You could start the review of any iPad Pro with this and it'd be just as true. It's the same take anyone could've seen coming from the moment it was announced.The new iPad Pro is a technical marvel, with one of the best screens I’ve ever seen, performance that few other machines can touch, and a new, thinner design that no one expected.
...
Still, it remains unclear why most people would spend one, two, or even three thousand dollars on a tablet that, despite its amazing hardware, does less than a comparably priced laptop—or at least does it a little more awkwardly, even if it's impressively quick and has a gorgeous screen.
It does seem like Apple is very careful to not mix the two. No touchscreens on their laptops, no macOS on their tablets. Otherwise, they'll give them basically the same hardware.At this point I'd just get a MacBook Air. Plenty of power, more ports, an OS that can actually be used for dev work, and an included keyboard!
If you don’t want an ipad specifically for drawing with pressure sensitivity it makes absolutely no sense to buy this latest ipad pro - unless i suppose you are very wealthy and really want that new screenAt this point I'd just get a MacBook Air. Plenty of power, more ports, an OS that can actually be used for dev work, and an included keyboard!
Yeah that’s just it, besides the question of whether they’d want to blur the lines so much, MacOS is not very touch optimized. You have to change the sizing of UI elements dramatically, consider workflows, not assume any external input.I still don't understand why they use iOS on these... these are essentially the same CPUs used in their laptops, so why not just use full OS X? It's basically just a touch screen macbook at this point.
I’ve used them on sets for video work. Incredibly bright displays that are easy to see, and you need that horsepower to ingest the RAW/ProRes files.Genuinely curious: does anyone need this device? I know it's niche, but does any use case utilize the full capabilities? If so, what are those cases? I really don't know, not trying to be a jerk.
Artists with lots of disposable income. So, not a lot. But there are some. Like my brother who just bought one. I'm not jealous at all.Genuinely curious: does anyone need this device? I know it's niche, but does any use case utilize the full capabilities? If so, what are those cases? I really don't know, not trying to be a jerk.
Does any other manufacturer get this kind of 'oh no, it's too good' coverage, or is it only Apple stuff?
The cynic in me: No 30% commission on software sales with OS X. No recurring revenue on subscriptions with OS X.I still don't understand why they use iOS on these... these are essentially the same CPUs used in their laptops, so why not just use full OS X? It's basically just a touch screen macbook at this point.
I too love the Surface Pro form factor. On my last personal computer purchase, I was torn between a MacBook Pro and a Surface Pro. The iPad wasn't even in consideration. Running Mac OS X would have put the iPad in the running.Now the iPad has reached this level of specs the fact that it is great hardware totally gimped by basically a phone OS is just dumb.
I have a Surface Pro and love the form factor. Tablet when I want but enough grunt to act like a laptop and do that well. The iPad would be the Apple version of the surface if only then would let it run OSX.
counter point: I would buy a $3000 tablet if it could do those things but instead i do notThe cynic in me: No 30% commission on software sales with OS X. No recurring revenue on subscriptions with OS X.
1.5x is literally 50% faster, always has been. Not sure what you're arguing here?First of all, this is a good, objective review. I appreciate the justified praise and criticism therein.
But I’m also going to be “that guy.”
Can we please agree that 1.5x faster is not the same as (roughly) 50% faster? I realize 1.5x is Apple’s claim, but we don’t need to repeat it unless roasting them for exaggeration. Otherwise, let’s reserve this kind of numerical concept fudging for the FT articles.
I am clearly not the target market for this so, no, I obviously don't need it. But I wonder what reasonable other options Apple will offer me when I next go shopping.
I have never been an early adopter. My current 5th gen iPad does everything I need it to do except that since the latest OS "up"grades it is slower and crashes from time to time.
Perhaps they need two product lines: one that offers the wonderful new stuff, and one that just makes the old stuff work better.
Oh, but that would mean one line wouldn't be expensive so would be missing the point.
Yes, I am now officially an old fart.
They have been offering those lines.I am clearly not the target market for this so, no, I obviously don't need it. But I wonder what reasonable other options Apple will offer me when I next go shopping.
I have never been an early adopter. My current 5th gen iPad does everything I need it to do except that since the latest OS "up"grades it is slower and crashes from time to time.
Perhaps they need two product lines: one that offers the wonderful new stuff, and one that just makes the old stuff work better.
Oh, but that would mean one line wouldn't be expensive so would be missing the point.
Yes, I am now officially an old fart.
No Mac has the Pen(cil).The new iPad Pro is a technical marvel, with one of the best screens I’ve ever seen, performance that few other machines can touch, and a new, thinner design that no one expected. [...] Still, it remains unclear why most people would spend one, two, or even three thousand dollars on a tablet that, despite its amazing hardware, does less than a comparably priced laptop—or at least does it a little more awkwardly, even if it's impressively quick and has a gorgeous screen.
I think it’s a common argument that can be made about any high end tech. Do you really need an 80” TV? A 10 year old Sandy Bridge chip can run most games if paired with a good GPU. Most people with high end laptops are just surfing social media or editing spreadsheets, etc.Genuinely curious: does anyone need this device? I know it's niche, but does any use case utilize the full capabilities? If so, what are those cases? I really don't know, not trying to be a jerk.
Then Apple can't sell you two devices. As long as touch is only found in iOS, you can't have an all-in-one and Apple can double-dip into your pocket. I don't like it, but I get why.I still don't understand why they use iOS on these... these are essentially the same CPUs used in their laptops, so why not just use full OS X? It's basically just a touch screen macbook at this point.
What are you doing to yours? I jam mine into a travel bag all the time in just the Magic Keyboard case and it’s in perfect condition after years of this treatment.I have the previous body design ipad pro and it is very fragile: despite being treated with care and forever in a sturdy protective case it has bent significantly over the years - i would think therefore that this thinner design would be even more prone to bending and therefore perhaps more prone to screen cracking