shawneofthedead
Joined Dec 2013
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings244
shawneofthedead's rating
Reviews246
shawneofthedead's rating
THE LOW-DOWN: Sometimes, you build a cinematic universe by design (hopefully). Other times, you build it almost by accident. When The Fast And The Furious was released way back in 2001, no one could have foreseen it spawning a box-office-busting franchise that has since raked in more than $5 billion over eight films. Deciding to create this spin-off focusing on two of the franchise's newest and most charismatic additions - the titular Hobbs and Shaw - must have been a no-brainer. Unfortunately, this film feels like a literal no-brainer too, its weak, cluttered script mostly failing to support its inexplicably talented cast.
THE STORY: If you've never watched a single Fast & Furious film (like this reviewer), you won't be too lost. It's fairly easy to pick up the threads of the spiky rivalry between American federal agent Luke Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) and British assassin-with-a-past Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham). Their mutual loathing takes a back-seat when both men end up on the same mission: chasing down a potentially world-destroying super-virus embedded in Deckard's sister, MI6 agent Hattie Shaw (Vanessa Kirby). Hot on their heels is the cybernetically enhanced Brixton Lore (Idris Elba), who's hellbent on securing the super-virus for his sinister employers.
THE GOOD: When deployed effectively, Johnson and Statham are marvels of charisma and comic timing - well able to steal scenes, if not entire films, with snappy, snarky ease. On occasion, their electric charm and chemistry flare to life during Hobbs & Shaw, but it doesn't happen often enough to save the film from its weak script and haphazard editing. That said, there's some joy to be had in watching Hobbs & Shaw's outrageously good supporting cast, which includes top-notch character actors like Helen Mirren and Eddie Marsan. Elba, for his part, acquits himself fairly well as a rampaging cyborg with a broken soul hidden somewhere beneath his menace and machinery.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: Unfortunately, the film never really lives up to the potential of its cast. The screenplay by Chris Morgan and Drew Pearce is frustratingly flabby. It's the kind of script in which a strong female character is only as strong as the film needs her to be - Kirby tries her best, but is given next to nothing to flesh out the role of Hattie. Hobbs & Shaw also fails to help its titular double act move from the sidelines into the spotlight. Their incredibly juvenile playground bickering and bantering becomes wearisome after a while, making it harder to buy into the film's attempts to delve into their histories and families. In grand Fast & Furious tradition, the action sequences are big and bonkers, bouncing from London to Moscow and even Samoa - but, shorn of effective character development, they also feel empty and soulless, strung together to pad out a running time that's already far too long.
LOCK IT DOWN: If you're familiar with Leitch's recent filmography, you won't be surprised by an extended cameo in Hobbs & Shaw that proves to be one of the film's highlights. It's the kind of blithely cheeky stuff that Leitch has proven he can pull off well - he juggled heart and humour to great effect in Deadpool 2. But Hobbs & Shaw never quite knows what it wants to be - silly or earnest, dumb or dark - and winds up being neither and nothing.
RECOMMENDED? Only if you're a Fast & Furious devotee, or a diehard fan of Johnson and/or Statham. Otherwise, Hobbs & Shaw is a muddled mess that will sorely test your patience and tolerance for poorly-written, testosterone-fuelled shenanigans.
THE STORY: If you've never watched a single Fast & Furious film (like this reviewer), you won't be too lost. It's fairly easy to pick up the threads of the spiky rivalry between American federal agent Luke Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) and British assassin-with-a-past Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham). Their mutual loathing takes a back-seat when both men end up on the same mission: chasing down a potentially world-destroying super-virus embedded in Deckard's sister, MI6 agent Hattie Shaw (Vanessa Kirby). Hot on their heels is the cybernetically enhanced Brixton Lore (Idris Elba), who's hellbent on securing the super-virus for his sinister employers.
THE GOOD: When deployed effectively, Johnson and Statham are marvels of charisma and comic timing - well able to steal scenes, if not entire films, with snappy, snarky ease. On occasion, their electric charm and chemistry flare to life during Hobbs & Shaw, but it doesn't happen often enough to save the film from its weak script and haphazard editing. That said, there's some joy to be had in watching Hobbs & Shaw's outrageously good supporting cast, which includes top-notch character actors like Helen Mirren and Eddie Marsan. Elba, for his part, acquits himself fairly well as a rampaging cyborg with a broken soul hidden somewhere beneath his menace and machinery.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: Unfortunately, the film never really lives up to the potential of its cast. The screenplay by Chris Morgan and Drew Pearce is frustratingly flabby. It's the kind of script in which a strong female character is only as strong as the film needs her to be - Kirby tries her best, but is given next to nothing to flesh out the role of Hattie. Hobbs & Shaw also fails to help its titular double act move from the sidelines into the spotlight. Their incredibly juvenile playground bickering and bantering becomes wearisome after a while, making it harder to buy into the film's attempts to delve into their histories and families. In grand Fast & Furious tradition, the action sequences are big and bonkers, bouncing from London to Moscow and even Samoa - but, shorn of effective character development, they also feel empty and soulless, strung together to pad out a running time that's already far too long.
