Next Article in Journal
Development of a Smart Material Resource Planning System in the Context of Warehouse 4.0
Previous Article in Journal
Bio-Power Generation in Microbial Fuel Cell with Vermicompost Using Eisenia foetida
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fault-Tolerant Performance Analysis of a Modified Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge Converter for an In-Wheel Switched Reluctance Motor

Department of Electric Power Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Egry József utca 18, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 18 July 2024 / Revised: 13 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 October 2024 / Published: 11 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical and Electronic Engineering)

Abstract

:
Reliability is an essential factor for the operation of the Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) drive. Electric vehicles operate in harsh environments, which may degrade the operation of power converters. These failure modes include transistor open- and short-circuits, freewheeling diode open- and short-circuits, and DC-link capacitor failures. This work presents a performance analysis of an in-wheel SRM for an electric vehicle under short-circuit (SC) and open-circuit (OC) faults of a modified Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge (NPC-AHB) Converter. The SRM is modeled as an in-wheel electric vehicle. A separate vehicle model attached to the motor is also developed for validation and performance of the NPC-AHB under different faulty scenarios. The performance of the modified NPC-AHB is also compared with that of a conventional AHB under faulty conditions for an in-wheel 8/6 SRM. The performance indicators such as torque, speed, current, and flux are presented from MATLAB/Simulink 2023b numerical simulations.

1. Introduction

There is a need for energy resource augmentation and, at the same time, carbon emissions reduction. Electric vehicles have recently attracted the attention of automakers due to constraints on non-renewable energy sources and concerns over global warming. Switched Reluctance Motors (SRMs) provide an alternative to DC and AC motors. As opposed to DC and AC motor structures, which involve careful construction with rare earth materials, the SRM presents a simple structure since its construction does not involve brushes, rotor conductors, or magnets. It is therefore attractive for applications in automotive drives that require high performance. SRMs are preferred over DC and induction motors due to their high power density, high reliability, considerable construction cost, fault tolerance, and fast dynamic response. SRMs depend on sensing the energized stator pole for alignment with the rotor. Due to these exceptional properties, the SRM is finding industrial acceptance in control applications with considerable performance in dusty and harsh environments of high temperatures. Presently, high-power SRM drives are being developed for electric vehicles with promising features of suitable torque–speed ranges, efficiency, and power density [1,2].
In SRMs, the independence of the phase windings presents the possibility of independent current control per phase as a function of the rotor position [3]. Theoretically, the rectangular waveform of the phase currents demands that power converters be utilized for the management of unidirectional and bidirectional currents per phase. To achieve efficient SRM performance, it is important that a suitable converter topology be selected [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Just like the permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs), a suitable converter topology is needed before a direct connection is made between SRMs and the voltage supply. One of the most popular topologies for SRM drives is the Asymmetric Half-Bridge (AHB) converter [10,11,12]. An AHB is designed with two switches and two freewheeling diodes for independent phase connections. However, in two-level converters, the standard conventional AHB converter is limited below given speed ranges and applications of low power demands [3,13,14]. In [3], the fault implications due to failure of the inner switches is addressed through current inversion. The method is, however, complicated and involves several redundant power semiconductor switches. The sizing of the split capacitors is also not addressed. Additionally, the rising-induced electromotive force during operation limits the current from reaching the base value at certain speeds. Therefore, wide-range and high-speed applications would require modified options of the AHB to guarantee excellent SRM performance. Currently, electric vehicle designs increase the DC-link voltage to a vary between 650 V and 900 V from the standard 400 V. Consequently, the converter voltage rating has to be increased. Disadvantages of semiconductor devices with higher power ratings include higher costs, increased size, and lower overall efficiency due to the slower response. To solve the listed challenges, multilevel converter topologies have been developed as an alternative [15]. An improvement to [15] is proposed in [3]. In [15], an NPC-AHB is presented for fault tolerance operation of the SRM. However, essential parts of voltage amplitudes are lost during failures due to open-circuit faults. The performance of the two topologies are compared for applications of high power and high voltages. The machine windings are still controllable even under multiple failure modes through other healthy switches. However, the topology demands a high number of power semiconductor devices to guarantee fault tolerance capability. The NPC topology proposed in [15] performs satisfactorily for fault-tolerant operations. However, only half of the switches are able to withstand the effect of full DC-link voltage. An analytical comparison between an asymmetric MMC and a five-level NPC is presented in [16]. Thus, by modifying the DC-link voltage to a multilevel configuration with an additional boost capability, the converter topology guarantees excellent overall performance [16,17].
Industrial applications have generally demanded for the design of fault-tolerant power converters. It is important that operations proceed safely in the event of one or more semiconductor device failures. For highly sensitive and safe critical industrial operations, fault-tolerant capabilities of the power converters must be taken into account. In [18,19,20,21], various power converters with fault-tolerant capabilities are discussed with regard to the speed control of industrial equipment. In the last decade, researchers have proposed various topologies for converter fault operations. In [22], auxiliary diodes, mechanical switches, and two controlled insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) are utilized in independent isolation and with replacement of the faulty power semiconductor devices. Redundant power semiconductor devices are launched immediately when there is a fault, which are then subsequently short-circuited following the switching operation. However, this topology incurs high costs due to the high number of auxiliary diodes and mechanical switches. A fault-tolerant topology based on a classical AHB converter is proposed in [23] for the control of a four-phase SRM. The author exploits the independent feature of the phases by connecting static switches out of sequence in the phases. The proposed method cannot be extended to odd-numbered SRM phases. Two of the AHB topologies coupled with various numbers of solid-state relays are proposed in [24]. The converter cannot be scaled for more than three phase operations. To solve for the high number of power semiconductor devices and scalability, [25] presents a fault-tolerant converter with a reduced number of switches and six-phase operation capability. However, the proposed topology presents poor faulty operations and cannot be utilized for more than six phases of SRMs.
Fault-tolerant solutions that do not involve auxiliary devices have also been studied. These solutions involve multilevel converter topologies such as the NPC-AHB and modular multilevel converters (MMCs). In this study, the DC-link voltage is not boosted. An NPC-AHB converter is developed in [26]. The converter DC-link voltage is augmented with voltage-boosting capacitors. However, the proposed topology cannot be scaled to other SRM configurations apart from an 8/6 SRM system.
The contributions of this work include the design of a fault-tolerant multilevel converter with voltage boosting capacity for an in-wheel SRM system based on speed–torque characteristics. A 2D look-up table is utilized for different speed and loading conditions for the design of the in-wheel SRM. The proposed converter topology presents a combination and arrangement of a minimum number of power semiconductor switches feeding a direct-drive motor attached to a vehicle system for validation purposes. This article is arranged as follows: I. Introduction. II. Switched Reluctance Motor and the derivation of torque equations. III. Modeling of the EV and the in-wheel motor system. IV. The proposed converter topology and its operation modes under open-circuit fault scenarios. V. Simulation results.

2. Switched Reluctance Motor

Generally, fault tolerance capabilities of the SRM surpass those of other types of motors, thus guaranteeing high reliability for electric vehicle applications [27]. Since there are no mutual couplings between the phases, as opposed to other types of motors, a fault on one phase of the SRM does not affect the operation of other phases. Fault isolation can be seamlessly achieved without affecting the other phases, due to magnetic independence of the phases. The SRM operates on the basis of variable reluctance. As current flows through the stator windings, individual phases are energized sequentially and torque is generated due to the movement of the rotor towards energized stator poles. Energized stator poles provide paths of minimum reluctance when aligned with the rotor pole. The torque generated is a function of the square of phase current and rotor position. Continuous torque is guaranteed through the synchronization of excited stator phases and rotor position.
The magnetic characteristic of the SRM is highly nonlinear, making its mathematical model complex. If the mutual inductance is neglected, for individual phase loops, voltage per phase is defined as
v = R i + d ψ ( θ , i ) d t
where i ,   R ,   θ , and ψ are the phase current, phase resistance, rotor position, and flux linkage, respectively. As the speed of the SRM increases, an induced emf develops and starts to oppose the change in phase current. Considering that the induced emf increases with the increase in speed, Equation (1) becomes
v = R i + ψ ( θ , i ) i d i d t + ψ ( θ , i ) θ ω
The last term on the right of Equation (2) corresponds to the induced emf as a function of rotor speed   ω . Therefore, to maintain the phase current values at high-speed operations, the supply voltage should be maintained at higher values beyond the rising emf magnitudes. This paper addresses this challenge by implementing a modified multilevel converter to help impose high values of DC-link voltage. Additionally, higher voltage values during phase excitation and de-excitation instances ensure minimum commutation periods between the phases. There is also a possibility of minimizing negative torque across the phases. For lower voltages, and therefore lower speeds, multilevel converters can help lower the switching frequency, thereby improving efficiency [3].
The total torque developed is a summation of individual phase torques developed for every time instant. The relationship between the torque T and developed power P m can be defined as
P m = W m t = T ω = T θ t
Therefore, the torque T from Equation (3) simplifies to
T = i λ θ W f θ
where W f is the stored magnetic energy and W m is the output of mechanical power.
Also,
W f = 1 2 L i 2
Substituting Equation (5) into Equation (4) yields the SRM torque as follows:
W f θ = L i i θ + 1 2 i 2 L θ
T = i ( L i ) θ W f θ
T = 1 2 i 2 L ( θ ) θ
Equation (8) implies that the torque is also a function of rotor position and its value is independent of the direction of the phase current.
The magnetic characteristics of each phase of the SRM is independent of the other and this implies that the motor system can continue to operate even in the presence of partial faults in the converter unit. However, it is noted that the converter faults lead to undesirable speed variations and increased torque ripples.

