[last call, E] miscellaneous edits

--
[checkpoint 4.13]� Say instead:

Allow the user to control the volume of synthesized speech, independently from
the volume of audio from other sources.

Rationale:

Saying "the synthesized speech volume" implies "the volume of _the_
synthesized
speech" and it is not clear that the second definite article is appropriate.�
There may be more than one source or track of synthesized speech.� Should say
something that equates with "the volume of _any_ synthesized speech," for
which
the suggested rewording is clearer.� Also, "independently from" is better
usage
than "independently of."

--

There appears to be something funny in the PDF extraction, where whitespace
gets inserted when link content abuts punctuation.� See e.g. end of third
paragraph under section 1.2.
--

Under Guideline 6, third bullet, where it says]

���� * W3C specifications are developed in a consensus process (refer to
������ the process defined by the W3C Process Document
������ [392][W3CPROCESS]). W3C encourages the public to review and
������ comment on specifications at all times during their development,
������ from Working Draft to Candidate Recommendation (for implementation
������ experience) to Proposed Recommendation. [...]

There should be _no comma_.� The sentence with the comma is false.� The W3C
only invites public scrutiny once a public working draft is released, not "at
all times during their development."

The comma indicates a non-restrictive modifier, which makes the statement
false.
--
In section 3.4 it ignores section 3.3.� It should not.� For example, where it
says

���� * Conformance Level "A": all Priority 1 checkpoints are satisfied

It would better be excessively clear in tying in 3.3 with

���� * Conformance Level "A": all applicable (per 3.3) Priority 1 checkpoints
are satisfied
--
The Note in section 3.7 should be marked explicitly "Note in Draft" and not
just "Note" to indicate that this Note _will be removed_ when the document
attains its target status.

Al
--
Usage in headers.� Comments in response to the last call request for comments
have been classified S1, S2, or E based on the following rough scale:

S1: Substantive matter of the first (highest) criticality or importance to the
mission of the document.� The standard set is ineffective, the document is
self
contradictory, etc.

S2: Substantive matter of a somewhat lower criticality.� The document is hard
to comprehend, does not align well with related WAI documents, etc.

E: Editorial matters.� Not regarded as substantive.

Re: 

User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0

W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000

�� This version:
���������
[9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W
D-UAAG10-20001023

Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 00:56:08 UTC