic urban landscape worth capturing. — Rhododendrites talk |  14:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mile, Rhododendrites, your observations are acute and shareable. Thank you Wilfredor for your commitmentː  Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Terraglo67, although the photo does not show the reality of extreme poverty, nor the dangers associated with being in this environment, such as the insecurity faced by visitors and residents, taking this photo was not easy. The insecurity in these places is high, and I have already experienced being threatened with a gun in a favela. On this occasion, thank God, it didn’t happen, but it was a quick shot: I saw the place, had a few minutes, took the photo, and left calmly. Unlike photographing a tourist destination or a European landscape, this image carries a complex background full of social, economic, and personal factors that make it much more than just a simple capture. Wilfredor (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Agree with Basile’s statements, but the subject (a slum) relativizes our criticism; e.g., waste and litter in the water (which are normally a deficit) are an integral part of this photo. And Rhododendrites is right that the composition makes the photo special. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Saint Sava (Crkva Svetog Save, Beograd).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 09:41:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Monasterio de Căpriana, Căpriana, Moldavia, 2023-11-02, DD 64-66 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 08:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova

File:Milano - Torre del Filarete - 2024-09-02 21-41-46 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 20:05:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Filarete tower, Milan (Italy).

File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - Tipiche imbarcazioni - 2024-09-02 20-33-08 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 19:05:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Typical boats in Cesenatico, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

File:D-6-78-181-61 Ehemalige Schäferei Birnfeld.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 15:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former sheep farm in Birnfeld

File:Maison de Castel Meur (Plougrescant).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 13:52:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment Three times the cars were present and no more sea for the reflection. Gzen92 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Havilland DH.98 Mosquito B Mk IV Series 2 (restoration).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 12:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

De Havilland Mosquito
  • Thank you, Chris! And sorry for not pinging you as the nominator – I wanted to ping you and Yann (because of a recent discussion about the “Historical” galleries), but somehow made a mistake and forgot your name. – Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150115 SB Yemen IMG 8130.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 06:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Cruiseschip FM217 Croisi Europe Strasbourg f, MS Victor Hugo. 15-07-2024. (actm.).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 04:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose  Weak oppose Unexceptional light and sky, sorry. Standard industrial boat. Boring background and foreground with too much flat water and dull sky. Also I agree with BigDom about the washed out colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved, better colors. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral The image is good now. Unfortunately, noise came out in the shadowed parts of the ship and in the sky. I'm sorry, but I think this (fixable?) issue is objectively too evident at the moment. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Putin on 2010 fires in Nizhny Novgorod Oblast 14.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 22:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Verkhanyaya Vereya

File:James Gillray The King of Brobdingnag and Gulliver.–Vide. Swift's Gulliver- Voyage to Brobdingnag The Metropolitan Museum of Art edit.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 18:40:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

King Brobdingnag and Gulliver

File:Litoměřice Sv Štěpán.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 17:24:51
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info The picture was certainly once a good, outstanding photo in the 2000s, but times change and this is especially true for this photo. Today it wouldn't even be a QI. The resolution is low and yet the image appears blurred. There are various image blurs and image errors and it is also tilted. What annoys me the most is the cropping of the houses at the bottom of the picture - to me it looks arbitrary. (Original nomination)
  •  Delist -- Fonzoyo (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist - Excellent for the age, but I don't think it meets current standards.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It would not be promoted today, but for 2008, sixteen years ago, it is a very standard quality. As the procedure for delisting is manual and long, I can't imagine nominating all the FPs promoted at this period for the reason they are not so good in 2024's. If you sharpen this picture with Topaz AI for example, it would be fine. Acceptable composition and light in my opinion.
Look at the archives, the picture that was promoted just after this one by chronological order, is File:Lunar Crepuscular Rays 2.jpg, which is much worse, so... good luck to find them all :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Unless there’s a better photo with similar features, I would agree to delist it. However, the factor of time also plays a role. Unless we had a time machine to see how the place looked back then, I don’t think anyone can reasonably delist photos like this. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Light and composition are fine. The technical quality … well, is solid for the time of its creation. Digital photography – and especially digital cameras and lenses which are in the reach of Commons users – has come a long way since the 2000s. I don’t think we should replace our FPs repeatedly like a snake sheds its skin; let’s sort out the worst which were not great even in their time, and keep the rest which can thus serve also as a vivid history of respectable digital photography. – Aristeas (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As an author of image firstly. But also there exist very great number ot Wikipedia pages, on them this image is presented for long time without any problems. -- Karelj 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist Even back then, some reviewers cited technical deficiencies that are even more serious today. --Msb (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Aristeas and Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:047 Kirk's dik-dik in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 16:09:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kirk's dik-dik in the Serengeti National Park