3. Electric Vehicle (EV) Model and the In-Wheel SRM Drive

The EV model comprises two wheels of equal size with forward and backward movements along a longitudinal axis. The vehicle is balanced vertically with wheels perpendicularly oriented with the horizontal plane. The application of longitudinal forces on the rear wheel accelerates the vehicle along the horizontal plane y at velocity   V y .
F y = m d V y d t F d r a g + m g sin ( α )
Therefore,
m d V y d t = F y + F d r a g m g sin ( α )
where
F d r a g = 1 2 C d ρ A V y 2 sgn ( α )
is the drag force due to aerodynamics.
The EV and the SRM are modeled separately at first where the measured torque from the SRM is used as the input to the vehicle system. The SRM is loaded with stepwise values of constant torque, and steady-state speed is observed. The motor is loaded through the torque–speed relationship for the purposes of speed-dependent loading. However, connecting the vehicle system directly to the SRM torque output does not account for vehicle inertia. It is important that the vehicle inertia be included as part of the motor model for the SRM to behave as a direct-drive motor, as described in [27]. The parameters of the vehicle model, including inertia, are inculcated into the SRM model to make it an in-wheel motor as an electric vehicle.

4. The Proposed Converter Topology

The most conventional and reliably used converter is the AHB [28]. This can be attributed to independent phase control and the three-level voltages it provides. However, the voltage levels are limited to 3 and it does not provide fault-tolerant capabilities. These limitations can be solved through the application of multilevel power converters. Several fault-tolerant converter topologies have been proposed by researchers in recent times. One of the most popular converters in fault tolerance research is the Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge Converter [29]. A commonly used NPC-AHB converter structure is shown in Figure 1 [29]. This topology allows the application of more than three voltage levels to the windings.
This topology presents excellent demagnetization and magnetization characteristics. The DC-link capacitors store the demagnetization energy during phase de-energization; hence, the time taken for the current to fall decreases. These characteristics provide an extension of the positive torque range for the subsequent smaller operation in the region of negative torque. Besides increasing the DC-link voltage, the energy stored in the split capacitors feeds the incoming phases, thereby allowing the current to build up faster. This in turn causes the output power of the motor to increase. However, the conventional NPC-AHB converter topology presents undesirable behavior when the inner switches are subjected to open-circuit faults. In [30], branch isolation of the affected leg is used through the utilization of several relays. The additional auxiliary switches and the power semiconductors introduce losses into the system, thus decreasing the system efficiency.
Sizing of the boosting capacitors
Sizing the DC-link boosting capacitors is highly significant in achieving overall efficiency and a wide range of operation speeds. Higher capacitance ensures that higher values of boosting voltages are provided to rapidly build up the current and then decrease it. Consequently, the base speed is increased. Maximum boost voltage levels are achieved through intricate sizing of the capacitors. Higher boosting voltages, however, imply an increased voltage rating of the semiconductor devices. Increased voltage ratings of the semiconductor devices in turn result in a slower response and higher costs of implementation. A smaller capacitance can be used to solve the challenges of cost and overall efficiency. However, undesirable performance will be presented when the motor operates beyond the base speed regions.
In this paper, the proposed multilevel converter is shown in Figure 2. DC-link capacitors are connected after every two phases for voltage boosting and also proper demagnetization. The number of switches is reduced to 5 as opposed to 8 per phase. The capacitor values are chosen according to the capacitor sizing procedure covered in [31].
C = I o 0.005 V D C f s
where I o is the initial current value in the phase winding, V D C is the DC-link voltage, and f s is the sampling frequency. In this paper, the proposed multilevel converter was applied to control an 8/6 in-wheel SRM system but can be easily extended towards other SRM configurations.

