Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/11/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14773805251).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
naphthalene.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_—_Luftbild_mit_folgenden_Layer_Topographische_Karte_+_Verkehrswege.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploaded by a WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 05:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
"found on Twitter" no reason to believe it is uploader's photo. Found on https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/45/96/de459685279487b975ad6ac020e55694.jpg Jim1138 (talk) 03:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Odebo-logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
It appears blank on Wikipedia even though it is flawless when opened in an editing program. SoWhAt249 (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: processed as a duplicate of File:Control status of the West Bank as per the Oslo Accords.svg. --Guanaco (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Displays only a portion of the content. SoWhAt249 (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: image fixed. --Guanaco (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
I've changed my mind about posting this photo, and would like to have it deleted. Qqnap1000 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Guanaco at 17:11, 13 November 2017 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nudes-A-Poppin 2015.jpg: I've changed my mind about posting this photo, and would like to have it deleted. --Krdbot 19:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. No known usefulness. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Zimbio image http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Regina+Hall/Arrivals+at+the+BET+Awards/VNWJfNHY_Hm Drown Soda (talk) 06:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb at 22:06, 13 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.gettyimages.com/license/172011727 --Krdbot 01:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Je suis Raphaël Ferret et je n'ai pas donné mon accord pour que cette photo apparaisse sur Wikipédia Zädhir (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Keep Subject is a public figure, making a public appearance. We don't need his authorization. JJ Georges (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)- Keep This is a public figure, in a public place, on a public event, as per image description this was taken at the premiere of the movie "Le Petit Locataire". Tm (talk) 13:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Taivo: the picture has been nominated for deletion again, by the same person, for the same reason. Could the new request be closed, please ? Thanks. It might also be useful to give a warning to this person. JJ Georges (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept, permission from depicted person is not needed. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Je n'ai pas donné mon droit à l'image pour ce fichier Zädhir (talk) 11:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept, I must add: here is no evidence, that Zädhir is depicted person. Unfortunately I must protect the photo. JJ Georges warned the user, at moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Ce fichier devrait être supprimé parce qu'il me représente, parce que je n'ai pas donné l'autorisation à la personne qui prise de l'utiliser. Parce que j'ai fait cette photo à sa demande de façon amicale mais dans un cadre privé, c'est à dire pour lui et uniquement pour lui. J'ai déjà essayé de demander à cette personne de la retirer en lui expliquant les raisons mais il a refusé. Je ne souhaite pas que cette photo de moi soit la première à être visible sur internet lorsque l'on tape mon nom dans les moteurs de recherche. Je ne souhaite pas que cette photo de moi soit celle qui illustre ma page wiki. Je fais un métier d'image et une photo comme celle ci, même si elle n'a rien de bien méchant pourrait malheureusement être nuisible à mon travail. en vous remerciant, Raphaël Ferret 89.157.19.59 20:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Enough already... There is no need to delete this photo, and no need for an authorization (public figure making a public appearance). If the subject does not like it, there is a very simple way of fixing the problem : that's replacing it on his wikipedia page. Which has just been done. JJ Georges (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Requests for the right to private life can only be valid if they are verified by our e-mail system (OTRS), andt that mean that the request will be successful. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TickForTack (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused apparently personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 3.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro.png
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 2.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 1.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (5).png
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (3).png
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (35).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 8.jpg
- File:AkinG kalld Pedro 7.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (1).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (2).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 5.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (DCTOP20) (5).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (DCTOP20) (3).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro 6.jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (DCTOP20) (1).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (80).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (79).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (51).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (42).jpg
- File:AkinG Kalld Pedro (78).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Info: Re-uploads of images deleted by Cookie one month ago. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Same images previously uploaded under a different account User talk:ILoveMasterMane. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio of https://www.queenslandlabor.org/our-people/state-members/annastacia-palaszczuk-mp/ Stickee (talk) 01:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Steinsplitter at 14:11, 15 November 2017 UTC: No permission since 7 November 2017 - --Krdbot 19:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Beeld en Geluid Collecties as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: license for this particular photograph doesn't permit CC-BY-SA. Source site has correct license, but I do not find the photo from source site and the photo has never been licensereviewed. Needs discussion, maybe really copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- I uploaded this file a couple of years ago after I found it on the Beeld En Geluidwiki. This image has catalog number 881404, as mentioned below the file description. The images seems to be recently deleted from Beeld En Geluidwiki ([1] and [2]). It says "2 nov 2017 14:10 WikiSysop (Overleg | bijdragen) heeft de pagina Bestand:881404-7 pos.png verwijderd (n.a.v. klacht)", which means: 'WikiSysop has deleted page File:881404-7 pos.png (because of a complaint)'.
- For so far the background. I don't know Wikimedia Commons' policy on handling these cases, but at the time it was uploaded this image was licensed correctly. Maybe Beeld En Geluidwiki violated the photograph's copyright? Clausule (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is correct, we were urged to remove this picture because of a complaint. We are sorry for the inconvenience. Beeld en Geluid Collecties(talk) 11:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vysotsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: license for this particular photograph doesn't permit CC-BY-SA Vysotsky (talk) 14:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the file please. I think there is sufficient info about licencing and reason that the author is unknown. Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 07:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- If there is such info somewhere, please add it to the image description page. Based on the information currently present, the copyright situation cannot be determined. Please be aware that unknown to us is different from anonymous. {Anonymous-EU} clearly states: "Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship." How did you make sure that the author never claimed ownership? Jcb (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, maybe i used the wrong clarification of " and shoul be "Anonymous". The photo's i uploaded from the "Beeldbank" belonging to the "Municipality archive Amsterdam" are labeled with "Anoniem" witch is Dutch for Anonimous. The "Municipality archive Amsterdam" always does its outmost best to recover the name of the owner of the photo's by searching there archives and the archives of "The Netherlands". So if they can't find it probably nobody can. Do you think i should replace the Unknown author with "Anonymous-EU"? Regards Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 07:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- No, just don't upload them. This municipal archive, like most archives, have lower standards than Wikimedia Commons regarding compliance with copyright regulations. These archives often let students deal with their collection, without thoroughly checking whether these students are sufficiently familiar with copyright regulation. You would be surprised how many of these students assume that copyright expires 70 years after creation instead of 70 years after the death or the author, or who even think that copyright does not matter at all for an archive. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, maybe i used the wrong clarification of " and shoul be "Anonymous". The photo's i uploaded from the "Beeldbank" belonging to the "Municipality archive Amsterdam" are labeled with "Anoniem" witch is Dutch for Anonimous. The "Municipality archive Amsterdam" always does its outmost best to recover the name of the owner of the photo's by searching there archives and the archives of "The Netherlands". So if they can't find it probably nobody can. Do you think i should replace the Unknown author with "Anonymous-EU"? Regards Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 07:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- If there is such info somewhere, please add it to the image description page. Based on the information currently present, the copyright situation cannot be determined. Please be aware that unknown to us is different from anonymous. {Anonymous-EU} clearly states: "Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship." How did you make sure that the author never claimed ownership? Jcb (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work, authors are mostly credited at the backsite of a postcard. Jcb (talk) 23:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the file please. I think there is sufficient info about licencing and reason that the author is unknown. Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- If there is such info somewhere, please add it to the image description page. Based on the information currently present, the copyright situation cannot be determined. Please be aware that unknown to us is different from anonymous. {Anonymous-EU} clearly states: "Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship." How did you make sure that the author never claimed ownership? Jcb (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the file please. I think there is sufficient info about licencing and reason that the author is unknown. Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 07:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- If there is such info somewhere, please add it to the image description page. Based on the information currently present, the copyright situation cannot be determined. Please be aware that unknown to us is different from anonymous. {Anonymous-EU} clearly states: "Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship." How did you make sure that the author never claimed ownership? Jcb (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Not only personal stuff but also nonsense. Do not abuse Commons please. E4024 (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no template but article page, not in use. --Achim (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jack Rabbit Slim's as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio : © BestImage. purepeople.com. Jackrs 17:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Beside that I don't understand what u want to say with that text the file has a broken info template. Sanandros (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.nme.com/photos/50-things-you-didn-t-know-about-eminem-1428834
Probably copyrighted but not clear case. Sanandros (talk) 20:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- This file does not qualify for speedy-deletion... This is a joke? --ManFromNord (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Léna (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not de minimus Vera (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: undefined --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Katrina Harding (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patt Smith, Jr. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:Patt Smith, Jr., CEO of FYE THE MOBB.jpg
- File:FYE THE MOBB Promotions.jpg
- File:Patt Smith, Jr.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: Used to promote one product rather than for educational use. Also has promotional description. theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright of toys pictured SecretName101 (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Toys are not utilitarian articles. — Jeff G. ツ 04:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
As a user's signature, it has no educational value. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
blatant spam Melissa Carleton (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Melissa Carleton (talk) 04:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Oryol Butcher (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Oryol Butcher (talk) 05:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
no educational value Oryol Butcher (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Oryol Butcher (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
blatant spam Oryol Butcher (talk) 05:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image A simple story (talk) 06:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image A simple story (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image A simple story (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image A simple story (talk) 06:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
private pic A simple story (talk) 06:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
advertising Gareth (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal type photos, out of scope
- File:Fullsizeoutput 5f4.jpg
- File:AAEAAQAAAAAAAAzXAAAAJDI3NzA3YWFkLWM0ZGItNDMyNC04ZWM2LWUxOGE0OWIzMTI4MA.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Talentwale (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
The picture is in many places at the internet. E4024 (talk) 07:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, low-res, no EXIF data. OTRS confirmation needed. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No source, no description, thumbnail quality. Useless for any purpose, we have better picture of the subject (KKK members, etc.). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nachiket walia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:Rave@moti partrt.jpg
- File:Fatehpur sikri ki photo.jpg
- File:Baby kiss.jpg
- File:January1st.jpg
- File:Rave@moti.jpg
- File:NH12 jhansi kanpur.jpg
- File:Parting at kanpur.jpg
- File:GMC orai.jpg
- File:Iphone moto shoot.jpg
- File:Zsquare.jpg
- File:Water rain spark.jpg
- File:Pond side bank.jpg
- File:Bridge bank.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schrottmeyer (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hip Hop Lover (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hip Hop Lover (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:OLDY CLAP RECORDZ - Live Festival Les Mauvaises Graines 4.png
- File:Oldy Clap Recordz (live2).png
- File:Oldy Clap Recordz (live1).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of Packaging
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Apple, Inc. iMessage logos have been called unfree by multiple enwiki uploaders. Apple vigorously protects its intellectual property. — Jeff G. ツ 13:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to any existing takedown notice or deletion request where Apple put its case. I'm unsure what "enwiki uploaders" has to do with Commons images. A link to that evidence would also be useful. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep based on evidence below, though open to further evidence being supplied by Jeff G. for the assertions in the nomination. --Fæ (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: An example is here. — Jeff G. ツ 15:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought the nomination meant that there had been previous discussion, or that Apple may have sent take down notices. I have no doubt that many Apple related product images are hosted on the English Wikipedia under Fair Use, this does not mean that they have a credibly enforceable copyright under U.S. law. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: An example is here. — Jeff G. ツ 15:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I assert that this file should be included in Commons with the tags {{PD-logo}} {{Trademarked}}. I acknowledge that large companies assert intellectual property rights. This particular one is not eligible for copyright and Wiki projects can acknowledge the trademark as our usual courtesy. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep PD-ineligible is PD-ineligible no matter the author. That is basically {{PD-shape}} to me. The Copyright Office ruled the iAd logo uncopyrightable[3]. I don't see how the quote oval would get a copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing that document from the copyright office on the apple logo. That is really interesting. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. It's PD-textlogo according to our common interpretation. If Apple has a different view, they can file a DMCA notice. The fact that users have claimed fair use, or that Apple is litigious does not change the copyright status of this image. Guanaco (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep on grounds of copyrightability per US Copyright Office, Blue, Fæ, Carl, and Guanaco. This is less complicated than the iAd logo. However, the question of keeping this or File:IMessage logo (Apple Inc.).png on the basis of duplication remains per Carl. — Jeff G. ツ 15:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- For the record, a similar discussion at COM:UDR#File:IMessage logo (Apple Inc.).png will be archived eventually. — Jeff G. ツ 15:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (No source since), which is not incorrect, however this file and the SVG version need to be resolved because this is the 3rd or 4th time this has been nominated. This file is in use, so is the SVG. Perhaps all the usage could be placed on the SVG file and this one removed since the other is superior? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In use. There is no policy that requires a PNG has to be deleted if a SVG equivalent exists. --Fæ (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete the image has a bad source and license. Unless someone is willing to fix it, that means it's currently unsourced. I'm not going to spend my time fixing uploads when the rest of the community can't be arsed to do it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I spent my time changing the license to {{PD-shape}}, it took about 1/10 the time I have spent responding to this DR. If you are seriously worried about your volunteer time, perhaps you should consider approaching these issues differently, such as making the correction rather than poking everyone else with claims that they are at fault for not being arsed. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep on grounds of copyrightability per US Copyright Office, Blue, Fæ, Carl, and Guanaco. This is less complicated than the iAd logo. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. License has been updated as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Obvious copyright infringement: five separate screens shots need five sources and five proofs of a free-to-use image. - SchroCat (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camila.argolo (talk · contribs)
[edit]"par Vincent Macher" est contradictoire avec "travail personnel". Il faut une autorisation explicite de Vincent Macher.