File:Tony Tornado e Sílvio Santos restored.tif

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 13:49:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

JPEG version

[edit]

File:Gyedong-gil street with climbing plants at golden hour in Seoul South Korea.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gyedong-gil street with climbing plants at golden hour in Seoul South Korea

File:Close wing Basking of Athyma perius (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Sergeant (4) WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 04:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing Basking of Athyma perius (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Sergeant
Struck vote until clarified -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Strong oppose I thought its technical quality is good since it is a QI. Now that its been revealed to have been digitally manipulated to deceive viewers, this should definitely not be a featured picture. Maybe its QI should also be revoked. --Zzzs (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Agree with the discussion below that the background apparently has been replaced. We could allow the cut-out, but in any case such a substantial edit must (i) be explained and (ii) done in the best possible way – right now there are some rough edges and (at the bottom) some strange pixels which may be remnants of the original background. – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, part of the wing is floating in green. Definite cut out. Struck my support - still great, but the cutout should be noted (and is a bit rough).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - @Charlesjsharp: , so you have asked the uploader to respond at 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC) and started rallying everyone at 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC) ans asked for withdrawal of nomination at 20:54, 5 September 2024, citing that they have not responded, which is less than 24 hours time for them. Isn't it too much to expect from volunteers from global south countries to respond then and there? I hope you understand that, people can have their own real life problems to deal with and not everyone might be in a super privileged position to respond in volunteer capacity on an emergency basis as and when asked. Personally, I don't have any issues if the FP nomination is rejected on technical grounds and if everyone changes the vote from support to reject but rallying and targeting without giving ample time to respond and not assuming good faith towards the editors, who have been contributing to Wikimedia sites in a significant way, can very well be demotivating to many people. Unlike you, I am not pinging anyone, who voted here, without any kind of expectation for them to change their votes or their minds, but I simply hope that everyone can at least assume good faith towards the uploader and provide him sufficient time to respond. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 20:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arc-eye hawkfish (Paracirrhites arcatus), Zanzibar, Tanzania
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cirrhitidae (Hawkfishes)

File:Полярное сияние на Чукотке.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 19:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Blick vom Pinnisjoch zu den Tribulaunen II.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 10:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tribulaun Mountains in the Stubai Alps, seen from the Pinnisjoch

File:Црква „Св. Никола“ - Челопек 5.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 20:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The apse of the 14th-century St. Nicholas Church in the village of Čelopek

File:Agouti In Tulum.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 15:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Agouti foraging in Tulum, MX.

