Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/20
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).
- File:Pierre suisse.png
- File:Pierre & Wemba.png
- File:L'article de hercule.png
- File:L'article de Pierre.png
- File:Pierre le Champion.jpg
- File:Pierre et les galas qui la organiser.jpg
- File:Pierre & Santos.png
- File:Pierre & Mousse.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).
- File:Pierre en 1999.png
- File:Pierre & Mousse.png
- File:Pierre & Jo.png
- File:Papa & karim.png
- File:Pierre et joe.jpg
- File:Pierre & Karim.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Pierre et Karim.png
- File:Pierre et Papa wemba.png
- File:Pierre et Jo.png
- File:Pierre et Mousse.png
- File:Pierre et Santos.png
- File:Pierre en Suisse.png
Ahmadtalk 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and has been speedied. --FitIndia Talk Mail 17:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Vandalism-only image DannyS712 (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:55, 20 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: DW of Getty image: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/matthewzeitlin/oslo-freedom-forum-founder-says-thiel-has-every-right --Krdbot 19:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamza Alanbaky (talk · contribs)
[edit]all images marked as cc0 but are from either facebook or news sites with copyright notices at the bottom, I checked the source on most of the images and none of the show that they are CC0
- File:Valeriu Tița.jpg
- File:Abbas Attiya.jpg
- File:Ayoub Odisho.jpg
- File:Basim Qasim.jpg
- File:Karim Salman.jpg
- File:Radhi Shenaishil.jpg
- File:Adel Nima.jpg
- File:Rodion Gačanin.jpg
- File:Sadiq Saadoun.jpg
- File:Hussam Fawzi.jpg
- File:Samir Kadhim.jpg
- File:Essam Hamad.jpg
- File:Ahmed Daham.jpg
- File:Aleksandar-Ilic.jpg
- File:Hussam-Fawzi.jpg
CodeLyoko (talk) 22:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted. Copyvios. --Majora (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
i do not need Gani Gashi piktor (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Majora. Masum Reza📞 00:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Seeing those copyvio notices on the uploader's talk page, I highly doubt that this is an Own work. Masum Reza📞 22:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedily deleted by ~riley. Masum Reza📞 02:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation Gahukuro (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 06:44, 21 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload --Krdbot 13:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:36, 21 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:CSD#F1, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. --Krdbot 13:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Uploader disagree so a regular DR instead. Found at http://www.mishaquintcello.com/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deletion Request Appeal Keep @Patrick Rogel I took the photo of Quint_Cellist2.jpg File:Quint_Cellist2.jpg myself and it is under the creative commons free use license. Please remove the speedy deletion request. Please let me know if you have any questions. User:llewcellist — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:581:4600:3910:1176:AD41:576C:5EC2 (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Llewcellist: No, website is © 2017 MISHA QUINT, not Creative Commons. Photographers are DAVID MILKIS and ABBY GAUDETTE. If you are one of them please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Thank you for your reply. I have just filled out the OTRS request by email. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:581:4600:3910:1176:AD41:576C:5EC2 (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019102110000129 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Quint_Cellist2.jpg” under ticket:2019102110000129. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Ticket:2019102110000129. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Picture of a newspaper, clearly violation copyright 212.187.67.146 06:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joy sagar Murmu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused person photo. OOS.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joy sagar Murmu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.
- File:Chandana Tea Estate, Udalguri, Assam.jpg
- File:Joy sagar murmu.jpg
- File:Joy sagar murmu at TTT 2020 Mumbai.jpg
- File:All india young santali writers conference new delhi 2018.jpg
- File:ᱡᱚᱭ ᱥᱟᱜᱚᱨ ᱢᱩᱨᱢᱩ.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Low quality. An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I think this is not own work. The author is specified in the lower right corner (I see: Фото: А. Ст<…>ко, perhaps Фото: А. Степаненко/Photo by A. Stepanenko). Also uploader is the person depicted at this photograph, therefore she can't be an author. FITY CHANGE (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
File uses Google Maps with bad liciense, good liciense has OpenStreetMap. See w:ru:Википедия:Примеры неоправданного использования несвободных изображений#1+. 217.117.125.72 11:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna aidovna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото сделаны более 45 лет назад, автор, скорее всего, неизвестен, фото оцифрованы в наше время. Необходимо обращение в OTRS.
Dogad75 (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автором указан ГБАТД, метаданных нет, фотограф, скорее всего, неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 18:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This image shows a copyrighted work of modern architecture located in Germany. Freedom of panorama is not applicable as the photograph was taken indoors. Gnom (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, Germany does not have freedom of panorama for interiors. Gnom (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Good to know. Fine for me to delete it. There are three more in that category that might be problematic. -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Although the photograph may be released in the public domain, the subject fanzines do not have any information about their copyright status. By default they are copyrighted and as these fanzines are the subject of the photo, de minimis does not apply. Whpq (talk) 19:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
probably copyvio, see description. No EXIF-data. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sankeshwarmhatre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, self-promo.
Ahmadtalk 20:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Miyuki Son
[edit]All files from same user, who uploaded 8 files, two of which are deleted. The other 6 are in this category, two have exif from differnt cameras the others are without exif, the file dimensions look, as if taken from web sites. The fotos have been taken at random but very different places. the category stated that this model ist from a prevecture of Japan and from Brazil. Only a single foto from each event.
- File:Autografo revista.JPG
- File:Miyuki Europa center.jpg
- File:Miyuki Son autograph.jpg
- File:Miyuki Son Triumph.jpg
- File:Miyuki Son, Pierre Woodman, Venus Berlin.jpg
- File:Ron Jeremy, Miyuki Son y Pierre Woodman.jpg
C.Suthorn (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images of the same person over the yearsand the places: unlikely to be own works.
- File:Black leopards.jpg
- File:JS kairouanaise 2015.jpg
- File:AFC Leopards.jpg
- File:Mc Oran - 2012.jpg
- File:Missile FC 2011.jpg
- File:Polokwane City.jpg
- File:Vita congo 2010.jpg
- File:Luc 2.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Author is claimed to be Luc Eymael but is also in the picture. Leopards.jpg was previously published on [1] and [2].
The photographer(s) should send permission to OTRS.
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works. Some of them from http://www.luceymael.be/galerie.html
- File:Rwanda fc.jpg
- File:Black-leopards.jpg
- File:Vista-club.jpg
- File:Tala-el-gaesh.jpg
- File:Free-state-stars.jpg
- File:Polokwane-city.jpg
- File:Oman-al-nasar.jpg
- File:Jsk-kairouan.jpg
- File:Kenya-afc.jpg
- File:Mc-oran FC 2012.jpg
- File:Missile-gabon.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sagar17101985 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Faizul Haque Sagar.jpg
- File:Faizul Haque Sagar Wife.jpg
- File:Faizul Haque Sagar got married on2012.jpg
- File:Faizul Haque Sagar Reception.jpg
Ahmadtalk 21:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: ©2003 Allan Tannenbaum on EXIF at Flickr. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 2015 года, без метаданных, по описанию-личная фотография персоны, необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Catherine darley (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nelly Marez-Darley died in 2001. No OTRS.
Chassipress (talk) 22:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: персона на фотографии и фотограф-одно и тоже лицо. Dogad75 (talk) 23:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio: https://2sao.vn/ngan-ngo-voi-seri-anh-moi-day-goi-cam-cua-dong-nhi-n-37092.html DHN (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Obvious scan from book; no info on copyright status of original nor justification for claimed cc license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
DW; scan from book. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
DW, scan of book pages. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
DW, scan of book pages. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
DW, scan of book pages. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work; scan. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.facebook.com/IdealGirlOfficial/photos/pcb.1914513648826507/1914513332159872/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
File:I took this cruise for that 'Classic Toronto View', and there it is behind me (27286983063).jpg
[edit]out of scope -selfie Mindmatrix 16:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
en:User:EasyLiveTrade software was globally locked as spam-only account. Probably its logo is out of project scope. The company is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This is a famous historical picture and it's highly unlikely the uploader is the author of this picture as claimed (If 1984 is a birth year the author would have been 9 years old at the time this picture was taken, which is too young to take a picture like this.). OTRS permission is required. 109.91.39.4 19:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. File don't have information about first publication.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works, no FoP in both Russia and Ukraine for modern sculpture.
