The first fifteen minutes of the movie are very strong,with a pessimism to rival the best of Duvivier.Ledoux masterfully portrays an aging teacher who lost his dear little girl a long time ago and who is sick and tired of his spouse and of his mother-in-law who dreamed the child was in Heaven.The moment when the teacher explains to his wife that it was not an accident (she actually took her own life) climaxes the movie.There's also the extraordinary scene in which he teaches his students about Napoleon in a school where they all line up to the sound of a drum roll: in front of an inspector,he refuses to praise the French emperor and he tells the boys about the death of million men Bonaparte's dreams caused.Then there's the meeting with a young girl on the bridge which brings back sad memories.
Probably fed up with teaching what the history books tell,and probably fired,the teacher becomes a clown,which does not make a big difference:both the clown and the teacher work/play in front of an audience ,but at least the clown makes them laugh.
Things begin to deteriorate beyond that point,and Fernand Ledoux's performance remains the only thing that keeps on grabbing you.Not that Annabella ,Michel Auclair and Louis Salou are bad actors: on the contrary they can be brilliant when they are given strong roles.The problem lies in the fact that ,after a (too) brilliant start,the movie loses steam considerably.
A beautiful girl works in the same circus as the ex-teacher ;he has become her confidant .She's got two lovers ,a young handsome artist of the circus and a middle -age aristocrat and she does not know where she stands anymore.Sorry to write this ,but Annabella's melodramatic-and a bit boring- story is irrelevant in Ledoux's tragic word.Maybe Douglas Sirk could have avoided the gap between the two plots.Lampin couldn't. The love triangle is a hackneyed subject and it takes genius to renew it.
Opinions differ:I know that a French oldies specialist,Marc A.,will disagree.
Like this ? try these...
La Foire Aux Chimères ,Pierre Chenal 1946 La Vie D'Un Honnête Homme Sacha Guitry 1952
Probably fed up with teaching what the history books tell,and probably fired,the teacher becomes a clown,which does not make a big difference:both the clown and the teacher work/play in front of an audience ,but at least the clown makes them laugh.
Things begin to deteriorate beyond that point,and Fernand Ledoux's performance remains the only thing that keeps on grabbing you.Not that Annabella ,Michel Auclair and Louis Salou are bad actors: on the contrary they can be brilliant when they are given strong roles.The problem lies in the fact that ,after a (too) brilliant start,the movie loses steam considerably.
A beautiful girl works in the same circus as the ex-teacher ;he has become her confidant .She's got two lovers ,a young handsome artist of the circus and a middle -age aristocrat and she does not know where she stands anymore.Sorry to write this ,but Annabella's melodramatic-and a bit boring- story is irrelevant in Ledoux's tragic word.Maybe Douglas Sirk could have avoided the gap between the two plots.Lampin couldn't. The love triangle is a hackneyed subject and it takes genius to renew it.
Opinions differ:I know that a French oldies specialist,Marc A.,will disagree.
Like this ? try these...
La Foire Aux Chimères ,Pierre Chenal 1946 La Vie D'Un Honnête Homme Sacha Guitry 1952