Journal of Medical Internet Research

Search Results (1 to 10 of 27624 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Sort by:

Assessing the Efficacy of Mobile Health Apps Using the Basic Principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Systematic Review

This review aims to synthesize the extant literature and assess the efficacy and user experience of SG-CBT apps with reference to app content. This review followed the guidelines provided by preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and adhered to the published PRISMA checklist [37]. A comprehensive literature search in relevant bibliographic, Web-based databases was carried out (Psyc ARTICLES, Google Scholar, Scopus, Pro Quest Central, JMIR, and Pub Med).

Amy Leigh Rathbone, Laura Clarry, Julie Prescott

J Med Internet Res 2017;19(11):e399

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Social Networking Sites, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review

The objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of literature examining SNSs and their relationship with depression and anxiety. It also considers links with well-being, as well as potential mediators and moderators to these relationships. Figure 1 summarizes the search strategy and article selection. A multidatabase search identified studies conducted between January 2005 and June 2016.

Elizabeth M Mary Seabrook, Margaret L Kern, Nikki S Rickard

JMIR Ment Health 2016;3(4):e50

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Trigger Tool–Based Automated Adverse Event Detection in Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review

This systematic review followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy [30], the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [31], and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews [32]. Hausner et al’s approach was applied to develop a robust search strategy (Multimedia Appendix 1) [33,34].

Sarah N N. Musy, Dietmar Ausserhofer, René Schwendimann, Hans Ulrich Rothen, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Anne WS Rutjes, Michael Simon

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(5):e198

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Facilitating Web-Based Collaboration in Evidence Synthesis (TaskExchange): Development and Analysis

Systematic reviews collate and synthesize evidence from research to support the best possible health care decisions and are a key step in the translation of the results of research into improved health care practice [7,8]. Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date requires substantial resources, skill, and time [9,10]. Cochrane has been producing systematic reviews for more than 20 years and is a leading producer of systematic reviews of health care research.

Tari Turner, Emily Steele, Chris Mavergames, Julian Elliott, Project Transform Team

JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(12):e188

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Health Literacy in Web-Based Health Information Environments: Systematic Review of Concepts, Definitions, and Operationalization for Measurement

Therefore, it was suggested that for the instruments to progress, more research should be focused on the investigation and elaboration of the construct of health literacy itself [26,27] A systematic review on e Health literacy measures [28] found that all the identified measures were based on self-report and measured the self-efficacy of individuals.

Anna-Maija Huhta, Noora Hirvonen, Maija-Leena Huotari

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(12):e10273

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

This was a stringent and precise review that excluded any other m Health methods to allow for a rigorous review of apps. This literature review builds upon and varies from previous research by being inclusive of SMS text messaging (short message service, SMS) as a m Health intervention. Previous research and empirical studies has given valid evidence of the effectiveness of mental health interventions using mobile apps [25-27].

Amy Leigh Rathbone, Julie Prescott

J Med Internet Res 2017;19(8):e295

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Applications of the Natural Language Processing Tool ChatGPT in Clinical Practice: Comparative Study and Augmented Systematic Review

By integrating NLP into the systematic review process, we aim to increase the efficiency and accuracy of the review, enabling the identification of relevant studies, extraction of key information, and synthesis of findings in a more streamlined manner [32]. LLMs have been gaining traction in both social media and the scientific community.

Nikolas Schopow, Georg Osterhoff, David Baur

JMIR Med Inform 2023;11:e48933

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study

Systematic and scoping reviews are among the most commonly used and rigorous forms of knowledge synthesis across multiple disciplines [1,2]. Given that the results from systematic and scoping reviews can inform guidelines, protocols, and decision-making processes, particularly for stakeholders in the realms of health care, the quality of the evidence presented by such reviews can significantly impact generated recommendations [3].

Eddie Guo, Mehul Gupta, Jiawen Deng, Ye-Jean Park, Michael Paget, Christopher Naugler

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e48996

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Efficacy of mHealth Interventions for Improving Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women With Hypertensive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review

The systematic review protocol was designed based on the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) 2015 checklist [18]. The review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022321686). The review will be conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions [19]. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review are given in Textbox 1.

Judith Angelitta Noronha, Mitchelle S Lewis, Tenzin Phagdol, Baby S Nayak, Anupama D, Jyothi Shetty, Ravishankar N, Sreekumaran Nair

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e51792

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Factors Underlying Vaccine Hesitancy and Their Mitigations in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Systematic Review

In-depth literature analysis reveals the current absence of a systematic review on vaccine hesitancy factors specific to Saudi Arabia. This review aims to (1) assess the prevalence and trends of vaccine hesitancy, (2) identify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy, and (3) explore potential solutions to enhance immunization rates. These findings will be instrumental in shaping a comprehensive vaccination policy for Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed Kanan, Samar Abdulrahman, Abdulaziz Alshehri, Renad AlSuhaibani, Nawaf M Alotaibi, Azhar Alsaleh, Bushra Nasser, Rana Baowaydhan, Ibrahim Alredaini, Taif Khalid, Fatima Almukhtar, Nourah Altoaimi, Almaha Alhneshel, Shouq Alanazi, Shahad Algmaizi

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e54680

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Search Articles

Search Results (1 to 10 of 27624 Results)