skip to main content
10.5555/1599871.1599935dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiclsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Designing for the epistemological entailments of physics through game-centered dialogical activity cycles

Published: 24 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This study examines a secondary-level science curriculum centered on a multi-user, "serious game" called Escape from Centauri 7. The game engine depicts qualitative physics phenomena via dynamics tied to player actions. Players progressively engage the epistemological entailments of charged particles through new phenomena they encounter as the game unfolds. We engineered discretely bounded gaming episodes to arrange transitions between game play, small group, and whole class discussions. Together, these elements of game play and discussion constitute recurring, game-centered dialogic activity cycles. Through this design, we investigate how gaming fosters intuitive physics understandings, how activity structures and materials engage learners and enlist gaming experiences in discussion, and how both game play and discussion shape subsequent participation. Analyses of trajectories of participation in and across cycles underscore the plausibility of this approach while also illuminating emerging tensions that we discuss in terms of epistemic reflexivity.

References

[1]
Barab, S. A., & Roth, W. M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3-13.
[2]
Barab, S. A., Zuiker, S. J., Warren, S. J., Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E. J., et al. (2007). Developing a theory of formalisms: Situating socio-scientific inquiry for schools. Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
[3]
Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281-300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[4]
Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 301-330.
[5]
Bruner, J. (1995). Meaning and self in cultural perspective. In D. Bakhurst & C. Sypnowich (Eds.), The social self. London: Sage.
[6]
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
[7]
Chee, Y. S. (2007). Embodiment, embeddedness, and experience: Game-based learning and the construction of identity. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 3-30.
[8]
Cresswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[9]
diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition & Instruction, 10, 165-255.
[10]
diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[11]
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279.
[12]
Feynman, R., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[13]
Forbus, K. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85-168.
[14]
Forbus, K. (1997). Using qualitative physics to create articulate educational software. IEEE Expert, May/June, 32-41.
[15]
Gee, J. P. (2003). Opportunity to learn: A language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education, 10, 27-46.
[16]
Geertz, C. (2000). Local knowledge (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
[17]
Greeno, J. G., & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42, 9-23.
[18]
Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhammar, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-151.
[19]
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
[20]
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action : How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
[21]
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[22]
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[23]
Moss, P. (2005). Toward "epistemic reflexivity" in educational research: A response to scientific research in education. The Teachers College Record, 107(1), 19-29.
[24]
Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind. New York: Random House.
[25]
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive developments in social contexts. New York: Oxford.
[26]
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition (pp. 183-204). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[28]
Rommetveit, R. (1998). On human beings, computers and representational-computational vs. hermeneutic-dialogical approaches to human cognition and communication. Computers & Psychology, 4(2), 213-233.
[29]
Squire, K., Barnett, M., Grant, J. M., & Higginbotham, T. (2004). Electromagnetism supercharged!: Learning physics with digital simulation games. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, 513-520.
[30]
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[31]
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ICLS'08: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 2
June 2008
523 pages

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2008

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 65
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media