4.1. Fault-Free Operation Mode

Considering phase A, and applicable to all other phases, the first voltage level, + V 1 , is achieved when switches SW1, SW2, SW3, and SW4/SW5 are turned ON. The capacitors help boost the quick development of the phase current to the reference current value. This in turn increases the power output of the SRM. The second voltage level + 1 / 2 V 1 has the following switches ON within the loop of the upper capacitor: SW1, SW2, and SW3. The switches SWA and SWB to SWn are always OFF in motoring mode and provide the necessary redundancy. Moreover, with additional diode arrangements, the switches can be used for regeneration.
The third level, 0 V 1 , is achieved when SW1, SW2, and SWA are ON, while SW3 and SW4 are OFF. The fourth level, 1 / 2 V 1 , is attained through the turning ON of SW3 within the loop of the lower capacitor. Switches SW1, SW2, and SW4 are OFF for this level. The fifth level, V 1 , is realized when all the switches are OFF and the demagnetization current flows through the diodes, charging the capacitors in the process.

4.2. Fault-Tolerant Operation Mode

Power semiconductor failure affects the overall performance of the SRM motor. The common converter faults are the open-circuit and short-circuit faults, as depicted in Figure 3 [30]. An open-circuit fault can be introduced either in the outer or inner switches. The direct motor drive performance is investigated for open-circuit faults in the inner and outer power semiconductors. The open-circuit fault considered in this paper entails a loss of the whole power semiconductor from the converter leg. For the operation of the proposed converter under fault, the voltage balance is realized according to the method in [30,31].

5. Simulation Results

Figure 4 shows the Simulink block diagram with the proposed topology and the vehicle model.
For the EV model, the following parameters were used for simulations in Matlab/Simulink 2023b.
Wheel radius, r ( m ) = 0.3;
Vehicle mass, m ( kg ) = 300;
Aerodynamic drag coefficient = 0.4;
Air mass density, ρ .
The proposed modified NPC-AHB topology feeds an 8/6 in-wheel SRM and is supplied by a 400 V DC source connected to 100 μ F capacitors. The converter is implemented using IGBT devices in parallel with a series RC snubber resistance of 200 ohms and internal resistance of 0.001 ohms. The snubber capacitance is set to 0.1   μ F , while the inductance is set to 0.
The direct motor drive speed and wheel speed are plotted in Figure 5 for validation of the direct motor drive method. With motor torque as the input, the vehicle wheel system attached to the motor is able to smoothly track the direct motor speed under normal operations.

5.1. Performance Evaluation of a Conventional NPC-AHB Converter Topology

A conventional NPC-AHB was subjected to an open-circuit fault on the inner and outer power semiconductor switches. Figure 6 shows the performance of the conventional NPC-AHB topology when both the inner and outer power semiconductor are lost through an open-circuit.
Due to the OC fault in the inner and outer power semiconductor devices, the in-wheel drive system and the vehicle experience prolonged transient periods, as shown in Figure 6. Simulations for longer periods were performed for the OC scenario. It can be observed from Figure 5 that tracking the in-wheel rpm is not realizable at higher speeds with a loss of more than two inner power semiconductors in one or more phases. In Figure 7, flux is lost in one of the phases associated with the introduced fault at the beginning of the simulations.
Although no torque ripple mitigation method was used, higher torque ripples, according to Figure 8, are experienced for the conventional NPC-AHB topology as compared to the torque output under the proposed converter topology.
The current behavior of Figure 9 shows that the reference current is sustained for other phases even though the fault-associated phase has no current flow. Only three phases are registered out of the available four. The reference current was set to 50 A and a hysteresis controller was implemented for the control. The realization and maintenance of a higher starting current can be attributed to DC-link split capacitors.