Habertix (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Some of the files in Category:Files by Pēteris to review
[edit]Non used low res and out of scope project files. I uploaded a large set of pictures and this is my first attempt to clean the "bad files". The second set of files to be deleted under this category is about to come. I can imagine from 10% to 15% of files to be deleted. Regards, Sturm (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:01.01.09. Back to work... (3460316894).jpg
- File:Bus driver-cashier (3455366610).jpg
- File:Christ the Redeemer statue (3455942147).jpg
- File:Cold stream in a hot night (3456056883).jpg
- File:Copacabana (3453696016).jpg
- File:Copacabana 2008-2009 (3459241122).jpg
- File:Copacabana, Dec.28, 2008 (3452864709).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1130775 (3667765584).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140475 (3667794292).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140478 (3666990923).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140485 (3667802130).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140654 (3667017361).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150042 (3667036617).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150156 (3667895252).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150282 (3667870452).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150288 (3667069965).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150392 (3667078339).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150557 (3667523005).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150706 (3667581811).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160004 (3668411744).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160038 (3667618027).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160200 (3667126309).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160236 (3667131999).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160541 (3664693845).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160561 (3665496630).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170019 (3667226609).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170050 (3666888529).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170213 (3667698966).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170391 (3666917237).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170405 (3667722912).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170426 (3666917837).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170441 (3666919767).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170693 (3668015910).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170784 (3666928077).jpg
- File:Ipanema (3459071662).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files by Pēteris to review
[edit]Low res / Non used / Out of scope
- File:File by Peteris P1140755 (3667833018).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150210 (3667859714).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150231 (3667056679).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150265 (3667059533).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150278 (3667867040).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150289 (3667880564).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1150389 (3667077083).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160446 (3665492928).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160506 (3665494394).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170132 (3667696052).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170157 (3667173773).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170159 (3666890589).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170212 (3666893461).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170261 (3667700450).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170267 (3667989758).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170270 (3666895401).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170272 (3666895463).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170312 (3667702904).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170341 (3666898159).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170500 (3667994428).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170502 (3666920993).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170746 (3667732880).jpg
- File:Paraty (3450204877).jpg
- File:Paraty (3450226009).jpg
- File:Polícia Militar do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (3459066518).jpg
- File:Sausages (3459204016).jpg
- File:São Paulo (3471718972).jpg
- File:São Paulo (3474293488).jpg
- File:Termite mounds near São Paulo (3450242386).jpg
- File:Typical Rio- walk with dogs (3455377130).jpg
- File:View from Santa Teresa district (3454537379).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted most, kept a few which were of decent quality or could be sufficiently categorized to serve an educational purpose. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files by Pēteris to review
[edit]Low res / Out of Scope
- File:File by Peteris P1140459 (3666979603).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1160394 (3664688681).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170246 (3667700364).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170247 (3667183355).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 05:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files by Pēteris to review
[edit]Non used / Low res / Out of scope
- File:File by Peteris P1140521 (3667809942).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140550 (3667005421).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1140551 (3667008309).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170530 (3667728392).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170651 (3666924147).jpg
- File:File by Peteris P1170768 (3668023078).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 05:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Virginia 209 (old).svg, and this version has the wrong font. Also see similar discussions listed at COM:HWY/P. Rschen7754 04:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- 'Delete—as superseded and incorrect. Imzadi 1979 → 04:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, small, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Overexposed, unusable. Mhohner (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. No educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are hopefully asked : 'family album' content, but also serioulsy personality right isusses }children{, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio, seems like screenshot from videogame. -- 109.238.80.47 19:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry, image not in use, a plethora of non-blurry alternatives exist on commons SecretName101 (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 19:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Lacks of permission from artist Tatjana Gavriļenko, see OTRS
- File:Sand art Titanik.jpg
- File:Sand art tatiana gavrilenko (1).jpg — permission OTRS, Ticket#2017111410012113
- File:Sand art tatiana gavrilenko (2).jpg — permission OTRS, Ticket#2017111410012113
- File:Sand art tatiana gavrilenko (3).jpg — permission OTRS, Ticket#2017111410012113
- File:Dalība starptautiskajā izstādē From Waste to Art .jpg — permission OTRS, Ticket#2017111410012113
- File:Tatjana Gavriļenko ar stīgu kvartetu Sinfonietta Rīga.jpg
- File:Tatjana Gavriļenko eļļas glezniecība.jpg
- File:Sand Show Titanik.jpg — Ticket#2017112310011704
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Остальные работы можно удалять, про них в разрешении ничего не сказано. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, because it is very blurry. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 21:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. Plus I doubt it is an own work. E4024 (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2014 as non-notable. Out of project scope. Additionally, as a professional photograph, this needs permission by the photographer or evidence of it being product of a work for hire. ℯxplicit 11:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from copyright holder Timothy Mason is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Direito Em Tela
[edit]- File:Prof. Séfora Schubert.jpg
- File:Séfora Cristina Schubert.jpg
- File:Ricardo Pedro Inácio Schubert.jpg
- File:Fabio 4.jpg
- File:Fabio Schubert Gelbcke.jpg
Out of project scope: self-promotion. --Francisco (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, doubtful own work as well. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. Deleting admin, please have a look at their other files. E4024 (talk) 14:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
What do you think, does the photo have educational value? Taivo (talk) 16:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This photo is a derivative work of the certificate, which is complex enough to be copyrighted. Guanaco (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 18:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 18:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of Uruguay
[edit] Delete: most unlikely to be the work of the uploaders as tagged. {{PD-Uruguay}} indicated that the copyright term is 50 years pma which these modern stamps fail to comply with.
