@inproceedings{clark-etal-2019-sentence,
title = "Sentence Mover`s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts",
author = "Clark, Elizabeth and
Celikyilmaz, Asli and
Smith, Noah A.",
editor = "Korhonen, Anna and
Traum, David and
M{\`a}rquez, Llu{\'i}s",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
month = jul,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/P19-1264/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/P19-1264",
pages = "2748--2760",
abstract = "For evaluating machine-generated texts, automatic methods hold the promise of avoiding collection of human judgments, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The most common automatic metrics, like BLEU and ROUGE, depend on exact word matching, an inflexible approach for measuring semantic similarity. We introduce methods based on sentence mover`s similarity; our automatic metrics evaluate text in a continuous space using word and sentence embeddings. We find that sentence-based metrics correlate with human judgments significantly better than ROUGE, both on machine-generated summaries (average length of 3.4 sentences) and human-authored essays (average length of 7.5). We also show that sentence mover`s similarity can be used as a reward when learning a generation model via reinforcement learning; we present both automatic and human evaluations of summaries learned in this way, finding that our approach outperforms ROUGE."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="clark-etal-2019-sentence">
<titleInfo>
<title>Sentence Mover‘s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Elizabeth</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Clark</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Asli</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Celikyilmaz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Noah</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Smith</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Korhonen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Traum</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lluís</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Màrquez</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Florence, Italy</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>For evaluating machine-generated texts, automatic methods hold the promise of avoiding collection of human judgments, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The most common automatic metrics, like BLEU and ROUGE, depend on exact word matching, an inflexible approach for measuring semantic similarity. We introduce methods based on sentence mover‘s similarity; our automatic metrics evaluate text in a continuous space using word and sentence embeddings. We find that sentence-based metrics correlate with human judgments significantly better than ROUGE, both on machine-generated summaries (average length of 3.4 sentences) and human-authored essays (average length of 7.5). We also show that sentence mover‘s similarity can be used as a reward when learning a generation model via reinforcement learning; we present both automatic and human evaluations of summaries learned in this way, finding that our approach outperforms ROUGE.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">clark-etal-2019-sentence</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/P19-1264</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/P19-1264/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>2748</start>
<end>2760</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Sentence Mover‘s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts
%A Clark, Elizabeth
%A Celikyilmaz, Asli
%A Smith, Noah A.
%Y Korhonen, Anna
%Y Traum, David
%Y Màrquez, Lluís
%S Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2019
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Florence, Italy
%F clark-etal-2019-sentence
%X For evaluating machine-generated texts, automatic methods hold the promise of avoiding collection of human judgments, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The most common automatic metrics, like BLEU and ROUGE, depend on exact word matching, an inflexible approach for measuring semantic similarity. We introduce methods based on sentence mover‘s similarity; our automatic metrics evaluate text in a continuous space using word and sentence embeddings. We find that sentence-based metrics correlate with human judgments significantly better than ROUGE, both on machine-generated summaries (average length of 3.4 sentences) and human-authored essays (average length of 7.5). We also show that sentence mover‘s similarity can be used as a reward when learning a generation model via reinforcement learning; we present both automatic and human evaluations of summaries learned in this way, finding that our approach outperforms ROUGE.
%R 10.18653/v1/P19-1264
%U https://aclanthology.org/P19-1264/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1264
%P 2748-2760
Markdown (Informal)
[Sentence Mover’s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts](https://aclanthology.org/P19-1264/) (Clark et al., ACL 2019)
ACL