5.2. Performance Evaluation of the Proposed Converter Topology

Fault-tolerant operation was realized through the combination and arrangement of power semiconductor devices in such a way that redundancy ensured system operation even under a loss of up to four devices, as depicted in Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13.

6. Discussion and Comparative Analysis

The proposed topology was able to maintain current through all the phases even under a loss of semiconductor devices, as shown in Figure 10. The current is also controlled well within the limits. The torque behavior in Figure 11 shows better torque performance even under faulty operations for the proposed converter topology. The flux characteristics are presented in Figure 12 for all the phases despite the presence of an OC fault.
The vehicle wheel is able to seamlessly track the speed of the direct-drive motor with the proposed converter topology, as shown in Figure 13. A smooth transition is also observed as compared to those in Figure 6 when OC fault scenarios are introduced in the inner power semiconductor devices.
Conventionally, the Asymmetric Half-Bridge (AHB) rectifier is the most commonly and reliably used [28]. This can be attributed to independent phase control and the three-level voltages it provides. However, the voltage levels are limited to 3 and it does not provide fault-tolerant capabilities. The conventional NPC-AHB converter topology has been used in [29,30] for fault-tolerant purposes. The conventional NPC-AHB converter topology presents undesirable behavior when the inner switches are subjected to open-circuit faults. In this study, simulations were performed with the conventional NPC-AHB topology under open-circuit faults. It can be observed that the affected phase is lost, as shown in Figure 7 and Figure 9. In Figure 8, a more negative torque is also registered for the conventional topology as compared to the torque output (Figure 10) from the proposed topology. Finally, in Figure 6, for the conventional NPC-AHB, tracking the in-wheel speed is not realizable at higher speeds with a loss of more than two inner power semiconductors in one or more phases. Figure 13 shows that even with a loss of more than two inner power semiconductors, tracking the in-wheel speed is still possible even as the speed increases for the proposed topology.

