Pages that link to "Q61819929"

The following pages link to The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (Q61819929):

Displaying 30 items.

• How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? (Q61819923) (← links)
• Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (Q83230750) (← links)
• Advice for Junior Faculty Regarding Academic Promotion: What Not to Worry About, and What to Worry About (Q89883615) (← links)
• Courtesy Authorship in Academic Surgery Publications (Q90159583) (← links)
• Rethinking academic reward for educators in pathology (Q91143115) (← links)
• On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure (Q91791879) (← links)
• Characterizing health researcher barriers to sharing results with study participants (Q91898436) (← links)
• Percentage of Studies Presented at a Conference Prior to Publication in Emergency Medicine Journals (Q92202977) (← links)
• Research Impact Core: A Research Impact Initiative at the University of Michigan (Q92401043) (← links)
• Gender Composition and Trends of Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Editorial Board Membership: A 33-Year Analysis, 1987-2019 (Q92622220) (← links)
• The limitations to our understanding of peer review (Q94527102) (← links)
• An Inter-Institutional External Peer-Review Process to Evaluate Educators at Schools of Veterinary Medicine (Q95297064) (← links)
• Social Media in Radiology: Overview and Usefulness of Online Professional #SoMe Profiles (Q96122660) (← links)
• The role of metadata in reproducible computational research (Q96335314) (← links)
• A case study exploring associations between popular media attention of scientific research and scientific citations (Q96836704) (← links)
• Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion (Q98161816) (← links)
• Has Breast Surgery Shattered the Glass Ceiling? Trends in Female Representation at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2009-2019 (Q98197295) (← links)
• Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible (Q98385756) (← links)
• GENDER DIFFERENCES IN AUTHORSHIP IN UROLOGY: A FIVE-YEAR REVIEW OF PUBLICATIONS IN FIVE HIGH-IMPACT JOURNALS (Q99614316) (← links)
• The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions (Q100517685) (← links)
• Gender disparities in the author bylines of articles published in clinical neuropsychology journals from 1985 to 2019 (Q101464603) (← links)
• The prestige economy of higher education journals: a quantitative approach (Q104089323) (← links)
• Characteristics and Academic Productivity Among Pediatric Plastic Surgeons in the United States (Q104678664) (← links)
• Forging Forward Together: Transforming Scientific Practice to Accelerate Scientific Progress (Q104798614) (← links)
• How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact in research (Q108083672) (← links)
• The Content Quality of YouTube Videos for Professional Medical Education: A Systematic Review (Q108924987) (← links)
• Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (Q110961882) (← links)
• Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (Q110972035) (← links)
• A Framework Proposal for Blockchain-Based Scientific Publishing Using Shared Governance (Q111689189) (← links)
• Citation Management Software Raises Library Profile (Q111972190) (← links)