Vasıf Şahoğlu
Ankara University, Faculty of LAnguages and History - Geography, Department of Archaeology, Program for Protohistory and nNear Eastern Archaeology
Ankara University Mustafa V. Koç Research Center for Maritime Archaeology
Çeşme - Bağlararası, Liman Tepe and Bakla Tepe Excavations
Izmir Region Excavations and Research Project (IRERP)
Address: Ankara University
Dil ve Tarih Cografya Fakultesi
Dept. of Archaeology, 06100, Sıhhiye - Ankara
TURKEY
Ankara University Mustafa V. Koç Research Center for Maritime Archaeology
Çeşme - Bağlararası, Liman Tepe and Bakla Tepe Excavations
Izmir Region Excavations and Research Project (IRERP)
Address: Ankara University
Dil ve Tarih Cografya Fakultesi
Dept. of Archaeology, 06100, Sıhhiye - Ankara
TURKEY
less
InterestsView All (53)
Uploads
Papers by Vasıf Şahoğlu
MÖ 2. binyıla tarihlenmektedir. Çeşme-Bağlararası’nın Orta Tunç Çağı, 2c, 2b ve 2a olmak
üzere üç evre ile değerlendirilmektedir. Bağlararası’nın ana yerleşim evresini temsil eden CB
2b tabakası, Orta Minos (OM) III dönemiyle çağdaştır. MÖ 2. binyılın en erken evresiyle (ÇB
2c) birlikte yerleşim güçlü bir sur ile çevrelenmiştir. ÇB 2b ve 2a evreleri de güçlü bir deprem
tabakasıyla birbirinden ayrılmaktadır. ÇB 2 kültür katmanında çok az sayıda da olsa Girit–
Minos kültürü ile bağlantılı ithal seramik örneği ele geçmiştir. Bu örnekler, bugüne kadar
Çeşme-Bağlararası’ndaki en erken Minos bağlantılı malzemeleri oluşturur. Çeşme-Bağlararası’nda
takip eden tabaka, Geç Minos IA dönemi ile çağdaş olan ÇB 1 tabakasıdır. Ancak bu
tabakaya ait bilgiler yerleşmenin üzerine açılan çukurlardan ve tsunami dolgularından gelmektedir.
Thera Yanardağı’nın patlaması sonucu oluşan tsunamiler Çeşme-Bağlararası’ndaki
yaşamı sonlandırmıştır. Kısa bir boşluktan sonra yeniden iskân edilen Çeşme-Bağlararası’nın
son kültür katmanı olan ÇB 0 tabakası, yerleşmenin Miken kültürü ile olan bağlantılarını
yansıtmaktadır. Anadolu Yarımadası’nın en uç yerleşimlerinden biri olan Çeşme-Bağlararası
yerel kimliğini korumasıyla birlikte özellikle Girit Adası’yla gerçekleştirilen ticari ilişkilerin
derinlemesine araştırılabileceği önemli bir merkezdir.
the Urla Peninsula in Izmir. The site was inhabited probably from the Neolithic until
the end of the Late Bronze Age and continued to be settled during the Classical
ages as Klazomenai until it became today’s İskele quarter of Urla. Liman Tepe is a
coastal settlement which reflects close contacts with the Cyclades at least from the
5th millennium BC onwards. These contacts reach a peak point during the 3rd millennium
BC, when the settlement transformed into a regional hub and a key site
for the maritime interconnections around the Aegean. This international character
of the site continued until into modern times.
Classical Period trading port and cultural centre in the eastern Aegean. The mainland harbour, now submerged
~1.5–2 m below present sea level, is one of the best-preserved examples of an Iron Age (Archaic Period; ca.