Alternative

[edit]

adjustments made

  •  Info Re-cropped (back to 2:3) and made adjustments in Photoshop to bring shadows up by 5 and highlights down by 5, with a neutral density gradient in the upper right to address concerns about the bright spot.
  •  Comment Now the crop is tight at the right in my opinion. And still not sure about the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 16:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sainte-Victoire Mountain seen from the Bibémus quarry, by Paul Cézanne
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes

File:021 African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 21:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park

File:USS Boulder (LST-1190), USS Mobile (LKA-115), USS Charleston (LKA-113) and USS El Paso (LKA-117) laid up at the Philadelphia Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility, Pennsylvania (USA), 21 October 2017.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 09:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Question I hate to ask this - but I think I botched it the last time I tried. If I upload another version of this image, how do I post it into the nomination? The last time I uploaded an image, it replaced the image nominated. I just want to follow the proper procedure. I have a 4488 x 2988 pixel version I can upload. Sadly, I cannot locate the original .PSD file or the Raw file. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the question, Needsmoreritalin. If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template ====Alternative==== below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: [[File:New version.jpg|480x320px]]. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. It is a pity that the original raw is not available. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help! Luckily I have some old external HDDs and found the original raw file! The image may be a little different because I have new sharpening / denoise tools and the crop might not be exactly the same. It should be close. Worse case I can revert. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Needsmoreritalin: Wonderful, many thanks for your efforts! A huge gain for the level of detail in this great photo :) -- Radomianin (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you too. If it weren't for your comment I wouldn't have gone looking for the file. And I found some other images I haven't seen in years that may help improve some other articles too. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NE Padum Valley Panorama Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 01091.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 04:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from southwest of Padum, Zanskar

File:Imlil village, High Atlas Mountains.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture is of a mountain village called Armed, located in the High Atlas Mountains in Morocco at an altitude of 1800 meters. The nearest city is Marrakesh. Its inhabitants are Berbers, its official language is Amazigh. Its inhabitants retain the ancient Amazigh traditions.

File:Roman art. Sarcophagus with Dionysian procession. Satyrs nad maenads. Detail. Capitoline Museums. Rome. Italy.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 23:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Traquet du désert Bou Hedma.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Desert wheatear (Oenanthe deserti) at Bou Hedma national park
  • Thank you for your sincere and competent assessment on reaction to my vote above. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @El Golli Mohamed, you need to stop revenge voting. Just because someone doesn't agree with one of your images becoming a featured picture does not mean you should revenge vote. They are only criticising the photograph, not the photographer. No one should expect all of their photos to become featured pictures. The community loves your photos, but some don't meet a certain standard. It's not worth being blocked for and losing a significant contributor of FPCs on Commons. This behaviour is unacceptable, and I strongly recommend you stop. Zzzs (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Fox Portrait.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 13:39:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)

File:The Blind leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder Google Art.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 08:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Blind leading the Blind, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder
  • For sure, this file does not reproduce the one painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder. The Louvre says: "La parabole des aveugles, d'après Pieter I Brueghel", The Blind leading the Blind according to, not by, Pieter I Brueghel. Also, at the attribution: School of Pieter I Brueghel, etc. The museum does not say it was painted by Pieter Brueghel the Older. The attribution of the painting in the Google Art Project is wrong, and consequently here. So, description and naming are wrong, for sure. This file reproduce the painting to which this category refers: Category:Parable of the Blind by Pieter Brueghel the Younger. The attribution of the painting to Pieter Brueghel the Younger is presented as dated by the Louvre Museum. So, the name of the file and the name of the category should not refer to Pieter Brueghel the Younger, but to the School of Pieter Brueghel the Older. The author should be considered unknown. Finally, the oldest painting, attributed to Pieter Bruegel the Elder, is the one conserved in Naples. Consequently, this one is a copy, painted by some pupil of him. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, but I don't understand your point. This picture reproduce the same painting to which this category refers, or not? I'm not saying that Brueghel the Younger is the author. It could be a way to distinguish two artworks that are similar: the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (and conserved in Paris), and the one painted by Bruegel the Elder (and conserved in Naples). For now, this file is in the wrong category, it is attributed to the wrong painter, and its title is misleading. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, thanks for your answer. The artwork hanging in the Louvre Museum, that is the one reproduced here, is the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (this does not imply that Brueghel the Younger actually painted it). This category refers to the artwork (once, in my opinion) attributed to Brueghel the Younger. It seems logical to me the conclusion that the category refers to the painting hanging in the Louvre Museum. Instead, you are not excluding that there is another artwork of Brueghel the Younger to which the category may refer. I'm quite sure that is not the case, but ok, let's go on. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly, I don't understand what you want. I changed the credit and the description to match the Louvre description. I created a Wikidata item, and renamed the category. Yann (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 01:59:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Machu Picchu in 1912
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1910-1919


