Before clearing Boeing's Starliner crew capsule to depart the International Space Station and head for Earth, NASA managers want to ensure the spacecraft's problematic control thrusters can help guide the ship's two-person crew home.
The two astronauts who launched June 5 on the Starliner spacecraft's first crew test flight agree with the managers, although they said Wednesday that they're comfortable with flying the capsule back to Earth if there's any emergency that might require evacuation of the space station.
NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were supposed to return to Earth weeks ago, but managers are keeping them at the station as engineers continue probing thruster problems and helium leaks that have plagued the mission since its launch.
“This is a tough business that we’re in," Wilmore, Starliner's commander, told reporters Wednesday in a news conference from the space station. "Human spaceflight is not easy in any regime, and there have been multiple issues with any spacecraft that’s ever been designed, and that’s the nature of what we do.”
Five of the 28 reaction control system thrusters on Starliner's service module dropped offline as the spacecraft approached the space station last month. Starliner's flight software disabled the five control jets when they started overheating and losing thrust. Four of the thrusters were later recovered, although some couldn't reach their full power levels as Starliner came in for docking.
Wilmore, who took over manual control for part of Starliner's approach to the space station, said he could sense the spacecraft's handling qualities diminish as thrusters temporarily failed. "You could tell it was degraded, but still, it was impressive," he said. Starliner ultimately docked to the station in autopilot mode.
In mid-June, the Starliner astronauts hot-fired the thrusters again, and their thrust levels were closer to normal.
(1) Thrusters actually were overheating. Not just a software tolerance set too low.
(2) The four thrusters that came back on weren't able to reach their full thrust. Even the test they did while docked to the station is described as "close to normal."
(3) Engineers apparently are actually still unsure if there's enough helium, to the point that they're still researching it.
(4) Boeing's testing and models did not accurately represent how frequently the thrusters would be used in practice.
This calls into question both their control algorithms and their modeling assumptions. Apparently they're seriously off, even after having two previous launches full of real data and years of time to use it...
(5) They didn't try to stress-test the thrusters beforehand harshly enough. And it sounds like there are ways to more accurately represent the orbital environment that can (apparently) be done in a matter of weeks, but weren't tried in testing before either.
No wonder they're still stranded up there. :)