Driverless racing is real, terrible, and strangely exciting

Tridus

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,231
Subscriptor
I watched this when it happened on Youtube, and it was awful. The biggest problem it was marketed and talked up as if an actual race would happen. They even billed it as "the ultimate autonomous race."

It was a test, and a test that went pretty badly. If they said up front "this is a test session", that's totally fine. Tests can be interesting. But when you sell a race and then don't deliver any racing (and don't kid yourself, this had about as much racing as the Monaco Grand Prix), its a problem.

Most of these teams looked not even remotely ready for an actual race and its clear there is a long way to go. They need to really be more honest about what they're offering until these cars can actually race each other.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Driverless car racing is really supersized remote control cars or slot cars. What’s next, we replace boxing with rock’um, sock ‘um robots?
If you're a Twilight Zone fan, there was an episode that dealt with a future in which the sport of boxing was done through robots, where it was now illegal for humans to engage in the sport. Then there was that Hugh Jackson movie where he controlled the robot through shadow boxing.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

demonbug

Ars Scholae Palatinae
654
Subscriptor
There’s a startup doing FPV RC racing but not with full-size cars. The scale speeds are quite high though. Keep meaning to dig into them for a story but still haven’t had time.
I was going to say, if you're looking at autonomous race cars it doesn't really seem like it makes sense to start at full-size human-scale cars; glad to hear there are some other ideas out there.

IMO something like go-kart size cars on temporary tracks you can fit in a stadium could be pretty interesting as a series; it doesn't really make sense to try to compete head-on with driver-centric series, it would make more sense to lean into the advantage of a driverless series (lack of safety risk), and that suggests keeping the cost of the individual vehicles down rather than going with expensive full-size race cars.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

DeeplyUnconcerned

Ars Praetorian
561
Subscriptor++
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Seems odd as to why they would pick an open wheel platform to test this. I would think a more robust vehicle would be preferable.
Because they look like F1 cars to a casual observer, and to much of the world that is the pinnacle of motorsport.

I think this is a really interesting experiment. It will be quite some time until the robots can beat a human, but I think the racing will get fun to watch fairly quickly. I mean, I enjoy watching my Roomba figure out how to deal with an obstacle, how could I not enjoy this?
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

dinfinity

Smack-Fu Master, in training
21
Pretty disasterous if you watch any video of the event.

I have seen racing RC cars converted to be autonomous racing that was more exciting.
To be fair, they weren't using sophisticated driving AI. I imagine that once they get properly trained AI to drive them the results will be very different.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

phoenix_rizzen

Ars Praefectus
4,298
Subscriptor
If you're a Twilight Zone fan, there was an episode that dealt with a future in which the sport of boxing was done through robots, where it was now illegal for humans to engage in the sport. Then there was that Hugh Jackson movie where he controlled the robot through shadow boxing.
Hugh Jackman and the movie is called Real Steel, now showing on Netflix.
 
Upvote
2 (4 / -2)

sunnysocal

Ars Centurion
360
Subscriptor
Seems odd as to why they would pick an open wheel platform to test this. I would think a more robust vehicle would be preferable.

And why start with full-sized vehicles? Use scaled down version of the cars to perfect the software.

Maybe just go a step further and do a car-less, driverless race.

John Cage's 4'33
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

raxx7

Ars Legatus Legionis
16,164
Subscriptor++
I don't know, F1 drivers have raced along side the likes of Maldonado and Stroll full well knowing they could crash into them at any second. Seems like racing a computer might be safer?

To race in F1 you need to first build a career in lower series with good enough results to qualify for a FIA Super License.
And then every race weekend you need to be able to put your car within 7% of the pole position time to be allowed to start the race on Sunday.

Maldonado and Stroll are still very very above average drivers.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

Sipperofwine

Ars Centurion
254
Subscriptor++
To race in F1 you need to first build a career in lower series with good enough results to qualify for a FIA Super License.
And then every race weekend you need to be able to put your car within 7% of the pole position time to be allowed to start the race on Sunday.

Maldonado and Stroll are still very very above average drivers.
I am aware of that. It was a joke. But one could also argue that each of those drivers didn't get into F1 because they were the best options.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Tridus

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,231
Subscriptor
No action shots of the race?