- File:Памятник Сталину, Рузвельту и Черчиллю в Ялте.jpg
- File:Бюст лейтенанта П.П. Шмидта.jpg
- File:Памятник Коли Пищенко (полностью).jpg
- File:Памятник Коли Пищенко (портрет).jpg
- File:Памятник Александру Пушкину в Ставрополе.JPG
Komarof (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Files with no exif data, hence dubious authorship.
- File:02 Bas-relief et graffiti dans la chapelle Saint-Michel de Monieux.jpg
- File:02 Saint-Michel Monieux 1648.jpg
- File:03 Gordes cheminée Renaissance du château.jpg
- File:05 Dégustation 01.jpg
- File:05 JP & Robert (dégustation).jpg
- File:05 JP & Robert Mayberry.jpg
- File:AOC Cabrières 2011.jpg
- File:Avignon Relevé des différentes inondations du Rhône.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Bd du 8 mai 1945 Parking 02.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Bd du 8 mai 1945.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Jardin 01.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Jardin 02.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 La Verne.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Parc Étienne Daillan 01.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Parc Étienne Daillan 02.jpg
- File:Bédarrides Décembre 2003 Villa du Bd du 8 mai 1945.jpg
- File:Coupe à saké close up.jpg
- File:Coupe à saké.jpg
- File:Côtes-du-rhône blanc Balma Venitia.jpg
- File:Fromage de brebis en Provence.jpg
- File:Lapin sauté chasseur.jpg
- File:Laragne Pont et ruines du moulin de Pornet.jpg
- File:Nouzha Skalli 001.jpg
- File:Nouzha Skalli 002.jpg
- File:Nouzha Skalli 003.jpg
- File:Nouzha Skalli 004.jpg
- File:Nouzha Skalli en campagne.jpg
- File:Poulets du Gers.jpg
- File:Production emblématique du Gers.jpg
- File:Romanin cave cathédrale.jpg
- File:Romanin Cuves de vinification.jpg
- File:Soeur Marie-Gabriel directrice de la Maternité.jpg
- File:Usson campagne Courveille 01.jpg
- File:Usson Campagne Courveille 02.jpg
- File:Usson campagne Courveille 03.jpg
- File:Usson maison Courveille 01.jpg
- File:Usson maison Courveille 02.jpg
- File:Usson maison Courveille 03.jpg
- File:Usson maison Courveille 04.jpg
- File:Usson Pontempeyrat 02.jpg
- File:Vacqueyras vitrail de l'église paroissiale.jpg
- File:Valsaintes dalle de Boulinette.jpg
— Racconish 💬 18:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: done by ~riley. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Related to file:Dead-End World 0001.ogv Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised video. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Not relevant with an encyclopedia content. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
scope? Just a noise Estopedist1 (talk) 13:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 14:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Very very poor lighting. OOS as the object can't be seen clearly in the files. Clearer files in Category:Lego brick
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Socially prescribed perfectionism on suicide and depression using the Perfection Social Dimension Model.png
- File:The Perfectionism Social Disconnection Model.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
blurry; similar photo exists at File:Oshawa Station (27634139935).jpg Mindmatrix 01:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankit8968Soni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots.
- File:Justice A. S. Bopanna.jpg
- File:Justice Aniruddha Bose.jpg
- File:Justice Surya Kant.jpg
- File:Justice B. R. Gavai.jpg
- File:Justice Krishna Murari.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Might also be found on https://sci.gov.in/chief-justice-judges . --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zahrasheikhi88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Isfahan university of technology En.jpg
- File:IUT campus.jpg
- File:Isfahan university of technology.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be a photo of a wall poster, so "own work" seems very unlikely Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bibliodrome (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Joel Flores (blanco y negro).jpg
- File:Joel Flores (color).jpg
- File:Jonathan Jiménez Salazar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Possibly cropped from a larger file of what seems to be a selfie of the subject (林沛笭). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Philippines. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan Philippines; thanks for your message, I respectfully submit and have no objection to the deletionJudgefloro 05:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
This category is unfortunately doubled: see Category:Alte_Burg_(Frankfurt-Praunheim). br --Commander-pirx (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- attack page Count Count (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Count Count: What exactly about that page is a personal attack? It is a purely factual and legitimate document of an administrator abusing his privileges. Also, read the quote in the disclaimer. This page is policy-compliant. --Handroid7 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- The user is not admin here and the issue is not related to this wiki. The same reason why the page at Meta was deleted. -- Tegel (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tegel: Where else am I suggested to put it then? Bbb23 has vandalized Wikipedia, but I can't put this report “where it belongs”, because “where it belongs” is Bbb23's power territory. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have explained on your Meta talk page the options that you have. Don't bring this issue cross-wiki so that you get blocked for cross-wiki abuse. -- Tegel (talk) 20:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- I don't intend to bring the issue cross-wiki. This is just a document. Does that mean that there is no way for me to publicly document and uncover the abusive practices of an English Wikipedia moderator? Does that mean that anyone who uncovers counter-productive and abusive behaviours of people we are supposed to trust (.i.e. Bbb23) does risk being blocked globally? ––Handroid7 (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tegel: Can you cite an official policy of Wikimedia Commons that states that this page is not allowed here? --Handroid7 (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have explained on your Meta talk page the options that you have. Don't bring this issue cross-wiki so that you get blocked for cross-wiki abuse. -- Tegel (talk) 20:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tegel: Where else am I suggested to put it then? Bbb23 has vandalized Wikipedia, but I can't put this report “where it belongs”, because “where it belongs” is Bbb23's power territory. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- The relevant policy is Commons:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories#User pages, galleries and categories: “User pages are generally reserved for personal profiles and information relevant to the user's contributions to Commons.” and “Content that does not advance Commons' aims, including advertising or excessive linking to external domains and anything apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack” --Count Count (talk) 08:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Count Count: First of all, as already stated, that page is not a personal attack page, but a factual, verifiable document. Also, a part of Commons:Project_scope#Aim_of_Wikimedia_Commons states “…that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation.”, including Wikipedia. The document is also informative, which is also stated there. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Of course it is an attack page. You are casting aspersions (“Why would he delete it, if he could? Maybe to cover up something shady about him?”) and include outright personal attacks (“Shady practices” and “ran amok...”).
- Also your quote is misleading, the text preceding it is “The aim of Wikimedia Commons is to provide a media file repository:...”. Your text is not a media file and it is not in the main repository but on a user page, so the policy previously quoted by my applies.
- In any case I will not further comment here. I am certain that this page will be deleted. --Count Count (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Count Count: First of all, as already stated, that page is not a personal attack page, but a factual, verifiable document. Also, a part of Commons:Project_scope#Aim_of_Wikimedia_Commons states “…that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation.”, including Wikipedia. The document is also informative, which is also stated there. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- The user is not admin here and the issue is not related to this wiki. The same reason why the page at Meta was deleted. -- Tegel (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. An attack page designed to export wikidrama from English Wikipedia to other wikis. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate: No, it is legitimate criticism, according to the policy quoted in the disclaimer section. Also, it is not intended to bring “WikiDrama” to Commons. It is just a place to host this legitimate report. Do you have any suggestions for where else I can put it? --Handroid7 (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Bbb23 has silenced my sincere and formal conversation on the English Wikipedia using his administrative tools. Have you read this report? Don't you think that Bbb23 has abused his administratorship? --Handroid7 (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Move to Meta One of the purposes of Meta is to provide a forum when the local wiki is failing to do so, regardless of the reason why. Fram was allowed to discuss his en:wp ban on Meta, therefore so should others. Commons doesn't have a similar purpose. I suggest that you change the way you represent your evidence though, because when it looks like an attack page, it will be viewed as one, even when it isn't. Also, it is probably more productive to focus on the question whether ignore all rules and assume good faith should in all cases be trumped by blocking policies, than to single out one administrator. Guido den Broeder (talk) 21:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Move to meta as noted above, there is a place for presentations such as these. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thegoodlifefrance (talk · contribs)
[edit]"© 2019 The Good Life France. All rights reserved." on the website. No permission.
