As much as western cars have, ie a lot. For countries that trust the great powers as far as they can throw them, it’s six of one, half dozen of the other.I wonder how much spyware these EVs do have....
It's the main reason why we can't have cool compact trucks in the US, like the rest of the world has.But this very decision has had long-lasting ramifications of the foreign and domestic car and truck market in the USA...and it still matters today.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.This whole situation is funny to me because if this was a European or US car company succeeding this way, it would be hailed and celebrated. But since it's a Chinese company it's 'evil' somehow.
Probably as much as any EV currently for sale in the US.I wonder how much spyware these EVs do have....
I understand and agree with counties adding tariffs to imports of Chinese manufactured vehicles that are likely heavily subsidized directly and indirectly, but I'm having trouble with this aspect. If BYD is setting up auto plants in various countries, isn't that exactly what should be happening? BYD building a plant in South Carolina or Tennessee would be a good thing, wouldn't it? I know this is complicated so I'm probably missing something obvious from a geopolitical aspect.Under a $1 billion-plus investment plan, BYD intends to start producing electric and hybrid automobiles this year at the site in Bahia state, which will also manufacture bus and truck chassis and process battery materials.
Have you considered responding to the article, rather than just jerking your knee?Yeah, let’s keep buying cheap crap from a communist dictatorship, send them billions of dollars, move production of critical goods there, while reducing employment in our home countries. Who cares about work exploitation and zero environmental regulations.
What could go wrong?
Nothing like saving the planet on the back of slave labor from a mass polluting fascist regime.Yeah, let’s keep buying cheap crap from a communist dictatorship, send them billions of dollars, move production of critical goods there, while reducing employment in our home countries. Who cares about work exploitation and zero environmental regulations.
What could go wrong?
The "evil" is that China heavily subsidies their export car market so other countries can't compete. Their environmental record is terrible, both on the raw inputs and manufacturing sides. I believe their electricity is about 70% coal generated, assuming the numbers aren't fudged. Their labor and human rights records are poor. Plus, we've just experienced what happens with brittle global supply chains.This whole situation is funny to me because if this was a European or US car company succeeding this way, it would be hailed and celebrated. But since it's a Chinese company it's 'evil' somehow.
Chicken Tax explainer: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/01/25/511663527/episode-632-the-chicken-taxThe whole question/issue of tariffs is so complicated. I'm not smart enough to figure it out.
Apparently in the 1960s tariffs were placed on imported trucks... that had something to do with the price of chicken ... chicken!
But this very decision has had long-lasting ramifications of the foreign and domestic car and truck market in the USA...and it still matters today.
It appears to have been prepared for a black background, but now is presented on a white background.Did something go wrong with the graph export to Ars? Both are missing data. For the first you can still sort of see the 'Asia' bar between the others, but for the second graph the 'US' and 'Rest of world' data is missing entirely.
I still struggle to understand what an "overcapacity" means. On its face, the word appears to suggest that production is higher than consumption. However, this is true of every export industry. One does not say that the US farm sector has an "overcapacity" issue simply because the US produces more grain than it can consume and exports the excess.Japan and Korea export more than 50% of their annual vehicle production volumes, China around 15%.. China imports far more cars from Europe than are imported to Europe from China. "Industrial overcapacity" is racist nonsense.
Then you should probably find a decent security report of those EVs provided by professional security research agencies. Guessing won't help.I wonder how much spyware these EVs do have....
When Chinese companies build to Western standards, the costs are only slightly lower than comparable cars. There's no magic, they're just building smaller, cheaper cars.Why are the Chinese able to sell EVs for under $10k, but for Americans the lowest possible price is $35k? Is the Chinese government subsidizing their cars to the tune of $25k PER CAR, or is there a chance Americans just aren't very good at building cars in a cost-effective fashion? Or is it option C, profit margins on American EVs are just very high?
Also I'd be ok with buying Chinese EVs here even with the 100% tariff. That's still under $20k.
It's very hard to calculate because so many layers of the BOM costs of a Chinese BEV have subsidies.I'm sure the data exists, though it is surely fiercely protected, but it feels like it's really important to get a better understanding of the real cost breakdowns that go into these Chinese EVs - as well as their Western and Japanese competitors - to try and understand the true nature of this problem.
Is it labour costs? Material input costs? Supply chain logistics? All of the above, and more?
How much do government subsidies and direct cash transfers actually represent in the bottom-line price tag of every vehicle? In 2022 BYD received ~$2.3B in direct government transfers, but they also sold 1.8M vehicles, so that only amounts to a little bit over $1000 per vehicle. And (to our understanding) the subsidy has declined in recent years, while sales have increased dramatically.
So it seems like surely there is another, much more significant, aspect of Chinese industrial policy that needs to be targeted to become competitive against EVs like the BYD Dolphin that start at $14K in China. That said, for whatever reason, that same vehicle sells for $31K in Mexico - is it just tariffs, transport costs, and pure profit making up that difference, or are the basic configurations sold in China unsustainably priced loss-leaders that wouldn't be viable in other markets?
In any case, the direct competitor for such a vehicle would probably be something like the Citroen e-C3 which starts at $25K and would compete against a Dolphin that costs something like $16-17K. That's still not a tiny gap, but it also doesn't seem obvious to me that Western EVs are fundamentally uncompetitive.
I do hope the engineers, product strategists, and supply chain managers at Western EV companies are as interested in these questions as I am...
Uh... China has more motor vehicles on the road than the US....If China can leapfrog the developing world straight to BEVs rather than going through gasoline cars, that would be amazing. Unfortunately it wouldn’t reduce emissions much compared to now, because they have relatively few cars, but it would prevent a large increase in oil consumption that would choke their lungs, spike our climate, and fund a bunch of autocrats (and the Conservative Party of Canada).
Assuming that was even possible, and not a mere sci-fi trope, would BYD & co be so stupid as to... weaponize EVs for whatever reason and potentially kill their sales - not just in Australia but globally?“We’ve all seen the movies where electric cars can be weaponized,” he says.
I understand and agree with counties adding tariffs to imports of Chinese manufactured vehicles that are likely heavily subsidized directly and indirectly, but I'm having trouble with this aspect. If BYD is setting up auto plants in various countries, isn't that exactly what should be happening? BYD building a plant in South Carolina or Tennessee would be a good thing, wouldn't it? I know this is complicated so I'm probably missing something obvious from a geopolitical aspect.
Are you referring to the base-level BYD Seagull?Why are the Chinese able to sell EVs for under $10k, but for Americans the lowest possible price is $35k? Is the Chinese government subsidizing their cars to the tune of $25k PER CAR, or is there a chance Americans just aren't very good at building cars in a cost-effective fashion? Or is it option C, profit margins on American EVs are just very high?
Also I'd be ok with buying Chinese EVs here even with the 100% tariff. That's still under $20k.