- File:Sobre con sello del INDT y matasellos.jpg
- File:Uruguay Year 2000 Postage Stamp Honoring Soka Gakkai International.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Source is a fan site and says: "Disclaimer: We have only compiled these images for the fans of Narendra Modi, we don’t claim copyright for any of the pictures published above." No indication that the author of the photograph has dedicated the work to the public domain. Malayy (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Cover of a copyrighted book (ISBN 978-9-66973-460-0, 2013). Retired electrician (talk) 02:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Supposedly a still from the series Jurassic Fight Club.[4][5] Licences on the listed source page can not be trusted. FunkMonk (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Aren’t stills fair use images? If anything I think the licensing and the permission parameters should be changed. If we can’t make the fair use argument it could always be modified a bit to consider it fair use Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fair use images cannot be uploaded to Commons, only free images. FunkMonk (talk) 08:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Aren’t stills fair use images? If anything I think the licensing and the permission parameters should be changed. If we can’t make the fair use argument it could always be modified a bit to consider it fair use Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for anything other than buildings. The ads are still protected by copyright. ℯxplicit 04:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
composite image, source missing Ytoyoda (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- And the portrait photo is from FC Basel, likely via https://www.transfermarkt.pt/blas-riveros/profil/spieler/401732 Ytoyoda (talk) 21:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Low quality image. Probably misleading description - user is blocked on plwiki for publishing hoaxes eg. "Węszeń wschodni" . ~Cybularny Speak? 10:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -Small photo without metadata, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Tourist panel in Greece, probably copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 10:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment Uploader wrote here. --Ruthven (msg) 11:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedrux N&Y (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y на пароме.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в поезде.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Испания 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Испания.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 8.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y пляжи Испании 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в музее 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в музее 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в Европе 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в кабине вертолёта 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в кабине вертолёта.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y музей 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y экскурсия.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y газировка.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в музее 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y и вертолёт.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y на скачках.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в музее.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y и пилот.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y музей 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y музей.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y пляжи Испании.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в театре.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление на ярмарке 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в Европе.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление на ярмарке.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 5.jpg
Ies (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedrux N&Y (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal photo album, out of project scope
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 80.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 79.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 78.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 77.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 76.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 73.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 75.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 74.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 72.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 71.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 70.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 67.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 69.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 68.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 65.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 66.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 64.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 62.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 61.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 63.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 59.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 60.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 58.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 55.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 57.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 56.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 25.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 24.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 23.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировка летом.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y визитка 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 51.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский проспект 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский проспект 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский проспект 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y на Невском проспекте 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футболка.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футболка 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y визитка.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в гриммёрке 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в метро 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 13.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 46.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 12.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 49.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 50.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 48.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 47.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 16.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 15.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y картины 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 14.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y картины.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y отдых 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 13.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 45.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 12.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 10.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y за спиной.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 8.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y футбол.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 11.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 39.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 44.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 43.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский проспект 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 41.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Невский проспект.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 40.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление 21.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип 8.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 18.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 17.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 37.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 35.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 34.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 33.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 32.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 31.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 30.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 29.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 28.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 27.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y с ножами 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y с ножами.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 26.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 25.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y на невском.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y рисунок.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y бадминтон.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y коллаж 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y коллаж 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y коллаж.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y приколы 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y с фанатом.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y приколы 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y приколы.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y гриммёрка 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 10.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y гримёрка.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y отдых.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото с приятелем.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 20.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y логотип.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y выступление в коттеджах 1.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 8.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y фото 1.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y кафе.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y кафе 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в метро 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в метро 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в метро 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в метро.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 24.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 23.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 22.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 21.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 20.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 19.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 18.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 17.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 16.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 13.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 14.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 15.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 12.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 11.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 10.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 8.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 6.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 4.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 5.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 1.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 3.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировки 2.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y тренировка.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 14.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 12.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 11.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 10.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 9.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 7.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа 16.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y прогулки по Европе.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y паром.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y Европа.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y готовность к отъезду на тур.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y прогулки.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y в автобусе.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y парк.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedrux N&Y (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos. No educational used. Out of scope
- File:Vedrux N&Y 681.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 682.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 683.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 679.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 678.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 680.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 677.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 674.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 676.jpg
- File:Vedrux N&Y 675.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Jarbascolor.jpg
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Rui Jobim Neto is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image and therefore not in the project scope of Commons. De728631 (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Ingrid Kronstadt (talk) 21:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Ingrid Kronstadt (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo Ingrid Kronstadt (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Ingrid Kronstadt (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Probably not licensed freely. Sanandros (talk) 21:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 21:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 21:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 21:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 22:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is obviously not your "Own work". © Watermark
Objeciton on discussion page. Sanandros (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - photographer Vital Abilgow must send a permission to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source given is © 2017 Twitter, Inc.
Twitter is probably not the copyright holder, but I also think that this is not a free pic. Sanandros (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: News photo: https://elbocon.pe/peruanos-en-el-extranjero/morelia-vs-toluca-en-vivo-online-raul-ruidiaz-de-titular-130456/
not clear case. Sanandros (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I saw it on enough news sites that I thought it was a clear case. Anyway, this link credits the photo to Getty Images: https://depor.com/futbol-internacional/mexico/monarcas-morelia-raul-ruidiaz-blindado-presidente-michoacano-liga-mx-36692 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
_(14773805251).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14773805251).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
_(14773805251).jpg){kind=link}
Delete per nomination: useless library file card. De728631 (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
_(14773805251).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
_(14773805251).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: News photo: https://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/1156690.sin-miedo-ante-pumas-dice-chato-rodriguez.html
not clear case Sanandros (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This image appeared at the above URL without a free license more than year before it was uploaded to Commons. Absent proof that is image is freely licensed, as a work previously published elsewhere with a non-free license, we need permission via COM:OTRS. —RP88 (talk) 05:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Low-res, newspaper quality photo from a user that has uploaded almost all copyrighted photos. No evidence to suggest this is any different. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per FBMD. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bree.argarin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims to have personally created these photographs, which seems unlikely based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. The uploader also uploaded a photograph with metadata indicating it was created by Emma Svensson but claimed to be the uploader's own work. The uploader claims to be working on behalf of artists, but it doesn't sound like they're doing so in the capacity of a professional photographer.
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I just wanted to clarify that the photos I've uploaded were permitted by my submission of a letter of permission from Sony Music Entertainment. I have a copy of this email if that helps clear anything here. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bree.argarin (talk • contribs) 18:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's very unlikely that any letter of permission would give you the right to claim to be the author of other people's works. It might be a good idea for you to read Commons:Guidance for paid editors – particularly the fourth and fifth bullet point. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if Sony Music Entertainment is the copyright holder then Sony Music Entertainment must send a permission to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kgyshsirga (talk · contribs)
[edit]seems to be a hoax, or a non-notable party at best. false information is not within project scope.
- File:King Fondren Bai the 2nd.jpg
- File:King Fondren Bai ll.jpg
- File:Young White.jpg
- File:Prince Eliab Bai.jpg
- File:Ruled from1585-1635 A.D. King Eliab,Bai from Kpelle people.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence that Salisbury (died 1962) was anything but a commsisioned artist; or a federal employee Denniss (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Since the original is the official Whitehouse portrait of FDR, surely the US federal government owns it (making it a federal image)? Hohum (talk) 04:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: User:Hohum, please take a look at the introduction to Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House. Six of the presidential portraits cannot be hosted on Commons for the reason given above. However, this one is PD-no notice and therefore can remain. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.instagram.com/p/BbRHGR2B8dy/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged for Speedy Deletion by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) but should be referred to DR. The most recent rationale for deletion was: No evidence that Salisbury (died 1962) was anything but a commsisioned artist; or a federal employee JGHowes talk - 14:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: As it says in the file description, this is PD-no notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Herber Pulex (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of unidentified subject without description. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
| Description |
한국어: 조선 세조의 어진. 저작권 소멸됨 |
| Date | |
| Source | 일제강점기 제작(1935) |
| Author | 김은호(金殷鎬) |
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
public domain |
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted book covers, not "own work".
