1969, a Year of Bombings

One night, 40 years ago this month, about 50 typists were on the eighth floor of the Marine Midland Building, keying records on automatic booking machines, when a bomb exploded.

Placed next to a bank of elevators, the bomb — which detonated around 10:50 p.m. on Aug. 20, 1969, with a force equal to about 24 sticks of dynamite — ripped off the elevator doors, blew out windows on three sides of the building and overturned filing cabinets. The blast collapsed the eighth floor into the seventh floor below. The explosion ripped a hole eight feet wide through a 10-foot-thick floor. About 150 late-shift employees were on duty at Marine Midland, at 140 Broadway in the financial district, but only two people had injuries serious enough to require extended medical treatment.

During a period of less than four months in the summer and fall of 1969, eight bombings rocked major institutions in New York City. While no one was killed, the bombings caused several injuries, jolted the city, damaged property and became symbols of the radical movements that were challenging the foundations of American society.

Prof. Jeremy Varon, a historian at the New School and the author of “Bringing the War Home: The Weather Underground, the Red Army Faction, and Revolutionary Violence in the Sixties and Seventies” (University of California Press, 2004), said that “1969 was the high watermark of anger and frustration in the Vietnam war.”

He added: “The bombings that year were an expression, an act of, if not foolhardy, optimism. They were desperadoes. They had the belief that they could bomb old ideologies out of existence.”

Prof. Beverly Gage, a historian at Yale and the author of “The Day Wall Street Exploded: A Story of America in its First Age of Terror” (Oxford University Press, 2009), said the zeitgiest of the ’60s — and specifically, the fears of faltering moral leadership — contributed to the paranoia of the era.

“One of the interesting things about the late ’60s bombings was the focus at the time: Everyone was focused on the youth,” Professor Gage said. “In other periods, it was about immigration and other issues, but people then were asking: Why are our children doing this to us?”

The F.B.I. created a 20-person unit to investigate the New York City bombings. Eventually, the Marine Midland bombing — and several other major bombings that rattled the city in 1969 — were ultimately attributed to one Samuel J. Melville, who was charged as the principal conspirator and bomb-setter.

Mr. Melville, 34, an engineering technician turned antiwar radical, was arrested on Nov. 12, 1969, as he tried to place a knapsack full of dynamite on Army trucks at 68th Regiment Armory, at 26th Street and Lexington Avenue. Earlier that day, a bomb had damaged part of the fifth floor of the New York City Criminal Courts Building, the fourth such explosion in Manhattan in two days.

Mr. Melville was apprehended with three others: George Demmerle, John D. Hughey III and Jane L. Alpert, a Swarthmore College alumna who was romantically linked with Mr. Melville. (Mr. Demmerle turned out to be a paid F.B.I. informant.) Mr. Melville was ultimately convicted of plotting eight bombings:

  • The United Fruit Company warehouse at the Grace Pier on the Hudson River (July 27).
  • The Marine Midland building at 140 Broadway (Aug. 20).
  • The Federal Office Building at 26 Federal Plaza (Sept. 19)
  • The Armed Forces Induction Center at 39 Whitehall Street (Oct. 7)
  • The Chase Manhattan Bank at 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza (Nov. 11)
  • The Standard Oil offices in the RCA Building at Rockefeller Plaza (Nov. 11)
  • The General Motors Building at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue (Nov. 11)
  • The Criminal Courts Building at 100 Centre Street (Nov. 12)

A letter to The New York Times from the bombers read:

The Establishment is in for some big surprises if it thinks that kangaroo courts and death sentences can arrest a revolution.

In 1970, Mr. Melville was sentenced to 13 to 18 years in prison for his role plotting the eight bombings. The following year, he was killed during the Attica prison uprising.

The 1969 bombings were part of a wave of similar episodes across the nation that spurred fear and anxiety. (One study found that from January 1969 to October 1970, there were about 370 bombings — most of them minor — in New York, an average of more than one every other day.)

“Bombs are back,” Police Commissioner Howard R. Leary testified at a Senate committee in 1970. “Bombing has reached gigantic proportions.”

The hearing, part of an investigated led Senator John L. McClellan, Democrat of Arkansas, concluded that from January 1969 to April 1970, the United States sustained 4,330 bombings — 3,355 of them incendiary, 975 explosive — resulting in 43 deaths and $21.8 million in property damage.

Dr. John P. Spiegel, then the director of Brandeis University’s Lemberg Center for the Study of Violence, which analyzed civil disturbances, told The Times in 1970 that the bombers were engaged in a sort of guerrilla theater, and that they were motivated by the ineffectiveness of peaceful protests against the war.

“You can attack property rather than people,” he said. “I mean you have to snipe at a human object whereas this is a way of symbolically attacking the Establishment without attacking human beings. There is something symbolically satisfying about a pure explosion, the emotional satisfaction and drama attached to it, calling everybody’s attention to the fact that something has been done.”

