I am a big reader of anything that has to do with this case. I read this book believing Jeff did it and got a fair trial. After reading this book, I think Jeff did it, but did not get a fair trial. The evidence presented is nowhere near enough vs. all the evidence that he did it, but it does raise a reasonable doubt in my mind when I look at the entire case. You have to realize how much times have changed since then and now when looking at certain items. For example, I thought it was a great point talking about an MP seeing a women matching the description on the streets near his house, and it is weird, don’t get me wrong. However it is less weird when you think that many women wore that style of clothing back then, whereas now it is not worn. So it seems like a sure bet that it was her right now, because most people are subconsciously thinking of how unusual that style of clothing is today vs. decades ago when hippies wore that style. I do like that this book has a lot of transcripts of what people said rather than a summary. It takes a sensible look at the case and I respect the opinion and the fact that it was not done like that other insane Fatal Justice book. I don’t agree with final opinion but I am glad I read it.