Contestations en cours

[edit]
[edit]

File:IceCube Neutrino Observatory in 2023 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:28:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

IceCube Neutrino Observatory in 2023

File:Marilyn Monroe photo pose Seven Year Itch.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marilyn Monroe while filming The Seven Year Itch on the streets of New York

File:Monasterio de Ciuflea, Chisináu, Moldavia, 2023-11-03, DD 06-08 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 07:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Ciuflea monastery, Chișinău, Moldova.

File:Townsend's Chipmunk 9424vv.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 04:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Townsend's Chipmunk on a branch

File:Monarch caterpillar (23229).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 13:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monarch butterfly caterpillar on a milkweed plant

File:Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) 27-08-2024 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 04:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Spa massage parlor in Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 02:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spa massage parlor in Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos

File:Wieskirche 18.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 13:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling painting in the nave, Wieskirche, Steingaden, Bavaria, Germany

File:Alucita hexadactyla 02 (js), Lodz (Poland).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 10:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alucita hexadactyla Lodz (Poland)
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: poor quality level -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron in Plumb Beach marsh (12973p).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 22:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron in a saltmarsh

File:Bubo September 2014-5a.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 18:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European eagle-owl

File:Huppe fasciée Lac de Tunis.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:33:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurasian hoopoe in the south lake of Tunis

File:Ips typographus (female).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:00:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus)

File:Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 12:01:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo
  •  Oppose Good documentation image but midday sun (13:28 according to the exif) coming from left side (according to the orientation of the shadows), creating a dull light. This is not something you can change afterwards. My eyes are caught by the wastes and litter in the water, and look for something more exciting to compensate. Unfortunately the houses are not colorful (like in Manarola for example), and seem quite ordinary with the uniform red of their standard bricks. Slightly blurry foreground (perhaps fixable with AI tools). I think Commons has many photos of this kind, featuring banal architecture and taken in the middle of the day. Perhaps at sunrise, sunset, golden hour, blue hour, or under a special sky, a stormy weather for example, or colorful clouds, the subject would appear more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I am fine with it. Its slum, aka mess, Manarola is Lux city. Midday sometime help to avoid shadow, unless godlen hours with sun behind. Foreground is not so sharp but if you cut it some info would be lost, like chanel and drying on balcony. --Mile (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 10:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support For finding a composition that works in a chaotic urban landscape worth capturing. — Rhododendrites talk |  14:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mile, Rhododendrites, your observations are acute and shareable. Thank you Wilfredor for your commitmentː  Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Terraglo67, although the photo does not show the reality of extreme poverty, nor the dangers associated with being in this environment, such as the insecurity faced by visitors and residents, taking this photo was not easy. The insecurity in these places is high, and I have already experienced being threatened with a gun in a favela. On this occasion, thank God, it didn’t happen, but it was a quick shot: I saw the place, had a few minutes, took the photo, and left calmly. Unlike photographing a tourist destination or a European landscape, this image carries a complex background full of social, economic, and personal factors that make it much more than just a simple capture. Wilfredor (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Agree with Basile’s statements, but the subject (a slum) relativizes our criticism; e.g., waste and litter in the water (which are normally a deficit) are an integral part of this photo. And Rhododendrites is right that the composition makes the photo special. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Saint Sava (Crkva Svetog Save, Beograd).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 09:41:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Monasterio de Căpriana, Căpriana, Moldavia, 2023-11-02, DD 64-66 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 08:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova

File:Milano - Torre del Filarete - 2024-09-02 21-41-46 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 20:05:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Filarete tower, Milan (Italy).

