Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug 3;152(11):3243–3265. doi: 10.1037/xge0001453

Table B4.

GEE Models Predicting Relative Latency from Pit-avoid vs Pit-go Group, Session Number, and the Interaction of Group and Session

Wald χ2 p
Model effects
 group 17.01*** <.001
 session 15.92*** <.001
 group x session 8.17** .004
Pit-avoid as reference group Pit-go as reference group
B Wald χ 2 95% CI p B Wald χ 2 95% CI p
Parameter estimates
 pit-avoida 1.48*** 17.01 [.78, 2.18] <.001
 pit-gob -1.48*** 17.01 [−2.18, −.78] <.001
 sessionc .42*** 24.43 [.26, .59] <.001 .07 .62 [−.11, .25] .43
 pit-avoid x session .35** 8.17 [.11, .60] .004
 pit-go x session −.35** 8.17 [−.60, −.11] .004

Note.

a

0 = pit-go infants, 1 = pit-avoid infants.

b

0 = pit-avoid infants, 1 = pit-go infants.

c

session = session number −1.

p < .01**,

p < .001***