Legal options limited to stop fake TikTok accounts harming teachers, school says.
See full article...
See full article...
For the non-US audience could an age range be provided? 'Eighth grade' doesn't mean anything to me. Yes, I can look it up but it would be nice to not have to. It doesn't have to be in metric units.
but they didn't mean to get into trouble! /s (fwiw that was actually said by one of the children in their "apology")Expel the kids doing this and send them to alternative school.
For the non-US audience could an age range be provided? 'Eighth grade' doesn't mean anything to me. Yes, I can look it up but it would be nice to not have to. It doesn't have to be in metric units.
"'I am 13 years old,' the other student said"
Right? Cause pedophilia accusations are so f**kin' funny!“We never meant for it to get this far, obviously,” one student said, while the other told teachers to “move on" and "learn to joke."
The Economist's recent special report on the state of schooling in the OECD mentions that teacher morale, retention, and recruiting are issues almost everywhere, mostly varying in severity.Some teachers may not stick around to be harassed if it escalates that far. For a veteran Spanish teacher at the middle school, Patrice Motz, being targeted in the mob attack was "so deflating." She told The Times that after 14 years, she's losing motivation as a teacher.
For the non-US audience could an age range be provided? 'Eighth grade' doesn't mean anything to me. Yes, I can look it up but it would be nice to not have to. It doesn't have to be in metric units.
The two girls who were briefly suspended likely only recently gained access to TikTok, as the platform only allows users ages 13 and up.
“I am 13 years old,” the other student said, “and you’re like 40 going on 50.”
With their social media experience, I'm sure Ron D. would love to have them work on his campaign.…the workforce!
You consider going out of your way to intentionally impersonate multiple teachers and present them as literal pedophiles to the world as typical underage behavior?I don't see a viable path toward any kind of money damages. Social media companies are not liable under section 230, and kids cannot be liable . . . because I doubt there is a jury that will award damages for typical underage behavior. I remember all sorts of horrible things that were said about my teachers when I was in K-12. Social media just made that behavior visible to adults.
While it may be easy to react in a way that suggests that students should have been more heavily disciplined in school, some, but not all, of their behavior is protected by the right of free speech and expression," Goffredo wrote.
Right? Cause pedophilia accusations are so f**kin' funny!
Civil suits against all the parents. Those can be funny too. Learn to joke!
Extremely familiar with the area, surprised this happened at a public school first. Figured it'd be one of the prep schools nearby, where all my classmates could charitably be described as future Brett Kavanaughs.
These sorts of challenges have happened several times in the history of US public school. The schools are extremely limited in what they can do because, appropriately, the law favors protecting children. However, these free speech statutes do get questioned and investigated more heavily after incidents like this and often at least produce clearer guidance and in some cases help clarify the limits of protected behavior vs consequences. I can think of two such cases and can remember the names of none... one had to do with protesting war I believe with their clothing choices, which were perceived as disruptive (if that helps anyone find it).
I genuinely don't know how to explain the difference between "said among students" and "on the public internet".Yes, I went to public school in NYC. Much worse things have been said amongst the students.
13 year olds, with access to the internet, will certainly be exposed to discussions about presidential behavior.Anyone else concerned about the topics they knew to weaponize?
In Pennsylvania I don't think you can send your kids to a public school outside of the district where the parents or guardians live.Expel the trash kids and blacklist them from any public schools. Maybe their parents could learn to do some parenting at this point.
There's a viable path, depending on how aggressive the teachers want to be (weighed against the reputational harm of being perceived as a litigious teacher). Teachers could sue the children's parents for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress due to the highly charged and public nature of the accusations, and a failure of the children's parents to stop them, with damages paid out by parents' insurance.I don't see a viable path toward any kind of money damages. Social media companies are not liable under section 230, and kids cannot be liable . . . because I doubt there is a jury that will award damages for typical underage behavior. I remember all sorts of horrible things that were said about my teachers when I was in K-12. Social media just made that behavior visible to adults.
If I'm not mistaken a plethora of teachers have actually been caught for abuse based on social media postings. This is hardly "so over-the-top that it's not possible to believe".On what grounds? As far as I can tell, the only thing the children are (legally) at fault for doing is violating the terms of service of Tik Tok.
Before anyone starts to mentioned "libel," let me remind you of the lead up to Hustler Magazine v. Falwell in which Hustler was found not guilty of libel because there was no dispute that the offensive ad in question was an actual representation of facts about Rev. Falwell. In other words, if something is so over-the-top that it's not possible to believe, it cannot be libel.