Astrophysics
[Submitted on 24 Nov 2004 (v1), last revised 3 Dec 2004 (this version, v2)]
Title:The Opacity of Spiral Galaxy Disks III: Automating the "Synthetic Field Method"
View PDFAbstract: The dust extinction in spiral disks can be estimated from the counts of background field galaxies, provided the deleterious effects of confusion introduced by structure in the image of the foreground spiral disk can be calibrated. Gonzalez et al. (1998) developed a method for this calibration, the ``Synthetic Field Method'' (SFM), and applied this concept to a HST/WFPC2 image of NGC4536. The SFM estimates the total extinction through the disk without the necessity of assumptions about the distribution of absorbers or the disk light. The poor statistics, however, result in a large error in individual measurements. We report on improvements to and automation of the Synthetic Field Method which render it suitable for application to large archival datasets. To illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of this new method, the results on NGC 1365, a SBb, and NGC 4536, a SABbc, are presented. The extinction estimate for NGC1365 is A_I = 0.6 (+0.6/-0.7) at 0.45 R_25 and for NGC4536 it is A_I = 1.6 (+1.0/-1.3) at 0.75 R_25. The results for NGC4536 are compared with those of Gonzalez et al. (1998). The automation is found to limit the maximum depth to which field galaxies can be found. Taking this into account, our results agree with those of Gonzalez et al. (1998). We conclude that this method can only give an inaccurate measure of extinction for a field covering a small solid angle. An improved measurement of disk extinction can be done by averaging the results over a series of HST fields, thereby improving the statistics. This can be achieved with the automated method, trading some completeness limit for speed. The results from this set of fields are reported in a companion paper Holwerda et al. (2005b).
Submission history
From: B. W. Holwerda [view email][v1] Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:40:21 UTC (850 KB)
[v2] Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:15:25 UTC (850 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.