Professor Varon, of the New School, described Mr. Melville and his collaborators as an “ad hoc collective.” He said most of the urban warfare that plagued the nation in 1969 was orchestrated by “small groups of friends.”

“Melville’s collective beat the Weathermen to the punch,” Professor Varon said, referring to the radical group that destroyed a Greenwich Village town house in March 1970, killing three people. “They were the precursors to the Weathermen, who, of course, received more notoriety.”

New York City has not endured serial bombings of the ’69 scale since that summer. But the explosions that year were a major chapter in the history of the Police Department’s bomb squad, which was founded at the turn of the last century to eradicate Italian Black Hand extortionists who were terrorizing fellow immigrants.

“Forty years later, however, there’s little if any public tolerance for the rationalization that radicals once employed in trying to justify their means to an end,” the Police Department’s chief spokesman, Paul J. Browne, said in an e-mail message in response to questions about the bombings.

Professor Varon said that the movements out of which groups like Mr. Melville’s emerged will always have a degree of romantic resonance with young activists.

“It’s the nature of young people,” he said. “They will always be inspired by people of intense principles. The bombers represent the extreme edge of the commitment. They will for a long time be regarded for their generational mobilization. It’s impressive to most people.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

I have always believed in non-violent social progressivism. As far as I’m concerned, there shouldn’t be a need for a violent and destructive approach to institutional change in a healthy and responsive liberal democracy.

But does such a strategy only work when dealing with a non-violent opponent? What does one (or a group, or even a people) do when no longer confronted by a healthy, responsive liberal democracy? How much violence – if any – is justified in humanity’s ongoing efforts to bring about a more equitable, honest, and accessible quality of life on this planet?

As far as I can tell, the best policy for ensuring a stable liberal democracy is to avoid the use of violent means in resolving political, economic, religious, cultural, and other differences.

And that goes for governments and corporations, too.

So, what do Democrats, liberals and progressives have to say now about a little yelling at town hall meetings by those opposed to government controlled healthcare? Yelling makes whole lot more sense than the bombings carried out by the left in 1969.

Bombs are stupid, but United Fruit was part of that AIC. AIC’s first big win in the commodities market was Baku. American industrialists had made headway into the new USSR by way of a fat check my SMom’s great uncle wrote Lenin. He was in Russia under the guise of the Red Cross even though Wilson protested the effort. Cheney probably thinks Baku is his promised land.

AIC was a corp who benefitted from the energies of the US Marines, and anyone who wants to can consult the work of Major General Smedley Butler to learn what he did the hard way. After dedicating his life to serve, he came to see he had served American wealth, not it’s people.

How ’bout that nutty German who couldn’t stand Jack Morgan financing and supplying the weapons tearing Europe apart, so he bombed the Senate and then went to Glen Cove and shot Jack in the shorts. Awful behavior. Shame on both of them.

Knowledge is the bomb to blow the doors off of despots, not thier favorite weapon, weapons.

“…but people then were asking: Why are our children doing this to us?”

Boomer children knew their parents had blown their futures by the acceptance of a permanent war culture, the destruction of quality public education, easy divorce, and sugared coated overt discrimination under the affirmative rubric.

After reading this, I’m reminded of an old adage:

“Diplomacy…when all else fails, blow things up.”

I dated someone in college whose parents met at Columbia University in 1968. She told me once that her father was part of a group of kids from Columbia that bombed a recruitment center. We checked with him. He confirmed with a smile and a wink. I thought that was interesting.

Paul (#2):
Right…unfortunately, the yellers are also people toting guns outside of presidential appearances and also blowing up abortion clinics. Nice bunch. Crummy morality knows no political boundaries, my man.

to Paul #2. I say that the violence of the 60’s was deplorable, unnecessary and plain wromg. but it was much more common and widespread as a tactic used by the police and therefore the establishment. You want liberals to feel bad about the 60’s? Ridiculous. Nixon and his supporters were ready and willing to sacrifice 50 thousand American lives for their pride, much as the Iraq war supporters are today, and Nixon went even further, destroying the lives of nonviolent dissenters, aressting, harassing, and so on. As for the screamers at town hall meetings… the only problem there is that they are the tip of tthe iceberg… behind them are a whole lot of irrational, ignorant, compulsive haters with concealed weapons permits…..

Where is Bill Ayers when you need him?

Patrick, Nixon, despite the GOP tag, enacted a slew of liberal policies, he has little in common with the town hall dissenters of today.

Second, before strangely blaming Vietnam on Nixon (which I think is what you’re doing, right?) let’s remember that it was President Kennedy who started the war and President Johnson who expanded it, not “conservatives” and not people you’d likely describe as “haters.” If you want to cast blame for the 58,196 dead, I would begin with them, not Nixon or his supporters. Yes, he did initially expand the war, but let’s not forget that for all his faults, he was responsible for the Gates commission which eventually led to the end of the draft, and his administration was responsible for the Paris Accords and the cease fire and eventually led us out of Vietnam.

Patrick, #8: You’ll have to provide some proof for your claim that bombs were “much more common and widespread as a tactic used by the police and therefore the establishment”. Statements like this only show ignorance of history. You can twist history, but you can’t rewrite it to suit your own viewpoint. And please remember, it was the Democrat icons Kennedy and Johnson who got us involved in Vietnam, and then escalated the war to its highest levels. The bulk of the war casualties occurred on Johnson’s watch. Nixon initiated war-ending negotiations, and ordered the eventual withdrawal of our troops. Lastly, I don’t consider myself an “irrational, ignorant, compulsive hater”, but your comments might lead some people to say that very thing about you.

Actually, the bombings extended well in the 1970s with the blast at Fraunces Tavern which killed four being one of the deadliest.

The Puerto Rican independance groups MIRA and the FALN were responsible for dozens of bombings from the late 60s through the 70s.

I arrested the bomb maker for MIRA in May of 1970 and he was ultimately convicted of 46 bombings in the NYC area. Those were certainly exciting times.

True, Nixon was the last president to give more up for the people than any one after him. Carter pardoned the dodgers, but he was hamstrung by Southern Dems. I often marvel that a man I detested so much would have been better than Reagan. If I’d had a choice between Bush and Nixon, I’d have been happy to erase a few minutes of tape for him. We’ve eliminated the very tax that has historically paid for war debt and sent soldiers on too many missions to pretend this is a necessary, but cost effective war. It is Target Baku, has been and will always be.

When I was a kid, I told my dad I’d like to take my car and set it on fire in front of the Capital. They made dad drop napalm. “Don’t waste a perfectly good car. Write a letter, so I didn’t waste my life.”

Carola Von Hoffmannstahl-Solomonoff August 27, 2009 · 11:50 am

The optimistic belief that one can “bomb old ideologies out of existence” is common to both war-mongering pols and the sort of radical “desperados” evoked by Prof. Jeremy Varon. Meanwhile, average folks doing back room work hope optimistic bombs don’t wipe them out.

All of you might enjoy and find food for thought in Beverly Gage’s excellent book referred to in this article: “The Day Wall Street Exploded: A Story of America in its First Age of Terror” (Oxford University Press, 2009). Professor Gage’s book is an exploration and reexamination of the policies and circumstances that lead to the bombing of Wall Street in 1920. The anarchists were a very different group in terms of background, education as well as in objectives than the fringe in the New Left who decided that bombs directed against property would somehow (mysteriously!) help bring an end to the War in Southeast Asia.

What was common to both eras was that to the FBI (and its precursor organization, the Bureau of Investigation, where Hoover was soon second in command), and much of the public the anarchists were indistinguishable from Bolsheviks, union organizers, and in certain parts of this country, Jews (especially from places like New York).

Repression and violence degrades society and confuses issues whether coming from the right or the left because most people are all too ready to sacrifice rights for safety. That was the cynical advantage taken by the Patriot Act in post-2001 America as well.

It is also wise to recall that the greatest amount of bombing, as well as bombing of civilian targets in North Vietnam and in Cambodia, occurred under Nixon with guidance and advice from Henry Kissinger. So too did the greatest loss of human life occur on Nixon’s watch.

Nixon let the air out of the tires of the antiwar movement by initiating the draft ‘lottery’ and by continuing many of the progressive racial programs and initiatives of the previous administration, despite cynically giving lip service to the white racial backlash in the South.

As we were all recently reminded by the airing of historic footage, it might have been a very different turn in history if Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. had not been wiped out by assassin Sirhan-Sirhan. Instead, we got Nixon, “Peace with honor,” and Watergate. Really folks, militias being encouraged to tote guns to Town Halls to meet the President is not a good idea for this society.

Dyker Park Truthsayer August 27, 2009 · 12:51 pm

Maybe, I have amnesia or some sentimentality, but I will take 1969 in the five boroughs of NYC over today, any day of the week. To me there was less mean spiritedness, more civility, more neighborliness, less barbarians on the roads, higher regard for being educated, more respect for teachers, and more regard for the other, than there is today!
And there were many more people with real NY accents!
Nonetheless, I would be remiss for not appreciating the higher Real Estate prices of today, cause I am one of the natives, who always believed in this place, put my money where my mouth was, and stayed, rather than fleeing in the following seventies and eightiies! Oh, and a lot less fat people and yuppie types?!

No mention of Bill Ayers? I wonder why…

How a comment thread goes from a year of urban bombings to “what happened to the real NY accents?” is astounding.

I guess that’s what you get when you take a stroll down memory lane, bombs and all.