7th–6th c. BCE) semi-enclosed harbour (>5 ha) with engineered breakwater structures. A multi-proxy study
(micropalaeontology, micro-XRF core scanning) was conducted on seven harbour sediment cores and integrated
with geophysical data to map the harbour structures and document coastal palaeoenvironmental changes. Bathymetry
and side-scan mapping revealed two broad (>35 m) rubble-constructed breakwater structures and a
submerged headland that divided the harbour into two separate sub-basins. Linear magnetic anomalies within
the eastern breakwater indicate a buried pier structure, recording possible augmentation of a Late Bronze Age
(LBA) or Early Iron Age (EIA) proto-harbour embayment. The harbour basin stratigraphy comprises foreshore
and upper shoreface deposits overlying terrigenous clays across a marine transgressive surface. A distinctive siltrich
chemofacies with increased Ti/Ca and decreased Si marks a transition from a sandy marine shoreface to a
low energy, sheltered LBA proto-harbour embayment. The Iron Age harbour construction (ca. 7th–6th c. BCE) is
recorded by a rise in Rosalina, decreased Ti/Ca and the appearance of Archaic pottery. The harbour was in use
from the Archaic to early Classical periods and served as Clazomenae's mainland commercial port.
MÖ 2. binyıla tarihlenmektedir. Çeşme-Bağlararası’nın Orta Tunç Çağı, 2c, 2b ve 2a olmak
üzere üç evre ile değerlendirilmektedir. Bağlararası’nın ana yerleşim evresini temsil eden CB
2b tabakası, Orta Minos (OM) III dönemiyle çağdaştır. MÖ 2. binyılın en erken evresiyle (ÇB
2c) birlikte yerleşim güçlü bir sur ile çevrelenmiştir. ÇB 2b ve 2a evreleri de güçlü bir deprem
tabakasıyla birbirinden ayrılmaktadır. ÇB 2 kültür katmanında çok az sayıda da olsa Girit–
Minos kültürü ile bağlantılı ithal seramik örneği ele geçmiştir. Bu örnekler, bugüne kadar
Çeşme-Bağlararası’ndaki en erken Minos bağlantılı malzemeleri oluşturur. Çeşme-Bağlararası’nda
takip eden tabaka, Geç Minos IA dönemi ile çağdaş olan ÇB 1 tabakasıdır. Ancak bu
tabakaya ait bilgiler yerleşmenin üzerine açılan çukurlardan ve tsunami dolgularından gelmektedir.
Thera Yanardağı’nın patlaması sonucu oluşan tsunamiler Çeşme-Bağlararası’ndaki
yaşamı sonlandırmıştır. Kısa bir boşluktan sonra yeniden iskân edilen Çeşme-Bağlararası’nın
son kültür katmanı olan ÇB 0 tabakası, yerleşmenin Miken kültürü ile olan bağlantılarını
yansıtmaktadır. Anadolu Yarımadası’nın en uç yerleşimlerinden biri olan Çeşme-Bağlararası
yerel kimliğini korumasıyla birlikte özellikle Girit Adası’yla gerçekleştirilen ticari ilişkilerin
derinlemesine araştırılabileceği önemli bir merkezdir.
the Urla Peninsula in Izmir. The site was inhabited probably from the Neolithic until
the end of the Late Bronze Age and continued to be settled during the Classical
ages as Klazomenai until it became today’s İskele quarter of Urla. Liman Tepe is a
coastal settlement which reflects close contacts with the Cyclades at least from the
5th millennium BC onwards. These contacts reach a peak point during the 3rd millennium
BC, when the settlement transformed into a regional hub and a key site
for the maritime interconnections around the Aegean. This international character
of the site continued until into modern times.
Classical Period trading port and cultural centre in the eastern Aegean. The mainland harbour, now submerged
~1.5–2 m below present sea level, is one of the best-preserved examples of an Iron Age (Archaic Period; ca.
7th–6th c. BCE) semi-enclosed harbour (>5 ha) with engineered breakwater structures. A multi-proxy study
(micropalaeontology, micro-XRF core scanning) was conducted on seven harbour sediment cores and integrated
with geophysical data to map the harbour structures and document coastal palaeoenvironmental changes. Bathymetry
and side-scan mapping revealed two broad (>35 m) rubble-constructed breakwater structures and a
submerged headland that divided the harbour into two separate sub-basins. Linear magnetic anomalies within
the eastern breakwater indicate a buried pier structure, recording possible augmentation of a Late Bronze Age
(LBA) or Early Iron Age (EIA) proto-harbour embayment. The harbour basin stratigraphy comprises foreshore
and upper shoreface deposits overlying terrigenous clays across a marine transgressive surface. A distinctive siltrich
chemofacies with increased Ti/Ca and decreased Si marks a transition from a sandy marine shoreface to a
low energy, sheltered LBA proto-harbour embayment. The Iron Age harbour construction (ca. 7th–6th c. BCE) is
recorded by a rise in Rosalina, decreased Ti/Ca and the appearance of Archaic pottery. The harbour was in use
from the Archaic to early Classical periods and served as Clazomenae's mainland commercial port.
10 MARCH 2016
'Cycladica' around the Urla Peninsula - Izmir
During the 3rd and 2nd Millennia BC
Prof. Dr. Vasıf Şahoğlu
(* Department of Archaeology, Ankara University)
(**Ankara University Mustafa V. Koç Research Center for Maritime Archaeology)
Cyclades, the “stepping stones” of the Aegean Sea, have culturally connected Anatolia and the Greek Mainland since the earliest times.
Melian obsidian, as a valued material originating from one of the Cycladic islands - Melos - connected these regions through exchange and enabled the islanders to reach beyond their own habitat and explore both mainlands from the Neolithic period onwards. In light of archaeological evidence, earliest contacts of the western Anatolian coastline with the Cyclades goes back to the Neolithic with abundant finds of Melian obsidian at various sites in western Anatolia. These contacts continued during the 5th and 4th millennia BC as evidenced by shared forms of pottery, marble and obsidian finds both on the islands and in western Anatolia.
First half of the 3rd millennium BC exhibits a new and flourishing cultural phase for the Cyclades. With the growing need for the distribution of obsidian and advances in metallurgy, the islanders began to dominate the Aegean sea and a heretofore unseen Cycladic influence is evidenced on the coastal settlements of the Greek mainland, Crete and western Anatolia.
Various Cycladic or “Cycladicizing” elements, ranging from burial habits to pottery and other small finds, are evidenced at coastal sites like Iasos, Miletus, Liman Tepe, Bakla Tepe and Troy. This period also reflects the most glorious phase of Cycladic culture.
After the middle of the 3rd millennium BC, with the increasing demand for metals and the emergence of the Anatolian Trade Network (ATN), Anatolia enters a new phase involving far-reaching interregional contacts. The cultural assemblages resulting from the western extension of this network are labelled as the “Kastri Phase” in the Cyclades and as “Lefkandi I” on the Greek Mainland. Both assemblages are characterized by Anatolian or “Anatolianizing” elements. The Urla peninsula is one of the main gateways of the Anatolian mainland that leads to the Aegean during this period and Liman Tepe, as the most important harbour site in the region, reached its zenith during this period.
Following a probable climatic event - which could have been one of the main reasons triggering the collapse of the ATN during the last quarter of the 3rd millennium BC - a new power began to emerge on Crete – an area located beyond the reaches of the ATN.
Minoan seafarers, using the sail as well as new technological advances in boatmaking, began to dominate the Aegean sea from the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC onwards. Çeşme – Bağlararası, at the westernmost tip of the Urla Peninsula, became an important hub of trade and exchange during this period as evidenced by numerous Cycladic and Minoanizing finds at the site.
The Urla Peninsula, with key harbour sites like Liman Tepe and Çeşme - Bağlararası, acts as an archaeological laboratory promising new insights into the changing social, cultural and economic dynamics evidenced in the Aegean region through the ages.
The Southeast Aegean/Southwest Coastal Anatolian Region (SASCAR): Material Evidence and Cultural Identity I. The Early and Middle Bronze Age (Italian School of Archaeology,
May 12th to 14th, 2016)
Vasıf Şahoğlu
Çeşme – Bağlararası: A Bronze Age Harbour Settlement in Coastal Western Anatolia"
Çeşme – Bağlararası is located at the westernmost point of the Urla Peninsula in Izmir facing the island of Chios. The site was inhabited during the 3 rd and 2 nd millennia BC with chronological breaks. The Early Bronze Age settlement dates to about the middle of the 3 rd millennium BC and displays the characteristics of a local western Anatolian coastal site. Strangely enough, the site exhibits very little overseas contacts during this period, contrary to the nearby site of Liman Tepe. Following a break in habitation, Bağlararası was re-inhabited during the second quarter of the 2 nd millennium BC. At this time, the site displays strong overseas contacts unlike the previous period. Abundant Minoan and Minoanizing artifacts have been unearthed in securely stratified contexts along with local assemblages characteristic of coastal western Anatolia. Bağlararası is an important new settlement, which gives us a chance to study the diachronic developments evidenced both within the site as well as on a regional scale around the Urla Peninsula.