Maybe the artwork is old enough to be PD-Art Sanandros (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright RomSavka
pls explain. Sanandros (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per content, and also Bangalore "real estate" advertisements, again, now by User:Imgreeshma, please block IP-address block, thx,
Scope needs discussion. Sanandros (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio because the copyright holder would be Godrej Properties, the real estate developer, or their advertising agency. No evidence they've released this from copyright restrictions. Even if the copyright holder sends permission to OTRS, how would this qualify as an exception to Commons policy regarding advertising per Scope? JGHowes talk - 14:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, no metadata, small size, pixellation on face, etc. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
No longer required Greyschoolshorts (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- This so-called "education method" is still used in many places. Therefore the file could always serve. My opinion is: Keep. --E4024 (talk) 07:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Per previous deletion of the same image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No longer required Greyschoolshorts (talk) 21:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep useful picture of a tawse, better than the other images in Category:Tawse. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No longer required Greyschoolshorts (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep useful picture of a tawse, better than the other images in Category:Tawse. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Please delete the previous versions of this photo, retaining this one only. The man pictured in the previous photo no longer wishes to be identifiable Greyschoolshorts (talk) 10:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Hid the versions with the identifiable person. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
No longer required Greyschoolshorts (talk) 21:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep useful picture of a tawse. Should be renamed. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No longer required Greyschoolshorts (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Please delete previous versions of this photo. The man pictured in previous versions no longer wishes to be personally identifiable. Greyschoolshorts (talk) 10:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The desired versions have been hidden. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Karl Lagasse (b. 1981) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Karl Lagasse (b. 1981) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No license for source country (Germany). No indication that the author would have died before 1947, Sänger died in 1964. Jcb (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
If the place is unidentified, then the image is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. Together with File:김성일-음식점-1.jpg please. E4024 (talk) 15:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused "personal emblem". -- 109.238.80.47 19:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 19:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- 109.238.80.47 19:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
total black image, not usable for encyclopedia Rudolphous (talk) 22:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea and the painting is modern. The photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK. I had this problem before. I took the picture of a wall of the temple and normally Korean new religions are very happy that their works of art are publicized, but explain to them how to send an authorization mail in English or upload themselves in Wikicommon is a pain in the neck. I substituted with another image User: Aidayoung
I understand this. I will try to contact the Korean temple but in my experience they rarely answer. This is why in the meantime I have changed the Simudo.jpg image in Daesun Jinrihoe with a picture I took that should not have copyright problems.User: Aidayoung
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Made a mistake while entering the description, would like to upload again RoubaintoN (talk) 13:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Do you know that you can edit the info section and also ask to change the title? Use the "move" button which is hidden behind "More", beside "History" up there. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 13:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: File is a copyvio -- Nepal currency is copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Derivative, no source given for incorporated photos. Kelly (talk) 14:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Bamsefar75
[edit]
All images were uploaded by me, User:Bamsefar75 for Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. I recently discovered the presence of the big yellow sign on the west wall of the shorter part of the building. The sign forbids me from taking these photos, by Swedish law. The sign was not (yet) there on three occasions in 2011 when I took around thirteen (13) similar pictures which I also uploaded earlier, see Category:Posthuset Sundsvall (images 06, 07, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). There is only one of these yellow signs on the building. It is facing west towards the yard away from most streets. This, plus the fact that I've taken similar pictures there before, is probably why I created the more recent pictures by mistake, despite the restriction. None of the images seem to be in use on any project at the moment. I think these three images should be courteously deleted due to my mistake, since my earlier images illustrate the same parts of the building with equal value so there would be no significant loss to Commons. --Bamsefar75 (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is Commons policy not to obey non-copyright restrictions. However, the photographer is at risk here and these are unused, so the requested deletion seems appropriate. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this not a real pic and this photos of xxx 2405:204:E287:B29B:F4DF:A6D8:63C8:9ACE 16:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Mason Ji is not mentioned in en.wiki, he is non-notable. The photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- No disagreement. Jone.Hu (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Image exists on the subjects website with no mention of licensing. The image also exists online[6] as part of a collection of images taken at the event. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license although photo appears to be professional and commerical (e.g., source says "Photo courtesy of CSU Dominguez Hills") ElKevbo (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license although photo appears to be professional and commerical (e.g., source says "Photo courtesy of CSU Dominguez Hills") ElKevbo (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK. Kelly (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gapfall as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of packaging.
Objection on the discussion page. Sanandros (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Its a photo of a box container for red wine. Please explain why this is a copy-vio. the only reference is the name of the contents which in its self is not a copyright issue any more than stating that a restaurant is a 'McDonalds' for instance. Kolforn (talk) 07:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The design of the container, in particular the photograph on the box, is copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a derivative copyrighted image from the image source. Leoboudv (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The person who created the poster is the real copyright owner. Not the person who takes a picture of the poster. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: See COM:LL. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Wrong and unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 20:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Reliefin on tehnyt M. Perttula vuonna 2002, siirrettävä suomenkieliseen Wikipediaan Kulttuurinavigaattori (talk) 01:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep That the file is moved to the Finnish Wikipedia is no reason to delete it here. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
This is derivative work of a plaque made by sculptor Marita Perttula, unveiled in 2002. No FOP for sculptures in Finland, not in PD. Transferred image to fi-wiki. Htm (talk) 22:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chrissymad as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/590a697ebebafba6193d0819/t/599cf939e6f2e1277db92afd/1503460087485/NEF_4008.jpg Sanandros (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Check also my talk page.--Sanandros (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See kornelijaslunjski.com/about/ for the source. No ticket found at OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1970th. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Даний файл є власністю ТЗОШ №16 ім.В.Левицького і публікується для вільного використання
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a film still Ytoyoda (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of non-free content. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, and while the claim is that it is courtesy of the US District Court, it is unclear whether the image was taken by the US Federal Government or by local law enforcement. If the images were taken by local law enforcement, they would be copyright. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This was uploaded to be placed in an article about convictions for sex trafficking in the United States. I've deleted the article as a BLP violation because the convictions were overturned on appeal, and there seems to be consensus within the legal community that the investigation was problematic. See AN/I discussion (permalink). SarahSV (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I left a note about this discussion on AN/I. SarahSV (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and inadequate sourcing. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Getty Images
Pls provode a link. Sanandros (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Stefania D'Alessandro/Getty Images Europe --ManFromNord (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, this is Getty Images #155935648 by Stefania M. D'Alessandro. —RP88 (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- There is no need to discuss this,
Speedy delete --Ailura (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- There is no need to discuss this,
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 20:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Searingjet as Copyvio (copyvio) Sanandros (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Datei durch andere bessere ersetzt (siehe File:Auftaktpressekonferenz 2002 Dortmund.jpg) GFHund (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @GFHund: , oyu can use more simply the template {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 05:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
File:1Практикум «Підготовка матеріалів для україномовного розділу відкритої багатомовної мережевої енциклопедії «Вікіпедія» 07.jpg
[edit]
Поганої якості Надія 06:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 05:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value-not used anywhere in Wikispace Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Can be used, in scope. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality signature of, supposedly, Polish writer Józef Hen. Uploader stated that it was made by him based on original autographs (diff in Polish). What's more, copyright may apply to the signatures and autographs under Polish law (Autograf może być utworem słowno-graficznym jeśli ma charakter indywidualny oraz twórczy – An autograph may be a word/figurative work if it has individual or creative character; from Pomoc:Porady prawne/Przedmiot ochrony – helpage with issues regarding copyright that has been clarified by lawyers on request of Polish Wikimedia Chapter). So, there is no source provided that this signature is authentic and there is no permission from author (or any other explanation that this work is not subject to copyright protection). Wostr (talk) 09:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. In addition, no source and very bad quality. Gytha (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of a 3d object Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Copy of http://music.virginia.edu/sites/music.virginia.edu/files/17-18/anne-le-berge-lrc-keke-keukelaar_7433d-e1504167433699.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Any metadata, copy of http://hebdo39.fr/article-cahier-special-elections-legislatives,15592.htm#PhotoSwipe1510574792383 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Not neccessarily own work, Equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Esquerra_republicana_pv_logo.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: These are simple shapes. Below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 05:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope. Commons is not a place to share personal images.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jon Kolbert. Ruthven (msg) 06:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal files, misuse of commons as a webhost.
