共享资源:管理员

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 94% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

本页面被视为维基共享资源的正式指引。

它阐明了大多数编者原则上认可并普遍遵循的标准或行为。必要时你可以随意更新本页面。但是，重大修改的建议请在讨论页面提出。

Other languages:
本页简而言之： 维基共享资源的管理员是指那些有额外技术能力来管理站点的用户。他们能够删除和恢复文件和页面、保护页面、封禁用户、重命名文件，以及执行其他管理任务。当前维基共享资源共有180名管理员。用户可申请并完成投票过程来成为管理员。

此页解释了管理员（有时叫做admins或者sysops）在维基共享资源上的职责。请注意，此职务的的细节，以及授予管理员权限的方式，可能与其他项目不同。

如果你需要管理员的帮助，请移步管理员公告板。

现时在维基共享资源上有180 名管理员。

什么是管理员？

Administrators as of 10月 2024
Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 180

  1. -revi, ko, en-3
  2. 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3
  3. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  4. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  5. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  6. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  7. Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1
  8. Abzeronow, en, fr-1
  9. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  10. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  11. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
  12. Aka, de, en-3
  13. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  14. Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2
  15. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  16. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  17. Anthere, fr, en-3
  18. AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward)
  19. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  20. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1
  21. Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1
  22. Billinghurst, en
  23. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  24. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  25. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  26. Captain-tucker, en
  27. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
  28. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  29. Common Good, en
  30. CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat)
  31. Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1
  32. Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1
  33. Czar, en
  34. DaB., de, en-1
  35. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  36. Davepape, en
  37. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  38. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  39. DMacks, en
  40. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  41. Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
  42. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  43. Ebrahim, en-3
  44. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  45. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  46. Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
  47. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  48. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
  49. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  50. Explicit, en, es, ko-2
  51. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  52. Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2
  53. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  54. Gbawden, en-3, af-1
  55. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  56. Geni, en
  57. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  58. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  59. Gnangarra, en, nys-1
  60. GPSLeo, de, en-2
  61. GreenMeansGo, en
  62. Grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  63. Hekerui, de, en-4
  64. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  65. Hesperian, en
  66. Holly Cheng, en, ja-2
  67. Huntster, en
  68. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  69. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  70. IronGargoyle, en, de-1
  71. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  72. Jaqen, it, en-2
  73. Jarekt, pl, en
  74. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  75. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  76. Jdforrester, en
  77. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  78. Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2
  79. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  80. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  81. JoKalliauer, de, en-3
  82. Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward)
  83. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  84. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
  85. Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2
  86. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  87. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  88. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  89. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  90. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  91. Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1
  92. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  93. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  94. Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
  95. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  96. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2
  97. Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  98. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
  99. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  100. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  101. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  102. Matrix, en, ta-2
  103. MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
  104. MBisanz, en
  105. Mdaniels5757, en, es-1
  106. MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1
  107. Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
  108. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  109. Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
  110. Minorax, en, zh (oversighter)
  111. Missvain, en
  112. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  113. Miya, ja, en-2
  114. Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  115. Morgankevinj, en
  116. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  117. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  118. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
  119. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  120. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
  121. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  122. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  123. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  124. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  125. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  126. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  127. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  128. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  129. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  130. Pyb, fr, en-2
  131. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  132. Racconish, fr, en-4
  133. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  134. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  135. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  136. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  137. Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1
  138. Regasterios, hu, en-1
  139. Rehman, en, si-1
  140. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  141. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  142. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  143. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  144. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  145. RP88, en, de-1
  146. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  147. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  148. Sadads, en, es-3
  149. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  150. Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1
  151. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  152. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  153. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  154. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
  155. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  156. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  157. Strakhov, es, en-2
  158. TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  159. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  160. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2
  161. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  162. The Squirrel Conspiracy, en
  163. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1
  164. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  165. Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1
  166. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  167. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  168. Wdwd, de, en-2
  169. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  170. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1
  171. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  172. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  173. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  174. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  175. Yuval CT, he, en-3
  176. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  177. علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
  178. Abuse filter, (automated account)
  179. CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
  180. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

If 180 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

技术

技术上，管理员在维基共享资源上有以下权限：

  • 删除和还原图像及其他上传的文件，并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
  • 删除和还原页面，并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
  • 保护页面和解除对页面的保护，并可编辑保护级别为“仅允许管理员”的页面。
  • 封禁和解封用户，进行IP地址（或IP段）的封禁。
  • 编辑没有太多限制的的界面讯息（参见界面管理员）
  • 重命名文件。
  • 添加和删除用户组。
  • 配置上载向导。
  • 彻底删除和还原特定页面的日志和历史版本。
  • 从其他项目导入页面。
  • 合并页面历史。
  • 修改防滥用过滤器。
  • 移动页面时不创建来源页面的重定向。
  • 无视欺诈检查。
  • 一次将一条消息发送给多个用户。（群发消息）
  • 在API查询中使用更高的上限。

这些统称为管理工具。

社群角色

管理员是维基共享资源社群内有经验的可信用户，负责进阶维护工作并且经公众讨论或投票已获授权使用管理工具。不同的管理员有着不同的兴趣和专长，但典型的管理员任务包括决策并关闭删除请求、删除版权违规、必要时恢复档案、反破坏保护维基共享资源以及在模板和其他受保护页面上作业。当然，其中有些工作也可以由非管理员完成。

管理员被期望了解是项目的目标，并准备着与其余有志人士一同做出建设性的贡献。管理员理应了解并遵守指引政策，在合理时尊重社群共识。

除去需要使用管理工具的时候，管理员由于个人立场不同并无特殊编辑权限，在讨论或公开投票内，他们的贡献被看作与其余任一普通编者相同。一些管理员可能会变得更有影响力，这不是因为他们的管理员地位，而是因为他们从社群中获得了对其个人的信任。

对管理员的建议

请详阅管理员手册。

移除管理员权限

根据管理员离任方针，如果管理员不活跃或者滥用管理工具，权限会被解除。 在管理员解任请求中，不适用参选管理员时判断共识的标准。而应当是使用“多数共识”，即超过50%的用户达成解任共识即可解任管理员。

申请成为管理员

所有有意愿成为管理员的使用者必须经过这个过程，自荐至申请成为管理人员，包括那些想重新上任的前任管理员。

首先，前往Commons:Administrators/Howto并阅读那里的资讯。随后返回并在下方的段落递交申请。

  • 如果他人提名阁下，请以陈述“我同意（I accept）”或是其余类似字样来接受，并在提名下方签名。子页面仍然需要被您或是您的提名人嵌入。


使用下方的方框，并将"Username"替换成您的用户名。

投票

任一注册用户都可以在这投票，不过那些很少甚至没有编辑过的人的票可能不会被计算在内。阁下最好在 Support或 Oppose时都给予理由，这能帮助行政员更好地做出决策。有支持理据的论证会比简单的投票更被看重。

上任管理员通常需要75%的支持率，并至少需要有8人同意。来自未注册用户的投票将不被计入。不管怎样，关闭个案的行政员可以自行考虑社群共识，最终决定并不只基于原始数据。如果行政员认为需要更好地确定社区共识，可以酌情延长投票的时间。

由于需计算成功或失败率， Neutral投票将不被计入投票总数。然而，这些评论是讨论的一部分，并可能会说服其他人，还有助于关闭个案的行政员更好地了解社群共识。

清除缓存使用下方的编辑链接来编辑嵌入后的页面。

申请成为管理员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Günther Frager

Related requests:

Vote

Günther Frager (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)

Scheduled to end: 21:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

After some encouraging comments from Yann and The Squirrel Conspiracy, and some reflection of my side I decided to apply for adminship. I roughly started collaborating in Commons 18 months ago after reporting some copyvios that I found while patrolling eswiki. While trying to upload old photos I was confused by URAA and other rules that lead me to the rabbit hole of learning copyright laws. I started more than 1.400 DRs and an uncountable number of SDs. I'm aware of the most important copyright issues like de minimis, freedom of panorama, URAA, etc, but I'm not an expert on specific legislation. I have a good grasp of Argentine law, Spanish law, German law with its weird rules on FoP, French law (WWII extensions, 50 years at URAA-time) and I can dig into US restorations, but I'm mostly clueless on Middle-East, African or Asian specific copyright laws. Thus, I will likely stick to tasks where I have confidence, e.g. closing FoP cases, and avoid controversial ones like scope-related DRs or user problems. The admin flag will also allow me to see deleted files while participating on undeletion requests. Günther Frager (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

