Buy used:
$6.81
FREE delivery September 12 - 17. Details
Or fastest delivery September 11 - 13. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Former library book; Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Ships from
ThriftBooks-Atlanta
Ships from
ThriftBooks-Atlanta
Condition
Used - Good
Condition
Used - Good
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

A Long Short War: The Postponed Liberation of Iraq Paperback – June 3, 2003

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 45 ratings

Presents an eyewitness account of the 2003 war in Iraq while arguing that the war actually began in 1990 when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, and discusses how the conflict has divided public opinion.

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Plume (June 3, 2003)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 112 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0452284988
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0452284982
  • Reading age ‏ : ‎ 18 years and up
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 3.52 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5 x 0.5 x 8.25 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 45 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Christopher Hitchens
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011) was the author of Letters to a Young Contrarian, and the bestseller No One Left to Lie To: The Values of the Worst Family. A regular contributor to Vanity Fair, The Atlantic Monthly and Slate, Hitchens also wrote for The Weekly Standard, The National Review, and The Independent, and appeared on The Daily Show, Charlie Rose, The Chris Matthew's Show, Real Time with Bill Maher, and C-Span's Washington Journal. He was named one of the world's "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
45 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2006
This is a wonderful book for everyone still entranced by the US role in the Iraqi civil war, and for those curious about the fantasies of the Bush administration that launched his crusade against Islam.

Hitchens is a crafty, skilled, invidious flack for the neocon minority that regards war as the solution for any problem produced by the collision of two or more ideas. He prides himself as a contrarian, an ironic self-title that mocks the opposition of those who recognize the civil war in Iraq as Bush's greatest folly. The book is an astute selection of 'Slate' online columns written prior to the invasion, his "facts" are a first-class example of what is known in the news business as "press release journalism".

As such, it is a concise summary of the folly -- some would say wisdom -- that inveigled Americans into a "perfect" war that avoids the horrendous toll of the Vietnam. But, it's just enough to maintain constant uncertainty, unease and doubts which Bush uses adroitly "to avoid changing horses (i.e. commander-in-chief') in midstream" but not enough to bring about his own defeat. Few wars are so good they last indefinitely without fatal results; but, Hitchens proves once and for all that it's possible to fool enough of the people enough of the time to win enough of the votes. The neocons couldn't be happier, more smug, more self-satisfied or more pleased with Hitchens.

Perhaps the most telling metaphor for the book is the cover photo showing US forces pulling down a statue of Saddam Hussein; to this day, Americans are still expected to do everything for the Iraqis. It's why more than 3,000 US civilians and military personnel have died since the "Mission Accomplished" boast. It shows why newspapers are still far more trustworthy than hired flacks. At least Colin Powell had the decency to admit he was duped; Hitchens has a habit of hiding from his mistakes, which may be why he hasn't come up with a sequel about "peace, prosperity and progress in the Garden of Eden (Iraq)".

Hitchens is a usually arrogant contrarian with a distaste for most elements of American-style democratic chaos; but, he can also be a fawning lap-dog for utterly ridiculous ideas as this book illustrates. Anyone who loves the American role in Iraq's civil war will find it is a useful and inspiring gospel; those who oppose folly will appreciate the ease with which some people can be thrown, tied and branded.

Today it's perhaps even more significant than in 2003, when Hitchens bought hook, line and sinker into the "let's have a nice little war" scenario. America now has its "long short war". Now, ominously, a similar drumbeat is starting faintly for a war against Iran; perhaps Hitchens will volunteer again to be a spokesman for why Americans should die in another MidEast land.

