Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 08:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 03:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info A visual of Maqam Ibrahim (Station of Abraham) in Great Mosque of Mecca, created by معتز توفيق اغبارية - uploaded by معتز توفيق اغبارية - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 18:46:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info Proposed replacement to the chaffinch picture I recently nominated for delisting. More than twice the resolution of the previous FP, much sharper, and with more accurate/less oversaturated colours. IMO the best image of a male chaffinch on Commons. created by Caroline Legg - uploaded by Jirib - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- dama 22 anaya 200.68.168.142 02:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 13:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
- Info created by المصور أنس الحاج - uploaded by Mr. Ibrahem - nominated by Abo Yemen -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Certainly an impressive sight but I'm unconvinced that the resolution is sufficient for FP in 2024, plus the vignetting in the top right corner disturbs me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- well the picture was taken 10 years ago. ill try to remove the vignette tho Abo Yemen✉ 18:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 12:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 12:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 12:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good photo but I'm not convinced the sharpness of this image is equal to the best in category, particularly the out of focus head. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 11:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Italy
- Info Emperor Augustus began building the Tiberius Bridge in 14 AD, and Tiberius finished it in 21 AD. The bridge, today, serves as a pedestrian passage and connects the charming village of San Giuliano (camera location) with the historic center of Rimini. It withstood the bombings of World War II and is one of the most stunning Roman bridges still standing today. C. U. N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Outstanding. Superb light, composition, and image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 11:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Lovely composition and mood, but a bit small for a landscape FP in 2024. Cmao20 (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 05:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
- Info created by StillOrange - uploaded by StillOrange - nominated by StillOrange -- StillOrange (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- StillOrange (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the resolution is inferior than 2 mega pixels -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 14:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport
- Info A visual of a Kashmiri lady on a Shikara (a wooden boat in Dal Lake) with houseboats in the background, created by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - uploaded by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 00:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info The entire Saxony-Coburg-Gotha family and further relatives at Coburg in 1894! From Queen Victoria to the Kaiser Wilhelm II and to the soon-to-become tsar Nicholas II, they are all there. A remarkable little piece of history. I searched for the photo among all with the highest resolution, taking off the yellowish atmosphere to make it even better. / Created by the photographer Eduard Uhlenhuth (1853-1919) - uploaded and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A cool bit of history indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 20:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Russia
- Info created by Alexander Novikov - uploaded by Alexander Novikov - nominated by Alexander Novikov -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 20:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 20:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice. I might brighten it a little bit. Cmao20 (talk) 02:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Some brightness added. Alexander Novikov (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment No wow for me and I think the white balance is wrong (currently too reddish) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Red tone reduced. Alexander Novikov (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. No wow, look dark, and wrong WB. Also disturbing branch at top right
and many spots on the sky-- George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment spots removed, but still ordinal image IMO -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I cleaned dust spots, pic is very nice and light is perfect. Its nice, calming-down photo of bridge. Compo is good too. --Mile (talk) 09:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I not sure that was a dust spots. Perhaps they were birds :-) Alexander Novikov (talk) 09:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Alexander Novikov Не знаю молодец. А можно сразу узнат - сделай фото неба, закрит на ф/22 и посмотри. --Mile (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- The sky is photographed https://disk.yandex.ru/i/FuBJY3VlS1uRPQ Alexander Novikov (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Alexander Novikov Не знаю молодец. А можно сразу узнат - сделай фото неба, закрит на ф/22 и посмотри. --Mile (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 20:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science
- Info created by Alexander von Humboldt - uploaded by Sette-quattro - nominated by Sette-quattro -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting diagram, and high resolution, but we can have a better color balance and contrast: File:Alexander von Humboldt - Diagram of a cross-section of the earth's crust, edit.jpg, trying rolling back paper ageing. Yann (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nice! Actually, I like the original scan, I feel it more 'natural' - or better, close to the source - given the age of the diagram. Sette-quattro (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing historical scientific visualization of the Great Alexander von Humboldt from 1850. Ventolinmono (talk) 22:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quote @User:Yann for the alternative file, an excellent infographic. --LucaLindholm (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 19:48:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info Choir of the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. It was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb as ever. Love the light in this one. Cmao20 (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Possible finalist at WLM Spain. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Leaning to left ?! --Mile (talk) 09:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support But per Mile.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 19:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Muqarnas of the mosque of Sidi Bellahsen built in 1296 during the Zayyanid dynasty. Created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very interesting motif and good image quality but the asymmetry of the composition here does bother me. It feels a little random and disorganised. Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A tripod would have helped. Lack of sharpness in the sides and corners due to shallow DoF. Also agree with Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
- Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a huge file but nice and sharp, + well composed Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There's a halo around the horns -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 10:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info cave painting of The Grand Dieu du Sefar in Tassili n'Ajjer Algeria.
