skip to main content
10.5555/2906831.2907012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Improving Inclusion Segmentation Task Performance Through Human-Intent Based Human-Robot Collaboration

Published: 07 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Introducing autonomy into robotic minimally-invasive surgery has the capability to improve surgical performance. While pure autonomy is not yet feasible for many surgical procedures, human-robot collaboration models, which operate on a combination of human and autonomous input, have the potential to foster the transition to autonomy and offer enhanced performance over pure human control. Building on our previous work on human-robot collaboration models, we focus on designing and testing collaborative control models based on human intent for an inclusion segmentation task. We seek to use learning techniques and support vector machine classifiers to predict both local regions of human interest and the level of interest in these regions; these predictions will then inform the role of the robotic agent in the task. The intent-based collaboration models will be tested in a human subject study for the inclusion segmentation task against teleoperation and pure autonomy to assess task performance. We anticipate that these collaboration models will outperform both pure human and pure autonomous control.

References

[1]
K. M. Fram, "Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer," Intl. Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57--61, 2002.
[2]
L. G. Seamon, D. E. Cohn, M. S. Henretta, K. H. Kim, M. J. Carlson, G. S. Phillips, and J. M. Fowler, "Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy?" Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 36--41, 2009.
[3]
H. Mayer, I. Nagy, D. Burschka, A. Knoll, E. U. Braun, R. Lange, and R. Bauernschmitt, "Automation of manual tasks for minimally invasive surgery," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, 2008, pp. 260--265.
[4]
N. Padoy and G. D. Hager, "Human-machine collaborative surgery using learned models," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 5285--5292.
[5]
K. E. Kaplan, K. A. Nichols, and A. M. Okamura, "Toward human-robot collaboration in surgery: performance assessment of human and robotic agents in an inclusion segmentation task," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2016, submitted.
[6]
G. P. Moustris, A. Mantelos, and C. S. Tzafestas, "Shared control for motion compensation in robotic beating heart surgery," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2013, pp. 5819--5824.
[7]
D. Hu, Y. Gong, B. Hannaford, and E. J. Seibel, "Semi-autonomous simulated brain tumor ablation with ravenii surgical robot using behavior tree," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2015, pp. 3868--3875.
[8]
M. Ryoo, T. J. Fuchs, L. Xia, J. Aggarwal, and L. Matthies, "Robot-centric activity prediction from first-person videos: What will they do to me?" in ACM/IEEE Intl. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2015, pp. 295--302.
[9]
J. R. Medina, M. Lawitzky, A. Molin, and S. Hirche, "Dynamic strategy selection for physical robotic assistance in partially known tasks," in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2013, pp. 1180--1186.

Index Terms

  1. Improving Inclusion Segmentation Task Performance Through Human-Intent Based Human-Robot Collaboration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
      March 2016
      676 pages
      ISBN:9781467383707

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      • AAAI: American Association for Artificial Intelligence
      • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      Published: 07 March 2016

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. human-robot collaboration
      2. inclusion segmentation task
      3. intent-based collaboration

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Conference

      HRI '16
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 181 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 75
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media