Commons:Deletion requests/File:Greece linguistic minorities.svg: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Meliniki (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


:What's the point of trying to do two nominations at once? Is that like "double secret probation"? -- [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 01:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
:What's the point of trying to do two nominations at once? Is that like "double secret probation"? -- [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 01:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
::I just wait for the block/ban. ^_^ Cheers mate. Enjoy the example: [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Minorities-in-Macedonia_%28FYROM%29-Vardarska.png]--[[User:Meliniki|Meliniki]] 01:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:16, 30 April 2011

unsourced data, omission of languages, politically motivated boundary claims and naming choices. Meliniki 15:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • If the image text is phrased in terms of of official Greek government nomenclature, that would not be a reason for deletion (though a clarificatory comment could be added to the image description page). Images are also not usually deleted from Commons for expressing the views of one side in a legitimate dispute -- only if they're deliberately hoaxing or hatemongering... AnonMoos 16:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination is retaliation of Future Perfect at Sunrise☼ propaganda using non official statistics according to his desires about this map. User has confuse official data statistics, censuses, minority groups and linguistics. You seem to use wikipedia for paid propaganda. --Meliniki 16:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as a derivative work of [1], which is non-free. –Tryphon 16:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is of course far too independent of that map, both in terms of substantial content and in terms of graphic realization, to count as a derivative work. It takes some information from it as a source, but the information as such is not copyrighted. If we called such things derivative works, no thematic map or diagram could ever be created for Wikipedia. Fut.Perf. 20:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, I agree with FPS.--MacedonianBoy 17:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per FPS. Note that I don't get into the disputation whether the showed data are either correct or false, I don't know and I don't care, thus my "keep" must not be intended as agreement to what's stated in the picture. But FPS gave a good reason to keep the media. -- Blackcat 17:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, this map is not linguistic and of course it doesn't came from the official data of the related state as is today. Why in some articles you use the official data and you don't accept nothing else and in some other topics you use unofficial data, or outdated, or edit and rephrase it in your favor? examples have archived from related users. So im wondering.--Meliniki 00:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-official states data. Nationalism-Propaganda, personal desires and choices of names. Meliniki 00:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of trying to do two nominations at once? Is that like "double secret probation"? -- AnonMoos 01:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just wait for the block/ban. ^_^ Cheers mate. Enjoy the example: [2]--Meliniki 01:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]