7. Conclusions

Generally, increasing the induced electromotive force during SRM operation limits the current from reaching the base value at certain speeds. Therefore, wide-range and high-speed applications would require modified options of the AHB to guarantee excellent SRM performance in EVs. Higher capacitances have been utilized in recent developments for higher DC-link voltages. However, this calls for higher-voltage-rated semiconductor devices. The disadvantages of semiconductor devices with higher power ratings include higher costs, increased size, and lower overall efficiency due to a slower response. Currently, electric vehicle designs increase the DC-link voltage to a variation between 650 V and 900 V from the standard 400 V. Consequently, the converter voltage rating has to be increased. Further, EVs operate in harsh environments, which could potentially lead to converter faults and various electronic failure modes. To solve these challenges, a multilevel converter topology has been developed in this study as a potential application to SRM-driven electric vehicles. The proposed converter topology has been tested for open-circuit faults, and its performance has been investigated for torque and enhancements in performance at higher speeds.
A modified NPC-AHB was used to investigate the speed tracking of an in-wheel SRM with that of an electric vehicle wheel system. The proposed topology was tested for open-circuit faults in MATLAB/Simulink 2023b by removing the switches just before simulation. The removal of up to four switches represents a failure mode of the power semiconductors. The associated SRM winding to the removed semiconductors could not be magnetized, forcing the in-wheel drive to operate under the loss of given phases. Higher torque ripples were registered under circumstances of a lost phase. The vehicle speed is not able to track the in-wheel speed, as the speed increases further for the conventional NPC-AHB under open-circuit faults. For the proposed converter configuration, the loss of the inner or outer, or both, power semiconductors did not have any effect on the winding current interruptions and speed tracking of the in-wheel. Future work will involve experimental validation of the proposed topology. Additionally, speed controller and torque ripple mitigation strategies will be investigated for the proposed converter topology in various fault scenarios, including short-circuit scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.O. and L.S.; methodology, J.O.; software—Matlab 2023b, J.O.; formal analysis, J.O.; resources, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.O.; writing—review and editing, L.S. and J.O.; supervision, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Electric Power Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, for the resources provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kiyota, K.; Kakishima, T.; Chiba, A. Comparison of test result and design stage prediction of switched reluctance motor competitive with 60-kW rare-earth PM motor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 5712–5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chiba, A.; Kiyota, K.; Hoshi, N.; Takemoto, M.; Ogasawara, S. Development of a Rare-Earth-Free SR Motor With High Torque Density for Hybrid Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2015, 30, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reddy, P.K.; Ronanki, D.; Perumal, P. Efficiency improvement and torque ripple minimisation of four-phase switched reluctance motor drive using new direct torque control strategy. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2020, 14, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Touati, Z.; Mahmoud, I.; Khedher, A. Torque Ripple Minimization Approach of a 3-phase Switched Reluctance Motor. In Proceedings of the 2021 18th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Monastir, Tunisia, 22–25 March 2021; pp. 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Pillay, P. A startup control algorithm for the split-link converter for a switched reluctance motor drive. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 1999, 46, 665–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, T.-W.; Yoon, Y.-H.; Kim, Y.-C.; Lee, B.-K.; Won, C.-Y. Control of c-dump converters fed switched reluctance motor on an automotive application. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2007, 77, 804–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anand, M.V.; Arunkumar, V.; Krishnamurthy, K.; Meenakshipriya, B. Analysis and modeling of different types of converter in switched reluctance motor for reducing the torque ripple. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), Coimbatore, India, 19–20 March 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, S.; Zhan, Q.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, L. Implementation of a 50-kW four-phase switched reluctance motor drive system for hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2005, 41, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tomczewski, K.; Wrobel, K. Improved C-dump converter for switched reluctance motor drives. IET Power Electron. 2014, 7, 2628–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barnes, M.; Pollock, C. Selecting power electronic converters for single phase switched reluctance motors. In Proceedings of the 1998 Seventh International Conference on Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drives (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 456), London, UK, 21–23 September 1998; pp. 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pollock, C.; Williams, B.W. A unipolar converter for a switched reluctance motor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1990, 26, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.; Krishnan, R. Novel Two-Switch-Based Switched Reluctance Motor Drive for Low-Cost High-Volume Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2009, 45, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bae, H.-K.; Lee, B.-S.; Vijayraghavan, P.; Krishnan, R. A linear switched reluctance motor: Converter and control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2000, 36, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yankov, D.; Grigorova, T.; Dinkov, E. A power loss analysis of a three-phase 12/8 switched reluctance motor fed from asymmetric power converter in MATLAB/Simulink. In Proceedings of the 2020 21st International Symposium on Electrical Apparatus & Technologies (SIELA), Bourgas, Bulgaria, 3–6 June 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pires, V.F.; Cordeiro, A.; Foito, D.; Pires, A.J. Multilevel converter with fault-tolerant capability for the switched reluctance machine. In Proceedings of the 2021 28th International Workshop on Electric Drives: Improving Reliability of Electric Drives (IWED), Moscow, Russia, 27–29 January 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borecki, J.; Orlik, B. Novel, multilevel converter topology for fault-tolerant operation of switched reluctance machines. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th IEEE International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), Cadiz, Spain, 4–6 April 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patil, D.; Wang, S.; Gu, L. Multilevel converter topologies for high-power high-speed switched reluctance motor: Performance comparison. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Long Beach, CA, USA, 20–24 March 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gan, C.; Wu, J.; Hu, Y.; Yang, S.; Cao, W.; Guerrero, J.M. New Integrated Multilevel converter for switched reluctance motor drives in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with Flexible Energy Conversion. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 3754–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, B.V.R.; Sivakumar, K.; Karunanidhi, S. A new dual stator-dual rotor switched reluctance motor for electric vehicle propulsion. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Chennai, India, 18–21 December 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ribeiro, R.L.A.; Jacobina, C.B.; Lima, A.M.N.; da Silva, E.R.C. A strategy for improving reliability of motor drive systems using a four-leg three-phase converter. In Proceedings of the APEC 2001. Sixteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (Cat. No.01CH37181), Anaheim, CA, USA, 4–8 March 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Priya, S.S.; Dhanasekaran, R.; Muthulakshmi, S. Simulation modelling and fault analysis of switched reluctance motor. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT), Ramanathapuram, India, 25–27 May 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stephens, C.M. Fault detection and management system for fault tolerant switched reluctance motor drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1991, 27, 1098–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cordeiro, A.; Pires, V.F.; Pires, A.J.; Martins, J.F.; Chen, H. Fault-tolerant voltage-source-inverters for switched reluctance motor drives. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), Sonderborg, Denmark, 23–25 April 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, Q.; Wu, J.; Gan, C.; Guo, J. Modular full-bridge converter for three-phase switched reluctance motors with integrated fault-tolerance capability. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 2622–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, Y.; Wang, T.; Ding, W. Performance evaluation on a novel power converter with minimum number of switches for a six-phase switched reluctance motor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdel-Aziz, A.A.; Ahmed, K.H.; Wang, S.; Massoud, A.M.; Williams, B.W. A neutral-point diode-clamped converter with inherent voltage-boosting for a four-phase SRM Drive. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020, 67, 5313–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krishnan, R. Switched Reluctance Motor Drives, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Makwana, J.A.; Agarwal, P.; Srivastava, S.P. Novel simulation approach to analyses the performance of in-wheel SRM for an electrical vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Energy, Automation and Signal, Bhubaneswar, India, 28–30 December 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bostanci, E.; Moallem, M.; Parsapour, A.; Fahimi, B. Opportunities and challenges of switched reluctance motor drives for electric propulsion: A comparative study. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2017, 3, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pires, V.F.; Pires, A.J.; Cordeiro, A.; Foito, D. A review of the power converter interfaces for switched reluctance machines. Energies 2020, 13, 3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pires, V.F.; Cordeiro, A.; Foito, D.; Pires, A.J. Fault-tolerant multilevel converter to feed a switched reluctance machine. Machines 2022, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conventional NPC-AHB topology.
Figure 1. Conventional NPC-AHB topology.
Eng 05 00135 g001
Figure 2. A section of the proposed fault-tolerant converter topology that can be cascaded to more phases.
Figure 2. A section of the proposed fault-tolerant converter topology that can be cascaded to more phases.
Eng 05 00135 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) Short-circuit faults and (c,d) open-circuit faults.
Figure 3. (a,b) Short-circuit faults and (c,d) open-circuit faults.
Eng 05 00135 g003
Figure 4. Simulink model of the SRM, EV model, and the converter.
Figure 4. Simulink model of the SRM, EV model, and the converter.
Eng 05 00135 g004
Figure 5. Vehicle speed and the in-wheel motor speed under normal operations.
Figure 5. Vehicle speed and the in-wheel motor speed under normal operations.
Eng 05 00135 g005
Figure 6. Speed characteristics under open-circuit semiconductor fault.
Figure 6. Speed characteristics under open-circuit semiconductor fault.
Eng 05 00135 g006
Figure 7. Flux characteristics under OC fault.
Figure 7. Flux characteristics under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g007
Figure 8. Torque output under OC fault.
Figure 8. Torque output under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g008
Figure 9. Phase currents under OC fault.
Figure 9. Phase currents under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g009
Figure 10. Phase currents under OC fault.
Figure 10. Phase currents under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g010
Figure 11. Torque output under OC fault.
Figure 11. Torque output under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g011
Figure 12. Flux characteristics under OC fault.
Figure 12. Flux characteristics under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g012
Figure 13. Speed performance under proposed topology under OC fault.
Figure 13. Speed performance under proposed topology under OC fault.
Eng 05 00135 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oloo, J.; Szamel, L. Fault-Tolerant Performance Analysis of a Modified Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge Converter for an In-Wheel Switched Reluctance Motor. Eng 2024, 5, 2575-2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5040135

AMA Style

Oloo J, Szamel L. Fault-Tolerant Performance Analysis of a Modified Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge Converter for an In-Wheel Switched Reluctance Motor. Eng. 2024; 5(4):2575-2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5040135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oloo, Jackson, and Laszlo Szamel. 2024. "Fault-Tolerant Performance Analysis of a Modified Neutral-Point-Clamped Asymmetric Half-Bridge Converter for an In-Wheel Switched Reluctance Motor" Eng 5, no. 4: 2575-2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5040135

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop