Evidence from a series of experiments on video-mediated collaboration: does eye contact matter?
Authors: 
Richard Joiner, Eileen Scanlon, Tim O'Shea, Randall B. Smith, Canan BlakeAuthors Info & Claims
Richard Joiner, Eileen Scanlon, Tim O'Shea, Randall B. Smith, Canan BlakeAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 371 - 378
Abstract
We report a series of studies on the role of eye contact in video-mediated communication. These are part of an ongoing research program, which is investigating the usefulness of the technological mediated collaborative problem solving for distance learning. Technological mediation consists of access to shared simulations and access to a variety of means of communication. The means of communication we have explored range from audio only contact to video mediated communication with or without eye contact. The motivating question behind this research program is 'what is different when members of a problem-solving group are physically separated but technologically connected?' The studies are set in the context of pairs of adults working with shared simulations of either physics or statistical experiments. The first set of studies investigated pairs working on a shared simulation of a physics experiment developed in SharedARK. The study compared remote technological mediated communication with communication that occurred during physical co-presence. There were no differences in performance, but the addition of computer mediated communication did influence the pattern of interaction. These experiments suggested that eye contact influenced problem solving. The second set of studies compared pairs and groups of threes and fours using a simulation of a statistic experiment developed in a system called Kansas. In these studies we compared learners with either video-mediated communication or audio only communication. The addition of the visual communication channel altered the pattern of interaction. The most recent study presents evidence that suggests eye contact facilitated conceptual understanding.
References
[1]
Bly, S., Harrison, S. and Irwin, S. (1993). Media Spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio and computing environnment. Communications of the ACM, 36, 28--45.
[2]
Chapanis, A. (1975). Interactive Human Communication. Scientific American, 232, 34--42.
[3]
Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R., Parish, R.,&Weeks, G. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: the effects of four modes on the behaviour of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 14, 487--509.
[4]
De Angelis, D.(1987). Is it really worth running in the rain? European Journal of Physics, 8, 201--202.
[5]
Enyedy, N., Vahey, P., and Gifford, B.(1997). Active and supportive computer-mediated reseources for student -to-student conversations. In Hall, R., Miyake, N. and Enyedy, N. (Eds.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 97, December 10--14 Toronto
[6]
Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R. and Rice, R. (1992). Evaluating video as a technology for information communication, Communication of the ACM, 36, 48--61.
[7]
Fullwood, C. (2001). Video-mediated gazing behaviour: training and advice for improvement of communication over video-mediated technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference on Communication, Problem-Solving and Learning. University of Strathclyde, June 25--29.
[8]
Fussell, S., Kraut, R. E.,&Siegal, J., (2000). Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work In the Proceedings on the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer supported cooperative work December 2--6, 2000, Philadelphia, PA USA.
[9]
Hoffman, P. (1999). The man who loved only numbers. London: Fourth Estate.
[10]
Kraut, R. E., Miller, M. D.&Siegel, J. (1996). Collaboration in Performance of Physical Tasks: Effects on Outcome and Communication. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference, CSCW'96. (pp. 57--66). NY: ACM Press.
[11]
O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G.&Bruce, V.(1996) Comparison of face-to face- and video mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8, 177--192.
[12]
O'Malley, C., Brundell, P., Lonsdale, P., Brooks, P., Asting, T., Heim, J., Schlieman, T., Skjetne, J. H., Hestness, B., Nilsen, S., Ulseth, T., Frowein, H.&Aaaby, C. (2001). Eye-2-Eye: Fitness for purpose of person-person communication technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference on Communication, Problem-Solving and Learning. University of Strathclyde, June 25--29.
[13]
O'Shea, T., Smith, R., Scanlon, E., Li, Y. (1997) Exploring the scalability of object-oriented environments that support synchronous distributed collaboration, Proceedings of EDMEDIA-97, Calgary.
[14]
Olson, J., Olson, G.&Meader, D. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real time work. Proceedings of CHI '95 (pp. 362--368). New York: ACM Press.
[15]
Olson, J., Olson, G.&Meader, D. (1997). Face to face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, S. B. Wilbur (Eds.) Video-Mediated Communication (pp. 157--173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[16]
Reid, A. (1977). Comparing the telephone with face to face interaction. In I. Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone, (pp. 362--368). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[17]
Scanlon, E., O'Shea, T., Driver, R., Draper, S., Hennessy, S., Hartley, J. R., O'Malley, C., Twigger, D.(1993). Twenty-nine children, five computers and a teacher, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder, Colorado: Cognitive Science Society.
[18]
Scanlon, E., O'Shea, T.&Smith, R. (1997). Supporting the Distributed Synchronous Learning of Probability: learning from an experiment. In Hall, R., Miyake, N. and Enyedy, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, CSCL '97 (pp. 224--230). New York: ACM Press.
[19]
Scanlon, E., O'Shea, T., Smith, R., O'Malley, C. and Taylor, J. (1993) Running in the rain-can a shared simulation help to decide? Physics Education, 28, 107--113.
[20]
Sipusic, M. J., Pannoni, R. L., Smith, R. B., Dutra, J., Gibbons, J. F.&Sutherland, W. R. (1999). Virtual Collaborative learning: A comparison between face-to-face tutored video instruction and distributed video instruction. Sun Microsystems laboratories Inc. TR-99-72. (Available at http://www.sun.com/research/techrep/1999/abtsract-72.html).
[21]
Short, J., Williams, E.&Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
[22]
Smith, R. B. (1992) A prototype futuristic technology for distance education. In Scanlon, E. and O'Shea, T. (Eds) New developments in Educational Technology. Location: Springer-Verlag.
[23]
Smith, R. (in press) KANSAS: a dynamically programmable multi-user virtual reality. In O'Shea, T. and Scanlon, E. (Eds.) Virtual learning environments and the role of the teacher.
[24]
Smith, R., O'Shea, T., O'Malley, C., Scanlon, E., Taylor, J. (1991). Preliminary experiments with a distributed, multi-media problem-solving environment. In Bowers, J. M. and Benford, S. D. (Eds.) Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: theory, practice and design. (pp. 31--48). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[25]
Taylor, J. A., O'Shea, T., Scanlon, E., O'Malley, C.,&Smith, R., (1993) Discourse and Harmony: Preliminary findings in a case-study of multi-media collaborative problem solving. In R. Glanville&G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Interactive Interfaces and Human Networks. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
[26]
Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G. M.&Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefits from seeing each other. Proceedings of the CHI' 99, (pp. 302--308). New York: ACM.
- Evidence from a series of experiments on video-mediated collaboration: does eye contact matter?
Recommendations
Role-based collaboration and its kernel mechanisms
Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) systems are computer-based tools that support the collaborative activities of human users. They should not only support virtual face-to-face collaborative environments but also improve face-to-face ...
E-Research Collaboration in Academia and Industry
E-Collaboration has come of age in the last decade, with industry and academia using the latest web-based collaborative software to bring together groups of workers to work on common tasks. Research is a $370 billion industry in the United States and is ...
ESAP Students' Perceptions of Skills Learning in Computer-Mediated Intercultural Collaboration
Reports on computer-mediated intercultural exchanges generally focus on their relevance for acquiring linguistic or intercultural competence, but little research exists on other educational outcomes, such as the development of electronic literacies, ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
International Society of the Learning Sciences
Publication History
Published: 07 January 2002
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 182 of 334 submissions, 54%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 20Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in