Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudra Pratap Chattopadhyaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra Pratap Chattopadhyaya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self published and promotional tone Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: has nom done WP:BEFORE in Bengali?. (Finding sources in English is frequently bloody impossible, especially when it's uncertain if the subject's very long name is even spelled correctly; i.e., does is really end in an 'a'? Google, for one, thinks it might not. Throwing in a middle-name and/or an honorific is also sure to limit the number of "easy" News/Scholar/etc. automatic matches one will encounter.) Pax 22:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even with a variation of search names, I'm finding nothing at all to support notability. Subject appears to be an obscure WP:FRINGE historian, and the article reports his ideas (unsourced) as if they are established facts. Subject certainly doesn't satisfy WP:N and WP:V fo English Wikipedia. Bengali Wikipedia does not have an article on him either. -- 120.17.24.183 (talk) 11:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I did not found anything substantial about the subject, nor in English nor in Bengali. Looks just one of the countless vanity pages about Indian non-notable personalities. Cavarrone 06:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable. Educationtemple (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Other than an article about an academic, I'm actually not seeing any assertion to notability and while I cannot do a search in Bengali, I wasn't able to find anything substantive. I think a reasonable effort at WP:BEFORE has been done, so the WP:BURDEN remains with the article contributors to provide WP:RS and WP:V to the point where it meets WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw ^talk 17:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.