LOCK IT DOWN: If you're familiar with Leitch's recent filmography, you won't be surprised by an extended cameo in Hobbs & Shaw that proves to be one of the film's highlights. It's the kind of blithely cheeky stuff that Leitch has proven he can pull off well - he juggled heart and humour to great effect in Deadpool 2. But Hobbs & Shaw never quite knows what it wants to be - silly or earnest, dumb or dark - and winds up being neither and nothing.
RECOMMENDED? Only if you're a Fast & Furious devotee, or a diehard fan of Johnson and/or Statham. Otherwise, Hobbs & Shaw is a muddled mess that will sorely test your patience and tolerance for poorly-written, testosterone-fuelled shenanigans.
THE LOW-DOWN: For the past decade, Disney has dedicated an immense amount of resources to translating its classic animated films into live-action blockbusters - with varying degrees of success. This new incarnation of The Lion King is unusual because it is, in itself, another kind of animated film: all its creatures, great and small, are computer-generated to look photo-real. The technical wizardry on display is undoubtedly impressive. But the final film winds up undermining its own existence - what is the point of re-making something that evidently works so much better with traditional hand-drawn animation?
THE STORY: If you've seen the original 1994 film, there'll be no surprises here. We are introduced to the adorable Simba (voiced by JD McCrary as a cub, before ageing into Donald Glover), the little prince who will one day lead his pride as a king. But even the best-laid succession plans crumble into dust when Simba's sinister uncle, Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor), plots against reigning king Mufasa (James Earl Jones). After tragedy strikes, Simba is forced to build a new life for himself - even though his true destiny lies far closer to home.
THE GOOD: There's no denying that the cutting-edge technology used to bring Simba's pridelands to life is really quite remarkable. It's photo-real in a way that probably wasn't possible even a few years ago, and you'd be forgiven for thinking you've stumbled onto a sublimely shot nature documentary if you watch this film without the sound on. That's not advisable, however, as director Jon Favreau clearly put some effort into engineering a new soundscape for the film. Elton John's score is beautifully refreshed, mixed with a fresh energy and rhythm that work very well (even though the new songs - Beyonce's Spirit and John's end-credits number, Never Too Late - aren't particularly memorable). The new voice cast is mostly very appealing. Glover never quite manages to slip under Simba's skin, but Ejiofor deliciously unearths several shades of evil as Scar, and John Oliver is a hoot as fluttery hornbill advisor Zazu.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: The biggest problem with this film is that its best feature also happens to be its worst. This new kind of photo-real animation looks great, but it somehow manages to appear life-like while lacking any actual life. As it turns out, hyper-realistic lions can't emote or talk like humans, so it borders on the ridiculous (and unnerving) to have them do just that. Moments that broke your heart in the original 1994 film might make you giggle 25 years later. It's unfortunate, too, that Favreau's film hews so closely to its predecessor's script and story beats. With that crucial spark of life - or soul, as it were - already missing from these lions, you'll only become more aware of the weaknesses that have always been a part of Simba's rather patchy emotional trajectory. (Chiefly: does he actually learn anything? Guilt and grief alone do not a character's growth make.)
COMIC RELIEF: Favreau's film almost slavishly follows its predecessor, except it allows comedians Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen a little room to riff as Timon (meerkat) and Pumbaa (warthog) respectively. Together, they provide some of the film's funniest - as well as its most annoying - moments. In one instance, they make an inspired reference to another classic Disney movie that's a surefire crowd-pleaser, even though its cheeky meta-textuality adds to the film's tonal woes.
RECOMMENDED? Not particularly. This Lion King is more misfire than masterpiece.
THE STORY: If you've seen the original 1994 film, there'll be no surprises here. We are introduced to the adorable Simba (voiced by JD McCrary as a cub, before ageing into Donald Glover), the little prince who will one day lead his pride as a king. But even the best-laid succession plans crumble into dust when Simba's sinister uncle, Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor), plots against reigning king Mufasa (James Earl Jones). After tragedy strikes, Simba is forced to build a new life for himself - even though his true destiny lies far closer to home.
