Skip to main content

Review: Polyend Tracker+

This groovebox isn’t for everyone, but master the interface and it’ll delight.
Different views of black electronic device for making music with a screen in the top left corner and buttons surrounding...
Photograph: Terrance O'Brien; Getty Images
TriangleUp
Buy Now
Multiple Buying Options Available

If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. This helps support our journalism. Learn more. Please also consider subscribing to WIRED

Rating:

7/10

WIRED
Built-in synths expand the sonic palette. Powerful 16-track sequencer. Hardware is tactile and satisfying. Smart shortcuts speed up composing.
TIRED
Interface can be intimidating. Using the sequencer can be tedious even with shortcuts.

Polyend’s Tracker+ is a significant update to its powerful (if somewhat anachronistic) sample-based groovebox, the Tracker. What made the Tracker so unique, and also confounding, was that it was a tracker (small t), but in hardware form. Trackers were an early form of music-making software that emerged in the late ’80s. They were initially used mainly for video game music but eventually found favor with a certain strain of electronic musicians, most famously Aphex Twin.

They’re very much a product of their time though, designed to work around the limitations of late 20th century personal computers like the Amiga. The new $799 Tracker+ has evolved to take advantage of modern technology, but its interface stays true to its forebears. The best way to describe a tracker is that it’s like composing in Excel. They’re vertically scrolling, spreadsheet-like collections of letters and numbers that can easily scare off a newcomer. But persistence will reveal a shocking amount of flexibility.

The Basics

Let’s get all the specs stuff out of the way first. The Polyend Tracker+ is a 16-track groovebox. Eight of those tracks can support stereo samples, with various methods of playback, and the other eight tracks can either control external devices via MIDI or one of the five built-in virtual synths. Samples can be simple one-shots or loops; you can slice up loops, or even load them into granular and wavetable engines for sample-based synthesis.

All of the tracks are monophonic. So playing a chord will eat up multiple tracks unless you’re using a sample of a chord. But tracks aren’t dedicated to any specific instrument so, you can combine kicks and snares on track one and maybe squeeze your bass in between hi-hats on track two.

The tracks themselves can be up to 128 steps, and each step contains instrument and note data, along with two slots for FX. The “FX” in this case aren’t chorus or reverb but things like chance, micro timing, and rolls. These two effects slots are the key to making your music not sound like it was written in a spreadsheet.

In addition to the increased sample memory, virtual synths, and stereo sampling, the other big upgrade from the original Tracker is support for audio over USB. This means you can connect the Tracker+ to your computer and get 14 stereo audio tracks out straight into your digital audio workstation (DAW). This makes it easy to put the final touches on an arrangement you’ve created on the Tracker+.

In Use

Photograph: Terrance O'Brien

Polyend nearly nailed the hardware with the original Tracker, if you ask me. The Tracker+ introduces some minor tweaks, but it’s mostly the same. It’s lighter and easier to toss in a bag but feels solid enough. The buttons are slightly clicky but have a new soft-touch finish. The large encoder has a bit more resistance, and the screen is brighter.

The grid of 48 pads is the same and remains, at best, usable. If you plan to use the built-in synths, I recommend connecting a MIDI keyboard. The pads are tiny, not velocity-sensitive, and don’t feel particularly natural to play. The quality of the hardware here is important since the interface can feel a bit like doing office work. But the feel of the keys and the resistance of the click wheel are all incredibly satisfying.

Polyend put a lot of thought into the interface to keep things from getting too tedious. There are shortcuts for quickly filling in entire tracks with data. For instance, you can quickly lay down a four-on-the-floor kick pattern with just a few button presses, generate a melody quantized to a specific scale, or randomly tweak the velocity on a hi-hat to give it a more natural feel.

Polyend even puts plenty of tips and explanations right in the interface to keep you from reaching for the manual too often. For example, if you’re trying to decipher what the difference between Rv and RV means when inserting a roll, a quick button press will slide out a pane from the FX menu explaining all the various text codes.

Other than deciphering some of those FX codes and such though, you probably won’t need a reference source often. The buttons are clearly labeled, the interface is pretty intuitive, and most people should be able to figure out the basics through trial and error.

Synths and Stereo Samples

Photograph: Terrance O'Brien

The two upgrades over the original Tracker that get the most attention are stereo sample support and the new soft synths that made their debut on Polyend’s other groovebox, the Play+. That the original supported only mono samples was a common complaint, though it didn’t bother me much. Plenty of beloved samplers and grooveboxes are mono only, and often I’d rather stick with a single channel and get the additional sample time.

Still, going stereo undeniably gives you more depth and detail if that’s what you’re looking for. Me? I’ll stick to mono samples, using the low-quality import option, and reduce the bitrate to 12 bits for a little extra crunch. Trust me, it sounds glorious.

The synths are a bit more exciting. There are five in total: ACD, FAT, VAP, WTFM and PERC. The first four made their debut with the Play+ last year, while PERC is all new. ACD is a relatively simple, one-oscillator virtual analog affair—think something like a Roland SH-101. FAT and VAP are also virtual analog but slightly more complex, with the latter having extensive modulation options. WTFM is a two-operator FM that is surprisingly capable and delivers some of my favorite tones of the bunch. Lastly, there’s PERC, a multi-part drum synth capable of delivering everything from 808-like retro beats to glitchy, modern chaos.

These aren’t the highest-quality virtual synths in the world, but they get the job done and greatly expand the sonic palette of the original Tracker. The cool keys and brittle pads of WTFM are a delight, and the three virtual analog engines can get convincingly unstable and warm sounding, though they sound a bit thin at times.

Photograph: Terrance O'Brien

Designing your patches for the synths can get a little tedious, but there are a few excellent presets to help get you started. That’s in addition to the nearly 2 GB of samples and wavetables that come preloaded on the microSD card. Oh, and it has a built-in FM radio you can sample from. So the Tracker+ is a pretty capable device straight out of the box.

Musical Spreadsheets

Even at the relatively high price of $799, the Tracker+ is an incredibly capable groovebox. The sticking point will be the actual tracker interface. It’s not for everyone. And, full transparency, it’s not for me. If you’re the kind of person who writes music in part by playing live or jamming along to tracks you’ve already laid down, you will likely be frustrated by the Tracker+. On the other hand, if you spend more time chopping up and arranging tiny fractions of samples and composing almost entirely with your keyboard and mouse, you might find a lot to like here.

If you’re already familiar with the Polyend Tracker and decided it wasn’t for you, the Tracker+ probably isn’t going to change your mind. But if you’re on the fence, I highly recommend you download a software tracker, like SoundTracker or Renoise. This way you can give this unique way of piecing together music a try before you commit to spending a bunch of money. The Tracker+ is an impressive bit of hardware that deserves credit for trying something different. But its interface means it will always be a niche instrument.