All by me IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 10:02:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Northeastern_Region_(Norðurland_eystra)
- Info Skútuá valley seen from Siglufjörður – all by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I like this photo and the resolution is huge but I am not sure whether I see an outstanding composition. I would like a stronger counterpoint in the foreground, at the moment it feels slightly aimless. Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Houses in the sunlight and low clouds in weightlessness work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 09:39:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
- Info Museum of contemporary art, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool photo, well composed, sharp, atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think there is also potential to be a finalist at WLM in Serbia. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great architectural picture. Shows the overall design of the building which can only be appreciated by a shot like this. Ventolinmono (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would be even more incredible at blue hour. Impressive architecture and exceptional viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 02:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 23:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Coraciidae_(Rollers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Henrysz (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Difficult capture of a bird in flight. Well frozen at high speed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Beautiful bird, excellent background bokeh. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 11:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Brilliant Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 22:20:11
→
- Info In favor of the Adam Cuerden's levels adjusted version. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 22:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace ---SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 20:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of South America
- Info created by Gerard de Jode - uploaded by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Been uploading a few maps myself, and I have to say this one is a beaut. Look at the resolution! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Chris. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support + --Mile (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 20:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info Overview of the Upper Zagedan Valley with the mountain cirque formed by ancient glacial erosion and high-altitude lakes. Zagedan Ridge, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support woah that's impressive. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view and striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Croped horizon. To me File:Zagedan Ridge, Zagedan Valley, Caucasus Mountains.jpg looks superior. --Milseburg (talk) 10:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was actually hesitant about which of these two versions to nominate and after a few minutes of contemplation finally decided to post this one because it felt more immersive and articulated for the cirque and the nearby lakes and rock formations. The other looks more conventional, more typical of how skylines are usually portrayed. But it could also be criticized in relation to this one, because while it has the horizon and distant peaks included, it also has the bottom near field view abruptly cropped out, shifting and dissipating the focus and exposure further away from the cirque into infinity. I don’t think either one of them is much better than the other. --Argenberg (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 13:06:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose FP is "one of the best images on Commons". The image does not have anything that is out of the ordinary. As this bench seems to have some historic interest, you could nominate as a Valued Image. --Tagooty (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light, and the textures in the wood at full size. Quality is v good. And the caption makes it interesting because this is all that's left of the old station as a new station has been built around it. Not immediately stunning but FP on reflection, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Tagooty. Yann (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 12:11:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Sweden
- Info Gustav III's Theatre in Gripsholm Castle. In the 18th century king Gustav III fitted out the exquisite castle theatre in one of the round Renaissance towers of the castle. Today, the theatre is one of Europe's most well-preserved theatres from the 18th century. The theater is very small and an off-center camera position was chosen to focus on the unique stage sets. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, and I like the choice of the off centre composition, it was definitely the best way to show this building because it means we have a proper view of the columns, the steps, and the stage all in one frame. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. The photo shows a spectator’s view of the stage, incl. the beautiful stage set, and at the same time it makes clear that the background is just that, a flat painted stage set. So we have illusion and disillusion in one image. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The mirrors on the left above were your precious allies in this delightful composition. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 12:03:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1980-1989
- Info Members of the National Congress celebrating the promulgation of the Constitution of Brazil, October 5, 1988. Created by Agência Senado from Brasilia, Brazil - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Iconic and historical. -- ★ 12:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is your third active nomination together with this and this. Please withdraw one of them. Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I usually create the ready preview of the nom pages and I was in doubt about which one to post; I accidentally clicked on “publish page”, publishing both. Sorry. ★ 13:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 09:14:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Comment Early in the morning one of OnRail's Stadler Eurodual (bi-modal diesel/electric) locomotives hauls freight train 95902 Åndalsnes - Alnabru on Raumabanen in Norway.
- Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support No one comes close to you at this kind of photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and colours work well together --Tagooty (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Flawless as always. ★ 02:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A fantastic addition to the huge collection :-) Excellent composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support obviously. – Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo is particularly beautiful, colours & shadows together highlights the subject even more. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 22:23:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Abbey of S. Maria del Monte is placed on the Spaziano hill (Emilia-Romagna, Italy). The structure is mostly dating back to the Renaissance, even if the origins of the monastery are millennial. Different painters have overlapped over time, creating an effect of pleasant colorful confusion and amazement. Even marble and stucco are nothing more than painting... Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and well-captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would skip one bottom step and put more above to have saint above with room, but fine image. Just that pink light on Maria statute is strange. --Mile (talk) 09:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 20:32:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
- Info Albrecht Dürer: The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse - uploaded by Nous - nominated by --Thi (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Large file by Google Arts project. -- Thi (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to go wrong with Durer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of one of Dürer’s most impressive woodcuts. – Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 19:52:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality and very striking composition, however the file page needs work, it contains a link to a black and white version of a completely different photograph, plus I think I would like a geotag for a photo like this where it's not clear to me where in the world it is. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment And we need a working gallery link (Places is just a redirect page nowadays); I have set it to Places/Agriculture for now and will add a new “Mexico” subsection to it if this nomination is successful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 13:56:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 13:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 13:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Pretty shot, but seems underexposed/muted. For better or worse, the standard for close-up shots of flowering plants is extraordinarily high for FP. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 04:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info View of the Waddenzee behind the sea dike at Paesens-Moddergat towards Schiermonnikoog (Breakwaters). The Wadden Sea is a unique tidal sea (UNESCO World Heritage) The photo consists of 6 more or less horizontal layers. Sky, mud, breakwaters, water, green and ground.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks "wow" for me. Wolverine XI 09:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Like a flag. Really cool IMO Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Painterly, beautiful and somewhat melancholic scene, with delicate and harmonious pastel colours. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing in its simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The Wow is between the lines, so to speak. The best Wow for me. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The picture is very busy/messy looking towards the bottom and it's unappealing to me Henrysz (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per supporters above. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 01:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance is a tiny bit too yellow for me, I'd make it a bit cooler, but is an artistic choice. Great photo. Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Made just similar today, bridge and trees. --Mile (talk) 17:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Though I do agree that a smidge less yellow may benefit the picture. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful place with beautiful reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 08:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 00:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info The mihrab of the Mosque of Sidi Bellahsen in Tlemcen, built during the Zayyanid dynasty in 1296. Created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool place and good composition outweighs the fact that it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose CA and noise as well as the burnt highlights spoil the image. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Ermell, I appreciate your feedback. I've made improvements by reducing the noise and fixing the chromatic aberration. Riad Salih (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts but I don't think the FP standard will be reached. Sorry. Ermell (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. Is there a possibility for this one? Riad Salih (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts but I don't think the FP standard will be reached. Sorry. Ermell (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Ermell, I appreciate your feedback. I've made improvements by reducing the noise and fixing the chromatic aberration. Riad Salih (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd vote for that one too but I think it could do with having a cooler white balance. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 20:27:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
- Info Super high resolution and great light and composition in this vineyard pic. Created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition works for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well balanced composition indeed and it has that special "Aristeas light" as well --Kritzolina (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile and Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and all of you for your support – I’m glad that you like the photo. – Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 17:19:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Marocco
