. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug 3;152(11):3243–3265. doi: 10.1037/xge0001453

Table B6.

GEE Models Predicting Relative Latency from Pit-avoid Vs Pit-go Group, First Crawling Session vs First Walking Session, and the Interaction of Group and Session

	Wald χ²	p
Model effects
group	17.26^***	<.001
crawlwalk	.90	.34
group x crawlwalk	5.92^*	.02
	Pit-avoid as reference group				Pit-go as reference group
	B	Wald χ ²	95% CI	p	B	Wald χ ²	95% CI	p
Parameter estimates
pit-avoid^a					.69	1.53	[−.40, 1.78]	.22
pit-go^b	−.69	1.53	[−1.78, .40]	.22
crawlwalk^c	1.01^**	6.78	[.25, 1.77]	.01	−.44	.95	[−1.33, .45]	.33
pit-avoid x crawlwalk					1.45^*	5.92	[.28, 2.62]	.02
pit-go x crawlwalk	−1.45^*	5.92	[−2.62, −.28]	.02

Note.

0 = pit-go infants, 1 = pit-avoid infants.

0 = pit-avoid infants, 1 = pit-go infants.

Crawling versus walking sessions; 0 = first crawling session, 1 = first walking session.

p < .05*,

p < .01**,

p < .001***