- File:Md 10.jpg
- File:Md 9.jpg
- File:Md 8.jpg
- File:Md 7.jpg
- File:Md 6.jpg
- File:Md 5.jpg
- File:Md .jpg
- File:Md 4.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of trophy. See e.g. Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_on_User_talk:Stefan4#Files_on_User_talk:Stefan4 --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sesión fotográfica con Evelyn Díaz Tarawa 
(jo ta ke irabazi arte) 14:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed from the photographer, not the subject. Veanse COM:OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 06:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Copy of Wojciech Sawilski (1906-1996) with no information of copyright release. Fallaner (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Will be good idea to remove viewer interface elements. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: 1771 document. Image cropped. Ruthven (msg) 06:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This is a gif created from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvqCmdITM-4 I really doubt this is the uploader's "own work" DreamLinker (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
copyvio - needs approval by the artist. h-stt !? 18:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
The artist´s approval was already given!
- The approval is not documented, please check out Commons:OTRS to see how you need to dokument the license. --h-stt !? 15:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Ruthven (msg) 06:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Mahdia in work.jpg. This is a very slightly cropped version of the original. Delete unless the uploader has a good reason to keep this. Guanaco (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per Guanaco. Ruthven (msg) 06:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Joy seller.jpg Almost an exact duplicate, only difference is a slight crop. Delete. Guanaco (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per Guanaco. Ruthven (msg) 06:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Irrtümlich falsche Einträge W. Bulach (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 06:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Irrtümlich falsche Einträge W. Bulach (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 06:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I made a mistake while uploading. Thanks. Best wishes, Maria Thamm / Thammtation Music Thammtation Music (talk) 19:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 06:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Levent Demircan is a movie, TV and voice actor and is not OoS. If he doesn't have an article in WPs now, he will have one at any time. I don't know much about the meta issue. --E4024 (talk) 07:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Instagram photo. Permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 06:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo without metadata. -- 109.238.80.47 19:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Levent Demircan is a movie, TV and voice actor and is not OoS. I made his cat. If he doesn't have an article in WPs now, he will have one at any time. I don't know much about the meta issue. --E4024 (talk) 07:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Instagram photo. Permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 06:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
لانه عنصري ويسبب الازعاج المتواصل 83.209.217.48 19:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (we have File:No Israel.svg). Ruthven (msg) 06:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This photo was not made by the user who uploaded it, even though it is claimed to be self-published work. Source of original photo: http://www.gettyimages.nl/gebeurtenis/premiere-of-warner-bros-pictures-we-are-your-friends-arrivals-570346053#actress-emily-ratajkowski-attends-the-premiere-of-warner-bros-we-are-picture-id484666914 Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Other sources found on the Net (e.g. [7]). Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Exact copy of https://res.cloudinary.com/crowdpac/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,g_xy_center,q_auto,x_504,y_301/v1/uploads/ktpz2vf1tkpfr1vttiz4 Sanandros (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Film poster is owned by the the production company and not freely licensed.
If this is an american poster then it could be PD-no notice. Sanandros (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality, stretched awkwardly (for a polar plot, the x-scale and y-scale should be equal). Easy to recreate if needed. Apocheir (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
David Grudl contacted me with request for deletion this picture. Vobrcz (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, considering also that it's an uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 06:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted logo Rudolphous (talk) 22:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available.-- 109.238.80.47 22:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available.-- 109.238.80.47 22:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
naphthalene.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
naphthalene.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Com:Redundant. Vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
naphthalene.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
naphthalene.png){kind=link}
© The Belgian Monarchy (https://www.monarchie.be/en/information/copyright), copy of https://www.monarchie.be/sites/default/files/public/styles/family_member_main_photo/public/027_bd_0.jpg?itok=d5XEh62K Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
© The Belgian Monarchy (https://www.monarchie.be/en/information/copyright), copy of https://www.monarchie.be/sites/default/files/public/styles/family_member_main_photo/public/30_7.jpg?itok=60CQNcXh Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
Pic form 1917 could be PD. Sanandros (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- {{PD-Italy}} seems to apply. Jcb (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Jcb. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no permission (No permission since)
Possibly below COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Josve05a. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Uploader states that this is an own work. Yet, it is a work by Defu Guo (郭德福). And I find it very unlikely that the uploader is said artist.
- https://www.facebook.com/DefuGuo/photos/pb.215706585587764.-2207520000.1510587932./241469673011455/?type=3&theater
- http://guodefu.com/
Authorship is doubted. --Cold Season (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Uploader states that this is an own work. Yet, it is a work by Defu Guo (郭德福). And I find it very unlikely that the uploader is said artist.
