Computer Science > Social and Information Networks
[Submitted on 16 Aug 2016 (v1), last revised 19 Dec 2017 (this version, v6)]
Title:Refining Approximating Betweenness Centrality Based on Samplings
View PDFAbstract:Betweenness Centrality (BC) is an important measure used widely in complex network analysis, such as social network, web page search, etc. Computing the exact BC values is highly time consuming. Currently the fastest exact BC determining algorithm is given by Brandes, taking $O(nm)$ time for unweighted graphs and $O(nm+n^2\log n)$ time for weighted graphs, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $m$ is the number of edges in the graph. Due to the extreme difficulty of reducing the time complexity of exact BC determining problem, many researchers have considered the possibility of any satisfactory BC approximation algorithms, especially those based on samplings. Bader et al. give the currently best BC approximation algorithm, with a high probability to successfully estimate the BC of one vertex within a factor of $1/\varepsilon$ using $\varepsilon t$ samples, where $t$ is the ratio between $n^2$ and the BC value of the vertex. However, some of the algorithmic parameters in Bader's work are not yet tightly bounded, leaving some space to improve their algorithm. In this project, we revisit Bader's algorithm, give more tight bounds on the estimations, and improve the performance of the approximation algorithm, i.e., fewer samples and lower factors. On the other hand, Riondato proposes a non-adaptive BC approximation method with samplings on shortest paths. We investigate the possibility to give an adaptive algorithm with samplings on vertices. With rigorous reasoning, we show that this algorithm can also give bounded approximation factors and number of samplings. To evaluate our results, we also conduct extensive experiments using real-world datasets, and find that both our algorithms can achieve acceptable performance. We verify that our work can improve the current BC approximation algorithm with better parameters, i.e., higher successful probabilities, lower factors and fewer samples.
Submission history
From: Shiyu Ji [view email][v1] Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:19 UTC (127 KB)
[v2] Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:10:55 UTC (127 KB)
[v3] Wed, 24 Aug 2016 01:18:09 UTC (127 KB)
[v4] Sat, 27 Aug 2016 01:14:39 UTC (127 KB)
[v5] Fri, 24 Feb 2017 03:15:39 UTC (127 KB)
[v6] Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:43:20 UTC (127 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.SI
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.