THE GOOD: There's no denying that the cutting-edge technology used to bring Simba's pridelands to life is really quite remarkable. It's photo-real in a way that probably wasn't possible even a few years ago, and you'd be forgiven for thinking you've stumbled onto a sublimely shot nature documentary if you watch this film without the sound on. That's not advisable, however, as director Jon Favreau clearly put some effort into engineering a new soundscape for the film. Elton John's score is beautifully refreshed, mixed with a fresh energy and rhythm that work very well (even though the new songs - Beyonce's Spirit and John's end-credits number, Never Too Late - aren't particularly memorable). The new voice cast is mostly very appealing. Glover never quite manages to slip under Simba's skin, but Ejiofor deliciously unearths several shades of evil as Scar, and John Oliver is a hoot as fluttery hornbill advisor Zazu.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: The biggest problem with this film is that its best feature also happens to be its worst. This new kind of photo-real animation looks great, but it somehow manages to appear life-like while lacking any actual life. As it turns out, hyper-realistic lions can't emote or talk like humans, so it borders on the ridiculous (and unnerving) to have them do just that. Moments that broke your heart in the original 1994 film might make you giggle 25 years later. It's unfortunate, too, that Favreau's film hews so closely to its predecessor's script and story beats. With that crucial spark of life - or soul, as it were - already missing from these lions, you'll only become more aware of the weaknesses that have always been a part of Simba's rather patchy emotional trajectory. (Chiefly: does he actually learn anything? Guilt and grief alone do not a character's growth make.)
COMIC RELIEF: Favreau's film almost slavishly follows its predecessor, except it allows comedians Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen a little room to riff as Timon (meerkat) and Pumbaa (warthog) respectively. Together, they provide some of the film's funniest - as well as its most annoying - moments. In one instance, they make an inspired reference to another classic Disney movie that's a surefire crowd-pleaser, even though its cheeky meta-textuality adds to the film's tonal woes.
RECOMMENDED? Not particularly. This Lion King is more misfire than masterpiece.
THE LOW-DOWN: There's a lot riding on the slim, young shoulders of everyone's friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man. Far From Home is the first film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) since the recent double-whammy of Avengers movies changed the status quo forever. Where does the most successful superhero franchise in the world go after this? Can non-legacy superheroes - like Spider-Man, Black Panther, Captain Marvel etc - carry on where Iron Man left off? Is the MCU running out of steam? It's a big burden for a relatively smaller film in the franchise to carry. But Far From Home does so very well by zeroing in on what has successfully fuelled the MCU thus far: prizing character development above all to tell a story that's as emotional as it is entertaining.
THE STORY: Peter Parker (Tom Holland) is trying to find his bearings in an unsettled world. He, along with half his school-mates, has suddenly reappeared on Earth - unaged and not at all dead - five years after the Snap. His mentor, Tony Stark, haunts him in the form of video tributes and street art. There's something strange going on between Aunt May (Marisa Tomei) and Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau), Tony's Head of Security. Amidst the uncertainty, all Peter wants is to get back to normal: to enjoy his school trip to Europe, and to let MJ (Zendaya) know how he really feels about her. But world-saving duties wait for no young man. Suddenly, Peter is roped in by Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) to do battle alongside Quentin Beck a.k.a. Mysterio (Jake Gyllenhaal), taking down rogue Elementals that have already ravaged one world and are hellbent on destroying another.
THE GOOD: At its best, Far From Home impressively blends the awkward comedy of a coming-of-age romantic drama with country-hopping superhero action thrills. It's a delight to watch Peter use his superhuman skills as Spider-Man to navigate his way through hormonal messes of his own making - often in the same scene. This is as intriguing a narrative direction as the MCU has ever taken: using a lighter, more humorous lens to examine the aftermath of Endgame's darker, considerably more mature themes. At the same time, Far From Home finds a rather ingenious way to quietly become one of the MCU's most political films. (More on this later.) It's worth noting, too, that, in a franchise filled with sublime casting coups, Holland continues to prove himself to be one of its very best. He dances nimbly through Peter's high-school misadventures, while still tapping into the heartbroken, traumatised core of his character.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: With the action focused so squarely on Peter, his friends - especially his love interest - invariably suffer. Jacob Batalon is as goofily charming as ever as Ned, Peter's best friend, but he might as well have the words 'comic relief' tattooed across his forehead. Zendaya's sparky, sarcastic MJ - while still an interesting twist on a classic character - comes dangerously close to being a damsel in distress. And, while Jon Watts' direction is more zippy and confident than it was on Homecoming, he doesn't always land or weave narrative beats together very effectively. As a result, the film occasionally sags when it should soar.
ONE OF LIFE'S GREAT MYSTERIOS: What is Gyllenhaal - indie movie darling and theatre thespian - doing in an MCU movie? It might seem like one of life's great mysteries... but all will soon come clear once you realise just what drew him to the part of Quentin Beck. Fans of the comics will know that there's far more to the character than what we saw in the trailers, but nothing will prepare them for how brilliantly he's been reinvented for the MCU. Essentially, this is a gift of a role for the prodigiously gifted Gyllenhaal - allowing him to play every shade of hero (including a few notes of uncanny similarity to Robert Downey Jr's Tony Stark), while also indulging his more whimsical, theatrical side. In retrospect, it's easy to see how Gyllenhaal must have been drawn to the grim relevance of Quentin's storyline to the world in which we live today. Just as Black Panther examined race and Captain Marvel explored toxic masculinity, Far From Home asks audiences to think about the concepts of truth and reality - at a time when both are very much under threat.
FAN FARE: Marvel has trained us all well - never leave the theatre before the credits stop rolling, for fear of missing a funny moment or a narrative nugget that hints at future films and storylines. This reaches a new level of necessity with Far From Home. Each mindblowing scene - one midway through and one at the very end of the credits - is vital to knowing (or, at least, guessing) where the MCU is going next. Also, watch out for one of Tony Stark's beloved A.I. acronyms: it will apply, in a subversively clever way, to more than one character in the film, drawing laughs in one instance, and eliciting a deep sense of foreboding in another.
RECOMMENDED? Absolutely. There might be a few growing pains here and there, but Marvel has hit another home run - grappling effectively and emotionally with its immediate past, while raising the storytelling stakes for the future.
THE STORY: Peter Parker (Tom Holland) is trying to find his bearings in an unsettled world. He, along with half his school-mates, has suddenly reappeared on Earth - unaged and not at all dead - five years after the Snap. His mentor, Tony Stark, haunts him in the form of video tributes and street art. There's something strange going on between Aunt May (Marisa Tomei) and Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau), Tony's Head of Security. Amidst the uncertainty, all Peter wants is to get back to normal: to enjoy his school trip to Europe, and to let MJ (Zendaya) know how he really feels about her. But world-saving duties wait for no young man. Suddenly, Peter is roped in by Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) to do battle alongside Quentin Beck a.k.a. Mysterio (Jake Gyllenhaal), taking down rogue Elementals that have already ravaged one world and are hellbent on destroying another.
THE GOOD: At its best, Far From Home impressively blends the awkward comedy of a coming-of-age romantic drama with country-hopping superhero action thrills. It's a delight to watch Peter use his superhuman skills as Spider-Man to navigate his way through hormonal messes of his own making - often in the same scene. This is as intriguing a narrative direction as the MCU has ever taken: using a lighter, more humorous lens to examine the aftermath of Endgame's darker, considerably more mature themes. At the same time, Far From Home finds a rather ingenious way to quietly become one of the MCU's most political films. (More on this later.) It's worth noting, too, that, in a franchise filled with sublime casting coups, Holland continues to prove himself to be one of its very best. He dances nimbly through Peter's high-school misadventures, while still tapping into the heartbroken, traumatised core of his character.
THE NOT-SO-GOOD: With the action focused so squarely on Peter, his friends - especially his love interest - invariably suffer. Jacob Batalon is as goofily charming as ever as Ned, Peter's best friend, but he might as well have the words 'comic relief' tattooed across his forehead. Zendaya's sparky, sarcastic MJ - while still an interesting twist on a classic character - comes dangerously close to being a damsel in distress. And, while Jon Watts' direction is more zippy and confident than it was on Homecoming, he doesn't always land or weave narrative beats together very effectively. As a result, the film occasionally sags when it should soar.
ONE OF LIFE'S GREAT MYSTERIOS: What is Gyllenhaal - indie movie darling and theatre thespian - doing in an MCU movie? It might seem like one of life's great mysteries... but all will soon come clear once you realise just what drew him to the part of Quentin Beck. Fans of the comics will know that there's far more to the character than what we saw in the trailers, but nothing will prepare them for how brilliantly he's been reinvented for the MCU. Essentially, this is a gift of a role for the prodigiously gifted Gyllenhaal - allowing him to play every shade of hero (including a few notes of uncanny similarity to Robert Downey Jr's Tony Stark), while also indulging his more whimsical, theatrical side. In retrospect, it's easy to see how Gyllenhaal must have been drawn to the grim relevance of Quentin's storyline to the world in which we live today. Just as Black Panther examined race and Captain Marvel explored toxic masculinity, Far From Home asks audiences to think about the concepts of truth and reality - at a time when both are very much under threat.
FAN FARE: Marvel has trained us all well - never leave the theatre before the credits stop rolling, for fear of missing a funny moment or a narrative nugget that hints at future films and storylines. This reaches a new level of necessity with Far From Home. Each mindblowing scene - one midway through and one at the very end of the credits - is vital to knowing (or, at least, guessing) where the MCU is going next. Also, watch out for one of Tony Stark's beloved A.I. acronyms: it will apply, in a subversively clever way, to more than one character in the film, drawing laughs in one instance, and eliciting a deep sense of foreboding in another.
RECOMMENDED? Absolutely. There might be a few growing pains here and there, but Marvel has hit another home run - grappling effectively and emotionally with its immediate past, while raising the storytelling stakes for the future.