20-22 March 2014, BIAA
ABSTRACT
Where the Land Routes End: Coastal Western Anatolia during the 3rd Millennium BC
Natural routes have always been a defining element in the emergence of contacts and interaction networks since the dawn of humanity. Some of the earliest means of exchange / trade involving obsidian and possibly bitumen took place between the Anatolian plateau and Upper Mesopotamia during the Neolithic times following river valleys. Natural boundaries define limits of cultural zones and natural pathways open gateways to new ones.
The geography of Anatolia reflects a unique case which is vital in understanding the cultures that inhabit it. The northern and southern coastlines are largely isolated by mountain ranges that extend parallel to the coasts leaving only a few natural passages which clearly must have served as the main pathways of communication from prehistory until modern times.
Western Anatolia posesses a totally different geographical character. The mountain ranges extend towards the Aegean coast in an east-west orientation with deep river valleys which must have served as highways of communication between Western and Central Anatolia throughout their history. These river valleys open to the Aegean sea which delimits the end of a very long land route extending from Mesopotamia and crossing Anatolia during the 3rd Millennium BC.
As the land routes meet the sea, the natural pathways transform into a radically whole new shape and a completely different way of travel which is dependent on different circumstances, knowledge and techniques. Important harbour settlements of the 3rd Millennium BC like Liman Tepe and Troy, must have been places where both the land and sea trade routes meet and cosmopolitan crowds sharing a vast knowledge of ideas and experiences lived.
3rd Millennium BC sites of the Western Anatolian coastline acted as central points where raw materials and eastern goods from Central Anatolia and Mesopotamia and western goods from the Cyclades and the Greek Mainland arrived and were exchanged. Rich archaeological contexts from these settlements create a unique environment for studying long distance interregional relations, chronological correlations and ways of thinking.
Vasıf Şahoğlu
Ankara University
T01SOO7 Who is on Board? Maritime Perspectives on the Prehistoric Aegean
Experimenting the Past: Maritime Perspectives on Prehistoric Voyages around the Aegean
Vasıf ŞAHOĞLU, Hayat ERKANAL, Osman ERKURT & İrfan TUĞCU
Ankara University, Faculty of Languages and History – Geography, Department of Archaeology
Ankara University Mustafa V. Koç Research Center for Maritime Archaeology
360 Degrees Research Group
Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Department of Archaeology
Melian obsidian and consumption of deep sea fish at Franthci Cave (Greek Mainland), clearly indicates the presence of certain sea vessels in use for navigation around the Aegean, already from the 11th Millennium BP onwards. Increased search for metals and distribution of Melian obsidian around the beginning of the 3rd Millennium BC, required new technologies in boat construction and advanced navigation techniques. Maritime contacts around the Aegean seem to have been conducted by the Cycladic seafarers with their longboats during this period. The earliest depictions of these vessels appear on rock carvings in Strofilas - Andros dating back to the Neolithic Period. Depictions of longboats on Early Cycladic II ‘frying pans’ and small lead models from Naxos, all point to a pretty much similar shape of a longboat with paddles. So far, there is no archaeological record for the use of a sail in the Aegean until the later stages of the 3rd Millennium BC. A recent project about the re-animation of the ‘Cycladic’ longboats, aims to have a better understanding of the construction and navigation techniques of the time and reveal the advantages and disadvantages of these vessels in transfer of goods and people around the Aegean sea.
