Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Stem Cell. 2011 Sep 2;9(3):219–232. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.015

Figure 4. The Transition from HF-SCs to HF-TACs Involves PcG-Mediated Gene Repression of Key Stemness Genes.

Figure 4

(A) Schematic of the two cell populations used for the comparisons described in this Figure. (Right) Global histone methylation patterns of chromatin from qHF-SCs and matrix HF-TACs. Note paucity of H3K4me3+H3K27me3 marked genes (yellow bar). (B) (Left) 12.5% of HF-SC signature genes are PcG-repressed in HF-TACs (red). (Right) mRNA expression (Log2) of HF-SC signature genes marked by H3K4me3+H3K79me2 is much greater in qHF-SCs than equivalently marked genes in HF-TACs. H3K4me3+H3K79me2 marked genes (blue) are more highly expressed than genes marked only by H3K4me3 (green). (C) How H3 methylation patterns of qHF-SC chromatin change during the transition to HF-TACs. Genes (total numbers indicated above each bar) displaying a particular chromatin state in qHF-SCs (indicated below each bar) were analyzed for their H3 methylation patterns in HF-TACs (color-coded as indicated). Note that only a small number of genes repressed or bivalent in qHF-SCs are now active in HF-TACs. Note also that some genes marked by H3K4me3 in qHF-SCs are now H3K27me3-repressed in HF-TACs. (D) Gene ontologies and associated examples of HF-SC signature genes that go from an active to repressed state in HF-TACs. Note that key HF-SC TF genes are among this shortlist. (E) Box and whisker plots of H3K4me3 and H3K79me2 peak intensities over key HF-SC genes vs housekeeping/control genes (examples provided beneath the plots) as analyzed both in qHF-SCs and in HF-TACs. Note that peak intensities are greatest for key genes in qHF-SCs, and that marked reductions in these chromatin marks occurs upon transition to the TA state. See also Figure S2 & Table S5.