Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 20;9(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00140-0

Table 3.

The comparative experimental results of different methods

Results Chen [29] Zheng [33] Jin [28] Jin [30] Wang [26] Ying [33] Xu [23] Li [32] Shi [34] Tang [31] This Method
Accuracy 95.2% NA 95.0% NA 82.9% 86.0% 86.7% NA 87.9% 87.5% 98.0%
Sensitivity 100.0% 90.7% 94.1% 94.7% 84.0% 93.0% NA 90.0% 90.7% 93.3% 99.0%
Specificity 93.6% 91.1% 95.5% 92.2% 80.5% NA NA 96.0% 83.3% 74.5% 94.9%
Method Unet++ U-Net +CNN CNN Unet++ +CNN CNN ResNet-50 CNN ResNet-50 RF RF SRGAN +VGG16