Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 01:40, 30 June 2021 by AntiCompositeNumber (talk | contribs) (fix lint errors)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
interface en français
Cette page du projet dans d’autres langues :
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Skip to current candidates Aller à:

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure

[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image

[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.

Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer

Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition

[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote

[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} ( Support),
  • {{Contre}} ( Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} ( Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} ( Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles

[edit]

Règles générales

[edit]
  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion

[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations

[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} ( Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire

[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste

[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours

[edit]
[edit]

File:Saslonch da Sacun Gherdëina.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
Buzz Aldrin's bootprint on the Moon Same image in higher resolution

File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London

File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Timo Boll (Germany) serving the ball at the European Table Tennis Championships as part of the European Championships 2022 in Munich

File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid.

File:SE Facade Phuktal Zanskar Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00617.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SE facade of Phuktal Gompa in a cliff, Zanskar, Ladakh, India

File:Akiem BB 37024 Port-la-Nouvelle - Leucate la Franqui.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Akiem's BB 37024 with an intermodal freight train pictured between Port-la-Nouvelle and Leucate la Franqui, France

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating, Nové Veselí

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock formations of Ustyurt plateau, Zhabayushkan sanctuary, Kazakhstan
  • You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Río Ameca.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Río Ameca

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moving to where the grass is greener with archers defending livestock scene in Tassili n'ajjer park in Djanet in Algeria. The Scene is a bit funny especially with the dog sniffing the floor

File:Tagetes2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photo of an orange Tagetes flower, slightly obscured by the surrounding dark green leaves

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph
Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South aerial view of Admont, Austria

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pumpkins, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nautilus by Edward Weston

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old woman walks with the cane through the flock of pigeons. Kaptarli mosque on the background. Yurmaduz mahalla, Margilan, Ferghana Region, Uzbekistan.

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Road R104 view with ubiquitous roadside argan tree in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Taj and people framed.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal.

File:Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner, Portland (2024)-L1006267.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner in downtown Portland, Oregon, at night
Good catch, Yann! I've uploaded a new version in 16×10 ratio. @Radomianin, Sumit Surai: hope this works for you! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I would crop even more, but yes, definitely better. Yann (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Yann for the suggestion and Frank for the update. The new cropping has emphasized the striking impression of the photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is looking better. Sumit Surai (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Tomb of Hazrat Salim Chishti, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a mausoleum. It enshrines the burial place of the Sufi saint Salim Chisti, a descendant of Baba Farid, who lived in a cavern on the ridge at Sikri. Considered one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India, the mausoleum was built during the years 1580 and 1581 by Akbar, along with the imperial complex at Fatehpur Sikri near Zenana Rauza.

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط)

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vines on the wine island near Sommerach

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.
Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sculpture "Tetrahedron" (Bottrop, Germany) at night with light installation "Fraktal".
Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

River Sil Canyon in Galicia, Spain.

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) on Tiritiri Matangi

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46
Austere medieval apse in Assisi

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keir Hardie

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraout, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria
  • No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).

Alternate version (sharpness)

[edit]

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).


Contestations en cours

[edit]
[edit]

File:Saslonch da Sacun Gherdëina.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
Buzz Aldrin's bootprint on the Moon Same image in higher resolution

File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London

File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Timo Boll (Germany) serving the ball at the European Table Tennis Championships as part of the European Championships 2022 in Munich

File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid.

File:SE Facade Phuktal Zanskar Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00617.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SE facade of Phuktal Gompa in a cliff, Zanskar, Ladakh, India

File:Akiem BB 37024 Port-la-Nouvelle - Leucate la Franqui.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Akiem's BB 37024 with an intermodal freight train pictured between Port-la-Nouvelle and Leucate la Franqui, France

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating, Nové Veselí

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock formations of Ustyurt plateau, Zhabayushkan sanctuary, Kazakhstan
  • You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Río Ameca.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Río Ameca

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moving to where the grass is greener with archers defending livestock scene in Tassili n'ajjer park in Djanet in Algeria. The Scene is a bit funny especially with the dog sniffing the floor

File:Tagetes2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photo of an orange Tagetes flower, slightly obscured by the surrounding dark green leaves

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph
Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South aerial view of Admont, Austria

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pumpkins, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nautilus by Edward Weston

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old woman walks with the cane through the flock of pigeons. Kaptarli mosque on the background. Yurmaduz mahalla, Margilan, Ferghana Region, Uzbekistan.

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Road R104 view with ubiquitous roadside argan tree in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Taj and people framed.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal.

File:Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner, Portland (2024)-L1006267.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner in downtown Portland, Oregon, at night
Good catch, Yann! I've uploaded a new version in 16×10 ratio. @Radomianin, Sumit Surai: hope this works for you! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I would crop even more, but yes, definitely better. Yann (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Yann for the suggestion and Frank for the update. The new cropping has emphasized the striking impression of the photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is looking better. Sumit Surai (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Tomb of Hazrat Salim Chishti, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a mausoleum. It enshrines the burial place of the Sufi saint Salim Chisti, a descendant of Baba Farid, who lived in a cavern on the ridge at Sikri. Considered one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India, the mausoleum was built during the years 1580 and 1581 by Akbar, along with the imperial complex at Fatehpur Sikri near Zenana Rauza.

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط)

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vines on the wine island near Sommerach

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.
Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sculpture "Tetrahedron" (Bottrop, Germany) at night with light installation "Fraktal".
Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

River Sil Canyon in Galicia, Spain.

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) on Tiritiri Matangi

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46
Austere medieval apse in Assisi

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keir Hardie

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraout, Tiznit Province, Morocco.

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria
  • No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).

Alternate version (sharpness)

[edit]

Haut-Koenigsbourg Castle (755 m) in Orschwiller (Bas-Rhin, France).


Planning (9e jour après proposition)

[edit]
Thu 24 Oct → Sat 2 Nov
Fri 25 Oct → Sun 3 Nov
Sat 26 Oct → Mon 4 Nov
Sun 27 Oct → Tue 5 Nov
Mon 28 Oct → Wed 6 Nov
Tue 29 Oct → Thu 7 Nov
Wed 30 Oct → Fri 8 Nov
Thu 31 Oct → Sat 9 Nov
Fri 1 Nov → Sun 10 Nov
Sat 2 Nov → Mon 11 Nov
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Propositions_d%27images_remarquables&oldid=572251133"