  • The intransigence on the User Page issue is not demonstrating good judgment. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm fine you changing your support, but I would prefer if you call me stubborn instead of saying I lack good judgment. I addressed the concern of the people that gave a justified argument with a counter-argument. I hope that you understand that I cannot give a counter-argument to a "I wish you do X" request. Also, such requests wouldn't fly in a DR where I'm supposed to apply my judgment. Günther Frager (talk) 00:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing to  conditional neutral based on the discussion this RFA has triggered. Gunter, if this is the hill your going to fail your RFA over, then I'm unsure if you will ever pass RFA. At this point, its not about the userpage, its about Beating a dead horse. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Could you please add the language(s) you speak on your user page using Commons:Babel? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Prior to submitting the request I placed that Babel template already on my user talk page Special:Diff/948915253, and I plan to set up an archive bot (but I'm still investigating which approach I will follow). Günther Frager (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please create Babel copy on your user page. It should not be blank. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I completely agree. A red page for an admin is not the best. --Msb (talk) 20:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @EugeneZelenko和Mosbatho：​ Why, exactly, is it a problem? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I might try to explore the underlying mindset.
    For new users of wiki projects, red link or blue link doesnt make much difference, coz they dont know shit about how the whole system works.
    But for users with some experience, they would know the fact that red username = no userpage, and that they would have built up an assumption that red username = rookies. Coupled with users' bias against new users, they would then come to the impression that red username = rookies = they should treat red link users less seriously. Then there's another assumption that "admins" should be treated preferentially.
    When the assumptions suddenly dont match, that makes them arrive at another deduction -- a red link sysop must have something wrong. RoyZuo (talk) 06:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I support the request, but I don't either agree with RoyZuo's words about the red links and his concepts in general. An userpage for admin should be mandatory beyond Gunther refuses to show some personal information. But if he is still reluctant to that, at least a babel template should be included. Fma12 (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I do not follow RoyZuo's explanation in any way. This is exclusively RoyZuo's world of thought, which has nothing to do with that of other users. I also find his choice of words unpleasant. In my opinion, it should be clearly recognizable on the user page that a particular user is an administrator, so the user page should also appear in the corresponding category (Category:Commons administrators). It is also quite clear here that the language in which someone can be contacted should be specified. A comprehensible reason is also given here. Especially as all these things are very easy to implement.
  • I would feel more comfortable voting if there was something personal about you anywhere. Like, any own uploads (even yesterday's breakfast mobile photo), or any quasi-personal information on user page (maybe nationality, or country of residence, maybe your languages, maybe age, even approximate, if you don't feel like being doxxed :)). Other than that, I'd support your Request.--Tupungato (talk) 11:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would also agree that for an admin, having a userpage can let others to know more about you, but I think information like residence and age is somehow private so I don't think Günther needs to disclose it. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although I am inclined to support, the red-linked user-page gives me a headache. May I know why is it so? Regards, Aafi (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    yeah, i love good looking userpages. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 22:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Before voting I too would like to see an userpage. Bedivere (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The user page is the only page in the wikis where the user has full control and I would like to keep that control. Paraphrasing Fernando Pessoa, if I say nothing there, it's because I have nothing to say. So, the day I have to urge to express myself I will create my user page.
At the moment only two reasons where given as to why I should have one. One argues that users should know the languages that I speak and that I'm an admin. I agree with the argument and I think I'm fulfilling it. If someone wants to contact me, they will write me a message on my talk page where they will see the languages that I speak without the need to go to another page to gather that information. If I become an admin, I will make sure it is clear they are addressing an admin. I have to point out that Commons:Guide to adminship is not a policy, it is just a set recommendations and tutorials for new admins.
Regarding the second argument, I think users should be treated fairly regardless if they are admins or beginners. If someone acts in an uncivil manner, I will either warn them or open a report in the admin board.
I hope I answered your doubts on the topic and my answers helps you to take your decision. Günther Frager (talk) 21:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That you strictly refuse to follow the convention to create a user page with babel boxes and maybe some sentences at least about what you do on Commons does not convince me to support your candidature. GPSLeo (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the coment above. You are being too reluctant to create an user page and the explanation given by you does not sound convincing at all, sorry :( Fma12 (talk) 23:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and honestly I would have supported had the user either responded here earlier or just redirected the user-page to their talk-page where people could find some necessary information. The above response doesn't convince me, sorry. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would've supported, too, but this is a strange hill to die on. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, honestly, it isn't one of the most satisfactory responses and doesn't convince me at all. If it were my admin request, I would be actively replying to everyone and would try my best to convince as much as I could, but you were like, I don't care what anyone says, and you didn't bother to reply until someone opposed. No doubt your work is great, and I initially supported you, but a would-be admin is supposed to be listening to others and understanding their concerns. You were given multiple options, but you chose to make it controversial. As a future admin, you should have de-esclated this situation and convinced everyone. I don't understand what you mean by having full control of the userpage, because it does not make any sense at all. It's not like anyone would edit your userpage without your permission. Even if that's your concern, you can add an edit notice or transclude your userpage. At the end, a bit of advice for you: if multiple admins and experienced users are telling you to do something, you should listen to them instead of going around refusing it profusely only when it's for the best. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • How about a compromise? Günther, you could change your signature to only point to your talk page, or create your userpage as a redirect to your talk page; that would eliminate the concerns about your signature having a red link and hopefully satisfy some of the opposes. It seems quite a trivial thing to fail over. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To be honest, I started this RfA because I was hoping to close more DRs that the number I was creating, neutralizing my impact on the backlog and I only started thinking about it after some admins pinged me. I was expecting the discussions here to be centered around it, but it turned, I'm my opinion, in a bikeshedding discussion on whether my link should be red or blue. I might try to change the vote of some people by making my link blue, but I won't be able to the change opinion of the people that find my behavior unfit to be an admin regardless of the color of my link. Günther Frager (talk) 13:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Günther Frager, in all honesty, I've already closed enough of your DRs to respect your judgment and take it into account if it's a yes/no, so you already have enough credibility in that respect. I voted for you despite your redlinked. I decided to remove my vote (I haven't opposed you) because you've deciding to take a stand about this, when it's such a minor issue that bothers so many people--i.e. their issues with trusting you outweigh the hill you're trying to die on. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with Bastique. It's not your competence in DRs that concerns me, I just can't understand why you would take a stand on such a small issue when it's clearly of concern to some members of the community. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A RfA should be a debate, but there is no arguments going back and forth. The only time I tried to give an argument it was considered an escalation and qualified as nonsense. The only choice that I seem to have is to follow the consensus of creating user page, yet I see plenty of people being fine without me having one. If I'm not mistaken, your point of view is that I should ignore it to gain the privilege of being an admin. The problem is that I have a different perspective. Being an admin is not a goal for me, it is a tool to help better the community. Thus, I'm a bit more reluctant to accept arbitrarinesses. Günther Frager (talk) 21:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell：​ Appreciate your suggestion. This might have been a workable solution if proposed by the candidate timely in this request. IMHO, the discussion has moved beyond this. I would also like to know now how I trust him to act on behalf of the community, if he is not respecting what clearly seems community consensus here (see, Commons:Administrators, Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus., which is a policy, and not just a set of recommendations) --Schlurcher (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair enough. How a prospective admin responds when consensus is against them is important. It might not be too late to make a recovery. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ratekreel

Related requests:

Vote

Ratekreel (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)

Scheduled to end: 21:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ratekreel. I am nominating myself for adminship on Wikimedia Commons. I am an active contributor who regularly tags files for speedy deletion, assists with file moves, and, as a license reviewer, helps review licenses—primarily, though not exclusively, of GODL-India files, which have a significant backlog of ~15,000 files.

In addition to these roles, I am involved in the VRT process and occasionally help by translating commons policies and other things. I have a fair understanding of our policies and guidelines, and I am always open to asking for guidance if I'm unsure or in doubt.

Thank you for your consideration. --Ratekreel (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Comments

@Modern primat：​. Here you go (it's not live data, but should be good enough): https://commons.wikiscan.org/?menu=userstats&user=Ratekreel --Schlurcher (talk) 13:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You performed many rename requests where the filename is in a language that you do not speak. How do you ensure that the request is within the renaming guideline in such cases? GPSLeo (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

申请成为行政员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

申请成为用户查核员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

申请成为监督员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Kadı

Related requests:

Vote

Kadı (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 00:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello I am Kadı. I am an administrator in Commons. Also, I serve as a VRT personnel and global renamer. Sometimes users request oversight actions from me. 3 days ago, I changed visibility of edits on a file because of the uploader's request and I forwarded it to the oversighters but there is no action. I request to be an oversighter, to handle this requests and suppress the edits. Kind regards, --Kadı Message 18:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Comments

  • There definitely is a need for another oversighter. I'm not sure if unwanted location data (which is still present in the metadata, file should be overwritten with changed EXIF to purge the unwanted data) merits oversighting rather than hiding it from non-sysops but maybe others can convince me that it's appropriate. Abzeronow (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Like in your last request, I think the community would like to hear how many requests for OS you made in the last 12 months, and how many of them lead to actual oversight. Feel free to add how long it took to have the OS requests processed. (The last 2 or 3 requests I made were processed within few hours, so I don't actually see any problem.) --Krd 07:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Krd, hello. Thanks for your question. Oversight actions are very important which includes users' privacy, and personal datas. I do not remember the number of my requests but 4 days ago I evaluated a request then forwarded to OS mails. 4 days passed, no answer. The request is so basic, it may take approximately 5 minutes. In addition, I do not indicate directly here the requested files for protecting the user's privacy.
    All of us are volunteers here, I do not blame anyone. Commons is a very large project, for example in trwiki we have 4 oversighters, Commons is a very enormous project than trwiki definitely, but in Commons we have only 3. This is definitely not adequate for Commons. I am volunteering here to handle oversight requests faster. In my previous request, you can see this link A steward self assigned OS access to themself in order to handle and emergency action. Kind regards, Kadı Message 09:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    An emergency is no relevant example. Also, two Commons OS have edited today. Can we rule out that there is just some communication problem? Krd 13:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Krd, I disagree with you. It is a relevant example. Large wikis should use local OS' We are not a small wiki. Kadı Message 15:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Even with more local OS, let it be 10, you will have situations where no one is present for an emergency situation. Volunteers are generally not required to meet emergency situation standard, so and emergency example IMHO is moot. Krd 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Minorax、​Odder、​和Raymond：​ Can you comment if you received the request, and if there is any relevant backlog? --Krd 13:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Krd: I can confirm we did receive the request. There is no backlog, but we place lower priority on requests where content has already been revision deleted by an administrator as opposed to content that's visible on the wiki. I had limited access to e-mail throughout last week but I will action the request shortly. I do have to say that this whole discussion is striking me as quite strange where a user is requesting advanced permissions because one (one!) request they filed hasn't been answered to their satisfaction. As demonstrated in our activity statistics, we get a fairly steady number of requests every month and nearly all of them are answered a in a prompt manner as a few of our more active contributors can attest to. odder (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Odder, as I said before I do not blame anyone. I am a very active user among the Wikimedia projects. My aim is to help oversighters. Best wishes, Kadı Message 16:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As someone who has sent a fair deal of oversight requests, I can confirm that 95% of the time, I get a 0-2 hr Response. I don't see any downsides with another oversighter. Normally the overnighters are very active, but I have had reports that took more than 24 hrs (IMHO the max time an oversight request can take), and another OS would be helpful, especially with @Kadı's timezone and editing patterns. As to @GPSLeo's concerns, WMF Legal will make the call as to if being in turkey is a problem, that's not our job. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    On my concerns: I just think we need to be more careful with such problems. For the other topic: For real emergencies there is the WMF T&S team and emergency cases do not have to be handled by volunteers. And it is always possible to contact a regular admin in parallel to perform a regular deletion before the suppression by an oversighter. GPSLeo (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You live in country that blocked Wikipedia in the past and the situation regarding democracy did not become better since then. I have the fear that giving you access to such sensitive information you bring you and the project into danger as authorities could try to force you to give information to them. GPSLeo (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @GPSLeo, In trwiki we have OS user group. All of the trwiki oversighters do not gave information to anyone. Your fear is irrelevant. Kadı Message 16:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There were multiple of such cases in other countries where the WMF had to ban the users to protect them. GPSLeo (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @GPSLeo, I am also in VRT. I guarantee that I would never do that. Kadı Message 16:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

参见

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators/zh&oldid=949139500"