- File:Chateau d'Hardelot, Opal Coast France.jpg
- File:Chocolate Shop Pommard Burgundy France.jpg
- File:Conques Aveyron.jpg
- File:French Cheese.jpg
- File:Ribeauville, Alsace.jpg
- File:Champagne bottles.jpg
- File:Villefranch-de-Rouergue market.jpg
- File:Belcastel Aveyron.jpg
- File:Rouen Normandy.jpg
- File:Deauville Normandy.jpg
- File:Sancerre, Loire Valley.jpg
- File:Bourges Cathedral.jpg
- File:Burgundy Canal Chateauneuf.jpg
- File:Le Crotoy, Somme Bay, Picardy, France.JPG
Cjp24 (talk) 00:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Mausoleo Bomberos de Ponce, Cementerio Civil, Barrio Portugués Urbano, Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg
[edit]This 15 July 2019 file is a duplicate of THIS file (''Mausoleo Bomberos de Ponce, Cementerio Civil, Barrio Portugués Urbano, Ponce, Puerto Rico (DSC05401).jpg") which I uploaded 6 years earlier, on 27 April 2013, but missing the informative file ref number in parenthesis. Mercy11 (talk) 02:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Damaged file Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; also found on https://lifeinua.info/jan-tombinski-european-union-stands-firm-to-support-ukraine/ etc. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Watermark 'VS photography ©' does not match name of photographer listed at 500px - suspect this may be a case of licence washing. MPF (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Stefano Bodini presents himself as a member of VS photography, does not look like license washing.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - thanks; hadn't spotted that! - MPF (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per MPF. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Imre Kertész by Csaba Segesvári
[edit]- File:Imre Kertész (1929-) Hungarian writer II. by Csaba Segesvári.JPG
- File:Kertész Imre cropped.jpg
- File:Viktor Frankl2 mirrored.jpg
- File:Imre Kertész (1929-) Hungarian writer by Csaba Segesvári.JPG
- File:Imre Kertész (1929-) Hungarian writer was on the University of Szeged in 2007. Photo by Csaba Segesvári.JPG
No permission from the photographer in OTRS. --Regasterios (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Imre_Kertész_(1929-)_Hungarian_writer_II._by_Csaba_Segesvári.JPG” under ticket:2019102510003995. --Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The only Wikipedia page this image was used on has been removed. Mapet318 (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE at wikidata, could be used at NO wiki. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing wrong with this image. OptoScalpel, since you're the uploader, perhaps you could create a better version and upload it on top of this one? Nyttend (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing wrong with this image. OptoScalpel, since you're the uploader, perhaps you could create a better version and upload it on top of this one? Nyttend (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- ??? What do you mean? How can an image be in bad mood? --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing wrong with this image. OptoScalpel, since you're the uploader, perhaps you could create a better version and upload it on top of this one? Nyttend (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
According to Tineye, it was already availalble on the Vtélé website in 2013, one year before the photo was uploaded and I do ntot currently see any autorisation of reuse on their website. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanataturi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Pelantikan-dewan-pengurus-Partai-Aceh.jpg
- File:Hasan-tiro.jpg
- File:Harmaini.jpg
- File:Darwati A. Gani.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Check this Edjoerv (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 06:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Wikimedia-globalblock.svg (meets CSD F8, duplicate also an SVG fraud) Calvinkulit • t • c 02:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Not the same, one has a larger cross. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- These files are similar but they are not duplicates. Delete and redirect it to File:Wikimedia-globalblock.svg because 1. This is a fake SVG and a better file is available. 2. Global blocks are for IP address and global locks are for user accounts. These are basically same thing.
- I see no reason to keep this version. Masum Reza📞 23:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Have made this a proper SVG (removing rasters, so no longer a fake SVG). Shyamal L. (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Not identical duplicates. Both versions are used by different projects (please replace the images first, since Commons should not dictate which images different project uses). I don't see any need to delete one out of a "storage perspecive". --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo: No TOO in Venezuela AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Phil Hardberger
[edit]The description page states cc-by-3.0, but the end of the video states that this is available under cc-by-nc-sa. Which one are we to believe?
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File is uploaded on YouTube as {{YouTube CC-BY}}. Dual-licensing is allowed, so if the YouTube account is the copyright owner, then this is ok to Keep --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The video clearly has an NC license. The YouTube license cannot change that. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by image (thumb|The village Drakia on Mount Pilion, Greece, cicra 1900.), which is more clean. Flashdart2 (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Well, new image is without the stamps and a bit bigger. I don't know if the fact that it is a cart postal with stamps and thus a bit different can be a reason to be kept. --C messier (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Stefanos Stournaras Drakia c1900.jpg Metallos (talk) 04:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The file has been nominated before for the same reason, and it was kept, as it was considered by user:Jameslwoodward as not a valid reason for deletion. --C messier (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Again, the images with and without the stamps are different, so both should be kept. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC). . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Subject died in 1984, photo appears to date to 1950s-1960s --Animalparty (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
This is a picture of my uncle. It was originally taken by his wife, and my aunt. Hoppyh (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Then you aunt owns the copyright and she, or her heir, must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic works in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic works like mural in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information, A1Cafel. What about all the other pictures of Banksy street art in the UK and the many other pictures of same type? There are lots of categories with many pictures of murals. Do they all have to be deleted?Thilo Parg (talk) 04:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep unless there is a decision to bulk delete Banksy works in the UK. (Per previous discussion, graffiti (illegally placed) is not the same as a mural (authorized artwork).) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - see https://theconversation.com/banksy-finally-goes-to-court-to-stop-unauthorised-merchandising-despite-saying-copyright-is-for-losers-112390. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation; there is no OTRS or any indication that the author of the image has given permission to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. The copyright page at http://solarviews.com/eng/copyright.htm explicitly states that his full-resolution images shall not be copied to other sites such as Commons. Nrco0e (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a NASA image, which are always copyright-free. Ruslik (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- But in the original image says the copyright owner is "Calvin J. Hamilton", not NASA. Paladinum2 (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- The question is whether Calvin J. Hamilton has any right to claim copyright? It was undoubtedly the Voyager probe which took the image, so what did Hamilton do that would generate copyright? — Huntster (t @ c) 21:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- The same image can be found in the NASA photojournal with NASA/JPL credit. Ruslik (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ruslik0, can you link it please? I'm unable to find any such image. By my understanding, Hamilton claims copyright because he took a black and white image of Ariel (and other similar images) and colourised them. I personally do not feel such a simple act should generate a new copyright, but historically Commons has placed a fairly low threshold on such things. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- I meant similar images. Hamilton created a mosaic from several images in case of Ariel. In addition, it is not clear if the images were made as part of his employment. Ruslik (talk) 09:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- In case of Oberon the Hamilton's picture is actually indistinguishable from https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/uranus-moons/oberon/in-depth/ Ruslik (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hmm. Lot of unknowns. In the case of Oberon, I could see those two images being based on the same base photo(set), but I wonder how he got access to the higher resolution files used in the images we have here (I certainly couldn't put together our Ariel image with what I've seen available on the web) and why he feels the images on his site so specifically warrant their own copyright. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- I think that the Oberon image was simply resized and some sharpening filters applied to it. I do not think that any higher resolution images exist. The ultimate source of all image data is Voyager EDRs. Ruslik (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hmm. Lot of unknowns. In the case of Oberon, I could see those two images being based on the same base photo(set), but I wonder how he got access to the higher resolution files used in the images we have here (I certainly couldn't put together our Ariel image with what I've seen available on the web) and why he feels the images on his site so specifically warrant their own copyright. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ruslik0, can you link it please? I'm unable to find any such image. By my understanding, Hamilton claims copyright because he took a black and white image of Ariel (and other similar images) and colourised them. I personally do not feel such a simple act should generate a new copyright, but historically Commons has placed a fairly low threshold on such things. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- The same image can be found in the NASA photojournal with NASA/JPL credit. Ruslik (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- The question is whether Calvin J. Hamilton has any right to claim copyright? It was undoubtedly the Voyager probe which took the image, so what did Hamilton do that would generate copyright? — Huntster (t @ c) 21:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Hamilton is not a NASA employee and it is well established that colorizing creates a new copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- This is a lie. Hamilton did not colorize this image. Ruslik (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation; there is no OTRS or any indication that the author of the image has given permission to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. The copyright page at http://solarviews.com/eng/copyright.htm explicitly states that his full-resolution images shall not be copied to other sites such as Commons. Nrco0e (talk) 03:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a NASA image, which are always copyright-free. Ruslik (talk) 17:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Hamilton is not a NASA employee and it is well established that colorizing creates a new copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- This is a lie. Hamilton did not colorize this image. Ruslik (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in UAE 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Saudi Arabia 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The image has been originally uploaded to Russian Wikipedia from http://award.adm.gov.ru with no photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
not own work: copied from not own work: copied from https://www.ordinedisantacaterina.it/# Bradipo Lento (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rockbridge County, Virginia
[edit]No FOP for 3D sculptures in the USA.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with this photo's usage over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with this photo's usage over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Imported without OTRS autorization. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Fictional / contra-factual diagram data mislabelled and therefore misleading: Almost none of these party names/initialisms actually exists/existed; in 1955 Portugal was ruled as a single-party regime; there’s not even enough seats for 300 assemblypeople in the Portuguese Parliament. If used/useful, then rename, otherwise delete. See also the uploader’s talk page for several other (sucessful) DRs, affecting similar diagrams which were however less egregious in that they were not labelled in a misleading way, indicating a fictional country name: This shows how this one file is especially pernicious as it is, since even an avid DR poster was fooled by its misleading filename, believing it to be genuine. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Potentially confusing redirect name that has (almost) nothing to do with the target file. Primefac (talk) 10:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
https://pxhere.com/id/photo/869175 states the license is CC0 and not CC-SA 4.0. https://pixabay.com/photos/cheerleader-cheer-park-girl-female-863890/ states this is under "Pixabay License" and not under CC-SA 4.0. Hence I don't think that the uploader actually checked or understood licenses. Malyacko (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Changed license to CC-0, added licensereview and source. Note that the pixabay license permits commercial use without attribution so is more or less equivalent to the CC-0 seen on pxhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
needless WikiFreibeuter (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Pochodząca z Tomaszowa Mazowieckiego Aleksandra Kapruziak wicemistrzyni Pucharu Świata Juniorek (2015), srebrna medalistka Akademickich Mistrzostw Świata (2018) Absolwentka I LO w Tomaszowie Mazowieckim.jpg
[edit]It can be seen from the exif that the original source is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 13:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Original source is her Instagram here. I have got her aproval by e-mail. Where I can send? She is our hero. Our school and community. This pic is important, because she is in school uniform with our symbols. It was a few years ago, today she is university student, and we can't make same picture again. She agreed, no one would question copyright. I've got this e-mail. This is her adress: aleksandra_kapruziak@onet.pl (from her Instagram profile). You can confirm my words. And here is the screen of this e-mail with her short answer ”yes, no problem” about this photo.WrS.tm.pl (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The subject does not generally have the right to freely license an image. The actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Cjstepney (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on en:Husayn ibn Ali. COM:INUSE says that if it's good enough for English Wikipedia, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Blurry, unused, and plenty of better quality alternatives in Category:Minbar in Cave of the Patriarchs. HyperGaruda (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- May delete.Md iet (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not tack sharp, but very different colors. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aap Noot Mies
[edit]Cornelis Jetses (1873–1955) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Alternative names |
C. Jetses | ||
Description | Dutch illustrator, cover artist, painter, printmaker and poster artist | ||
Date of birth/death | 23 June 1873 | 9 June 1955 | |
Location of birth/death | Groningen | Wassenaar | |
Work period | 1885 –1955 | ||
Work location | |||
Authority file |
- File:Aap Noot Mies (4868462441).jpg
- File:Aap noot mies.jpg
- File:Aapnootmies blik.JPG
- File:Aapnootmies broodtrommel.JPG
- File:Aapnootmies chocolade.JPG
- File:Aapnootmies dienblad.JPG
- File:Aapnootmies kop en schotel.JPG
- File:Aapnootmies stickers.JPG
- File:Het aap-noot-mies-plankje, Bestanddeelnr 254-5290.jpg
- File:Het aap-noot-mies-plankje, Bestanddeelnr 254-5291.jpg
- File:Leesplank DSCF5006.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, derde uitgave.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, derde versie.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, eerste uitgave.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, tweede uitgave.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, tweede versie-001.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, tweede versie.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, vierde uitgave.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, vierde versie.jpg
- File:Leesplankje Aap Noot Mies, vijfde uitgave.jpg
- File:Leesplankje-rommelmarkt.jpg
- File:Leesplankje0951.JPG
- File:Schoolafdeling, Leesplank Aap Noot Mies, Museum voor Nostalgie en Techniek pic1.JPG
Vera (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Publisher J.B. Wolters bought the copyright of the original version of this reading board at the beginning of the 20th century, and published the 5th version of this board around 1902. For a new edition (sold between 1910 and 1916) the publisher commissioned J. Ligthart and H. Scheepstra to adapt the design, and Cornelis Jetses to make new illustrations. The successor of the publisher, Wolters Noordhoff, always made clear Wolters Noordhoff owned copyright. To check this I sent emails to the expert on these Dutch reading boads, and to the successor of the publisher. Vysotsky (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete (undelete in 2026) Jetses apparently sold his copyright to publisher Wolters Noordhoff. The copyright on these images will, according to the Dutch Copyright Act, last till 31 December 2025 (70 years after Jetses' death). The archives of Noordhoff publishers are transferred to Onderwijsmuseum in Dordrecht. From an email by Onderwijsmuseum: "De beeldrechten berusten bij Noordhoff en worden beheerd door CPLG." (my translation:) The rights on these drawings are with Noordhoff Publishers [until 31 Dec. 2025] and will be enforced by CPLG. Vysotsky (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- thank you for checking that. I think there are a fair few more photos of "Aap Noot Mies" in the "leesplankje" category. 2026 isn't too far away fortunately. Going to be a pretty gem at that year's Public Domain Day. Vera (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos. Should be sourced and relicensed if in public domain.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: A imagem é um emblema de um partido político brasileiro e a fonte (nem a página inicial dela) não trata de qualquer informação sobre licenciamento da imagem, quanto mais em termos livres.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo had been on Commons since 5 years. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Also: File:PSB.gif --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly above TOO, bogus licensing. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
File:אֵם 2. 2013 צילום מטופל של פסל האמנית ע'ג לוח נירוסטה 24, 34 ס'מ . עיצוב והדפסה על הנירוסטה טולי באומן.jpg
[edit]COM:DW, needs OTRS permission. Ahmadtalk 14:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Found here, and it seems that the file has been edited. I'm not sure if it's {{PD-Old}} or not. Ahmadtalk 14:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Hong Kong for graphic works.