Vasıf Şahoğlu & Hayat Erkanal
Ankara University Faculty of Languages and History - Geography, Department of Archaeology
Ankara University Mustafa V. Koç Research Center for Maritime Archaeology
ABSTRACT:
Liman Tepe is a prehistoric harbour settlement situated on a promontory in Urla Peninsula – İzmir in western Turkey. The site was continuously inhabited from at least the 5th millennium BC onwards and evolved into one of the famous ports of the Archaic world as Klazomenai. Liman Tepe exhibits strong maritime connections from the 5th millennium BC onwards and reaches its zenith as a harbour site during the 3rd millennium BC with strong Cycladic connections. İzmir region has rich metal sources as well as extensive fertile plains which greatly contributed to its economic development. The coastline is directly connected to the inland, all the way to central Anatolia through deep river valleys like those of the Hermos and Meander rivers. Urla peninsula projects into the Aegean as a long, narrow promontory and divides the northern and southern coastline of western Anatolia into two. In this paper, it will be argued that the combination of technological developments in seafaring and the unique location of Liman Tepe / Klazomenai at the junction of all these natural pathways played an important role in the changing socio – economic development of the site through time.
T01S015 Cultural Continuity, Transformation and Interaction in Western Anatolia and the Aegean from the Early Neolithic up until the Mid-Second Millenium BC.
Cultural Interactions between West Anatolia and the Aegean during the 3rd Millennium BC: Changing Dynamics
Vasıf Şahoğlu
Ankara University
Aegean world witnessed great developements in seafaring and organized trade activities during the 3rd Millennium BC. A unique culture, dominating the Aegean sea, flourished in the Cyclades during the first half of the 3rd Millennmium BC. Cycladic seafarers reached all the coasts of the Aegean (Anatolia, Greek mainland and Crete) and acted as the hub of this network in this process. Distribution of obsidian and metals along with the limited resources on the islands as well as the islanders’ dependence on the mainlands, must have been some of the main reasons behind the presence / activities of the Cycladic seafarers around the Aegean. This picture changed effectively around the middle of the 3rd Millennium BC mainly due to important new developments emerging from the eastern mainland, Anatolia. With the western expansion of the Anatolian Trade Network, the Anatolian seafarers started to become active in the Aegean Sea – even setting up small fort sites at strategic locations around the Cyclades in order to control the smooth flow of sea connectivity. This rather short period, brought an end to many of the characteristic elements that shaped up the Cycladic Civilisation and opened a new page in the story of the Aegean.
Vasıf ŞAHOĞLU (Ankara University)
Michele MASSA (University College London)
Although scarcely investigated archaeologically, the 2200-1950 BC period is increasingly understood as a pivotal moment in the history of Anatolian communities, a phase of turmoil and radical changes that will culminate in the appearance of more complex socio-political structures at the beginning of the Middle Bronze Age. In this phase, west and central Anatolia, that were so far part of the same interregional network of exchanges (the Anatolian Trade Network), seem to take different trajectories, one looking west towards the Aegean world and the other gradually becoming integrated into the wider Near Eastern arena. While overall the main centres in the west experience a contraction in settled area and the disappearance of monumental public buildings, on the central plateau there is a gradual transition from the small EBA polities to the MBA territorial city-states ruled by royal couples and serviced by a complex administrative apparatus. Across the whole area, these changes are marked by destruction episodes at most excavated sites and a drastic reduction in the number of occupied settlements. These events are seemingly contemporary to a horizon of drought spells that have been recently recorded by several recent geoarchaeological and palaeoenvironmental studies across Anatolia, suggesting a possible correlation and confirming a trend already well-known in other areas of the Mediterranean and Near East.
The aim of this paper is to offer an integrated analysis of both archaeological and palaeoenvironmental datasets, trying to understand in more detail the impact of climatic changes on the Anatolian communities and their diverse social response at the local and regional level.
Vasıf Şahoğlu
Ankara University
Underwater arhaeological research in Turkey started as early as the 60's and excavation of numerous important shipwrecks have been conducted by INA ever since. The first submerged harbour excavations started in 2000 as a joint Ankara - Haifa Universities project at Liman Tepe / Klazomenai and lasted till 2007. The work which is currently continuing as an Ankara University project, revealed the presence of a harbour facility dating to the 6th and 4th centuries BC respectively. ANKÜSAM has also started an underwater harbour excavation project at Teos and an underwater photographic survey around Erythrai in İzmir region in the recent years. The Center is also conducting an experimental archaeology program together with the 360 degrees research group building replicas of ancient boats and making experimental voyages with them. A replica of Uluburun, an Archaic warship and reanimation of an Early Cycladic boat have been completed so far through this program. The center is also organizing educational programs and events for public awareness on the protection of underwater cultural heritage in Turkey and beyond.
The unique Bronze Age settlement at Çeşme Bağlararasý has shifted its location horizontally according to the changing coastline and the alluvium brought by a nearby river throughout time. Available data suggests that the site was inhabited during the EB2 and Later MBA – Early LBA periods. The EB2 site consists of rows of houses with uniquely well preserved plastered mudbrick walls, divided by streets. Çeşme – Bağlararasý must have been one of the gateways of the EBA Anatolian trade network towards the west.
Following a gap in the habitation history, a similar settlement model evolves and continues to be used in the later MBA which is contemporary with Middle Minoan III period. A winehouse dating to this period is a unique structure which reflects all stages of wine production, storage and consumption. A powerful earthquake destroyed the entire settlement and ends this phase. Following a recovery phase, the last occupation of this site consists of many pits dug all over site including a rich variety of Minoanising Cycladic and Eastern Aegean wares as well as Cretan imports dating to the LMIA period. The site must have been an important harbour town acting as one of the main ports within the Minoan Sea Trade around the Aegean during the 2nd Millennium BC.
The Izmir region has proved to be an important cultural zone where Anatolia meets the Aegean and acts as a valuable laboratory for analysing the relative chronologies of both regions, as well as investigating the changing nature and degree of interaction between them during the Bronze Age.
IN WESTERN & CENTRAL ASIA
(https://arwa-international.org/)
ARWA International Online Workshop
Call for Papers
‘Death, Rituals and Symbolism in Prehistoric Aegean’
(11-13 December 2022)
The study of material culture related with death, rituals and symbolism has always attracted a major interest of scholars who are studying past societies of the Prehistoric Aegean and beyond. The management of death echos after life beliefs that extend beyond the burial praxis, since they enable access into the cognitive field of humans. Burial customs allow the reconstruction of demographic, social, economic and political organization of ancient populations. The significance of mortuary data from the Prehistoric Aegean is immense, as some areas of this geographically fragmented region are mainly known from burials, i.e. the Early Bronze Age Cyclades and Crete. Funeral architecture and practices are indicators for social and political complexity, symbolism, cultural variability and interaction, whereas the interdisciplinary study of skeletal remains illuminate dietary habits, health, kinship, etc.
The increasing of mortuary data dating to the Neolithic and the Bronze Age around the Aegean, the emerging of new methodological approaches on relevant material excavated in the past century, and the application of new methodologies of the Computer and Natural Sciences on mortuary data seeks this call for an International Conference on Death, Rituals and Symbolism in Prehistoric Aegean, dedicated to the Memory of Hayat Erkanal. The conference will take place online between December 11th-13th2022. The official language of the conference will be English. The duration of oral presentations will be 15-20 minutes. The conference will be published as a peer-reviewed ARWA Volume by Brepols Publishers.
Scholars interested are kindly requested to send the title of their contribution, a summary of 200-300 words, and their affiliation by June 30th to Vasıf Şahoğlu and Ourania Kouka. [email protected]
Suggested themes of the conference:
• Mortuary landscapes
• Burial Customs
• Society and Rituals
• Symbolism of life and death
• Interdisciplinary approaches
Co-organized by:
Vasıf Şahoğlu (University of Ankara) and Ourania Kouka (University of Cyprus)
SEMPOZYUM DUYURUSU
Akdeniz’in üçüncü büyük Adası olan Kıbrıs, Tarih Öncesi Çağlardan itibaren Anadolu, Mezopotamya, Suriye, İsrail, Lübnan, Mısır ve Ege dünyası ile yakın ilişkileri barındıran bir kültür tarihine sahiptir. Kıbrıs, Akdeniz’deki bu özel konumu ile kendine özgü kültürel yapısının yanı sıra bölgelerarası ilişkilere açık bir kültürel gelişimi ortaya koymuştur. Tarihi süreç içindeki yeri ve farklı uygarlıklara yaptığı ev sahipliği ile Ada’nın dönemler arası iletişim ve etkileşim olanağı sunan bu kültür tarihi nedeniyle düzenlenecek olan uluslararası arkeoloji sempozyumunun Kıbrıs- Lefkoşa’da yapılmasına karar verilmiştir. Ankara Üniversitesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi ve Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi’ne bağlı öğretim üyelerinin organizasyonunda 23-25 Kasım 2016 tarihlerinde düzenlenecek olan bilimsel toplantı kapsamında, farklı dönemler içerisinde gelişen ticaret ve ilişkiler, bölgesel ve bölgeler arası boyutlarda ele alınarak incelenecektir.
Sempozyumda ticaret ve ilişkiler özelinde, eski Anadolu, Ege, Kıbrıs, Suriye, Mezopotamya, Mısır, Kıta Yunanistan ve Ege Adalarını içine alan bölgeler kapsamında ele alınacak konuların, belli ana başlıklar altında sunulması önerilmektedir. Buna göre;
Sempozyumda söz konusu bu bölgeleri kapsayan ticaret ve bölgeler arası kültürel ilişkiler konusu, aşağıda sunulan ana başlıklar altında şekillendirilmiştir.
Doğa ve coğrafya çalışmaları,
Kültürel çevre,
Yollar ve rotalar,
Ekonomik, dinsel ve ideolojik etkileşimler,
Her türlü hammadde,
Lüks mallar,
Fikir ve teknolojiler ile
Deniz seferleri başlıkları altında ele alınacaktır.
Konuyla ilgilenen akademisyen ve araştırmacıların 300 kelimeyi geçmeyecek olan özetlerini değerlendirilmek üzere en geç 30 Eylül 2016 tarihine kadar düzenleme kurulu adına Prof. Dr. Vasıf Şahoğlu veya Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yiğit H. Erbil’e ulaştırmaları gerekmektedir:
E-mail: [email protected]
Sempozyuma poster bildiri ile katılmak isteyen akademisyenlerin de katılım şartları aynı olup, poster başlıklarını ve 300 kelimeyi geçmeyecek özetlerini 30 Eylül 2016 tarihine kadar göndermeleri gerekmektedir.
Başvurularıyla ilgili değerlendirmelerin sonuçları, 15 Ekim 2016 tarihinde katılımcılara gönderilecektir. Basılmak üzere makale olarak düzenlenen bildirilerin ise, 31 Ocak 2017 tarihine kadar gönderilmesi beklenmektedir. Sempozyumun ile ilgili diğer detayların 2. Sirkülerde duyurulması planlanmıştır.
Sempozyum dili, Türkçe, İngilizce, Almanca ve Fransızca olarak belirlenmiştir.
Sempozyum katılım ücreti, 100 Euro olacaktır.
Bilgilerinize sunarız.
Düzenleme Kurulu:
Prof. Dr. Tayfun Yıldırım (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Prof. Dr. Vasıf Şahoğlu (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Prof. Dr. Sevinç Günel (Hacettepe Üniversitesi)
Prof. Dr. Fikri Kulakoğlu (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Prof. Dr. Harun Taşkıran (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Prof. Dr. Musa Kadıoğlu (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Doç. Dr. Müge Şevketoğlu (Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi)
Doç. Dr. Erhan Öztepe (Ankara Üniversitesi)
Doç. Dr. Cemil Atakara (Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi)
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yiğit H. Erbil (Hacettepe Üniversitesi)
Dr. Rıza Tuncel (Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi)
Held at ANKÜSAM, Urla, November 2017
CONNECTING CULTURES: Trade and Interconnections in the Ancient Near East from the Beginning until the End of the Roman Period. Cyprus, 2016
Urla / İzmir, 16-17 Kasım 2017
SBT 2017
Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of
Underwater Science and Technology
Urla / İzmir, November 16 – 17, 2017