All in all, a wonderful book by a brilliant author whose penchant for irrascibility instead of reason results in razzle-dazzle raves for cowboy politics instead of the rational ideas of the Clinton years. Journalism used to reflect the idea, "Question everything: If your mother says she loves you, check it out." Hitchens has turned it around to mean, "Accept everything, if Bush says "war" just reply "Ready, aye, ready!"
13 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2021
It's a collection of articles that he wrote for Slate magazine during the run up to the most recent war in Iraq. He is decidedly in favor of the effort. The articles cover a wide range of topics related to why he believes war is herein justified, with special reference to the often times specious arguments given against the proposition. As is usual with Hitchens, his writing, as an expression of the craft, is always superb, even when his reasoning is perhaps less impressive. Some of his claims and analysis have aged quite well. Others, (like dedicating the book to Ahmad Chalabi, of all people . . . yikes) have aged, shall we say, less well. A few points of interest:

1. He claims that Hussein's regime will inevitably fail and fall, as, we are told, all such despotic regimes do. This is historically false. There are many, many records of long-sustained despotisms, including those of incredible moral turpitude. North Korea would be a very obvious modern day example. Merely referencing the fact that a particularly evil system of government came to an end is no proof that all such governments carry an early expiration date.

2. He claims that Hussein has used chemical weapons before, including on his own people (quite true) so therefore we can be assured that he continues to have such weapons and is likely to use them again. We now know for a fact that he did not have such weapons. And the reasoning which says that something once happened before therefore we know for a fact that it will happen again is not tenable.

3. He makes a similar claim about nuclear weapons (that Hussein was well on his way to developing them, or perhaps to even have them quite soon). We now know for a fact that Hussein had no nuclear weapons and was not close to developing them.

4. It is repeatedly noted that well-known terrorists had been in Iraq without being detained or arrested or anything else, which supposedly proves complicity with terrorism, including 9/11. If failure to arrest someone who later turned out to be a terrorist constitutes culpability for 9/11, there are about 30 or 40 more countries, including some in Europe, that are equally to blame. Suspicious? Sure. Conclusive proof of anything? Of course not.

The book functions best as a historical record of what went on in this country after 9/11. How angry, paranoid, fearful, even conspiratorial a good number of people were. It is also helpful as a readjustment of sorts -- now that history has proven "the naysayers" right, this book is an excellent antidote to any kind of arrogance or moral posturing. As Hitchens does well to point out, not everyone against the war was a clean and pure moral objector. The book provides an excellent counterbalance in that regard.

It is also the record of a successful con job perpetrated by a group of people so desperate to get rid of Hussein (and to install themselves in his vacated seat) that they felt justified to tell any lie they could think of to reach that end. The amount of bad intelligence that either originated from these con men, or was at least ushered along and aided by them is nauseating. And there is no better example of this sort of person than the man this book is dedicated to: Ahmad Chalabi.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2013
Naturally Christopher Hitchens talks about Iraq in ways that cuts through everyone else's double talk and excuses. Everything you need to know about Iraq is in this small 100 page book, although he mentions other necessary books for understanding Iraq. At the same time, he cuts down all the excuse makers and moral equivalence puzzlers without hesitation. After this book was written, it was over for the anti-war crowd.
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2015
There is no written word from the Hitch that is lacking. This short book, a collection of the best essays addressing the best points to support his belief, will reinforce the opinion of those that were for the removal of Saddam as well as give pause, and hopefully allow reflection, for opponents of regime change if they decide to read this.
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on February 23, 2013
Christopher Hitchens is a writer I agree with in the majority of cases. I do not agree, however, with his support of the Iraqi War. I still don't agree with Christopher, even after reading this book, but for anyone who has any interest in another point of view, this book is worth picking up.

Top reviews from other countries

Bajro Nuhanovic
5.0 out of 5 stars Still fully valid, still entirely unrefutable - to the fury of the ignorant pacifists
Reviewed in Italy on January 8, 2020
Collection of Hitchens' quick-wit arguments on war in Mesopotamia (not exhaustive but representative)
Stephen Eadon
5.0 out of 5 stars A historically significant book that is worth reading despite being a facile book full of brazen sophistry and no citations.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 18, 2012
The essays in this book were very influential in the run-up to the Iraq War and for that reason I recommend reading it. I recommend it however in the same way I would recommend Mein Kampf. It is fascinating if only marginally profitable by negation.

To sum it up, it deals with possibilities and not probabilities which makes it useful to fanatics, and useless to practical and sane people.
One person found this helpful
Report