Home Agencies Publicis Writes Down Digital Agency Group By Roughly $1.5 Billion

Publicis Writes Down Digital Agency Group By Roughly $1.5 Billion

SHARE:

mauricePublicis will write down its digital arm, Publicis.Sapient, by roughly $1.5 billion – almost half of its initial valuation – the company told investors during its earnings call Thursday.

Sapient, for which Publicis paid $3.7 billion in 2014 to expand its digital assets, has become a drag on the overall business.

While Sapient grew 7% in 2016, its growth has not met expectations, culminating in a slowdown of the holding company’s organic growth. Publicis posted -2.5% growth for Q4 and 0.7% for the full year. North America was the weakest region, with a staggering -6.9% growth rate for the year.

After the announcement, shares of the company fell 5% in Paris trading.

“Publicis.Sapient concentrates almost 50% of the goodwill that we have in our books due to the significant acquisitions we made in the field,” said Chief Financial Officer Jean-Michael Etienne. “The tests that we conducted when we closed the 2016 books revealed that we had to impair the books on Publicis.Sapient.”

Etienne and CEO Maurice Lévy attributed slow growth to issues at Razorfish, including the high turnover of CEOs and duplicative offerings between itself and SapientNitro. Razorfish fell by 15% year on year.

“Some triggering events were obvious, such as the specific situation of Razorfish as well as the slowness in the Sapient integration,” Etienne said.

Publicis merged SapientNitro and Razorfish in November in the hopes of streamlining redundant assets.

For Publicis, the struggle to integrate Sapient is a blow to the company’s overall digital strategy.

At the time of acquisition, Lévy referred to the digital consulting agency as the holding company’s “crown jewel” which would enhance its leadership position in digital, achieve its goal of deriving 50% of revenues from digital by 2018 and leverage technology and consulting capabilities to expand in new verticals.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Publicis also continues to be stung by major account losses during the pitchapalooza of 2015 and early 2016, including Procter & Gamble and Walmart.

“We have been hurt big-time in Q4, more than we expected,” Lévy told investors. “We not only had the impact of account losses in 2015 and early 2016, but on top we had very little one-offs and many urgent cuts.”

And an ongoing reorganization of its agency assets under three distinct umbrellas continues to cause confusion throughout the group.

“2016 was a very busy year,” Lévy said. “We have decided to dramatically change our organization. It was a little bit like changing the tire of a car while driving.”

Despite these setbacks, Lévy, who will depart Publicis in June, says his legacy will remain strong. The group has bounced back this year with a couple of account wins, including MillerCoors and Mattel.

And without the negative impacts of Razorfish, growth would have remained flat in 2016, providing “a different picture on the underlying health of the overall business,” wrote Pivotal analyst Brian Wieser in a note to investors.

“An eventual turnaround at that unit should help support margin improvements, as should the company’s ongoing efforts to rationalize operations in smaller markets via the company’s Publicis One model,” he wrote. “The combination of Publicis’ media agencies into a single division should also help. Paired with the appointment of the company’s new CEO, the company looks set up to produce momentum as the year progresses.”

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.