File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - Tipiche imbarcazioni - 2024-09-02 20-33-08 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 19:05:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Typical boats in Cesenatico, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

File:D-6-78-181-61 Ehemalige Schäferei Birnfeld.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 15:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former sheep farm in Birnfeld

File:Maison de Castel Meur (Plougrescant).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 13:52:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment Three times the cars were present and no more sea for the reflection. Gzen92 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Havilland DH.98 Mosquito B Mk IV Series 2 (restoration).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 12:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

De Havilland Mosquito
  • Thank you, Chris! And sorry for not pinging you as the nominator – I wanted to ping you and Yann (because of a recent discussion about the “Historical” galleries), but somehow made a mistake and forgot your name. – Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150115 SB Yemen IMG 8130.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 06:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Cruiseschip FM217 Croisi Europe Strasbourg f, MS Victor Hugo. 15-07-2024. (actm.).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 04:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose  Weak oppose Unexceptional light and sky, sorry. Standard industrial boat. Boring background and foreground with too much flat water and dull sky. Also I agree with BigDom about the washed out colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved, better colors. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral The image is good now. Unfortunately, noise came out in the shadowed parts of the ship and in the sky. I'm sorry, but I think this (fixable?) issue is objectively too evident at the moment. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Putin on 2010 fires in Nizhny Novgorod Oblast 14.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 22:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Verkhanyaya Vereya

File:James Gillray The King of Brobdingnag and Gulliver.–Vide. Swift's Gulliver- Voyage to Brobdingnag The Metropolitan Museum of Art edit.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 18:40:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

King Brobdingnag and Gulliver

File:Litoměřice Sv Štěpán.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 17:24:51
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info The picture was certainly once a good, outstanding photo in the 2000s, but times change and this is especially true for this photo. Today it wouldn't even be a QI. The resolution is low and yet the image appears blurred. There are various image blurs and image errors and it is also tilted. What annoys me the most is the cropping of the houses at the bottom of the picture - to me it looks arbitrary. (Original nomination)
  •  Delist -- Fonzoyo (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist - Excellent for the age, but I don't think it meets current standards.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It would not be promoted today, but for 2008, sixteen years ago, it is a very standard quality. As the procedure for delisting is manual and long, I can't imagine nominating all the FPs promoted at this period for the reason they are not so good in 2024's. If you sharpen this picture with Topaz AI for example, it would be fine. Acceptable composition and light in my opinion.
Look at the archives, the picture that was promoted just after this one by chronological order, is File:Lunar Crepuscular Rays 2.jpg, which is much worse, so... good luck to find them all :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Unless there’s a better photo with similar features, I would agree to delist it. However, the factor of time also plays a role. Unless we had a time machine to see how the place looked back then, I don’t think anyone can reasonably delist photos like this. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Light and composition are fine. The technical quality … well, is solid for the time of its creation. Digital photography – and especially digital cameras and lenses which are in the reach of Commons users – has come a long way since the 2000s. I don’t think we should replace our FPs repeatedly like a snake sheds its skin; let’s sort out the worst which were not great even in their time, and keep the rest which can thus serve also as a vivid history of respectable digital photography. – Aristeas (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As an author of image firstly. But also there exist very great number ot Wikipedia pages, on them this image is presented for long time without any problems. -- Karelj 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist Even back then, some reviewers cited technical deficiencies that are even more serious today. --Msb (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Aristeas and Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:047 Kirk's dik-dik in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 16:09:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kirk's dik-dik in the Serengeti National Park

File:Tony Tornado e Sílvio Santos restored.tif

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 13:49:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

JPEG version

[edit]

File:Gyedong-gil street with climbing plants at golden hour in Seoul South Korea.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gyedong-gil street with climbing plants at golden hour in Seoul South Korea

