Strong and Reliable storage
August 28, 2020
Strong and Reliable storage
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with NetApp FAS series
NetApp has been defined as a Global standard for NAS (CIFS, NFS) workloads in our company, so it is being actively used in several of our sites across the globe. The largest sites using it are the USA, Brazil and Norway.
One of the main reasons for it to be selected as the standard for NAS workloads is the resiliency and high availability it provides. In Brazil, we have ~5000 users accessing more than 700TB of user data (CIFS shares) on a daily basis. We didn't have a single availability incident in the last 7 years!
One of the main reasons for it to be selected as the standard for NAS workloads is the resiliency and high availability it provides. In Brazil, we have ~5000 users accessing more than 700TB of user data (CIFS shares) on a daily basis. We didn't have a single availability incident in the last 7 years!
Pros
- NAS Workloads (CIFS, NFS)
- Snapshot retention/management
- Disaster Recovery protection (SnapMirror and SnapVault)
- Storage efficiency (compress, deduplication)
Cons
- The workload balance between the nodes is managed manually
- The technical and intangible benefits overcame any financial burden.
- Dell/EMC CX4 series (Clariion), HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and HPE 3PAR StoreServ Storage
NetApp is a truly unified solution, with a single OS to manage both SAN and NAS workloads.
Both the legacy EMC solution we had in place and the 3PAR + Storeasy solutions used a server host backed by SAN LUNs to provide NAS workloads. It works but adds some complexity and performance/availability issues.
Also, the 3PAR + Storeasy solution used a Windows host as the 'NAS server', and Windows is not so good to manage NAS workloads at this size.
Both the legacy EMC solution we had in place and the 3PAR + Storeasy solutions used a server host backed by SAN LUNs to provide NAS workloads. It works but adds some complexity and performance/availability issues.
Also, the 3PAR + Storeasy solution used a Windows host as the 'NAS server', and Windows is not so good to manage NAS workloads at this size.
Do you think NetApp FAS Storage Arrays delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with NetApp FAS Storage Arrays's feature set?
Yes
Did NetApp FAS Storage Arrays live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy NetApp FAS Storage Arrays again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation