Short-term versus long-term effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts in writing-to-learn
Pages 124 - 131
Abstract
Journal writing is a promising follow-up to course-work. A learning journal is a written explication of one's own learning processes and outcomes after a lecture or seminar session. To fully exploit the potential of journal writing, instructional support is required. Experimental studies showed that prompts are effective in optimizing journal writing. To investigate the long-term effects of prompts, we conducted a longitudinal study. Students (N = 50) wrote journal entries about weekly seminar sessions over a whole term. The experimental group received cognitive and metacognitive prompts for their writing. The control group received a non-specific instruction without prompts. The prompts proved to be effective in the short term. However, in the long term, they had negative effects on (1) learning strategies elicited in the journals, (2) learning success and (3) students' writing motivation. In order to avoid such pitfalls of over-prompting, a gradual fading of the prompts might offer a solution.
References
[1]
Barnett, J. E., DiVesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 181-192.
[2]
Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564-577.
[3]
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York. Academic Press.
[4]
Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21, 1-11.
[5]
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
[6]
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[7]
Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S. E. (1989): Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading writing, and mathematics. In: L. B. Resnick (Eds.): Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 453-494.
[8]
Connor-Greene, P. A. (2000). Making connections: Evaluating the effectiveness of journal writing in enhancing student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 44-46.
[9]
Deci, E. L., Eghari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The selfdetermination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.
[10]
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
[11]
Dillenbourg, P., & Jerman, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. M. Haake (Eds.). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 259-289). Berlin: Springer.
[12]
Efklides, A., & Vauras, M. (Eds.). (1999). Metacognitive experiences in their role in cognition (Special Issue). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 455-584.
[13]
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[14]
Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2006). Prompting cognitive and metacognitive processing in writing-to-learn enhances learning outcomes. In R. Sun, N. Miyake & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 357-362). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
[15]
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539.
[16]
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31.
[17]
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
[18]
Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30-42.
[19]
McCrindle, A., & Christensen, C. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performances. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167-185.
[20]
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 153-191.
[21]
Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 49-66.
[22]
Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-109.
[23]
Puntambekar, S., & Hüübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40, 1-12.
[24]
Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335-382). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[25]
Renkl, A. (1999). Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 477-488.
[26]
Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl. B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.). Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers (pp. 15-37). New York: Springer.
[27]
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In C. M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Index Terms
- Short-term versus long-term effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts in writing-to-learn
Recommendations
Short- and long-term effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance
Effects of self-directed metacognitive prompts were analyzed in an experiment.Self-directed prompts improved learning process and transfer performance.Findings indicate greater effects for students who complied with prompts.Effect on learning transfer ...
Supporting technology-enhanced inquiry through metacognitive and cognitive prompts
The aim of this study was to develop and examine supports for inquiry practices in computer-based learning environments (CBLEs). Two kinds of supports for inquiry practices were developed, namely cognitive and metacognitive prompts. We employed a ...
Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning
The results complement research on self-regulated learning in online learning environments.Findings indicate the benefits of directed preflective prompts for novice learners.Personalisation and adaptation of prompting in online learning is crucial for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2008
523 pages
Publisher
International Society of the Learning Sciences
Publication History
Published: 24 June 2008
Qualifiers
- Article
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 122Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in