skip to main content
10.5555/3306127.3332089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Modeling Human Decision-Making during Hurricanes: From Model to Data Collection to Prediction

Published: 08 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Hurricanes are devastating natural disasters. To effectively plan to help people at risk during a hurricane, a model of human decision-making is needed to predict people's decisions and to potentially identify ways to influence those decisions. In this work, we propose a generative model of human decision making based on a Markov Decision Process where we explicitly model concerns, risk perception, and information. As a first step toward evaluating the model, the work presented here focuses on one step of the decision part of the model. We created a questionnaire based on the model and collect data from 2018 Hurricanes, Florence and Michael. The results show that, across hurricane data-sets that we collected, the features of the models correlate well with evacuation decisions and our model outperforms existing methods in most cases, demonstrating the validity of the proposed model.

References

[1]
Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman, Matthew D Hoffman, Daniel Lee, Ben Goodrich, Michael Betancourt, Marcus Brubaker, Jiqiang Guo, Peter Li, and Allen Riddell. 2017. Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of statistical software 76, 1 (2017).
[2]
Nicole Dash and Hugh Gladwin. 2007. Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: Individual and household. Natural Hazards Review 8, 3 (2007), 69--77.
[3]
Christina H Gladwin, Hugh Gladwin, and Walter Gillis Peacock. 2001. Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 19, 2 (2001), 117--143.
[4]
Samiul Hasan, Satish Ukkusuri, Hugh Gladwin, and Pamela Murray-Tuite. 2010. Behavioral model to understand household-level hurricane evacuation decision making. Journal of Transportation Engineering 137, 5 (2010), 341--348.
[5]
Shih-Kai Huang, Michael K Lindell, and Carla S Prater. 2016. Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environment and Behavior 48, 8 (2016), 991--1029.
[6]
Michael K Lindell, Jing-Chein Lu, and Carla S Prater. 2005. Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review 6, 4 (2005), 171--179.
[7]
Pamela Murray-Tuite and BrianWolshon. 2013. Evacuation transportation modeling: An overview of research, development, and practice. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 27 (2013), 25--45.
[8]
Adam J Pel, Michiel CJ Bliemer, and Serge P Hoogendoorn. 2012. A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations. Transportation 39, 1 (2012), 97--123.
[9]
Kecheng Xu, Rachel A Davidson, Linda K Nozick, TriciaWachtendorf, and Sarah E DeYoung. 2016. Hurricane evacuation demand models with a focus on use for prediction in future events. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 87 (2016), 90--101.
[10]
Weihao Yin, Pamela Murray-Tuite, Satish V Ukkusuri, and Hugh Gladwin. 2014. An agent-based modeling system for travel demand simulation for hurricane evacuation. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 42 (2014), 44--59.

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Human Decision-Making during Hurricanes: From Model to Data Collection to Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AAMAS '19: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
      May 2019
      2518 pages
      ISBN:9781450363099

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

      Richland, SC

      Publication History

      Published: 08 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. decision-making during hurricanes
      2. modelling for agent-based simulation
      3. validation of simulation systems

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      AAMAS '19
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      AAMAS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 193 of 793 submissions, 24%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 122
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media