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA exit and entrance Hing Lung Street October 2019 SSG 02.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space interior October 2019 SSG 01.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space interior October 2019 SSG 02.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space interior October 2019 SSG 03.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 03.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 05.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 06.jpg
- File:HK Central 中環中心 The Center basement H6 CONET 市區重建局 URA 公共空間 Space wall painting Central & Western District buildings in art October 2019 SS2 07.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
What are authors dates of life? Why USA law was applied to books printed in India/British Empire?
- File:कर्बला.djvu
- File:हिंदी विश्वकोष भाग ३.djvu
- File:हिंदी विश्वकोश खंड 2.djvu
- File:मीराबाई का काव्य.djvu
- File:रहीम-कवितावली.djvu
- File:अतीत-स्मृति.pdf
- File:आदर्श हिंदू ३.pdf
- File:आदर्श हिंदू २.pdf
- File:आदर्श हिंदू १.pdf
- File:शैवसर्वस्व.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparently the author is this guy: Category:Ramdhari Singh Dinkar. The license is wrong and this is not public domain.
File:सौ अजान और एक सुजान.djvu- File:अर्धनारीश्वर.djvu
- File:मिट्टी की ओर.djvu
- File:सामधेनी.djvu
- File:रेती के फूल.djvu
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
HI, Magog the Ogre This file File:सौ अजान और एक सुजान.djvu is copyright free according to low of India which was published in 1944. And the author of this book has died in 1914. नीलम (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- I struck that one. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Kuzman Shapkarev Pyrvonachalni Poznanija za Malechkite Dechinja.pdf
- File:Naravnoucitelni soveti.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- The first book File:Kuzman Shapkarev Pyrvonachalni Poznanija za Malechkite Dechinja.pdf is printed in 1868, and the second File:Naravnoucitelni soveti.jpg in 1858 so they are more than 100 years old and the copyright is expired. GStojanov (talk) 13:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- I updated both pages with the requested information. Please remove the delete flag. GStojanov (talk) 19:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Why USA law was applied to documents created in Macedonia/Yugoslavia?
- File:Od Ilindenskata Organizacija Do NRM.pdf
- File:Protokol-goce-delchev-1.png
- File:Protokol-goce-delchev-1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- The tag PD-EdictGov covers both local and foreign gov. edicts and proclamations. Do you have other tag that you think is more appropriate? GStojanov (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: These are to a government, not from it, so the copyright remains with the writer(s). . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I added a description in English: "Periodic publication that was discontinued in 1947. It was prepared and printed in Sofia, Bulgaria. Contributors were state officials, party leaders and intellectuals from both Bulgaria and Macedonia (then part of Yugoslavia)" GStojanov (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Licence tag have not been correct (i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} is inappropriate as licence). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, maps, postcard. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mulini 01.jpg
- File:Mulini 02.jpg
- File:Ospedale di Asola - Parte Vecchia con vista Antiche Mura.jpg
- File:Ospedale di Asola - Vecchia foto panoramica.jpg
- File:Ospedale di Asola - Cortile Interno con Vecchio Orologio.jpg
- File:Asola - Mappa del Catasto Lombardo-Veneto, 1831.jpg
- File:Rocca di Asola.jpg
- File:Fortezza di Asola 02.jpg
- File:Antico insediamento di Asola.jpg
- File:Asola - Palazzo Municipale (1792).jpg
- File:Asola - 1609.jpg
- File:Fortezza di Asola.jpg
- File:Fontana di Ercole 1946.jpg
- File:Fontana Ercole - 1958.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Asola - Palazzo Municipale nel 1792.jpg
- File:Asola - vecchi mulini 02.jpg
- File:Asola - Vecchi Mulini 01.jpg
- File:Ospedale di Asola - Cortile interno con vecchio orologio crollato nel 1965.jpg
- File:Ospedale Vecchio - Panorama Anni '70.jpg
- File:Ospedale Vecchio.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This is from a YouTube thumbnail, see the first result. It's not a screenshot of the video, nor this image appears in the video. YouTube speaks nothing of thumbnails in their copyright section, it only refers to videos. Frodar (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UnBearable30 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Монумент слава покорителям космос.jpg
- File:Монумент слава покорителям космоса (ракурс справа).jpg
- File:Монумент слава покорителям космоса (ракурс слева).jpg
- File:Монумент слава покорителям космоса в Монино.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
i have created this and want to delete it as the person in the picture does not want her image online Semra Eren-Nijhar (talk) 19:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - notable author, the license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Blurry, unused image. It has been replaced by numerous higher-quality images during the last 15 years. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment -- It looks more like a lighting issue than anything else. Also, I don't see the replacements. ----DanTD (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- There are, by my count, eleven other images of the Green Line platforms in Category:Park Street station - most of which are also much more useful angles, in addition to the superior quality. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also probably a dw of a probably copyrighted poster. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 4.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 3.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 2.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 1.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else image. Paladinum2 (talk) 21:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Disagree. "Divulgação" means the uploader is not the owner of the image for who? You? Chronus (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's quite simple, in Brasil we use "Foto: name of the owner" normally, You can see as an example, the "Palácio do Planalto" ones. If it was created by Rede Brasil Atual, it whould be "Foto: Rede Brasil Atual" or "Foto: Someone/Rede Brasil Atual". "Divulgação" means it is Disclosing an image from somewhere else. FOr example you can see this image Here. This page is also not the owner, so it uses "divulgação" or "reprodução", you can also see it used here and here too. It's quite common in the news. Paladinum2 (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blanka Smolková (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by František Smolka (d. 1974), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Fr. Smolka ,.jpg
- File:František Smolka.jpg
- File:Smolka frantisek 1932 Stará ulička,Muzeum umění.jpg
- File:Smolka František 1937, Žerotínovo náměstí,Muzeum umění Olomouc.jpg
- File:František Smolka .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This is an old and low quality flag image from 2008. It is not used anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artanisen (talk • contribs) 2019-10-14T13:30:08 (UTC)
Deleted: new version is vastly better. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jean2005acosta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Le Prince and his family, 1880s.jpg
- File:Le Prince, self-portrait, 1880s.jpg
- File:Louis Le Prince with his family in 1840s.jpg
- File:Louis Le Prince and Joseph Whitley.jpg
- File:Román Delgado Chalbaud.jpg
- File:Francisco salias1-216x300.jpg
- File:JoséLuisRamos.jpg
- File:Hombre caminando por una esquina.ogv
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: images already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't see anything here with a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS NicoScribe (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This 15 July 2019 file is a duplicate of THIS file ("Parque Luis A. Wito Morales, Barrio Maragüez, Ponce, PR (DSC02593).jpg") which I uploaded 7 years earlier, on 29 September 2012, but missing the informative file ref number in parenthesis. Mercy11 (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination but larger file moved to older filename. --Green Giant (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 07:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader request within 7 days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation Leo CXXIV (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: não há informações de licenciamento da imagem na fonte apresentada arquivo
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo is on Commons since 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, pois foi atribuída uma licença que não consta na fonte. --Luan (talk) 15:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Sloppy re-creation of logo using similar font Trivialist (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
seems like a empty media file? Estopedist1 (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: works for me. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
bessere Auflösung verfügbar: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karl_Ernst_Albrecht_Wagner.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/NLI Ref.: ODEA
[edit]Per close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg NLI photgraphs in ODEA collection all probably have copyright issues as photographer died 1992
- File:Planes, Shannon Airport, Co. Galway (17221974050).jpg
- File:Viaduct, distant view, Killorglin, Co. Kerry. (17941846982).jpg
- File:Tractor engine, Athy, Co. Kildare (34151696054).jpg
- File:Maynooth Railway Station (8345555978).jpg
- File:Ross Corbett House, Glengarriff, Co. Cork (43714809850).jpg
- File:Virginia Road Station, Virginia, Co. Cavan (35008023385).jpg
- File:View from the top of Cahir Castle.jpg
- File:Balloon House (6788565746).jpg
- File:Viaduct, distant view, Killorglin, Co. Kerry. (17941846982) (cropped).jpg
- File:Just a load of Hot Air (6764766047).jpg
- File:Moyasta Junction, County Clare (30230379325).jpg
- File:GSR Class L2 (16982035428).jpg
- File:Station, Carrick-on-Shannon, Co. Roscommon. (21279493202).jpg
- File:Limavady Junction Train Station (7541513886).jpg
- File:Railway Footbridge at Churchtown, Dublin (8364225794).jpg
- File:Doorway, Banagher, Co. Offaly (19889712780).jpg
- File:Royal Canal at Downs-Who pays the Ferryman? (11461896546).jpg
- File:Filming at Westland Row Station (7431422344).jpg
- File:Valleymount Church, Co. Wicklow (45662218711).jpg
- File:Humphreystown Bridge, Blessington, Co. Wicklow. (27850577973).jpg
- File:Dromod Railway Station Feb 1959.jpg
- File:Cement hoppers at Kildare Train Station.jpg
- File:Allen Tower, Kildare, Co. Kildare. (36412955373).jpg
- File:Flying Sporrans (6922892557).jpg
- File:Capel Street, Dublin at 9.30 am (7459404340).jpg
- File:Trains passing, Mount Pleasant, Co. Louth. (20285615551).jpg
- File:Boat on river, Lanesboro, Co. Longford (29809715967).jpg
- File:Miss Furey behind the bar, Moyvalley, Co. Kildare (36748008051).jpg
- File:Railcar, Stranorlar, Co. Donegal. (17409834175).jpg
- File:The Púca's Hole (10940771815).jpg
- File:A German Cruiser leaving Dublin after a courtesy visit! (22818663678).jpg
- File:Marine Royale Canadienne in Dublin (17156253080).jpg
- File:Pontoon bridge, Newbrook, Co. Westmeath. (17946029071).jpg
- File:Signal Cabin at Athlone West, Co Westmeath.jpg
- File:CIE Tamping machine (18890864269).jpg
- File:From top of County Hall, Cork City, Co. Cork (37470538480).jpg
- File:Emptying her out (7412731914).jpg
- File:Swedford? No, its Guildford! (7588866862).jpg
- File:Foreman (6826125940).jpg
- File:Train crossing street, Fermoy, Co. Cork. (17604984019).jpg
- File:Straffan (6553255103).jpg
- File:International Level Crossing Awareness Day (17805253233).jpg
- File:Adam Eve's Post Office, Bawnboy, Co. Cavan. (33702141395).jpg
- File:Bill County (7038682161).jpg
- File:Station, Porthall, Co. Donegal. (20456576511).jpg
- File:Bridewell, Tarbert, Co. Kerry. (37108385866).jpg
- File:Rusty Kelly (7101669939).jpg
- File:The Builder? (16788736438).jpg
- File:CIE F502 (17156275240).jpg
- File:Building Bridges (8947719526).jpg
- File:Never Argue (16950474146).jpg
- File:Driver, A. McGrath, 46 Mile cabin, Co. Westmeath. (29365598086).jpg
- File:Train (6955627056).jpg
- File:Christmas Eve (6563951087).jpg
- File:US diesels arrive, North Wall, Co. Dublin (16982064518).jpg
- File:2.45pm leaving, Dundalk, Co. Louth (16787046694).jpg
- File:Inspection Car at Straffan Train Station Ireland 1960s (7044664635).jpg
- File:Queen Street, Dublin City, Co. Dublin. (17826156095).jpg
- File:Monaghan Train Station (6536734223).jpg
- File:A view from across the River Liffey in Dublin of Liberty Hall under construction.jpg
- File:St. Patrick's Hill, Cork, Ireland in 1970.jpg
- File:To hell or to Connacht for dummies? (33788868956).jpg
- File:European Wooden Architecture (No half-timber) (6587294579).jpg
- File:The Church of Ireland (6921132978).jpg
- File:Last train from the brewery (19130644968).jpg
- File:Station Master at Hazelhatch, Co. Kildare, Ireland in 1960.jpg
- File:Tramway demolition, Howth, Co. Dublin (17342006962).jpg
- File:Where's the Austin Cambridge (18035451128).jpg
- File:View from south, Armagh, Co. Armagh (17317909326).jpg
- File:Approaching The Station (17143877206).jpg
- File:Rev. Frank Skuse, Kilnagross Rectory, Clonakilty (17529192874).jpg
- File:Island Road Station, Co. Sligo (17049237317).jpg
- File:Christy Mahon on the phone (8599469155).jpg
- File:Station Master Nolan standing in front of Lord Maude's private waiting room, Dundrum, Co. Tipperary. (31177128671).jpg
- File:The Irish House (17383577586).jpg
- File:The Thing A Modified Road Going Tram or Float Ireland 1960s (17907565342).jpg
- File:Cromaboo bridge, first stone laid in 1796, Athy, Co. Kildare. (22876029957).jpg
- File:Trains at station, Valentia Harbour, Co. Kerry (20344107901).jpg
- File:Kingsbridge Station (6981593445).jpg
- File:Christy Mahon in pensive pose (8599468787).jpg
- File:Scrapping a steam loco Ireland 1959.jpg
- File:Borris Train Station, Co. Carlow in 1963.jpg
- File:Cargo trains, Limerick City, Co. Limerick. (17223325009).jpg
- File:P. McCormick (7076908151).jpg
- File:Foreman Limerick Railway Works 1960s Life Portraits Expressions (6708071229).jpg
- File:Fred McDonagh (7063779403).jpg
- File:Gricers on Bloomsday (17343536141).jpg
- File:Record tower in Dublin Castle visible, Exchequer Street, Dublin (29477535601).jpg
- File:CIE 201 Class C205 at Kilkenny Train Station.jpg
- File:GM diesel locomotive B124 being unloaded from a ship at the North Wall in Dublin.jpg
- File:Line of steam locomotives County Westmeath Ireland 1960s (6874606377).jpg
- File:Church Road Junction, Dublin (6829895544).jpg
- File:Chetwynd Viaduct and the Mystery Car!! (17266837873).jpg
- File:At Thurles Railway Station, Co. Tipperary (9357682002).jpg
- File:Locomotive at Athlone East Junction Westmeath Ireland 1960 (6471154337).jpg
- File:Locomotive yard, Ballinamore, Co. Leitrim. (16618218853).jpg
- File:Horse and Jockey village railway station, County Tipperary, Republic of Ireland (cropped).jpg
- File:Locomotive Engine number 123 at Ballybrophy County Laois Ireland 1960s (6308275109).jpg
- File:Rail worker Paddy Carroll at signal cabin in Thurles Train Station, County Tipperary, Ireland, 1961.jpg
- File:Derailment (6868937433).jpg
- File:4T engine failed, Adoon, Co. Leitrim (17254854862).jpg
- File:Horse and Jockey village railway station, County Tipperary, Republic of Ireland.jpg
- File:Men with dog Ashtown Train Station Dublin Ireland 1960s (6962803418).jpg
- File:Coat of arms dated 1566 from Daingean, Co. Offaly (17104951997).jpg
- File:Not Movable (6294892134).jpg
- File:CIE 421 Class accident.jpg
- File:Howth, Co. Dublin (6000723105).jpg
- File:Back on track? (6073278117).jpg
- File:Walking across Athlone Bridge September 24, 1961 (6178084831).jpg
- File:CIE B114 loco-October 26 1963 (6282156209).jpg
- File:Harcourt Street Railway Station, sold for £67,500 by Morrisseys Auctioneers.jpg
- File:Irish Railway Record Society (6347130270).jpg
- File:Cheers! Fureys Pub? (6209964369).jpg
- File:Wash and brush-up for Loco 42… (9391940890).jpg
- File:Signal box at Sallins North, County Kildare, Ireland 1960s (6174237797).jpg
- File:Train crossing pier at Dun Laoghaire, Dublin December 1959 (6574790365).jpg
- File:Aftermath of train derailment County Kildare Ireland March 1959 (6895616476).jpg
- File:Shunting engine on city street in Cork Ireland in 1960s (6139854402).jpg
- File:No. 9 to Donnybrook.jpg
- File:Out of action or just taking a break?.jpg
- File:Shannon Airport.jpg
- File:Caragh River January 24, 1960.jpg
- File:Shame we couldn't call these ClareMorris Minors!.jpg
- File:Bantry Bay Steamship Company Office.jpg
- File:CIÉ truck loading material into a train wagon.jpg
- File:Office (7041564603).jpg
- File:Irish Railway Records Society excursion, Baltinglass, County Wicklow, 1959 (6838090666).jpg
- File:Railway locomotive at station platform Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland, 17 April 1962.jpg
- File:Irish Railways (6073775104).jpg
- File:Driver and fireman of steam locomotive passing through Straffan Train Station, County Kildare, Ireland, 1960s (6199795865).jpg
Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "probably" isn't good enough, unless this is just another of those "serious admin biznis" deletions that are only here as a make-work exercise, not for anything to do with the images.