- Info Arab League Park, Casablanca; حديقة الجامعة العربية، الدار البيضاء. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 17:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support As on your other nomination, I do think you sharpen a little too much, but this time the composition and colours are so stunning that I have to support. Cmao20 (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A convincing and perfect central composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good, but for something that is all about the centered line, the bottom being off-center is a little distracting to me. Probably fixable. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @talk if you mean right-bottom corner, i made some warp, but if you put much, you will be loosing middle line. --Mile (talk) 10:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The strong sharpening makes your photo look like a cheap smartphone shot. I would reduce it. – Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Aristeas My sharpening is same on all others. Maybe my lens are beter. I wont change anything, and you have a vote. --Mile (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, it’s your photo, so keep it to your taste. But I don’t think that the sharpness (resolution) of your lens is the reason because in this photo only the coarse contours are very sharp; if the lens was extremely sharp, one would rather see more fine structures and microcontrast, e.g. on the plants. The combination of strong sharpening of the coarse contours with a rather low level of fine structures (detail resolution) is what makes a photo look like a smartphone shot. – Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 16:50:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Recurvirostra
- Info American avocet (Recurvirostra americana). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 16:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Tight crop at the bottom but acceptable composition for FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty cool. Wolverine XI 09:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 16:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Buteo
- Info Red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). I like the juxtaposition of the bird's expression and the blurred colors/textures in the background. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 16:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meme potential Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Duhh, what? --Zzzs (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support O RLY? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support nature's ruthless killing machine Henrysz (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 11:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines_and_statuettes
- Info Statue of Samvara, the central deity of the Cakrasamvara Tantra (འཁོར་ལོ་བདེ་མཆོག་གི་སྐུ་པར་ཡིན་པ་འདྲ་) tradition of Tibetian Buddhism, in Stakrimo Monastery, Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Samvara is embracing his consort Vajravārāhī in male-female pose. The blue figure of Chakrasamvara has additional heads in orange and green. With his principal hands he grasps Vajravarahi and holds a bell and a thunder bolt, with various icons in other hands. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - I like it, but a couple things give me pause. This feels slightly dark, at least in thumbnail, and there seems to be quite a bit of noise. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Done Thanks for the comments. I've raised the brightness and applied NR. Please see the new version. Preferably view at greater than thumbnail size, as some of the beauty is in the intricate details. Note that curtains cover the few windows in the prayer hall, and it is with lit only with dim lights. The image is shot at ISO 4000. --Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 10:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent action shot, the FP gallery has only static images. --Tagooty (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 10:19:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link: .../Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you.-- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support One day I might still make it to Saint Martin - this pictures makes me want to! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- You’re always welcome. The peaceful calm and the powerful roar of the waves will lead you to another world.-- Rocky Masum (talk) 11:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflection! StillOrange (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition and colours. --Tagooty (talk) 00:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 07:58:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
- Info Aqueduct of Segovia, Spain. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and wow-y composition. I think people might ask for the birds to be cloned out, but I'm not bothered either way. Cmao20 (talk) 15:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. The birds will be gone in a few days --Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view of an interesting construction -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 16:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking perspective. I assume from your comment above that you'll be cloning out the fuzzy birds which detract. --Tagooty (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition feels unbalanced to me, and the light makes the pillars blend together in the distance, giving a flat wall like appearance Henrysz (talk) 00:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The birds wouldn't bother me if they weren't so blurry. I switch to pro after fixing. --Milseburg (talk) 16:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2024 at 06:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info Chapel of Alexander Nevsky in Yaroslavl. Created by User:Елена Нечипоренко - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 06:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 06:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome to FPC (I think this is your first nom). A very good candidate. Sharp, colourful, well composed, lovely reflections. I've changed the gallery, as we have a specific 'religious buildings' gallery for pictures like this. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome to FPC with your second nomination ... or were there earlier ones? --Kritzolina (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I may be wrong but I think it's the first of this user's pictures (s)he has nominated, but other users have nominated two of their pictures (one successfuly, one pending but looks likely to succeed). Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's right. Yesterday, I tried for the first time to figure out how photos get nominated here. Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I may be wrong but I think it's the first of this user's pictures (s)he has nominated, but other users have nominated two of their pictures (one successfuly, one pending but looks likely to succeed). Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light, colours and reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20, Kritzolina & Aristeasː Well done. -- Terragio67 (talk) 12:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 21:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of North America
- Info Published by E. L. Carey & A. Hart, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Famous map of the United States in the shape of an Eagle, from an extremely rare geography book, Rudiments of National Knowledge, presented to the Youth of the United States, and to Enquiring Foreigners. Published by E. L. Carey & A. Hart, Philadelphia, 1833.