File:Close wing Basking of Athyma perius (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Sergeant (4) WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 04:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing Basking of Athyma perius (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Sergeant
Struck vote until clarified -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Strong oppose I thought its technical quality is good since it is a QI. Now that its been revealed to have been digitally manipulated to deceive viewers, this should definitely not be a featured picture. Maybe its QI should also be revoked. --Zzzs (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Agree with the discussion below that the background apparently has been replaced. We could allow the cut-out, but in any case such a substantial edit must (i) be explained and (ii) done in the best possible way – right now there are some rough edges and (at the bottom) some strange pixels which may be remnants of the original background. – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, part of the wing is floating in green. Definite cut out. Struck my support - still great, but the cutout should be noted (and is a bit rough).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - @Charlesjsharp: , so you have asked the uploader to respond at 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC) and started rallying everyone at 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC) ans asked for withdrawal of nomination at 20:54, 5 September 2024, citing that they have not responded, which is less than 24 hours time for them. Isn't it too much to expect from volunteers from global south countries to respond then and there? I hope you understand that, people can have their own real life problems to deal with and not everyone might be in a super privileged position to respond in volunteer capacity on an emergency basis as and when asked. Personally, I don't have any issues if the FP nomination is rejected on technical grounds and if everyone changes the vote from support to reject but rallying and targeting without giving ample time to respond and not assuming good faith towards the editors, who have been contributing to Wikimedia sites in a significant way, can very well be demotivating to many people. Unlike you, I am not pinging anyone, who voted here, without any kind of expectation for them to change their votes or their minds, but I simply hope that everyone can at least assume good faith towards the uploader and provide him sufficient time to respond. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 20:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arc-eye hawkfish (Paracirrhites arcatus), Zanzibar, Tanzania
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cirrhitidae (Hawkfishes)

File:Полярное сияние на Чукотке.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 19:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Blick vom Pinnisjoch zu den Tribulaunen II.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 10:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tribulaun Mountains in the Stubai Alps, seen from the Pinnisjoch

File:Црква „Св. Никола“ - Челопек 5.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 20:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The apse of the 14th-century St. Nicholas Church in the village of Čelopek

File:Agouti In Tulum.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 15:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Agouti foraging in Tulum, MX.

Alternative

[edit]

adjustments made

  •  Info Re-cropped (back to 2:3) and made adjustments in Photoshop to bring shadows up by 5 and highlights down by 5, with a neutral density gradient in the upper right to address concerns about the bright spot.
  •  Comment Now the crop is tight at the right in my opinion. And still not sure about the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 16:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sainte-Victoire Mountain seen from the Bibémus quarry, by Paul Cézanne
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes

File:021 African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 21:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park

File:USS Boulder (LST-1190), USS Mobile (LKA-115), USS Charleston (LKA-113) and USS El Paso (LKA-117) laid up at the Philadelphia Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility, Pennsylvania (USA), 21 October 2017.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 09:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Question I hate to ask this - but I think I botched it the last time I tried. If I upload another version of this image, how do I post it into the nomination? The last time I uploaded an image, it replaced the image nominated. I just want to follow the proper procedure. I have a 4488 x 2988 pixel version I can upload. Sadly, I cannot locate the original .PSD file or the Raw file. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the question, Needsmoreritalin. If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template ====Alternative==== below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: [[File:New version.jpg|480x320px]]. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. It is a pity that the original raw is not available. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help! Luckily I have some old external HDDs and found the original raw file! The image may be a little different because I have new sharpening / denoise tools and the crop might not be exactly the same. It should be close. Worse case I can revert. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Needsmoreritalin: Wonderful, many thanks for your efforts! A huge gain for the level of detail in this great photo :) -- Radomianin (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you too. If it weren't for your comment I wouldn't have gone looking for the file. And I found some other images I haven't seen in years that may help improve some other articles too. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NE Padum Valley Panorama Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 01091.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 04:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from southwest of Padum, Zanskar

File:Imlil village, High Atlas Mountains.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture is of a mountain village called Armed, located in the High Atlas Mountains in Morocco at an altitude of 1800 meters. The nearest city is Marrakesh. Its inhabitants are Berbers, its official language is Amazigh. Its inhabitants retain the ancient Amazigh traditions.

File:Roman art. Sarcophagus with Dionysian procession. Satyrs nad maenads. Detail. Capitoline Museums. Rome. Italy.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 23:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Traquet du désert Bou Hedma.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Desert wheatear (Oenanthe deserti) at Bou Hedma national park
  • Thank you for your sincere and competent assessment on reaction to my vote above. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @El Golli Mohamed, you need to stop revenge voting. Just because someone doesn't agree with one of your images becoming a featured picture does not mean you should revenge vote. They are only criticising the photograph, not the photographer. No one should expect all of their photos to become featured pictures. The community loves your photos, but some don't meet a certain standard. It's not worth being blocked for and losing a significant contributor of FPCs on Commons. This behaviour is unacceptable, and I strongly recommend you stop. Zzzs (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Fox Portrait.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 13:39:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)

File:The Blind leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder Google Art.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 08:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Blind leading the Blind, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder
  • For sure, this file does not reproduce the one painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder. The Louvre says: "La parabole des aveugles, d'après Pieter I Brueghel", The Blind leading the Blind according to, not by, Pieter I Brueghel. Also, at the attribution: School of Pieter I Brueghel, etc. The museum does not say it was painted by Pieter Brueghel the Older. The attribution of the painting in the Google Art Project is wrong, and consequently here. So, description and naming are wrong, for sure. This file reproduce the painting to which this category refers: Category:Parable of the Blind by Pieter Brueghel the Younger. The attribution of the painting to Pieter Brueghel the Younger is presented as dated by the Louvre Museum. So, the name of the file and the name of the category should not refer to Pieter Brueghel the Younger, but to the School of Pieter Brueghel the Older. The author should be considered unknown. Finally, the oldest painting, attributed to Pieter Bruegel the Elder, is the one conserved in Naples. Consequently, this one is a copy, painted by some pupil of him. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, but I don't understand your point. This picture reproduce the same painting to which this category refers, or not? I'm not saying that Brueghel the Younger is the author. It could be a way to distinguish two artworks that are similar: the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (and conserved in Paris), and the one painted by Bruegel the Elder (and conserved in Naples). For now, this file is in the wrong category, it is attributed to the wrong painter, and its title is misleading. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, thanks for your answer. The artwork hanging in the Louvre Museum, that is the one reproduced here, is the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (this does not imply that Brueghel the Younger actually painted it). This category refers to the artwork (once, in my opinion) attributed to Brueghel the Younger. It seems logical to me the conclusion that the category refers to the painting hanging in the Louvre Museum. Instead, you are not excluding that there is another artwork of Brueghel the Younger to which the category may refer. I'm quite sure that is not the case, but ok, let's go on. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly, I don't understand what you want. I changed the credit and the description to match the Louvre description. I created a Wikidata item, and renamed the category. Yann (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 01:59:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Machu Picchu in 1912
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1910-1919


Planning (9e jour après proposition)

[edit]
Wed 28 Aug → Fri 6 Sep
Thu 29 Aug → Sat 7 Sep
Fri 30 Aug → Sun 8 Sep
Sat 31 Aug → Mon 9 Sep
Sun 1 Sep → Tue 10 Sep
Mon 2 Sep → Wed 11 Sep
Tue 3 Sep → Thu 12 Sep
Wed 4 Sep → Fri 13 Sep
Thu 5 Sep → Sat 14 Sep
Fri 6 Sep → Sun 15 Sep
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Propositions_d%27images_remarquables&oldid=572251133"