- Commons is full of work from living, and recently deceased, creators. We accept stuff here either because it's PD by age after death or because the creator has chosen to freely license it. These have come via the National Library of Ireland. A body of professional librarians, whose view I'm going to take over that of a couple of WP editors every time. No doubt the nominator has discussed this issue with the NLI WP:BEFORE (What did Ticket:2019093010006056 say?) , but otherwise this seems to be a large bulk deletion of content for no more reason than Commons' own poor filing. That's no good rationale. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
@Andy Dingley: Ticket:2019093010006056 was applied to the following email sent by myself to info@nli.ie & permissions@nli.ie and cc'ded to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
For attention of "National Library of Ireland on The Commons" "Flickr" team / O'Dea photographic collection.
Hi, Hi,
I have worked on Irish Railway articles and obviously have used images from Wikimedia Commons when available. Previously these were licensed on "National Library of Ireland on The Commons" in such a way as they could be used:
For example: NLI Ref: ODEA20/12
http://catalogue.nli.ie/Record/vtls000148330 which NLI placed onFlickr Commons about 2011/12 https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/5994423216/ was copied to Wikpedia commonshttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kilfree_Junction,_Co._Sligo_(5994423216).jpg then used on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilfree_Junction_railway_station in 2014.
However more recent items the NLI have published from the from the O'Dea collection cannot be used: For example NLI Ref.: ODEA 22/50 - I think uploaded about April 2019 to Flickr ... https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/33917599278/ is not usable and I would love an image at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCC_Class_W (Current interpretation of https://www.flickr.com/commons/usage/ of "No known copyright restrictions" leading to https://www.flickr.com/commons/usage/ and http://www.nli.ie/en/flickr-commons.aspx which seems incompatible with Wikipedia commons ).
My ideal would be if all O'dea collection pictures uplaoded to Flickr copy be confirmed as usable in Wikipedia. (In all events they should probably be all in or all out I'd like to certain of which).
Basically in terms of of the ODEA 22/50 I might have an option of purchasing an alternative H.C. Casserley image of same and obtaining the the copyright with a chance (at extremely hard work) of obtaining a copyright trail through the vendor and auctioneer. I have been badly burnt through not being able to get a provenance trail to Wikimedia Commons permissions satisfaction previously. Obviously I don't want to go through the pain of this route if I can simple use an O'Dea image from NLI.
Hope this makes sense,
Best regards,
My name redacted
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/48640728006/
- Notes:
- The purpose of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg was to confirm there was no issues with O'Dea photographs from NLI.
- I would have assumed per Ww2censor comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg there was more time to contact the NLI or whatever to try to resolve this. Seems not.
- The copyright of image of the H.C. Casserley equivalent to class W ODEA 22/50 I mention did not come into my possession but OTRS have accepted File:H.C.Casserley-ref78177-19530414-50781-LYR-242T-Wigan-LYR-shed.jpg which is an equivalent test case for practical purposes.
- May be worth raising at Commons:Village pump/Copyright perhaps ? Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Notes:
Delete, Unfortunately I would only restate what I wrote at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg, so please read it. This NLI problem has already been raised over 6 years ago with this research request and some other such images have also been deleted based on author's death date and PCP. Without confirmation from the NLI I think these have to go but can be restored in 2063. Djm-leighpark your mention of a Casserley image is an entirely different matter where the OTRS ticket, which I have access to, verifies the negatives were sold on behalf of the heir and included the copyright from the heir, so the purchaser now own the copyright. I'm fairly certain there are more NLI images whose author copyright is still extant. Ww2censor (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- The librarian's name is Carol, we're buddies on flickr. I'm more than happy to ask for advice there. I've sent a PM on flickr, can we hold off for a few days until the Library responds? Oaktree b (talk) 22:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b Any response? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) 15:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b: What's the word? No response? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- No response from the NLI. Oaktree b (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm having a wee gentle prod myself. I can't see myself in Dublin for a few months at least but the NLI is on my itinerary.Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- No response from the NLI. Oaktree b (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment considering that most of these images have been here for several years, we should really wait until we get a response from the NLI on way or another. Perhaps one of our Dublin-based editors could visit them and see if they can solicit a definitive answer. Depending on the donation of the collection it's possible the copyright was transferred at that time. I am sure there are still several W.D. Hogan images, as mentioned above, still on the commons from these 128 found on the NLI Flickrstream that should certainly be deleted too, such as most of these. Ww2censor (talk) 11:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- CommentHere's what they replied today:
Re: Can you help with copyright on images?
Hello there, Brian! Sorry for delay on this, it came in just as I was dealing with the launch of a big exhibition! But I do thank you for bringing it to our attention. That said, I'm not convinced you'll be delighted with my response.
Brian, I don't feel qualified to make a decision on this matter. Copyright is a huge legal and other quagmire that has broken better women than me. Our take here has always been that we are willing to share on Flickr Commons our photos that are out of copyright, or for which we hold the copyright – solely for people to enjoy and for research, not for any commercial use, with the proviso that people link back to either Flickr, or reference the National Library of Ireland.
This is Flickr's take: BY ASSERTING "NO KNOWN COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS," PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS ARE SHARING THE BENEFIT OF THEIR RESEARCH WITHOUT PROVIDING AN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTY TO OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO USE OR REPRODUCE THE PHOTOGRAPH.
And Flickr also says on RIGHTS STATEMENT... Participating institutions may have various reasons for determining that "no known copyright restrictions" exist, such as: The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired; The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions; The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.
Our simplest option (and one that allows EVERYONE to have such an excellent and fruitful time on our Flickr Commons photo stream) has always been to use the No known copyright restrictions. That may not, and obviously from the whole string of queried images, apparently does not satisfy the Wikimedia admins involved. I personally have no problem with properly referenced O'Dea images being used on Wikimedia Commons, as they're always well-referenced, and link back to our Flickr.
Sorry, Brian, I know this is probably an unsatisfactory response, that will not really help you in this regard, but it is the best that I can give.