- Support Seeing the price asked for the original, it seems rare. I reduced the yellowing of paper. -- Yann (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool map and great quality reproduction Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly an unusual take! It still works somewhat, too, even in the modern map... — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Original color / original version is more faithful and accurate in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Faithful to what? You weren't there when the map was created, so how can you judge? We would need a color picture taken at the time, but photography wasn't invented yet. Yann (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Talking about the original photograph probably taken by a professional photographer. Original colors have certainly been carefully adjusted to be faithful to the original work that was under the eyes at the moment of the picture. Not sure about what you mean with "we would a color picture", but I think an old postcard (as an example) has its own tint that is characteristic of its time. One can try to make the postcard brand new like a 2024 stuff, but this is less accurate than the real state of the old document. Whatever the price it costs, the owner is likely to purchase a yellow map (with orange parts), and not this one with arbitrary (and in my opinion artificial) colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I don't think the scans are adjusted in anyway. The objective there is to sell the maps, not to make nice pictures. They have to be faithful to the documents, so that the clients can choose without seeing the documents themselves. Yann (talk) 11:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, "they have to be faithful to the documents". Which means if you show a white image to the customers and send them a yellow and orange map, there are more chances of complaints and refund requests :-) Showing the reality is usually how it works. And that's also my concern in this case. I would prefer an accurate representation of what it is, rather than of a "nice but unrealistic map" -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Originally, paper was white, not brown. Here is the objective is not to be faithful to the present day document, but to the original one. It seems quite obvious to me, but... Also, you mention esthetics as a criteria. This version is IMO much nicer to look at that the original. Yann (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 18:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Uzbekistan
- Info Great placid mood, colours and reflections. No FPs of this place and would be only our second FP of a non-natural place in Uzbekistan. created by Bgag - uploaded by Bgag - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I fully agree --Kritzolina (talk) 19:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Architecture and mirror image composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 14:01:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
- Info Ten years ago, the line one of the subway show the labor reality of Sao Paulo. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment aren't there some personality rights problems with this image? I would certainly not like if a random photo of me sleeping appeared in ptwiki's main page... RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's a public space and the picture is not focused in a particular person but in the train reality itself. The aim is to portray precisely the precariousness of long, slave-like working days in that city. Wilfredor (talk) 02:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I actually like the picture but do not fully understand the image description. I see seemingly well off and well-dressed, mostly white, members of the middle class commuting home on a relatively modern subway train. Just like everywhere else in the developing world, where the metro and public transport are a smarter, faster and more environmentally friendly choice. I myself use the subway when commuting to my office, not because I have to, but because it is the most rational choice. I would probably look tired if someone took a picture after a long day. But if the purpose is to show slave-like working conditions, the picture doesn't work for me.--ArildV (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For me, this image does not emanate any of the ‘slave-like working days’ or ‘labor reality’ or anything like that. A few people look tired and that’s it. Instead, it actually translates some hidden, underlying vigour and energy, not sure why, maybe because almost all the people there are young, in their early 20s or something. That’s what I feel looking at it before I read titles and descriptions. --Argenberg (talk) 01:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Almost all people in developing countries are younger than in developed countries. Regarding slave labor, when I lived in Brazil I had to take the red line (the most populated line), and it took 3 hours to go and 3 hours to return. File:São Paulo metro, Palmeiras Barrafunda station.jpg Wilfredor (talk) 01:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
File:The main house in Abramtsevo.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:49:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
It feels slightly tilted to me, but I like it and would vote for it if this is fixed.Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)- Thank You! I fixed it Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 06:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link: .../Architecture/Exteriors#Russia. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice --Tmv (talk) 06:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, Great composition.--Rocky Masum (talk) 10:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not tilted now Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful winter mood --Kritzolina (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and mood, nice architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:49:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info Created and uploaded by Jacek Halicki, nominated by Yann. -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Jacek Halicki: If you agree, I can nominate it myself. Yann (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good idea, Yann. I had the same thought. If Jacek agrees, I'll change the gallery link just in case: .../Historical#2020-now. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann Ok, thx. Jacek Halicki (talk) 01:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Jacek Halicki: If you agree, I can nominate it myself. Yann (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I nominate it. Yann (talk) 14:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Yann, I have updated the info regarding the current nominator above. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Again strong image quality but I'm not sure this one has an FP level composition, as important as it is to document this event. Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Agree with Cmao20 about the composition, but this is such a strinking illustration of the flooding – the water running over the bridge instead of below of it – and the collected waste emphasizes another important problem of any flooding that I still want to support this image. – Aristeas (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral leaning to {{O}} per Cmao20. Although documenting, the ugly trash at the right in the water dominates and spoils the effect a bit. Not convinced either by the light and tight framing of the buildings. Interesting angle of view, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- IMO that's an important part of the picture, showing how polluted our environment has become. The pollution is often hidden, but it is revealed in case of disasters. Yann (talk) 04:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Documenting, yes. But trash and litter playing a part in our environment doesn't make trash and litter attractive, nor aesthetically pleasing in any way. Like many others on Commons, the photo is an excellent illustrative document, but in this case 1) the light is rather dull and the colors faded, 2) the composition is tight, and 3) garbage is visually repulsive -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully, FPC are not just about beauty. Yann (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: "some of the finest [pictures] on Commons". And 8 minutes earlier I supported this one that was much more interesting, because the visual impact of the wonderful building in the flood is very strong (without rubbish). That picture here is just an ordinary bridge. A bridge with some cut off buildings and litter. Sorry, no wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I find this one much more dramatic. Yann (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps because I see this spectacle almost every year during the monsoon. Sorry to be unimpressed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info Dear Jacek, I think that the gallery of historical events is more suitable for this photo. Therefore I took the liberty to change the gallery link: .../Historical#2020-now. Serdecznie pozdrawiam, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Again, great composition. Agree with Radomianin re. gallery Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 18:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for capturing this catastrophy in such an impressive way! --Kritzolina (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Part of the 2024 history. ★ 10:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A valuable image of modern history. --Tagooty (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 11:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--ArildV (talk) 13:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important and impressive documentation, good quality and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:14:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Poland
- Info created by Jacek Halicki - -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Poland. Pozdrawiam, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A train on the overpass would have been nice. —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool drone photography, maybe not the best light but great composition makes up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Bruce1ee. I think Kabelleger would have waited for (or chosen) the right moment :-) Still a striking view, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 09:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info Externsteine, seen from the west. Re-shooting this view from the west like File:Externsteine 2 1900.jpg is difficult these days because the bank is heavily overgrown. To take this shot I had to climb down to the pond and balance on a tree trunk lying in the water. All by me.-- Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wasn't sure at first but the composition has grown on me the longer I look at it Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 00:07:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link: /Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment thank you!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Tomascastelazo Idea is good, and water waves make it. I tried a bit croped in bottom and in BW version. Its much better. I can put Alt if so. --Mile (talk) 12:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment by all means!!! Thanks!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I think it's a cool composition but unsure if the image quality + level of detail is quite FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Info Black&White version + some editing.
- Support What i like are shapes, complete other way around than Giles bird making a nest. This is cool while in thumb, other is cool when checking details. I think shapes are best covered with BW here. --Mile (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I just don't understand this one. Very little detail on the ducks so I presume the nom is based on the water ripple/composition, but while the very wide aspect ratio is an interesting idea, I ultimately have a hard time finding the "wow" in the composition. The file and caption say "one legged ducks", but the description just says "ducks" and no further information is provided. Have they literally both lost a leg? Is this a sad photo? Or just a joke based on them circling (many ducks, including mallards, do swim in circles sometimes to bring food to the surface)? — Rhododendrites talk | 11:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah, I don't really understand this either. As Rhododendrites says the caption is just 'ducks', not even a species name. Cmao20 (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 20:50:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
- Info The Sundering of Elves and names given to their divisions. Created by Agnaton - uploaded by Agnaton - nominated by Agnaton -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: The divisions of elves in Tolkien's works are a very complex matter. This diagram organizes practically all the knowledge in this area and presents it in the most accessible way possible. This image has also previously been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and is considered a Quality image.
