Pages that link to "Q52622119"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following pages link to Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. (Q52622119):
Displaying 23 items.
- Quo vadis, Acta Crystallographica F? (Q58618633) (← links)
- University tenure decisions still gloss over scientists’ public outreach (Q59057413) (← links)
- Case reports: old-timers and evergreens (Q59326956) (← links)
- How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? (Q61819923) (← links)
- From Big Data to Precision Medicine (Q64076742) (← links)
- Most UK scientists who publish extremely highly-cited papers do not secure funding from major public and charity funders: A descriptive analysis (Q64097618) (← links)
- Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator (Q64114978) (← links)
- Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability (Q64272799) (← links)
- Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research (Q83230535) (← links)
- Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (Q83230750) (← links)
- Open Data Revolution in Clinical Research: Opportunities and Challenges (Q89467603) (← links)
- The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis (Q89919026) (← links)
- Framework for advancing rigorous research (Q90004516) (← links)
- Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (Q91291703) (← links)
- Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h-index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (Q91664738) (← links)
- Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (Q91668293) (← links)
- Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences (Q92078089) (← links)
- Impact factor impacts on early-career scientist careers (Q92133403) (← links)
- Resource Sharing to Improve Research Quality (Q92305566) (← links)
- A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (Q92564059) (← links)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (Q97553480) (← links)
- Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions (Q107349441) (← links)
- How do career promotion policies affect research publications and open access? (Q114058418) (← links)