Jim Armitage: AB InBev will have to dig deep to win SABMiller

Cold as ice: Some SABMiller shareholders have been against an AB InBev takeover
Gene J. Puskar/AP
Jim Armitage @ArmitageJim12 October 2015
City Spy

Our unmissable weekly email of all the gossip, rumours and covert goings-on inside the Square Mile

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

It’s too much to say South Africa's state pension fund Public Investment Corporation represents the whole of the Rainbow Nation’s vote on AB InBev’s bid for SABMiller, but its opposition is still a major blow.

The investment fund only holds around 3% of SAB, so doesn’t even speak for the majority of South African shareholders who own a tenth of the company.

But it is owned by the South African government and as such will be seen as a proxy for the view from the Cape Town parliament.

And today’s message to AB boss Carlos Brito is clear: we don’t like your price and we don’t like the loss of SAB’s Johannesburg share listing.

Given that any takeover has to pass South Africa’s “public interest test”, the PIC’s concerns are no small thing.

Brito can easily address its points: he must stretch his offer up to £44 to get negotiations underway and pledge to continue a Jo’Burg listing.

While he’s at it, he should give all other shareholders the chance to take more shares in the combined company too.

But most importantly, he should take a more-conciliatory tone and avoid going hostile at all costs.

Breathless Merrill

Ra-ra-ra! Cheerleader of the month award goes to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, whose analysts today took up the pompoms to declare Carlos Brito could pay up to £49 a share for SABMiller without damaging AB InBev.

That is a high kick far above most other analysts, who reckon — by the way — that £44 is all that’s needed to get SAB to start talking.

Only the cynical might think Merrill’s breathless passion could be influenced by the millions of pounds it will make as a member of the deal financing syndicate.

Caudwell in court

Phones 4u tycoon John Caudwell’s battle with Lyme disease clearly isn’t his only problem these days. His spectacular fallout with the ambitious Nathalie Dauriac makes him look absurd, if her allegations are true.

The billionaire is suing Dauriac, a previous star of this column, for falsifying her expenses while she was running his Signia wealth management business.

But according to her, he demanded she took a lie detector test and got her to make a written confession of her alleged misdemeanours “under significant duress”. She claims he also texted her with the kind advice to “seek psychiatric help”. Has he been studying the Stasi handbook?

Dauriac, in turn, is accused of running a “chaotic” and “poisonous” office where people joined and left at a dizzying pace.

Sounds to me like this charming pair deserve each other.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in