I was getting a bit weirded out how none of the tires in the static pictures were touching the pavement... Until I noticed a little bit of jackstand under one of the cars, I had thought the pics were faked.
Last I checked the video was on Youtube. The "action" was mostly cars following each other, cars stopping because the car in front of them stopped, and such. It was what you'd expect from an early test of the tech.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Statistical

Ars Legatus Legionis
52,645
The cars are impressive, but it will be a long time until they're competitive against human drivers.

If it is like anything else it will go from can't compete to can beat most non-pro drivers to can challenge pro drivers but rarely win to battling it out with the best of drivers to humans can rarely beat it, to no human ever beats it again.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

user12121

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
187
This is all interesting, but I'm really interested in why we haven't seen racing with remotely piloted cars (like these big open-wheel ones). It seems to me that it could be very exciting, as once you take the meat bag out of the cockpit, you can then dial up the performance of the cars. If the virtual racers were on site, the latency could be very low and doable.

Of course, that takes the danger out of the remote driver's mind, but there is still a penalty for crashing your expensive race car too often, which is, of course, losing your virtual seat.

With VR and augmented reality, it seems this is doable and would be far more interesting in my mind than watching a bunch of AI race each other.
R/C racing has existed for a long time.
1/12 scale
1/10 scale
1/8 scale
1/4 scale

I don't know how feasible it would be to drive to drive a full size one. Would you drive it based on internal cameras or sit on up high and drive it like a smaller one?
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
So I guess there's still a long way to go before we can install weapon systems on these cars to make the race more interesting.

View attachment 82088
What's funny, is while this race was such a big disappointment, there are, Ukraine is apparently mass-producing AI driven vision based kamikaze drones right now.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

x14

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,213
I think drone car races would be more fun. I mean real drivers sitting inside a nice air conditioned control room with a steering wheel, shifter, pedals, gauges, etc. operating a real fast car out on the hot noisy track. Kids could have go kart races like that and mom's would approve because it's safe. Although dad's might not want to pay the freight on such a pricey game. Unless, they were into it, too.

I get this article is about autonomous, btw. I just think drone cars would be cool.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

macr0t0r

Smack-Fu Master, in training
43
This is all interesting, but I'm really interested in why we haven't seen racing with remotely piloted cars (like these big open-wheel ones). It seems to me that it could be very exciting, as once you take the meat bag out of the cockpit, you can then dial up the performance of the cars. If the virtual racers were on site, the latency could be very low and doable.

Of course, that takes the danger out of the remote driver's mind, but there is still a penalty for crashing your expensive race car too often, which is, of course, losing your virtual seat.

With VR and augmented reality, it seems this is doable and would be far more interesting in my mind than watching a bunch of AI race each other.
This is essentially Drone Racing (lookup DRL), and you're correct that being on-site minimizes lag issues. I think it could be interesting, but a car on a flat track isn't quite as exciting as an angry flying blender ripping through a 3D obstacle course. But, hey, I'm all for some variety in the space!
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Hammer_Thyme

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
184
This is all interesting, but I'm really interested in why we haven't seen racing with remotely piloted cars (like these big open-wheel ones). It seems to me that it could be very exciting, as once you take the meat bag out of the cockpit, you can then dial up the performance of the cars. If the virtual racers were on site, the latency could be very low and doable.

Of course, that takes the danger out of the remote driver's mind, but there is still a penalty for crashing your expensive race car too often, which is, of course, losing your virtual seat.

With VR and augmented reality, it seems this is doable and would be far more interesting in my mind than watching a bunch of AI race each other.
I'm waiting for that, but for blood sport
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
R/C racing has existed for a long time.
1/12 scale
1/10 scale
1/8 scale
1/4 scale

I don't know how feasible it would be to drive to drive a full size one. Would you drive it based on internal cameras or sit on up high and drive it like a smaller one?
Sure but like I said full size. The cameras would need to be situated in a way that a remote driver in a sim racer type setup could use a vr helmet to simulate the view from the actual cockpit
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

vonduck

Ars Scholae Palatinae
955
Mad Max races, automated. Live machine guns, rockets, spears, what have you.
that sounds like a waste of money. some sort of electromagnetic pulse that (temp) disables the electronics only, if that's a thing. obviously there's still the "unexpected" crashes from sudden slow downs to fix, but far cheaper than blowing shit up.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

HazelSouthwell

Smack-Fu Master, in training
2
I'm not so sure about that. Because the hardware is fixed1, and the course is closed, the only changes that need to be made are to the software. And that software could be tested in massively parallel environments (EG see all the robotics research being done by shoving several thousand virtual robots into an environment and letting them flop around until they slowly evolve to walk). But a human driver can only learn in a linear time frame. So IMHO the odds are stacked against the human drivers.

1. I didn't see anything the article about tuning the cars. From my limited understanding of car racing, better tuning does help differentiate racing teams (and this may actually be where a human driver is superior, as they can better articulate how a car feels on the track and how it responds to changes to the setup).
The cars are all set up and tuned by a team supplied by TII, teams are not permitted to touch the hardware, to keep them all as fair as possible. And, let's be honest, to give them a realistic chance of running a Super Formula car when they're a programming department from a universit.y
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
"A less morally ambiguous use case is the potential for maritime and aviation collision avoidance, something the logistics industry is very interested in."

A collision avoidance system could be adapted to collision seeking.
Ukraine could use a drone that was immune to jamming.
Might have to have pretty robust IFF, since IFF spoofing would be the countermeasure.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ExoptusVeritas

Seniorius Lurkius
47
Subscriptor++
Last I checked the video was on Youtube. The "action" was mostly cars following each other, cars stopping because the car in front of them stopped, and such. It was what you'd expect from an early test of the tech.
There are a few youtube videos. One I watched was a one minute hype from ADARL called "A2RL Final Race Highlights" which was not anything like final race highlights. The other I watched was from an F1 biased site. This is where I learned that the actual "race" was only 8 laps. The first two laps were under some kind of virtual lead car lap, rolling around, waiting for the fourth of four cars to catch up for the actual "start" of the "race". Even though the author of this article mentions several times the chassis is a Super Formula, I still couldn't tell if these were ICE or EV. Chassis is different in my mind than powertrain, and it wasn't until I was a few minutes into the second youtube video and did a search on Super Formula that I was sure these are ICE engines.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

ExoptusVeritas

Seniorius Lurkius
47
Subscriptor++
I have the utmost respect for the author of this article. While I haven't read her full article on Medium, it looks very informative. However, I do have a few comments. First, there was no mention of what these cars used for power. I do not assume that a Super Formula platform includes the engine, and no mention here that these are ICE cars. My second comment is regarding 'What's the point of driverless racing?'. A2RL takes away all the things I like about racing except the 'roaring noise' and that can be done away with by making these all electric. Make them electric and I have absolutely no reason to watch.

Or so I thought at first. I'm an old 68 yo geezer, and as I thought about this over my morning bowl of Metamucil fortified Wheatena, I realized there is a future population that has no idea of what past motor racing was like and really couldn't care. After watching several seasons of Drive To Survive I see that younger people can take away a different story. I can see doing away with a driver in the car and putting him in a simulator rig actually driving from the sidelines. You don't need guys that look like Verstappen or Hamilton, you don't need people with names like Lando or Hulkenberg. And, they obviously don't need to be all male. This has nothing to do with the autonomous driving series that this article is about, but it gets to my point that motor racing is going to change because there is this newer younger audience that has no point of reference other than Tesla Plaids for going fast.

Why not have a race series a bunch of Tesla Plaids, put internet influencers in the driver seats, set the cars on Full Self Driving mode and then floor it! They can TikTok / Insta the whole race!
 
Upvote
-2 (1 / -3)

ExoptusVeritas

Seniorius Lurkius
47
Subscriptor++
it did get a mention! TII participated in Indy Autonomous Challenge and that's where they got the idea for what they wanted to do, including the contact with Dallara.
May I assume you are the actual Hazel Southwell of this article? I have just finished reading your article 'What it's actually like to visit Riyadh, alone, for Formula E'. Excellent article. I see now there's a change coming with the new generation in regards to motorsports racing.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

mobby_6kl

Ars Scholae Palatinae
886
it did get a mention! TII participated in Indy Autonomous Challenge and that's where they got the idea for what they wanted to do, including the contact with Dallara.
Oh wow you're the Hazel!? Have you been to Riyadh since that post?

I was supposed to spend a few days on a layover there (before plans changed) and from the comments I've seen it's supposedly changed massively over the last couple of years. Unfortunately didn't get to see that myself but seems like your assessment was more accurate than that of the naysayers. Hope you've had an easier time there if you have returned since.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)