- https://www.facebook.com/DefuGuo/photos/a.215714932253596.1073741828.215706585587764/256382314853524/?type=3&theater
- http://guodefu.com/
Authorship is doubted. --Cold Season (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
A low quality crop of this image existed online[8](archived) prior to this being uploaded. This might be that the uploader took the image and shared it, but that image was uploaded before this one claims to have been taken on. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: "FBMD" in metadata, probably Facebook image. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Previously published image: https://www.google.com/search?q=tyler+the+creator+pillow+talk+remix&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmwEJqjRyg1ZzJ-MajwELEKjU2AQaCAg9CEIIFQgFDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIonB3zGrYazRGkEfcPzA-BEMUPsxqoOt4uqTqrOtkt2i3mLdEkqjqWLhowOYM9Us-9AZCK1JeXWv_1vz7UsQuN5-mMbMtXa4dGqZhf8hTmpT4MC8CpPZRUsN1drIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRZHdKEDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjl8oWrprzXAhVlzIMKHVdnADUQ2A4IJigB&biw=1384&bih=780#imgrc=_ Requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 19:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused copy of File:Incomarose.jpg. -- 109.238.80.47 19:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, no evidence that uploader is the photographer. Widely available online, e.g. at http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/television/it-was-a-wonderful-journey-but-time-to-move-on-niti-taylor-on-her-exit-from-ghulaam-4769806/ Verbcatcher (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The uploader added this image to Wikipedia with a citation of the Indian Express article linked above. This suggests that this is the origin on the image. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Invalid licensing information. The photo is a non-free work by German photographer Heinrich Hoffmann; these are not in public domain in the U.S. or Germany. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: It seems that the uncropped version of the pic (with higher resolution and without handwriting) belongs to Hoffmann Postcards Knight Cross Holders Series R 151 - R 200. Collectibles. --....HMS (talk) 13:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:13, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value-unused anywhere in Wikipedia Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It's the source version of what was probably a sign at the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear -- see File:Dont Tread on Me Rally to Restore Sanity.jpg for another variation. If a photo of a sign at a rally is allowed, I don't know why the vector source of a sign wouldn't be allowed. Anyway, Commons has hundreds of "Special or fictional flag" images, and it's pretty well established that in most cases a flag image won't be deleted just for being special or fictional, unless there's some additional aggravating factor involved (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering). AnonMoos (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- User:Kintetsubuffalo, in response to your latest little spiteful hissy-fit, resulting from you working yourself into an emotional tizzy over something that's probably not worth understanding. -- You left a message on my user talkpage in connection with this deletion nomination, so that under those circumstances it's blatantly and brazenly hypocritical of you to demand that I not leave messages on your user talkpage. Someone somewhere once said something along the lines of "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"... AnonMoos (talk) 10:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hyperbole much? I didn't put anything on your talkpage. A bot might have.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, User:Kintetsubuffalo -- the edit may have been facilitated by scripting or gadgets, but it happened exactly and only when you chose to click on the button which initiated a deletion request of an image that I had uploaded a version of, and it's attributed to you in the edit history, and even signed by you on the page (see [9]), so that you're 100% responsible for it in every respect. Hiding behind scripting and gadgets doesn't do anything in particular to hide your apparent hypocrisy. AnonMoos (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded this file. I don't really remember doing it, or why I would have done it, but I'm sure I did it because the picture is one that I made for the Rally to Restore Sanity. All I did with it was put it on a shirt and wear it to the rally. I don't have an opinion on whether or not it should be deleted, but I doubt that there's any harm either way, so it's probably not worth any personal conflict. Ike9898 (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Funny flag, but no encyclopediac value. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Violates project scope. Commons is not a file hosting service to show off random works of art. To quote: Material uploaded to Commons must be realistically useful for an educational purposes. This file is not in use in any of our sister projects. Fleet Command (talk) 12:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Complaint is entirely false as image is not random, is generated from the primary sample file provided within the FOSS application K-3D, the specific rendering demonstrates a specific feature, LuxRender output. Image is used as support to Wikipedia page K-3D. Image is entirely algorithmic and therefore is not art, it is a diagram that illustrates functional capabilities within the application. Actual code to generate image is in image comment. Image is linked from Wikipedia page as an external resource to support reference to the LuxRender capability without being a distraction as it would if embedded in the page. I am the developer who worked with the lead developer to implement said functionality along with sun position modules so that it could be used in educational institutions to demonstrate realistic daylight and shading. You have to understand the subject to fully appreciate the relevance of the example file, it shows the recursive reflections that the main render does not produce, hence it's axillary value in some use cases. The fact that you may think that it is "pretty" or art is an entirely subjective observation made by yourself and has no relevance to the image's actual intended purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmatthews (talk • contribs) 21:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Oh, yes, I can see a link from it on Wikipedia. Not only that, I can see that another editor removed the link, citing English Wikipedia's external link policy. You first tried to assume the ownership of the Wikipedia article and then grossly insulted that editor calling him/her "an abusive troll". It appears I am not the only one who thinks this image is not educational. I am contacting Codename Lisa (talk · contribs) to get her opinion here too.
But you yourself said it: You have to understand the subject to fully appreciate the relevance of the example file. Wrong! You are saying the image requires education, while our policy says the image must be educational. When you write a Wikipedia article, or a Wikibook tutorial, you are supposed to be writing it for people like me, who know nothing whatsoever.
Fleet Command (talk) 07:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Hello. I just saw the ping by FleetCommand above.
- I just read COM:SCOPE and a couple of paragraphs took my attention. To quote:
- Files uploaded to Commons must be either "realistically useful for an educational purpose" or "legitimately in use". The uploader has already made case that this image is not realistically educational because, as he said, it requires prior knowledge of "recursive reflections" instead of teaching it. This image is not legitimately used by a sister project, because not only it is not inserted in the middle of a Wikipedia article to help make what the article already says clearer. Instead, it is inserted in the "External links" section; thus it is expected to justify its own existence.
- An example provided is "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills". It is an artwork because after "understand[ing] the subject to fully", the viewer can only appreciate it.
- Another example provided is "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". Finally, the image is offers less than what other existing images have, namely File:K3d software screenshot.png and File:K-3D.png.
- Now, a question that might come up is: Couldn't we fix the problem I explained in the first bullet point by writing prose about "recursive reflections"? COM:SCOPE has info on this too: "An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph. [Line break] For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people." Since the author has not realistically considered the use of this image for educational purpose, it is dubious whether this image can actually be used for such a purpose.
- Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)- The dialogue above is a classic case of the sort of abusive trolling by self appointed content overlords that goes against the spirit of wikimedia. The comments are false, simply confected arguments put forward in order to justify their harassment and show no appreciation of the topic or what may or not be relevant in it's context.
- BTW "Codename Lisa" is a man, and I know exactly who that ex Microsoft project manager is too, so there is no need to be so "galant". LOL.
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmatthews (talk • contribs) 08:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
So to reiterate my points with regard to the actual claims made initially, rather than the tactical maneuvering (second attack) after those points were refuted.
The Complaint is entirely false as image is not random, is generated from the primary sample file provided within the FOSS application K-3D, the specific rendering demonstrates a specific feature, LuxRender output. Image is used as support to Wikipedia page K-3D. Image is entirely algorithmic and therefore is not art, it is a diagram that illustrates functional capabilities within the application. Actual code to generate image is in image comment. Image is linked from Wikipedia page as an external resource to support reference to the LuxRender capability without being a distraction as it would if embedded in the page. I am the developer who worked with the lead developer to implement said functionality along with sun position modules so that it could be used in educational institutions to demonstrate realistic daylight and shading. You have to understand the subject to fully appreciate the relevance of the example file, it shows the recursive reflections that the main render does not produce, hence it's axillary value in some use cases. The fact that you may think that it is "pretty" or art is an entirely subjective observation made by yourself and has no relevance to the image's actual intended purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmatthews (talk • contribs) 21:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
The above demonstrates clearly that:
The work is not Art, and not random. The purpose of the diagram is to illustrate a functional feature of the software. The work is used in the wikipedia page for the software application that produced it. None of the initial points made in the Deletion Request are valid.
FleetCommand (talk) who originated this Invalid Deletion Request has 5 years ago for some reason decided to commit "Wikimedia suicide", coincidently their account is still active in support of user Codename Lisa see https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=FleetCommand&users=Codename+Lisa&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki for evidence. Clearly a case of a Puppet. --Dsmatthews (talk) 20:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- (Yawn) Have you ever seen one those spam emails that try to reproduce genuine emails from eBay, PayPal, Apple, Google, Microsoft and so on? Most of them do a very poor job of copying the original, often calling you by your email username instead of your name, have typos and don't reproduce the one typo which you made during registration and was never fixed. This message is like those. It tries to copy a drama in English Wikipedia, in which one wiki-hound tried an accusation of sockpuppetry. This Dsmatthews is clearly copying that an bungling it up badly, not knowing what an EIA link is supposed to show. Fleet Command (talk) 07:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unacceptable behavior by Dsmatthews aside, the file is not in scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal image. While policy allows active contributors to have one or two personal images for use on User Pages, "active" and "Contributor" must come first. This user's only other upload was a copyright violation. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
(c) Pierre-André Thiébaut. Found elsewhere (https://files.newsnetz.ch/story/1/4/0/14002730/5/topelement.jpg) with DR tag (Droits Réservés aka All Rights Reserved) incompatible with CC Licence. Identity of Megatim should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright 2017 © ilinx éditions (https://ilinxeditions.com/index.php/author-book/charles-chevallier/), copy of http://ilinxeditions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Portrait-CHC.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- File is copyright of François Ayme, photographer, under authorisation from Ilynx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erodommock (talk • contribs)
- Hi @Erodommock: . In the two cases, this picture is copyrighted (by François Aymé and/or Ilinx éditions) so it's incompatible with the Creative Commons licence. Author François Aymé should read Commons:OTRS and eventually send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused copy of File:Toyota Corolla 1997 Canada.jpg. -- 109.238.80.47 19:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
A more accurate file of the same theme was uploaded, in File:Visa requirements for British Nationals (Overseas).png222.167.166.187 10:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - different languages; also the cited file has no legend, so is useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vegetable as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.parcolucretili.it/app/webroot/wp/#portfolio-image/3/ Comment see talk page and this file has EXIF metadata. @Alemarmotta: please send permission via COM:OTRS from SIT. Y.haruo (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
This picture is my own property. I had make this photograph. And authorize to use it. I actually work in the Parco dei Monti Lucretili and I put this photograph in that album.
- Italiano: Puoi scrivere a permission-it
wikimedia.org per rilasciare il permesso; vedi anche it:WP/OTRS. --Ruthven (msg) 05:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - needs a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Schlechtes Foto von mir 156.67.138.225 17:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we do not delete photos at the request of IPs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Whitepixels as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: :File:Marosvásárhely az 1950 -es években (2).jpg These are different scans of the same photograph. Guanaco (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete: Derzsi Elekes Andor nem a kép a szerzője, és a kép nem vált még közkinccsé. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic
Lentebb egy, a kép törlési megbeszéléséhez nem tartozó vita található kikommentelt állapotban. Mivel nem a kép törléséhez tartozik, ezért OFF-téma. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ivar the Boneful as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image source states that it is copyright "Until 2025 [Created/Published Date + 70 Years]", and that there is "No Government Copyright Ownership", so this image is not in the public domain in Australia or elsewhere. Unfortunately anonymous works are only PD in Australia if created *before* 1955, not *in* 1955. The catalogue reference reiterates that the image is not government-owned as claimed, but was rather the personal property of the subject.
OK lot's of text let's check that also by other users. Sanandros (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.svg states as its source only the file proposed to be deleted. File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.png refers precisely its source as well as legal origin of that sign. Official variant of a signs should be never deleted due any derivative work. --ŠJů (talk) 02:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- I added the template {PD-CzechGov} to SVG file, and I think that it removes any claim of its license status. I believe that keeping unused picture with a blue triangle and a white strip just to be able using the other picture with a blue triangle is very strange and needless. --109.238.80.47 10:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- File page of File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.svg states his source not so exactly and precisely as File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.png. An image of a official road sign based on an official legal document has more value for the project than unsourced creative works of uploaders, independently on their technical or graphical qualities. File page File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.svg states even no real official source. If the original file will be deleted, the information about the legal source (a specific governmental ordinance and its specific passage) is quite lost. --ŠJů (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- 1.The source image can be deleted, even if a derivative work refers to it. Recent example, where not even DR was (and it's not my action).
2.Some time before I nominated current Russian road sign. And "the image from the official legal document" has been removed and "unsourced creative work of uploader" was kept. And nothing terrible has happened, the world didn't end, just ones versions of the images replaced by more high quality versions. It's totally normal.
I transferred the original source-link to SVG file. Now for sure all claims have to be cleaned. --109.238.80.47 17:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- 1.The source image can be deleted, even if a derivative work refers to it. Recent example, where not even DR was (and it's not my action).
- File page of File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.svg states his source not so exactly and precisely as File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.png. An image of a official road sign based on an official legal document has more value for the project than unsourced creative works of uploaders, independently on their technical or graphical qualities. File page File:1935 CS-2 Nebezpečná zatáčka.svg states even no real official source. If the original file will be deleted, the information about the legal source (a specific governmental ordinance and its specific passage) is quite lost. --ŠJů (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- I added the template {PD-CzechGov} to SVG file, and I think that it removes any claim of its license status. I believe that keeping unused picture with a blue triangle and a white strip just to be able using the other picture with a blue triangle is very strange and needless. --109.238.80.47 10:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - needed for history of svg file. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Com:Redundant. Unused image, vector version available. -- 109.238.80.47 22:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission. Photographic files from Tribunal fédéral seems to be Copyright: Tribunal fédéral suisse (https://www.bger.ch/fr/index/press/press-inherit-template/press-mediaplatform.htm), incompatible with CC licence. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Hello, I understand your concern, but have received a specfic permission to use freely this image on Wikipedia issued per e-mail by the "Tribunal fédéral suisse". I can send it to you. --Nwidmer (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Nwidmer: . You've to send this email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, Thanks. I have sent the email. --Nwidmer (talk) 07:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Nwidmer: . You've to send this email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User:Nwidmer, note that "specfic permission to use freely this image on Wikipedia" is not sufficient -- WP and Commons images must be free for any use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use. Also note that the copyright holder must send the license directly to OTRS --forwarded messages are not acceptable as it is too easy to forge a license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Bundesstraße 11 Landkreis Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen (Kesselbergstraße) — Luftbild mit folgenden Layer Topographische Karte + Verkehrswege.jpg
[edit]_%E2%80%94_Luftbild_mit_folgenden_Layer_Topographische_Karte_%2B_Verkehrswege.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Luftbild_mit_folgenden_Layer_Topographische_Karte_%2B_Verkehrswege.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Used layers "Orte und Straßen" and "Gelände und Gebäude" not released under CC BY 3.0 DE, see https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/weitere/opendata.html тнояsтеn ⇔ 20:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)