All the best Carol
-so, no real help. They allow us to use the ones out of copyright, and have no issues with us using the O'Dea ones still in copyright, but not for commercial use. This would seem to negate keeping the more recent ones on Commons. Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Accordingly, it is up to us to determine the copyright status based on our own best research because NLI cannot exactly confirm the copyright status and their "No known copyright restrictions" does not verify the images are freely licensed for them to be kept on the commons. Therefore we really can only go by the death date of the photographer when known. That's not what we wanted to hear but is pretty much what I had expected. We may have to go through the rest of the NLI media in the same way. Ww2censor (talk) 22:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it would likely be necessary for the O'Dea heir to confirm the passing of the copyright in this circumstance in the rightful words. If the collection was bought by the NLI it would obviously rest on the terms of the agreement; if donated it is likely the intention was altruistically for unrestricted or CC-BY-SA use but it is perhaps equally likely no such thing was discussed.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark, Oaktree b: I wonder if the NLI knows who the heirs are and would they share that information. Otherwise someone may have to search for an obituary in the Irish newspaper of 1996. Does anyone have access to them online? The Gilbert Library in Pearse Street used to keep them but it was maybe 30 years ago since I was there and used their newspaper archive. Ww2censor (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- It is just possible the Irish Railway Record Society (or IRPS) might have the contacts. I'm not a member ... (I have chewed it over and it would give me additional sources) and I might go to a (London) meeting at some point but its likely Dublin where the answer will lie. I have no clue whatsoever as to the IRRS their view of Wikipedia! Or the man and the Cavan & Leitrim knows nearly everything. For some reason the I think the Mullingar area may be relevant, or not. In essence I have the simple hope of attaching the odd couple of images to Irish railway wikipedia articles where necessary. Amazingly the removal of the O'Dea might trigger some positive searching for images(unlikely), or there may be possibility of appealling to modellers or even general public who might have images their willing to upload. The person at the Eiretains site is another possibility. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Djm-leighpark, Oaktree b: I wonder if the NLI knows who the heirs are and would they share that information. Otherwise someone may have to search for an obituary in the Irish newspaper of 1996. Does anyone have access to them online? The Gilbert Library in Pearse Street used to keep them but it was maybe 30 years ago since I was there and used their newspaper archive. Ww2censor (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it would likely be necessary for the O'Dea heir to confirm the passing of the copyright in this circumstance in the rightful words. If the collection was bought by the NLI it would obviously rest on the terms of the agreement; if donated it is likely the intention was altruistically for unrestricted or CC-BY-SA use but it is perhaps equally likely no such thing was discussed.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, previous DR, and discussion. Author died in 1992, so images are still under copyright. The source site does not provide evidence of a free license. Undelete in 2063. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/NLI Ref.: ODEA
[edit]Same reason as previous deletion discussion.
We may want to blacklist the Flickr account.
- File:Steaming into history.jpg
- File:The tables are turned on 207.jpg
- File:On track with Double Dutch.jpg
- File:A promise of sweetness for Palace but will the Queen be pleased?.jpg
- File:The Chattanooga choo choo leaves Kilfree.jpg
- File:When Lough Melvin met Lough Erne.jpg
- File:Trains lined up at sheds, Adelaide, Co. Antrim. (19861078829).jpg
- File:King George VI visits Dundalk.jpg
- File:Now there's a Steam Engine for ya!.jpg
- File:US diesels arrive, North Wall, Co. Dublin.jpg
- File:Mail passing, Rathduff, Co. Cork.jpg
- File:"Changing signal, Howth, Co. Dublin" is actually Broadstone.jpg
- File:Emptying her out GNRI Class VS 207 Boyne.jpg
- File:Brittas Ponds.jpg
- File:A tempting tableau of turntable, tower, tracks and trains.jpg
- File:Canadian destroyer, 304, Albert Quay, Cork City, Co. Cork (33056486253).jpg
- File:"Station, Long Pavement, Co. Tipperary" is actually Co. Limerick (37497949694).jpg
- File:The Irish House, Wood Quay.jpg
- File:Happy at his work - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:Trainless wheels and a wheeless train - can we arrange a marriage - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:Beetles, points and Foynes. - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:Stone plant, Lisduff, Co. Laois.jpg
- File:Queen Street, Dublin City, Co. Dublin (37187103374).jpg
- File:Filling her up GNRI Class VS 207.jpg
- File:April 22, 1961 CIE 171.jpg
- File:The train from Ballaghadereen may be a little late?.jpg
- File:GS&WR 90 February 10, 1967.jpg
- File:Defensorium seu Correctorium Fundamentarii Doctoris Domini Egidii Romani ... in Corruptorium librorum Angelici Doctoris sancti Thome Aquinatis ... a quodam emulo depravatorum (IA ARes782103).pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't blacklist the entire NLI account, but the items from the O'Dea collection certainly don't seem to be public domain. Oaktree b (talk) 23:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Blacklisting the NLI seems like overkill considering many of their images are proven to be in the public domain and for others unfortunately neither we, nor the NLI, have exact details of their copyright status. As with many museum or library Flickr donated images, the onus is on us to determine that and change the licence of those images accordingly. "no known copyright restrictions" does not help us in this case. Others, like these ODEA images, have to be deleted for the time being until we can find better information or until 2063. There is a small chance I can visit the NLI in October but don't know until I get to Dublin. Ww2censor (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no arquivo da fonte apontada há o rodapé que diz: "2017 - PMDB - Partido do Movimento Democrático do Brasil - Todos os direitos reservados" GMGtalk 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Brazilian TOO seems to be fairly on-par with the US. This is fairly simply just text with some lightly shaded swashes. Is there some reason in particular to think this shouldn't fall below COM:TOO? GMGtalk 15:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: mesmo a parte vermelha associada à letra "M" está dentro de COM:TOO? Se sim, então não há problemas. --Luan (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Machine translation
Não sei estou perguntando GMGtalk 23:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: mesmo a parte vermelha associada à letra "M" está dentro de COM:TOO? Se sim, então não há problemas. --Luan (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Seems a bit like an edge case to me, but probably below the TOO. But if the closing admin disagrees I'm not going to argue with them either. @GreenMeansGo: the swashes are shaded to appear as if they are connected to form one platform. The red part has a partial yellow border and color gradient. I think these are not enough elements to become eligible for copyright protection, but one wouldn't have to add many more to become eligible. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- If this falls below TOO in Brazil, that's perfectly fine. I just want to know because I need to update my limited knowledge about Brazilian law. GMGtalk 23:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- You shouldn't look at me for that, I just try to interpret COM:TOO Brazil at best. (at worst I'm just waving my hands in the air) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- If this falls below TOO in Brazil, that's perfectly fine. I just want to know because I need to update my limited knowledge about Brazilian law. GMGtalk 23:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:TOO Brazil doesn't give any guidance for logos, but it says that it's generally more strict than in the US. COM:PCP, since we have no other information. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nesta imagem só há "formas geométricas simples" mesmo? Há a bandeira do Brasil, o texto estilizado "Brasil", gradiente de cores. Fora que envios que sobrescreveram a imagem inicial não apontaram suas fontes.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo is on Commons since 2010. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, pois não me parecem formas geométricas simples. --Luan (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Design includes probably non-trivial elements. Paul_012 (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: also out of scope/advertisement. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This image was never properly sourced (links: Special:PermaLink/369844435, w:Special:Diff/5466457). The authorship is suspect (the leader of the rebellion is the painter?). The uploader has no other contributions, and no license was added. For all we know this is a modern painting. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I've asked for help at w:WP:RD/H#Who created this painting. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Beleg van Hulst in 1591, geschenk mr.dr.Overvoorde - Hulst - 20118534 - RCE.jpg is a photo of the same painting, but has more pixels, yet seems to be more damaged too. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per license in File:Beleg van Hulst in 1591, geschenk mr.dr.Overvoorde - Hulst - 20118534 - RCE.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
با پوزش، این تصویر برای یک دانشنامه مناسب نیست Thehalee (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)