Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MAXXI
Files in Category:MAXXI
[edit]Sorry, but this building of Zaha Hadid (living people) is too recent (2010) and Italy has no FOP exemption (for exterior and interior).
Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome).
- File:Le MAXXI (Rome) 3.jpg
- File:MAXXI - Museo nazionale delle arti del XXI secolo.jpg
- File:MAXXI 1499.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1501.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1502.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1504.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1505.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1506.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1508.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1510.JPG
- File:MAXXI 1511.JPG
- File:Maxxi interni.jpg
- File:MAXXI photo-10.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-2.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-3.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-4.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-5.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-7.JPG
- File:MAXXI photo-8.JPG
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete--Dega180 (talk) 08:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:MAXXI
[edit]The building was completed in 2010 by architect Zaha Hadid (1950–2016). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright terms of Italy lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2087.
- File:ArtAndFeminism 2017 Rome 31.jpg
- File:ArtAndFeminism 2017 Rome 32.jpg
- File:Calamita gravitazionale Gino de Dominicis.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 01.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 02.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 03.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 04.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 05.jpg
- File:MAXXI Museum opening night 05.JPG
- File:MAXXI.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete See also Commons:Deletion requests/Internal of MAXXI, where Ruthven deleted a number of photos but also decided to keep some (for reasons I respectfully disagree with). --Gnom (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete In this case, the photos also represent recent artworks and some representative architectural element of the museum. --Ruthven (msg) 19:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:MAXXI
[edit]No FoP in Italy. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated. Artist Zaha Hadid died in 2016
- File:Le MAXXI (Rome) 3.jpg
- File:MAXXI (2017) Rome 31.jpg
- File:MAXXI (2017) Rome 32.jpg
- File:MAXXI - Museo nazionale delle arti del XXI secolo.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 01.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 02.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 03.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 04.jpg
- File:MAXXI ingresso 05.jpg
- File:MAXXI Museum opening night 05.JPG
- File:MAXXI.jpg
- File:MAXXI0.jpg
_Rome_31.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Rome_32.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment Some files have already been deleted then undeleted (e.g. File talk:MAXXI ingresso 04.jpg). This kind of "blind" DR is counterproductive. --Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- The deprecated discussion is available here (Started by User:JWilz12345. As new evidence about the FoP issue appears, it is necessary to re-open the discussion. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Ruthven the "dead architects" exception has been voided after concerns from other users that the parliamentary pronouncement did not directly mention works by deceased authors, see COM:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/08#Question on the so-called de facto Italian FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Re: undeleted then nominated again, per an admin here, there is no official policy that only limits deletion of a file once. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Right. In any case, some of these files can be kept:
Keep File:Le MAXXI (Rome) 3.jpg (de minimis)- Keep File:MAXXI Museum opening night 05.JPG (de minimis)
- Keep File:MAXXI.jpg (de minimis, the old building is centered in the frame)
- Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Respectfully, I don't see a case for de minimis here. Gnom (talk) 12:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with Gnom, even though the image only contains part of building, it still covers a rather large area of the image. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I don't see a case for DM. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)