- Support -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment As of 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC), there is a typo above "NANDOR": "le" should probably be "led". Also, using an image for something that's essentially a text table doesn't seem the best choice in terms of accessibility (searchability, text-to-speech, …). 217.9.50.231 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's "left", some conversion issues. Corrected it :) Agnaton (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thank you for providing this informative table. However, I believe that a FP should not be something that can be completed in just two minutes. Additionally, I noticed some errors in the text. Thank you for your understanding --Wilfredor (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder if this would do better on the FPC project on English Wikipedia than here. FPC on ENWiki tends to put more emphasis on 'encyclopedic value' and may be more likely to favour a very important and useful illustration that adds a lot to an article but doesn't necessarily have the immediate 'wow-factor.' Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's there also - CLICK. Agnaton (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I realize that this kind of thing takes a lot of time and effort to research and organize into a nice structure, It's very well made, I just hesitate to support because it's not really a 'picture' Henrysz (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I miss the wow. It's just an information sheet about Silmarillon and Middle-earth... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Sebring. Yann (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Egypt
- Info created by Mona Abo-Abda - uploaded by Mona Abo-Abda - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This is a well composed photo but it's a little noisy and I'm not sure I like black and white here. Cmao20 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Black & white fits very well with the architecture style. Yann (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Denoised version proposed Dear author Mona Abo-Abda, dear reviewers @Henrysz, Cmao20, and Yann: I have taken the liberty of moderately denoising the photo to rescue the nomination. In my opinion, it's an eye-catching capture and it would be a pity if the nomination fails due to technical quality issues. If you are convinced by the edit, please feel free to use the suggested file for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version (denoised)
- Support OK I hope I did this right, thank you Radomianin -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the denoised alternative. An impressive interior scene, the black and white stylistic technique highlights the lines in the composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive interior, and many thanks to Radomianin for the improvement! – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 08:58:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
- Info created by Bernhard Gillam (1856-1896) in 1882, and published in the humor magazine Puck after President Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act. Uploaded and nominated by Peulle -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and interesting with the header. I would add a little bit more light. Yann (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great reproduction. Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for the period -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 04:29:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice. I can't find any FPs of this species. Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The colours make this special --Kritzolina (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well, finally something catchy! This image would be really nice to have on "picture-of-the-day" section in the main page. ;D --LucaLindholm (talk) 13:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 22:47:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Morning view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Placid and tranquil, good light, great image quality. I might crop a tiny bit of the sky so there's the same amount of room above the tree as below the reflection. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded (Brighten + Crop change) --Laitche (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support but probably centered would have been nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 10:39:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Bouches-du-Rhône
- Info En-Vau calanque, Calanques National Park, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France. No existing FPs. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Super high resolution and satisfying composition, spectacular view. Strong candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif is outstanding, but technical quality is below the FP-bar in my eyes. The overexposed clouds are large and disturbing. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the clouds to the left, as pointed by Milseburg above, are overexposed. Wolverine XI 20:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Milseburg. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, and quality is ok for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It’s such a spectacular and vertiginous view that IMHO we can ignore the small quality issues. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Top crop is too tight. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a beautiful place which I know quite well. It deserves better. Yann (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with both Milseburg and KoH's criticisms. BigDom (talk) 08:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Bouches-du-Rhône
- Info Alternate version without the clouds.
- Support —kallerna (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is a different picture, not an alternate version of the nomination above. Please nominate it separately. Yann (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I much prefer the original. This tighter composition doesn't really work for me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Me too --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 09:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
- Info Red helleborine (Cephalanthera rubra), found on Ulrichsberg mountain, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very elegant flower. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringilla coelebs chaffinch male edit2.jpg (delist), delisted
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:34:13
- Info It is rare that I nominate an image for delisting but this one struck me in the category as obviously well below the standard. Not even 3 megapixels for a very common bird and nothing is really sharp, IMO not QI let alone FP. Barely passed in 2007. Also downsampled to make it appear sharper (see original nomination) which is against guidelines. I will soon nominate this as a replacement. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. BigDom (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Thi (talk) 10:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Peulle (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Harlock81 (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Cayambe (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. And surprised it passed the first time. Small and blurry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist How did this even pass? --Zzzs (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was seventeen years ago, but it barely passed even then - 8/4 margin (narrowest possible passing %). There are plenty of very early FPs that hold up well but this is not one of them. Cmao20 (talk) 18:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well, light, colours, the posture of the bird and the simple, but clear composition are indeed very good. If one does not try to view the image in full resolution (and hence does not learn that, well, this thumbnail just is the full image), the photo is still quite appealing. If it just was much larger and sharper, sigh … – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Unconfirmed results: (info) Result: 9 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 08:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<Animals/Mammals>]]
- Info created by Adygrafix250 - uploaded by Adygrafix250 - nominated by Adygrafix250 -- Adygrafix250 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adygrafix250 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 29 Sep → Fri 04 Oct Mon 30 Sep → Sat 05 Oct Tue 01 Oct → Sun 06 Oct Wed 02 Oct → Mon 07 Oct Thu 03 Oct → Tue 08 Oct Fri 04 Oct → Wed 09 Oct
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 25 Sep → Fri 04 Oct Thu 26 Sep → Sat 05 Oct Fri 27 Sep → Sun 06 Oct Sat 28 Sep → Mon 07 Oct Sun 29 Sep → Tue 08 Oct Mon 30 Sep → Wed 09 Oct Tue 01 Oct → Thu 10 Oct Wed 02 Oct → Fri 11 Oct Thu 03 Oct → Sat 12 Oct Fri 04 Oct → Sun 13 Oct
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.