This year, the legal reform community has seen significant victories across various states, marking substantial progress in ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability within the civil justice system. These wins are crucial in protecting businesses and consumers from abusive plaintiffs’ lawyers’ tactics and ensuring that the legal process remains just and equitable. Read more on legal reform victories within the states: https://lnkd.in/eKeWkFGS
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
Government Relations Services
Washington, DC 3,507 followers
The country’s most influential and successful advocate for civil justice reform, both in the U.S. and abroad.
About us
Restoring Balance. Ensuring Justice. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) is the country’s most influential and successful advocate for civil justice reform, both in the U.S. and abroad. While the U.S. has the greatest legal system in the world, in some cases the courts have been hijacked by players who abuse the system. The mission of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) is to champion a fair legal system that promotes economic growth and opportunity. Join the Legal Reform Discussion and get regular updates by signing up here: http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/get-updates Contact ILR at 202-463-5724. ILR is a 501 (c)(6) tax-exempt, separately incorporated affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
- Website
-
http://instituteforlegalreform.com
External link for U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
- Industry
- Government Relations Services
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Washington, DC
- Type
- Nonprofit
- Founded
- 1998
- Specialties
- Civil Justice Reform, Research, Advocacy, Asbestos, Class Actions, Data Privacy, False Claims Act, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Lawsuit Abuse Impact, Over-Enforcement, State Attorneys General, Litigation Financing, State Legal Reforms, Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF), Tort Reform, Mass Tort Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), Class Actions Around the Globe, Arbitration, Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Unclaimed Property, and Tort Reform
Locations
-
Primary
1615 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20062, US
Employees at U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
-
Stephanie Gregorian, SHRM-CP
Strategic HR Leader driving inclusive culture and organizational excellence
-
Page Faulk
Senior Vice President at U.S. Chamber of Commerce
-
Oriana Senatore
Managing Director and Senior Vice President, Strategy, at U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
-
Marshall Kirby
Senior Director at US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Updates
-
Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) allows financiers to secretly invest in lawsuits, exerting undue control over litigation and reducing plaintiffs' recoveries in the process. Our latest research debunks myths surrounding this secretive industry and reveals how TPLF funders manipulate litigation to maximize their profits. Legislative wins across the country have marked major advancements by demanding transparency from funders. Learn more: https://bit.ly/40aJrXQ
-
The U.S. Supreme Court's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules has taken a significant step towards transparency in third-party litigation funding by proposing the creation of a subcommittee to explore this issue further. ILR has been at the forefront of advocating for transparency in TPLF, highlighting the potential risks and calling for mandatory disclosure requirements. In response to the committee’s decision, Page Faulk, senior vice president of legal reform initiatives at ILR, called on the judiciary “to move forward swiftly in adopting mandatory disclosure requirements.” More from Reuters: https://lnkd.in/gqCx-dRC
-
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform reposted this
A new report from U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform debunks myths in third-party litigation funding. “Litigation funders perpetuate the myth that their industry is a benign force that enhances access to justice, suggesting there’s “nothing to see here” when it comes to third-party litigation funding. However, this narrative is far from the truth,” says the report. Read More > https://bit.ly/3BtQhNO
Grim Realities: Debunking Myths in Third-Party Litigation Funding - ILR
https://instituteforlegalreform.com
-
We’re hiring! ILR is looking for a Vice President and Special Counsel to lead our state legal reform advocacy program. In this role, you’ll develop strategic campaigns, foster relationships with state officials, and drive legal reform initiatives across the country. You’ll also represent ILR at various forums and work closely with senior leadership to shape policy strategies. Apply now:
-
We’re hiring! ILR is seeking a Manager of State Legislative Affairs. This role includes managing legal and lobbying projects, and leading state legislative campaigns. You’ll represent ILR at hearings, conferences, and coalition meetings, while building relationships with partners and shaping legal reform strategies. Ready to make an impact? Apply now!
-
This legislation is an important step toward safeguarding the integrity of our judicial system. Thanks to Rep. Issa for his leadership and strong work on this critical issue.
A federal lawmaker has introduced legislation that would require the disclosure of third-party funding in civil lawsuits. U.S. Republican Representative Darrell Issa of California on Oct. 4 introduced a bill that calls for parties in civil litigation to tell the court and other named parties the identity of third-party that has the right to receive payment that is contingent on the outcome of a case or group or cases. The bill comes as the litigation funding industry faces continued calls for increased oversight. Critics have long argued the practice promotes unnecessary litigation and undermines transparency in the legal system. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others have said disclosures can help determine if financial backers are influencing decisions in cases or have conflicts of interest. Sara Merken has more: https://reut.rs/3XSOVUx
-
On Friday afternoon, Rep. Darrell Issa introduced the Litigation Transparency Act. The bill would protect the integrity of our judicial system by requiring third-party litigation funding agreements to be disclosed and produced in all federal civil litigation. Read our statement: https://lnkd.in/etEczj7W
-
Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) poses significant national security risks by allowing foreign adversaries to secretly influence U.S. litigation. Our latest research highlights growing concern among policymakers about TPLF’s potential to undermine U.S. national security by enabling foreign entities to exploit the American legal system. Read the report: https://lnkd.in/e8czrNNX
-
The Wall Street Journal reports that rampant fraudulent claims are escalating insurance costs for ride-share drivers. The state's largest insurer, American Transit Insurance Company (ATIC), which covers 64% of NYC's for-hire vehicles, is at significant risk of failure. Fraudulent claims, often driven by litigation funding by outside financiers, are overwhelming insurers, forcing them to pay out excessive settlements or face costly lawsuits. This could leave tens of thousands of drivers uninsured and force them to seek alternative coverage at higher premiums, which in turn means higher fares for ride-share passengers. A glimmer of hope: The New York Office of Court Administration has proposed requiring plaintiff attorneys to disclose litigation funding in wrongful death and personal injury cases involving infants. As WSJ states, "such transparency would provide useful information to juries about the motive and merits of claims, likely resulting in fewer fraudulent claims." https://lnkd.in/e-z3BGuB
Opinion | New York’s Legal Corruption Racket
wsj.com